No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

National City Post Acute

220 East 24th Street, National City, CA 91950 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 98 certified beds · (619) 474-6741 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (619) 474-6741 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Dec 20252 actual-harm citations$15,652 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,652 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-22)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
102 Mile of Cars Way
Pharmacy
415 W 30th St · (619) 791-1400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2035 Highland Ave · (619) 474-5289 · Call to confirm hours
Park
148 E 12th St · (619) 336-4241 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.3%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.4%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.8%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.3%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.5%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.7%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.0%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.1%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.0%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.402.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.401.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 82 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.9%CMS range 48.2–63.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 7.1–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge59.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge21.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge81.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.241.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.66
RN hours/ resident / day
0.77
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.49
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
44.3%
Total nursing turnover
46.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 98 beds and averages 91.8 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.49 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-19)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-22)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

47 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 35 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to safely transfer one of five residents reviewed for pain (Resident 51) from the bed to the wheelchair, using a gait belt. As a result, Resident 51 sustained a fracture to the left humerus (shoulder). In addition, Resident 51's fistula (a site used for dialysis[a treatment to remove waste products from the blood]) was unusable, requiring Resident 51 to be hospitalized for the placement of a new dialysis access site. Findings: Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (a condition in which the kidneys cannot remove waste from the blood), dependence of renal dialysis (a treatment to remove waste products from the blood), according to the facility's admission Record. On 8/19/23 at 12:20 P.M., a concurrent observation and interview was conducted with Resident 51. Resident 51 was in her room, with her lunch tray in front of her. Resident 51 was grimacing and pointing to her left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, for one of one resident reviewed for falls (Resident 25), the facility failed to ensure: 1. Adequate supervision and close monitoring were provided; and 2. Effectiveness of interventions were evaluated, and new interventions were implemented to address resident's behavior of getting up unassisted and prevent further falls. These failures resulted to Resident 25 to have five repeated falls in 2022 while at the facility. The resident's 5th incident of fall on September 20, 2022, resulted in Resident 25 sustaining left hip fracture (broken bones), and was transferred out to acute hospital for further evaluation and surgery. Findings: On September 20, 2022, at approximately 1:05 p.m., Resident 25 was observed standing near the foot of her bed and was trying to ambulate. Resident 25 was observed to have difficulty standing and keeping her balance. There were no staff observed near Resident 25's room nor the hallway to monitor Resident 25. On September 20, 2022, at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care services (professional services for residents with breathing problems) in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 10 residents reviewed for oxygen use when:Resident 1's oxygen equipment was not set up correctly by a licensed healthcare provider, and Resident 2's humidifier (water attached to oxygen machine to provide moisture to the delivered oxygen) was empty. This failure had the potential to further compromise the respiratory status of the residents. Findings:A consumer complaint was received by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) alleging the facility was not monitoring oxygen equipment adequately for residents. The complaint alleged that the equipment had been observed to be incorrectly set up, resulting in oxygen not being delivered as ordered by the physician. 1. Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the California Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program (advocacy for skilled nursing facility residents) of emergent hospital transfers and the facility failed to notify and obtain confirmation from residents within 24 hours regarding their bed hold policy, for two of 16 sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2)These deficient practices placed two residents at risk for loss of their bed hold rights, lack of advocacy (the act of speaking up) support, and potential inappropriate discharge or inability to return to the facility.Findings:1. A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included a history of Diabetes Mellitus (DM-a disorder characterized by difficulty in blood sugar control and poor wound healing).A record review of Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated [DATE] indicated, a Brief Interview for Mental Status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation of written information regarding formulating an advanced directive and the right to accept or refuse medical treatment was provided to 9 of 10 sampled residents (6, 9, 25, 33, 34, 60, 62, 78 and 89). This failure had the result for residents to not have the opportunity to express wishes for care if capacity for decision making was lost and the right to accept or refuse treatment.FindingsOn 12/18/25 a review of Resident 6's clinical record was conducted. