No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windsor Care Center Of Sacramento

501 Jessie Avenue, Sacramento, CA 95838 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 128 certified beds · (916) 922-8855 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (916) 922-8855 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3946 Norwood Ave · (877) 665-4623 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
4195 Norwood Ave · (916) 418-0322 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4211 Norwood Ave · (916) 993-4100 · Call to confirm hours
Park
600 Benton Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%10.2%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%4.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.9%1.2%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%7.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%1.6%3.3%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.5%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.0%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.1%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.6%10.2%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.2%12.0%17.1%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.162.251.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.091.571.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 7.8–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.801.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-12-20)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2023-11-16)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) was free from physical abuse when Resident 1 was forced into the chair, shoved down on the chest to be seated, and got hit in the hand and arm by a Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1). This failure had the potential to result in serious physical injury for Resident 1. Findings: In a review of Resident 1's admission Record, Resident 1 was admitted to the facility in 2022 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions) and dementia (a condition of progressive loss of memory and abstract thinking, and personality change). A review of Resident 1's clinical record included the following documents: A Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/20/2024, indicated Resident 1 had severe memory impairment. An eInteract Change in Condition Evaluation, dated 5/3/24, indicated, Staff to resident physical abuse, resident was handled aggressively. Noted with increased agitation and confusion compared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient nurse staffing for a census of 111 residents, when the facility's Actual Direct Care Service Hours Per Patient Day (DHPPD- use to measure the total number of hours dedicated to direct care provided by caregivers, like nurses and certified nurse assistants to each patient in a facility over a 24-hour period) were below the required minimum standard of 3.5 DHPPD and 2.4 hours per patient day for certified nurse assistants (CNA DHPPD) from 11/1/24 to 11/7/24. This failures resulted to 10 recorded resident falls from 11/1/24 to 11/7/24 and had the potential for facility residents to not receive needed health treatment and personal care, and to not achieve their highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: During a review of the facility's DHPPD documents, for the month of November 2024, the documents indicated the facility had actual DHPPD and actual CNA DHPPD as follows: 11/1/24: resident census- 125, Actual DHPPD- 2.66, Actual CNA DHPPD- 1.75. 11/2/24: resident census- 125, Actual DHPPD-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility compromised resident personal privacy and confidentiality when the shred box containing meal tickets was overfilled, exposing resident information. This had the potential of exposing resident information to non-staff individuals. Findings: During surveyor initial set-up on 12/17/24 at 7:49 a.m., the survey team was briefly set up in the large dining room off the kitchen. A shred box was located next to the main door with meal tickets coming through the box opening. The survey team was able to read resident information from meal tickets at the box's opening. During the initial kitchen tour on 12/17/24 at 8:03 a.m., the Dietary Manager (DM) was escorted to the shred box. She concurred that the shred box was full to the brim. The DM tried without success to push the meal tickets back inside of box. The DM believed the meal tickets were picked up every two weeks. During a review of meal tickets for lunch for Wednesday, 12/18/24 at 2:16 p.m., the meal tickets included the following information: Resident name, room location,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two out of 26 sampled residents (Resident 72 and Resident 59) was assisted with their activities of daily living (ADLs- normal daily functions required to meet basic needs) when: 1. Resident 72 had blackish substance underneath the fingernails; and, 2. Resident 59 was not provided with oral care as indicated. These failures had the potential for Resident 72 and Resident 59 to acquire an infection and not achieve their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 72 was admitted January of 2023 and had diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). During a review of Resident 72's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment) Cognitive Patterns and Functional Abilities and Goals, dated 9/15/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 72 had a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 26 sampled residents (Resident 35 and Resident 30) were offered activities that meet their interests and preferences when; 1) Resident 35 did not receive activities that met her preferences and was only offered activities once a week; and 2) The facility did not provide Resident 30 any activity that meets his psychosocial needs from 11/12/24 to 12/16/24; These failures had the potential for Resident 30 and Resident 35 to not achieve their highest mental, emotional, spiritual, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 89 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a disease characterized by a progressive decline in mental abilities). During an observation on 