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Record. The facility did not have documentation that information regarding an Advance Directive was provided to Resident 6 or Resident 6's representative. On 12/18/25 a review of Resident 9's clinical record was conducted. Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the facility's admission Record. The facility's document titled Advance Directive Acknowledgement dated 12/20/22, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean and homelike environment was provided for eight residents (51, 53, 92, 45,100, 95, 34, 31).This deficient practice had the potential to reduce comfort, feelings of security, and well-being for the residents. Findings: A review of Resident 51's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 53's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 92's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 45's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 100's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 95's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of Resident 34's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement resident-centered written care plans for 4 of 19 residents (92, 5, 95, and 60) when:1. Resident 92 kept perishable food routinely at her bedside and a care plan was not developed to address the behavior.2. Resident 95's severe weight loss was not care planned timely.3. Resident 5's care plan was not implemented when the resident's heel protector (device used to prevent pressure ulcer development) was not applied.4. Resident 60's left upper arm edema (fluid retention/swelling) was not care planned.As a result of these deficient practices, residents were at risk for not receiving care and treatment. Cross reference F686 and F580.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 92's admission Record indicated the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bipolar disorder (mood disorder characterized by mania and depression), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. On 12/16/25 at 8 A.M., an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and effective pharmaceutical services when:1. Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 administered Geri Tussin DM (cough syrup containing dextromethorphan, a cough suppressant, and guaifenesin, an expectorant - loosens mucus) to Resident 52 instead of Geri Tussin (cough syrup containing guaifenesin), which was ordered. This failure had the potential to expose Resident 52 to additional side effects and slow her recovery. 2. Controlled medications (medications with a high abuse potential) for pain were not administered as ordered for one of five sampled residents (Resident 6). This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to experience harmful effects and negative health outcomes from the controlled medication. 3. Random controlled medication use audit for two of four sampled residents (Residents 93 and 60) indicated medications were signed out of the controlled drug record (CDR, count sheet used to track controlled medications), but were not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated medications were stored under proper temperature controls in two of two Medication Rooms. This failure had the potential to negatively alter the drugs' stability, physical properties (such as consistency) and effectiveness, which could result in adverse resident outcomes.Findings:During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/16/25, 10:53 A.M., an inspection of the Back Medication Room was conducted with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON). A medication refrigerator was inspected. A thermometer inside read 40 F (degrees Fahrenheit, a measurement of temperature). Two boxes of acetaminophen (medications used to treat pain and/or fever) suppositories (medications designed to be inserted into a body cavity, such as the rectum) were found to be wet. The ADON confirmed that the boxes were wet and stated she would discard the suppositories. The inside of the refrigerator was observed to be wet to sight and touch. The ADON grabbed paper towels and wiped down the inside of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow appropriate infection prevention and control practices when:1. Tuberculin test (TB) was not done annually for Resident 5.2. The Licensed Nurse did not perform hand hygiene when dispensing medications.3. The back shower room and a shower chair was not clean and disinfected according to facility's cleaning schedule. In addition, the shower stall was not disinfected between residents' use.As a result of these deficient practices, residents, staff, and visitors were placed at risk for contracting infections.3. On 12/16/25 at 10:55 A.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with certified nursing assistant (CNA) 6 in the back shower room. The back shower room was observed with two shower stalls with a wet musty smell. Two shower stalls had dark, scattered black residue in some of the grout and tiles on the wall and on the floor. A shower chair was observed in the right shower stall with torn tape and scattered black spots on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 19 residents (Resident 5), who was cognitively impaired, had a representative (responsible party, RP) designated.This failure had the potential for Resident 5 not to have the opportunity to have a representative make decisions on their behalf.Findings:A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include vascular dementia (a decline in thinking, memory, and reasoning caused by damaged blood vessels) and bipolar disorder (a mood disorder characterized by mania and depression).A review of Resident 5's admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment tool), acceptance date 1/29/21, indicated the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was scored five out of 15 (which meant the resident was cognitively impaired).A review of Resident 5's History and Physical dated 9/23/25, indicated, .This resident: Has NO capacity to understand and make decisions.A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light for one of 19 residents (Resident 8) was within reach.This deficient practice had the potential for Resident 8 to not have his needs met. Findings:A review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia, hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) following a stroke affecting the left side of the body.A review of Resident 8's Minimum Data Set Assessment ( a comprehensive assessment tool) Section GG-Function Abilities, dated 9/16/25, indicated Resident 8 was coded, .01 Dependent (Helper does ALL the effort. Resident does none of the effort to complete the activity. Or, the assistance of 2 or more helpers is required or the resident to complete the activity. for toileting and was coded, .02. Substantial/maximal assistance-Helper does, MORE THAN HALF the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort. with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 35 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a resident's change of condition (COC) in a timely manner for one of two residents (Resident 95) reviewed for nutrition.As a result, Resident 95's severe weight loss was not reported to the physician in a timely manner which had the potential to delay the resident's care and treatment.Findings:A review of Resident 95's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic kidney disease and stroke.A review of Resident 95's Monthly Weight Report dated 12/19/25, indicated the following weights:October 2025, the resident weighed 154 lbs. (pounds).November 2025, the resident weighed 153.6 lbs.December 2025, the resident weighed 140.6 lbs. (the weight was taken/recorded on 12/6/25).A review of Resident 95's Nutritional assessment dated [DATE], indicated, .-13 lbs (8%) x 30d [in a month].According to the State Operations Manual (SOM) revised 7/23/25, a resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one out of five sampled residents (Resident 6) was free from unnecessary psychotropic (affecting brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication when Resident 6 was prescribed a psychotropic medication as needed for more than 14 days. This failure had the potential for Resident 6 to receive an unnecessary psychotropic medication which can lead to side effects, such as sedation and falls, and a decline in psychosocial (how a person feels about themselves and their environment) well-being.Findings: A review of Resident 6's medical records indicated she had an active order for lorazepam (a medication for anxiety, a condition characterized by excessive worrying) 0.5 milligrams (mg, unit of measure) by mouth every six hours prn (as needed) anxiety aeb (as evidenced by) restlessness for 30 days, dated 12/2/25.During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/19/25 at 2:08 P.M., the DON confirmed she was aware that orders for prn psychotropics exceeding a 14-day treatment duration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to a resident's responsible party (RP) and the Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one of three residents (Resident 97) reviewed for closed records.This deficient practice had the potential for the Resident 97's RP to not be aware of the resident's rights pertaining to transfers. FindingsOn 12/18/25 a review of Resident 97's clinical record was conducted. Resident 97 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 97 Alert Charting dated 9/17/25 indicated the resident was assessed to have an acute change in level of consciousness (a crucial neurological indicator of a patient's arousal and awareness) and was transferred to the hospital for evaluation. On 12/19/25 at 2:12 P.M., a record review and interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (SSD). SSD stated Resident 97 was discharged from the facility to the hospital on 9/17/25. SSD stated the written notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it completed a pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) and appropriately referred one of two residents (Resident 8), reviewed for PASARR, after the resident was newly diagnosed with schizophrenia (a mental disorder characterized by paranoia and psychosis) while residing in the facility.As a result of this deficient practice, there was the potential Resident 8 required specialized services that he did not have access to.Findings: A review of Resident 8's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Record did not indicate Resident 8 had been admitted with schizophrenia.A review of Resident 8's PASARR I level screening, completed while at the hospital prior to admission to the facility on [DATE], indicated, .9. Diagnosed Serious Mental Illness. Does the individual have a serious mental disorder such as.Schizophrenia.? The question was marked, No.A review of Resident 8's Psychiatry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the use of a heel protector (pressure ulcer prevention device) as ordered by the physician and identified on the care plan for one of two residents (Resident 5).This deficient practice had the potential for the resident to be at risk for pressure injury and skin breakdown.Findings:A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis (paralysis and weakness) affecting the left side, contracture (shortening of the muscle) of left ankle, and muscle wasting and atrophy.A review of Resident 5's written care plan for higher risk/ potential for pressure ulcer development related to impaired mobility and fragile skin condition dated 3/14/22, indicated an intervention, .Apply heel protector to left foot when in bed for off loading.A review of Resident 5's physician's order dated 9/22/25, indicated, Apply heel protector on left foot…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory services were provided according to acceptable standards of practice for two of two residents (55, 60) when:1. Resident 55's nasal cannula (device delivering oxygen into the nostrils) and oxygen tubing were not changed per facility's protocol.2. The director of business development (DBD) picked Resident 60's nasal cannula off the floor and placed it into the resident's nostrils.These deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at risk for respiratory infection and compromised oxygen therapy effectiveness.