12/17/24 at 9:15 a.m., 10:35 a.m., and 3:50 p.m., Resident 35 remained in her room without activities. During an observation on 12/18/24 at 9:12 a.m., 2:25 p.m., and 4:00 p.m., Resident 35 remained in her room without activities. During a review of Resident 35's Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow and maintain an effective infection prevention and control program for a census of 111 residents, when: 1. A shared blood pressure cuff equipment was not cleaned and sanitized in between resident use; 2. Staff did not wear required personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care for Resident 96, who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP); 3. Certified Nursing Assistant 9 (CNA 9) did not perform hand hygiene when feeding multiple residents during lunch; and 4. Two facility staff and a hospice staff did not wear PPE when provided care to Resident 79 and Resident 117 who were both on EBP. These failures resulted in increased risk for cross-contamination (transfer of bacteria from one person, object, or place to another) and may cause transmission of infection to a vulnerable population. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/17/24 at 7:37 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 3 (LN 3), LN 3 was checked Resident 14's blood pressure with a blood pressure cuff that was shared between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment for 29 residents (Residents 53, 29, 54, 40, 83, 28, 22, 16, 71, 73, 59, 103, 20, 272, 47, 104, 98, 101, 95, 67, 56, 39, 27, 70, 273, 51, 24, 26, 92) for a census of 111 when their bathroom exhaust fans were not properly cleaned leading to dust buildup. This failure had the potential to pose a fire hazard and expose the residents to breathe in mold and bacteria from the dust buildup. Findings: During an observation on 12/17/24 at 9:50 a.m., the exhaust fan had a dust buildup in the shared bathroom of Residents 53,29,54,40,83,28. During an observation on 12/18/24 at 8:42 a.m., the exhaust fan had a dust buildup in the shared bathroom of Residents 22,16,71,73,59,103. During an observation on 12/19/24 at 8:30 a.m., the exhaust fans had dust buildup for all shared bathrooms for Residents 53,29,54,40,83,28,22,16,71,73,59,103,20,272,47,104,98,101,95,67,56,39,27,70,273,51,24,26,92. During an interview on 12/19/24 at 8:37 a.m. with Certified Nurse Assistant 8 (CNA…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity and respect for three out of 26 sampled residents (Resident 1, Resident 14 and Resident 33) when: 1. Certified Nursing Assistant 9 (CNA 9) remained standing while assisting Resident 1 and Resident 33 with lunch; and, 2. Resident 14 was served her lunch tray late while other residents in the table were already eating. These failures had the potential to impact the three residents' self-esteem and self-worth. Findings: 1. Resident 1 was admitted in late 1989 and readmitted in late 2024 with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the right-dominant side, and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During a review of Resident 1's care plan (CP), dated 12/7/24, the CP indicated, EATING: At times the resident can need assistance at an intensity level of limited (guiding and maneuvering of extremities) . Resident 33 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 89) when Resident 89 did not have their call light within reach. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 89 further falls with injury. Findings: Resident 89 was admitted to the facility in January 2023 with multiple diagnoses which included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 89's care plan (CP), initiated 5/8/24, the CP indicated Resident 89 was a fall risk. The care plan indicated interventions to prevent falls that included, .place call light within reach . During a review of Resident 89's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool), dated 10/21/24, the MDS indicated Resident 89 needed assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs- routine tasks/activities such as bathing, dressing and toileting a person performs daily to care for themselves). During a review of Resident 89's Interdisciplinary Care Conference (IDT), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment) assessment for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 49), when Resident 49's comprehensive MDS behavioral assessment was inaccurate. This failure placed the facility to not have an accurate health status data of Resident 49, and had the potential for Resident 49 to not achieve his highest practicable well-being. Findings: Resident 49 was admitted in January of 2024 and had diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities) and major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). During a review of Resident 49's MDS Cognitive Patterns and Behavior, dated 10/22/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 49 had a severely impaired cognition (mental process of acquiring knowledge and understanding), and did not exhibit any physical or verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others or other behavioral symptoms not directed toward others. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were followed in accordance with professional standards of care for one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 91), when: 1. Resident 91 did not receive spironolactone (medication used for high blood pressure) for four days (four scheduled doses) due to the medication not being re-ordered timely (Within 3-5 days of medications running out), and the licensed nurse (LN) did not notify the physician for Resident 91's missed medications; and 2. Resident 91 did not receive a full dose of antidepressant medication (medication used for depression) for four days due to the medication not being re-ordered timely, and the physician was not notified for the missed medications. These failures had the potential for not meeting the resident's treatment needs or worsening of her medical conditions. Findings: Resident 91 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnosis of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and depression. During a review of Resident 91's physician order (PO), dated 12/19/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one out of 26 sampled residents (Resident 102) received trauma-informed care (a framework of care for helping people who have experienced trauma) in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for residents' experiences when Resident 102's trauma trigger(s) was not identified and her Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD-a mental health condition that can develop after a person experiences or witnesses a traumatic event) diagnosis was not care planned. This failure placed Resident 102 at risk for re-traumatization (re-experience/relives a traumatic event or experiences causing similar stress reactions to a new event), and to not achieve her highest physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 102 was admitted in October of 2024 and had diagnoses that included dementia a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and PTSD. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 91), when: 1. Resident 91 did not receive spironolactone (medication used for high blood pressure) for four days (four scheduled doses) due to the medication not being re-ordered timely (Within 3-5 days of medications running out); and, 2. Resident 91 did not receive the full dose of the antidepressant medication (medication used for depression) for four days due to medication not being ordered timely. These failures had the potential for not meeting the resident's therapeutic needs or worsening of her medical conditions. Findings: 1. Resident 91 was admitted to the facility in late 2024 with diagnosis of hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure) and depression. During a review of Resident 91's physician order (PO), dated 12/19/24, the PO indicated, Spironolactone .tablet .25 MG (milligrams) .Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to .HYPERTENSION . During a review of Resident 91's Medication Administration Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 26 sampled residents (Resident 6) was free of unnecessary medications, when Resident 6 was prescribed a psychotropic (any drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medication without adequate indication or a target behavior. This failure resulted in the use of unnecessary psychotropic medication that could potentially cause adverse reactions and consequences. Findings: Residents 6 was admitted in the middle of 2024 with diagnoses which included vascular dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities). During a review of Resident 6's Psychiatrist Consult Note dated 9/26/24, the note indicated, Bedside staff report that [Resident 6] is very calm with no behavioral issues, easy to manage. Talks a lot but doesn't make any sense. During a review of Resident 6's care plan (CP) initiated 9/27/24, the CP indicated there were no behavioral interventions attempted or included for Resident 6's of aggressive behavior of yelling out for needs. During a review of Resident 6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled correctly for a census of 111, when: 1. One opened vial and three bottles of perishable medications were not labeled with an open or use by date in the medication room; and, 2. One bottle of glucose strips, one inhaler and one insulin pen were not labeled with an open or use by date in the medication cart. These failures had the potential for residents to receive expired medications with reduced potency. Findings: 1. During an inspection of the medication room on 12/17/2024 at 8:30 a.m. with Licensed Nurse 2 (LN 2), LN 2 verified there were three bottles of latanoprost (a medication to treat glaucoma - chronic eye disease that can lead to vision loss) eye drops and one vial of tuberculin (a protein mixture to diagnosis tuberculosis - an infectious disease caused by bacteria that affects the lungs) that were not labeled with an open date or use by date. LN 2 stated not having open date and use by date on multi dose vials and eye drops could result in residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store supplies in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the 110 residents eating facility prepared meals, when: 1. Three large steam table pans were found stored wet; and 2. A bag of frozen spinach was not closed, exposing the spinach to the environment. These failures had the potential to result in food-borne illnesses. Findings: 1. During initial kitchen tour on 12/17/2024 at 8:03 a.m., three large steam table pans were observed on the bottom shelf of the cook's station in storage. When removed, three of the large steam table pans were found with water droplets on inner and outer surfaces of the pans. During a subsequent interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/17/2024 at 8:03 a.m., the DM concurred that the pans were wet. The DM stated that the condition of the wet pans could lead to contamination. During a review of the 2022 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code section 4-901.11, the food code indicated, Items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before being…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the right to be free from physical abuse for one out of 26 sampled residents (Resident 49) by another resident (Resident 112), when Resident 112 grabbed Resident 49 by the hair, pulled her down and hit her. This failure resulted in Resident 49 getting hurt, and had the potential for Resident 49 and all residents in the facility to experience physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings: Resident 49 was admitted January of 2024 and had diagnoses that included dementia (a progressive state of decline in mental abilities), and major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life). During a review of Resident 49's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) Cognitive Patterns, dated 10/22/24, the MDS indicated, Resident 49 had a severely impaired cognition (mental process of acquiring knowledge and understanding). Resident 112 was admitted June of 2024 and had diagnoses that included dementia and other specified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse (deliberately aggressive or violent behavior with the intention to cause harm) for one of four sample