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 55's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include pneumonia (a respiratory illness). A review of Resident 55's physician orders dated 12/16/25, indicated, Oxygen at 2 L/Min [liters per minute] via nasal cannula for SOB [shortness of breath] every shift. On 12/16/25 at 10:11 A.M., an observation was conducted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the cook was competent to carry out dietary functions according to standards of practice when the cook did not prepare pureed foods according to the recipe.This failure had the potential to create a choking hazard, lessen nutritional value, and contribute to weight loss for the 12 residents on a pureed diet.Findings:A review of the facility's therapeutic diet menu dated 12/16/25 indicated there were 12 residents on a pureed diet.On 12/18/25 at 11 A.M., an observation during prepping of pureed foods was conducted with the Cook, (CK) 1. CK 1 stated the pureed menu for the day was mixed vegetables, chicken stroganoff, and bread. CK 1 put mixed vegetables in the blender and then put the blended vegetables in a metal container. CK 1 looked at the recipe, then proceeded to put water in a pitcher, held it up, and put thickener in it. CK 1 turned to the Kitchen Manager (KM) to ask if it was correct. The KM stated it was not and took the pitcher away from CK 1 and dumped the water with thickener into the sink.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated a resident's preference for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 34).This failure had the potential to affect Resident 34 appetite and meal intake and lead to frustration.Findings:According to the admission Record, Resident 34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia (high blood sugar).On 12/16/25 at 8:32 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted with Resident 34 while in Resident 34's room. Resident 34 was sitting in his wheelchair with a meal tray on top of the side table. The meal tray consisted of milk, juice, fruit cup, dry cereal, toast and two sausage patties. Resident 34's tray card (a paper indicating diet orders and any preferences or allergies) indicated dislikes of egg, sausage patties, pancakes and sweet bread. Resident 34 stated often the tray does not match his tray card. Resident 34 stated you see, says right here on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow appropriate infection prevention and control practices when:1. There was an expired box of tomatoes stored in the refrigerator.2. [NAME] (CK) 1 did not perform hand hygiene between gloves changes.These failures had the potential to result in foodborne illness to an already vulnerable population.Findings:1. On 12/16/25 at 7:36 A.M., an initial facility kitchen tour, observation and interview was conducted with Kitchen Manager (KM). In refrigerator number two, there was a small box of tomatoes with a used by date of 12/14/25 written on the box. The KM stated the box of tomatoes should have been thrown away. The KM stated expired food could cause residents to become ill. The KM stated her expectation was for the staff to have discarded the box of tomatoes.On 12/19/25 at 4:20 P.M., an interview was conducted with Administrator (ADM). The ADM stated there should never be expired food in the kitchen and staff should have thrown the expired box of tomatoes away. The ADM stated his expectation was for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation in the medical record was complete and accurate for 2 of 19 residents (95, 17) when:1. There was no documentation the nurse communicated Resident 95's condition and obtained a new order for megace (appetite stimulant) from the provider.2. Non-applicable and irrelevant additional medication directions were attached to Resident 17's levothyroxine (medication for underactive thyroid).As a result, the rationale could not readily be determined for the treatment that was provided to Resident 95. In addition, there was the potential to cause confusion during medication administration for Resident 17.Findings: 1. A review of Resident 95's admission Record indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic kidney disease and stroke. A review of Resident 95's physician order dated 12/12/25, indicated the resident was to take megace 40 milligrams/milliliter, 5 milliliters once a day.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five residents sampled (Resident 5) received the influenza vaccine in accordance with the Center for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations and facility policy.This failure had the potential to place Resident 5 at risk for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from influenza (a contagious respiratory illness caused by influenza viruses that infects the nose, throat, and sometimes lungs).Findings:A review of Resident 5's admission Record indicated Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on admission date on 11/27/21 with a diagnosis of Vascular Dementia (a cognitive decline caused by damaged blood vessels in the brain, which reduces blood flow, oxygen, and nutrients, impacting thinking, memory, and behavior), Type II Diabetes Mellitus with Hyperglycemia (high blood sugar)On 12/19/25 at 2:15 P.M., an interview and record review was conducted with the Infection Preventionist Nurse (IP). The IP reviewed Resident 5's immunization record. The IP stated the last date Resident 5 received an influenza…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code a fall incident on the Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) for one of three sampled residents (Resident 4).This deficient practice placed Resident 4 at risk for ineffective care planning, monitoring of fall risks and inaccurate health status sent to the federal database. Findings:A review of Resident 4's admission Record indicated Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation(an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm).A record review of Resident 4's clinical chart indicated: - Resident 4's Intradisciplinary (IDT) note dated 10/14/25 1357 (1:57 P.M.) indicated, .fall incident: 10/12/25 11:00 AM.Reported unwitnessed fall when res. Noted by LN sitting at bedside, remains on same baseline orientation.- Resident 4's progress note dated 10/12/25 11:38 (11:38 A.M.) indicated, .LN found resident on the floor sitting on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to follow proper infection control procedures for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) to prevent the spread of pediculosis (lice-tiny, parasitic insects [about the size of a sesame seed] that feed on blood in the scalp/skin and cause intense itching that can lead to open sores and infection) when the facility failed to assess, screen, or monitor exposed former and new roommates during a room change.This deficient practice placed four residents (Resident 1's roommates) at risk for undetected lice and possible outbreaks (further spread) in the facility.Findings:A review of Resident 1's admission Record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included history of Cervical Disc Disorder (injuries to a disc [shock absorber between the bones in your neck], or multiple discs, located between the cervical [seven small bones that make up your neck] bones).A record review of Resident 1's clinical chart indicated: -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when Licensed Nurses (LNs) failed to consistently follow physician's order related to eye drop therapy for one of one sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for ophthalmic (eye) medication. This failure had the potential to place Resident 1 at risk of vision loss and blindness. Findings: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included glaucoma (damage to the optic nerve often related to high pressure in the eye that can cause vision loss and blindness), per the facility's admission Record. A review of Resident 1's clinical record was conducted. Resident 1's physician's order dated 6/7/25, indicated Resident 1 was to receive two eye drop medications. One of the physician's orders were as follows: - Latanoprost (ophthalmic solution) to be given on both eyes for glaucoma. A review of Resident 1's medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient number of staff to answer call lights and deliver personal care in a timely manner for three of four sampled residents (1, 3 and 4), and six residents identified in the resident council meeting minutes. As a result, there was the potential for residents not to get their minimum daily care needs met. Findings: During a telephone interview with Resident 1's family member (FM) on 7/2/25 at 8:40 A.M., the FM stated Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) come after 30 minutes to an hour. The FM stated there were multiple occasions when she needed assistance to change Resident 1's incontinence brief, the staff informed FM the CNA assigned to Resident 1 was either on break or on one on one (1:1, sitters or constant observation) monitoring of another resident. FM 1 stated she ended up changing Resident 1's incontinence brief. During a concurrent observation and an interview of Resident 3 on 7/2/25 at 11:45 A.M., Resident 3 was observed alert and smiling, and asked another resident (Resident 4) to express his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a clean, safe and comfortable homelike environment when insects were observed in a resident ' s room and the screen of the sliding door was in disrepair. These failures had the potential to negatively impact the residents' health and well-being. Findings: On 4/22/25, the Department received a complaint related to physical environment. On 4/29/25 at 9:56 A.M., an unannounced on-site visit was conducted. On 4/29/25 at 5:17 P.M., a joint observation of Resident 5 and Resident 6 ' s room, an interview of Resident 5 and Resident 6, and an interview were conducted with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS). Resident 5 stated she had placed an insect trap because she was afraid the insects would come to them. Resident 5 stated the screen door was slightly open and did not know if it was broken. Resident 5 stated she did not go to the patio. The MS checked the insect trap and noted big black insect. The MS stated the sliding door was opened. The MS stated, Sometimes the resident opens the sliding door. On 5/13/25 at 3:13 P.M., a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify in a timely manner the development of pressure injuries (skin damaged by lack of movement for staying in a position for too long) for one of three sampled residents reviewed for pressure injuries/ wounds. In addition, the facility did not consistently provide treatments for Resident 1 ' s existing surgical wounds in his right foot. As a result, Resident 1 developed a new pressure wound on his coccyx (tailbone). In addition, Resident 1 ' s surgical wounds in his right foot did not heal properly, developed an infection and eventually Resident 1 underwent an amputation (surgical removal of a limb) of his right leg. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, diabetes (high blood sugar) and generalized muscle weakness, per the facility ' s admission Record. A review of Resident 1 ' s minimum data set (MDS, a federally mandated resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident 3) received food that accommodated her food preferences. This failure had the potential for Resident 3's wishes to be ignored. In addition, this failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake and weight loss. Findings: On 4/22/25, the Department received a complaint related to Dietary Services. On 4/29/25 at 9:56 A.M., an unannounced on-site visit was conducted. Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included surgical after care after a surgery according to the facility ' s admission Record. On 4/29/25 at 11:59 A.M., a joint review of Resident 3 ' s dietary record and an interview was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The CDM stated she spoke to Resident 3 on 4/14/25 and found out Resident 3 preferred vegan diet and requested tofu. The CDM stated the facility did not have tofu. The CDM stated the kitchen provided Resident 3 with some green salad. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pain medication (med/s) was available for one of three sampled residents reviewed for pain management (Resident 1). This failure had the potential to cause the resident unnecessary pain, negatively affecting the resident's quality of life. Findings: Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic ulcer (sore) of the left foot and gout (a type of inflammatory arthritis that causes pain and swelling in your joints), per the facility's admission Record. A record review was conducted of Resident 1. Resident 1's History and Physical (H & P), dated [DATE], indicated the attending physician (AP) documented Resident 1 had the capacity to make own decisions. A record review was conducted of Resident 1. Resident 1's minimum data set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated [DATE], indicated Resident 1's brief interview for mental status (BIMS, ability to recall) score was 15/15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and facility documents review, the Licensed Nurse (LN) 1 failed to verify a provider's discharge plan related to opioid (powerful pain-reducing medications, an example is hydrocodone/ acetaminophen) medication upon discharge for one of three sampled residents (Resident 1). The lack of communication between the provider and the facility's LNs had the potential for miscommunication with the transition of care to the receiving facility for Resident 1. Findings: On 12/18/24, the Department received a complaint related to resident's discharge. On 12/23/24, an unannounced visit to the facility was conducted. A review of Resident 1's admission Record, indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included lumbar fracture (broken vertebrae in the lower back). On 12/23/24, a review of Resident 1's discharge notes completed by Nurse Practitioner (NP, is a healthcare provider who teamed with the attending physician) was conducted. The NP notes dated 10/7/24, indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow isolation precautions when contact droplet isolation (a type of isolation requiring a gown, gloves, mask and eye protection prior to entering the room) was delayed for one resident (Resident 48) with Covid-19. This failure had the potential to place residents and staff at risk of exposure to Covid-19 and cause the spread of infection. Findings: On 8/19/24 at 8 A.M., during the entrance conference for the facility's annual recertification survey, the Administrator (Admin)stated Resident 48 was sent to the hospital on 8/18/24 and tested positive for Covid-19. The Admin stated Resident 48 was expected back to facility on 8/19/24. On 8/19/24 at 8:52 A.M., an observation and interview was conducted in Resident 48's bedroom. Resident 48 was observed in his room with two roommates. Resident 48 was not wearing a face mask. Resident 48 stated he had returned from the hospital a few minutes earlier with Covid. On 8/19/24 at 8:55 A.M., an observation was conducted in the hallway outside Resident 48's room. A sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written information regarding formulating an Advance Directive (AD - a written instruction such as a living will, relating to the provision of treatment and services when the individual is unable to make decisions) was provided to the residents and/or the resident's representative (RR), for nine of 10 residents reviewed for Advance Directive (Residents 15, 25, 40, 58, 61, 78, 82, 83, and 284). This failure had the potential for the residents to not be aware of their right to formulate an AD. Findings: On September 22, 2022, Residents 15, 25, 40, 58, 61, 78, 82, 83, and 284's records were reviewed: 1. Resident 15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included orthopedic aftercare (type of care dealing with corrections of the bones and muscles). The Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated September 9, 2022, indicated Resident 15 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13 (cognitively intact). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-09-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired food items were not stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. This failure had the potential to result in foodborne illness to an already vulnerable facility population. Findings: On September 19, 2022, at 11:10 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The following food items were observed stored inside the refrigerator and freezer: - One plastic jar of Dijon mustard, approximately half full, was observed with an open date of November 23, 2021 and a used by date of June 2022. The opened jar of mustard had a Best By date of June 29, 2022 printed on the product label. In a concurrent interview, the CDM stated the mustard was expired and should not have been stored in the refrigerator, readily available for use. - An opened carton box of whole kernel corn was observed in the freezer with a date label of June 6, 2022. A bag of frozen corn kernels, weighing approximately three pounds, was observed inside the carton box readily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review - a federally required document to ensure residents are appropriately placed for services) was coded accurately for diagnosis of mental illness, for one of one resident reviewed for PASRR (Resident 40). This failure had the potential for Resident 40 to not receive the care and necessary services under the appropriate setting. Findings: On September 20, 2022, Resident 40's record was reviewed. Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included dementia (decline in mental status), depressive disorder (mood disorder), and bipolar disorder (mood disorder). The PASRR, dated November 29, 2021, did not indicate Resident 40 had a diagnosis of mental health disorders. On September 26, 2022, at 12:04 p.m., an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted. She stated Resident 40 was admitted with a mental health conditions which included depressive disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for oxygen administration, for one of one resident reviewed for oxygen use (Resident 6). This failure had the potential to negatively impact the resident's quality of care and had the potential for staff to not be aware of the resident's care needs and provide appropriate treatment. Finding: On September 19, 2022, at 11:50 a.m., Resident 6 was observed in bed, with oxygen (O2) via nasal cannula (NC - a tube used to deliver oxygen through the nose). Resident 6's oxygen administration was observed at three liters per minute (LPM). In a concurrent interview with Resident 6, she stated she uses O2 continuously due to shortness of breath. Resident 6's record was reviewed. Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included acute respiratory failure (lung failure). The physician's order, dated August 10, 2021, indicated, .Continuous O2 via NC at 3LPM . On September 22, 2022, at 9:17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-09-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications and medical supplies were labeled and stored according to the facility policy and manufacturer's guidelines, when: 1. The pharmacy label on the medication bubble pack did not match the physician's order on the Medication Administration Record (MAR), for one of 11 residents reviewed during the medication administration observation (Resident 236). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 236 to not receive the correct frequency and dosage of the medication prescribed by the physician; 2. One opened vial of tuberculin testing solution (test for tuberculosis - lung infection) was not labeled with a date when it was opened, and readily available to administer. This failure had the potential to not be able to determine the effect and potency of the tuberculin testing solution; and 3. Expired medical supplies were stored and readily available for use. This failure had the potential for residents of the facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and dietary document review, the facility failed to ensure the lunch menu was followed on 8/9/19. This failure had the potential for residents to have their nutritional status compromised when they were served food items they were not expecting, or did not like. Findings: On 10/8/19 at 9:58 A.M., a confidential group interview was conducted. The confidential group stated the facility regularly served food with gravy on it. Six out of 12 confidential residents stated they did not like the gravy and felt it was served on everything. On 10/8/19, a record review of the facility's weekly menu was conducted. The lunch menu indicated on 10/9/19, Roasted chicken, roasted red skin potatoes, french cut green beans, wheat dinner roll, margarine, fruit gelatin with marshmallow, milk, beverage of choice. On 10/9/19 at 11:38 A.M., an observation of the lunch tray line and meal plating was conducted. The dietary staff plated all the roasted chicken with gravy, including those plates for residents on a regular diet (no dietary restrictions). On 10/9/19 at 12:40…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-10-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was consistently served at an appetizing temperature for 6 out of 12 residents interviewed during a confidential group interview. This failure to serve food at an appetizing temperature may result in decreased food intake resulting in weight loss, and could further compromise the nutritional status. Findings: On 10/8/19 at 9:58 A.M., a confidential group interview was conducted. Six out of 12 confidential group residents stated the food at the facility was so-so. The confidential residents stated food was served mainly warm. The confidential residents stated cold items were not very cold and hot items were not very hot. The confidential residents further stated they did not consider the temperature of their food to be appetizing. On 10/9/19 at 11:38 A.M., an observation of the lunch tray line and meal plating was conducted. Food temperatures were taken by dietary staff at the beginning of meal distribution and revealed that all hot food temperatures were greater that 165°F. The temperature of cold beverages were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-10-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a safe/sanitary manner and in accordance with standards of practice when: 1. Resident ice cream and cake were not properly covered when stored. In addition, ready to use produce was slimy and moldy. 2. Food and beverages were not properly dated and labeled. 3. Meat was not defrosted according to acceptable standards of practice. 4. Dietary staff did not consistently use gloves in the tray line while plating food. Failure to ensure safe and effective food service operations may result in exposing resident food to cross contamination and bacterial growth which may result in foodborne illness. Foodborne illness may further compromise the medical and nutritional status of the residents. Findings: 1. On 10/8/19 at 7:40 A.M., the facility's kitchen was inspected with DA 1. In the reach-in freezer there was ice cream stored in a large container without a lid. DA 1 stated the ice cream should not have been stored in the freezer without being secured with a lid. On 10/8/19 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (18) bedroom was clean, comfortable, and homelike. This failure had the potential to negatively impact Resident 18's quality of life. Findings: Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/8/19 at 2:44 P.M., a joint observation and interview was conducted with Resident 18. Resident 18 was in her bedroom with her overbed table next to her bed. The overbed table was missing the top layer of veneer (a thin wood layer). The surface of the resident's overbed table was composed of a rough, particle board type material. Resident 18 stated she did not like her overbed table and thought it was ugly. Resident 18 stated the overbed table was so scratchy, she used it to file down her fingernails. Resident 18 further stated if she spilled water on her overbed table it got absorbed and the surface stayed wet. Resident 18's bed was next to the sliding glass door leading to the patio area. The curtains to the sliding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an IDT care conference after each MDS assessment for 2 of 18 sampled residents (48, 73). As a result, there was a potential for resident care issues to not be addressed. Findings: 1. Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and spinal stenosis, per the admission Record. The clinical record was reviewed on 10/9/19. There was an annual MDS assessment in the EMR, dated 8/20/19. However, there was no IDT care plan conference done after the 8/20/19, MDS assessment. The last IDT care plan conference for Resident 48 was 5/21/19, five months prior. During an interview on 10/10/19 at 12:15 P.M., the DON stated the MDS coordinator or the SSD scheduled the IDT care plan conference for the residents. When interviewed on 10/10/19 at 4:12 P.M., the SSD stated there was an IDT care plan conference scheduled for Resident 48, but he refused to attend. The SSD acknowledged she had not rescheduled and the IDT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-10-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (66) narcotic (a controlled drug with high abuse potential) pain medication order was clarified with the physician when the order was unclear and incomplete. This failure had the potential for Resident 66 to receive the pain medication when it was not appropriate. Findings: Resident 66 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per the admission Record. On 10/9/19, a record review was conducted. Resident 66's physician's orders, dated 8/31/19, indicated, Oxycodone-acetaminophen tablet 10-325 mg by mouth every four hours as needed for pain. On 10/10/19 at 3:18 P.M., a joint interview and record review was conducted with LN 1. LN 1 reviewed Resident 66's physician's order for oxycodone-acetaminophen and stated the order did not have pain parameters. LN 1 stated pain parameters were a required part of a physician's order for pain medication. LN 1 stated to give for pain was not specific enough. LN 1 stated oxycodone-acetaminophen was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 18 sampled resident's (88) end of life wishes were documented consistently. As a result, there was the potential for an error in the event of an emergency. Findings: Resident 88's clinical record was reviewed on [DATE]. Resident 88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnosis that included high blood pressure, insomnia, falls, and Alzheimer's disease, per the facility's admission Record. According to the current clinical EMR record, Resident 88's end of life preferences were to have CPR, full treatment, long-term artificial nutrition including a feeding tube. Resident 88 had a Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) form, signed by the physician on [DATE]. The POLST documented the residents end of life preferences to be: Do Not Resuscitate, comfort focused treatment, and no artificial means of nutrition. The DON was interviewed on [DATE] at 9:54 A.M. The DON stated Resident 88 had been on hospice for her Alzheimer's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Thoroughly investigate each of Resident 76's falls; 2. Consistently conduct fall IDT meetings after Resident 76 fell, and; 3. Develop and implement resident specific interventions in an effort to prevent further falls for Resident 76. As a result, Resident 76 sustained five falls over a four month period, and on the fifth fall, fractured a hip. Resident 76 suffered pain and became more dependent on staff for ADLs. Findings: Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include left hip fracture, aftercare following joint replacement surgery, unsteadiness on feet, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility, per the facility's admission Record. On 10/8/19 at 3:22 P.M., an observation was conducted of Resident 76's room. Resident 76's name placard outside the door had the resident's first and last name. There was no visual indication by the resident's name that the resident was part of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-10-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy label on a medication pack matched the physician's order and MAR for 1 of 5 residents selected for unnecessary medication review (73). The facility also failed to ensure the physician's order for a medication indicated the total dosage to be given for 1 of 5 residents selected for unnecessary medication review (73). As a result, there was a potential for a medication error. Findings: 1. Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and paranoid personality disorder (odd or eccentric ways of thinking, paranoia, an unrelenting mistrust and suspicion of others), per the admission Record. On 10/10/19, the clinical record was reviewed. On 6/10/19, the physician ordered olanzapine (an antipsychotic) 5 mg tablet, give 0.5 tablet by mouth one time a day for Bipolar disorder. The DON was interviewed on 10/10/19 at 12:15 P.M. The medication bubble pack for Resident 73's olanzapine was reviewed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,652 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,652 — penalty dated 2024-08-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WINDSOR — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ANTELOPE HOLDINGS II, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/30/2023
ANTELOPE HOLDINGS III, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 06/30/2023
ROBIN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 06/30/2023
TRESS, AVROHOMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER50%since 06/30/2023
NEWGEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2025
HERNANDEZ, ERIBERTOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2023
SANCHEZ, LUISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2023
SHAW, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
ANTELOPE REALTY HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$195K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 14%Other / private 17%

This home reported $195K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$430per resident / day
operating cost
$13,085per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$417per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 055954. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next