residents (Resident 2) when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 4 slapped the face, aggressively pulled the arm, and used a gown to cover the face of Resident 2. This failure had the potential for Resident 2 to suffer physical and emotional injury. Findings: During a review of Resident 2's admission Record, dated October 2024, the admission Record indicated, Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills over time), dementia (decline in mental ability that affects memory, thinking and reasoning) and Major Depressive Disorder (mental health condition where a person experiences persistent feelings of sadness, hopelessness, and a lack of interest/pleasure in most activities.) During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect two of five sampled residents (Resident 2 and Resident 3) from abuse when Resident 1 punched Resident 2 on the face and bit Resident 3 on the right hand. These failures resulted in Resident 2 sustaining a scratch on the left lower lip and Resident 3 sustaining a skin tear on the right hand. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in March 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and depression. Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1 ' s care plan, initiated on 3/29/24, the plan indicated, Resident/patient exhibits, or has the potential to exhibit physical behaviors related to: Cognitive Loss/Dementia. History of behaviors .and has the potential to strike out at others. During a review of Resident 2 ' s admission record indicated Resident 2 was admitted in March 2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan for one of five sampled residents (Resident 1) when there was no care plan developed for Resident 1 ' s use of Trazodone (medication used to treat depression). This failure had the potential to result in Resident 1 not maintaining the highest practicable well-being and preventing avoidable decline. Findings: During a review of Resident 1 ' s admission record, the record indicated Resident 1 was admitted in March 2024 with diagnoses that included dementia (group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities) and depression. Resident 1 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) indicated Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 1 ' s Psychotropic Medication [drug that affects behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception] Administration Disclosure (Anti-Depressant), dated 7/31/24, the disclosure indicated, Physician order: Trazodone 50mg [milligrams, a unit of measurement] PO [by mouth] tablet QHS [hours of sleep]. During a review of Resident 1 '…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents' (Resident 1) right to be free from physical abuse when Resident 2 kicked Resident 1 on the right side of his torso. This failure had the potential to result in serious physical injury to the Resident 1. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of encephalopathy (brain disease that alters brain function or structure) and alcohol dependance with withdrawal delirium (confused thinking and reduced awareness of surroundings). During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 7/16/24, the MDS indicated Resident 1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 indicating he had severe cognitive impairment. A Behavior Note for Resident 1, dated 7/15/24, indicated, Patient is very intrusive .he goes to other peoples' rooms .he is up multiple times in the night and is hard to redirect. Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Policy and Procedure, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, and report an alleged abuse for one of four sampled residents (Resident 2) when Resident 3 physically harmed Resident 2. This deficient practice placed Resident 2 and other residents in the facility for potential injury from Resident 3. Findings: 1. During a review of Resident 3's admission Record, indicated, Resident 3 was admitted in the facility on 12/22/23, with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia, and with other behavioral disturbances (a pattern of disruptive behaviors). During a review of Resident 3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, tool used to identify cognitive conditions) Section C, Cognitive Patterns showed a score of 3 which suggested severe cognitive impairment. During a review of Resident 3's SBAR, Communication Form [SBAR, Situation, Background, Assessment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-20 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility ' s dietary services failed to recognize a food allergy for one resident (Resident 1) of three sampled residents when Resident 1 was served fish for lunch and was allergic to it. This failure resulted in Resident 1 having to take medication to prevent a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included intracranial hemorrhage (bleeding within the brain) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). This admission record also indicated Resident 1 was allergic to fish and shellfish. A review of a health status note authored by a licensed nurse, dated 11/30/23 at 8:05 p.m., indicated, [Resident 1] .admitted from [hospital] at [2:30 p.m.] via gurney .Allergies= Fish, Shellfish . A review of an allergy audit report indicated a Registered Nurse (RN) created an allergy status for Resident 1 ' s allergy to shellfish on 11/30/23 at 3:02 p.m. and fish on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete annual performance evaluations for eight of eight sampled certified nursing assistants (CNAs), CNA 2, CNA 3, CNA 4, CNA 5, CNA 6, CNA 7, CNA 8, and CNA 9 for a census of 109. This failure increased the risk for residents to receive poor quality of care from the CNAs. Findings: During a review of the facility's electronic time keeping system, the time system indicated the following dates of hire (DOH): CNA 2 - 4/3/18 CNA 3 - 10/21/16 CNA 4 - 2/19/20 CNA 5 - 6/20/16 CNA 6 - 6/10/05 CNA 7 - 1/29/18 CNA 8 - 6/25/13, and CNA 9 - 7/1/19. During a concurrent interview and record review, on 11/15/23 at 9:48 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM), the ADM indicated the personnel records for the CNAs were reviewed and no performance evaluations (PEs) were completed in 2023. The ADM stated if the PEs were not completed annually, the staff skills could be decreased and could affect the CNAs competency to provide care for the residents. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Performance Evaluations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared in a form to meet individual needs for 24 of 109 residents when Minced and Moist (MM) diets received bowtie pasta and green beans that were not modified to ¼ inch or less, and Soft and Bite-size (SB) diets received regular size bow-tie pasta that were not cut to ½ inch or smaller size. This failure had the potential to create a choking hazard for 24 residents (including Resident 14, Resident 460, Resident 83, Resident 84, Resident 161, Resident 103, Resident 54, Resident 25, Resident 3, Resident 5, Resident 49, Resident 213, Resident 210, Resident 106, Resident 63, Resident 52, Resident 40, Resident 63, Resident 1, Resident 91, Resident 58, Resident 6, Resident 33, and Resident 59) eating facility prepared meals. Findings: During the initial kitchen tour on 11/13/23 at 8:34 a.m., the Dietary Supervisor (DS) explained the various diets served in the facility. These diets included textured modified diets from the International Dysphagia (swallowing difficulty) Diet Standardization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was stored and distributed in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, when the facility failed to: 1. Prevent a build-up of ice around the freezer door and on the floor; and 2. Provide tray tickets with the lunch meals when the tray was delivered to the resident. These failures had the potential to compromise the safety of frozen food served to the 109 residents eating facility prepared meals, as well as to provide the wrong meal tray to the 34 residents on hallway two. Findings: 1. During a kitchen observation and interview on 11/13/23 at 9:50 a.m. with the Maintenance Supervisor (MS), an area of ice (approximately 2x 4) was noted inside the freezer door handle and towards the bottom of the freezer door, as well as on the floor. The MS indicated he replaced the gasket last August and that he did a monthly service of the freezer. The MS was observed chipping off the ice during our interview. The MS stated that someone probably did not close the door correctly. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-16 · tag F0813 — pattern
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, foods brought to the facility for residents were not kept safe for consumption when resident food was labeled only with a room number. This failure had the potential of leading to foods being given to the wrong resident (who may be allergic to or unable to safely consume) as well as staff not throwing out foods that were no longer safe to eat. Findings: During an observation and interview on 11/13/23 at 1:50 p.m. with Licensed Nurse 7 (LN 7) in the locked medication room (behind nursing station one), the procedure for handling food brought in for residents from outside of the facility was discussed. LN 7 stated the process for outside food was that nursing would check the food for compliance with the resident's diet order, and if the food was found to be acceptable, it would be labeled with the resident's name and the date it was brought in. This was to ensure that the food was given to the correct resident, and that it would be thrown away when the food was considered unsafe. LN 7 opened the resident refrigerator. Inside was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean and homelike environment was promoted for two of 33 sampled residents (Resident 61 and Resident 102), when: 1. Resident 61's room had a broken closet door, two missing drawers, and trash in the bottom drawer; and 2. Resident 102's immediate environment was empty and the walls were bare, and the resident had food particles in bed. These failures had the potential for the residents not attaining their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 61 was admitted to the facility in late 2022 and readmitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included gender identity disorder and depression. During a review of a facility document titled, Work Order #4248, dated 7/10/23, the work order indicated, Drawer for [Resident 61] broken .removed. During a review of a facility document titled, Work Order #4253, dated 7/10/23, the work order indicated, Closet Door is broken . [Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected the residents' current status and health conditions for three of 33 sampled residents (Resident 107, Resident 15, and Resident 30), when: 1. Resident 107's discharge MDS indicated the resident was discharged to an acute hospital; 2. Resident 15's MDS assessments indicated an active diagnosis of pneumonia (PNA, infection in the lungs) on six different occasions; and 3. Resident 30's MDS assessment indicated the resident received insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar) injections. These failures resulted in the MDS data and records submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare-Medicaid Services) being inaccurate, and had the potential to result in the residents not receiving appropriate treatment and care to maintain their highest practicable well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 107 was admitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included muscle weakness. During a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were reviewed and revised timely for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 93) when his indwelling urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder) and acute pain due to catheter placement care plans had not been updated at least quarterly. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 93 having unmet nursing needs. Findings: A review of Resident 93's admission record indicated he was originally admitted in 10/22 with diagnoses including obstructive and reflex uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs when urine cannot drain from the bladder). An MDS (Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool), dated 8/22/23, indicated Resident 93 had an indwelling urinary catheter. A review of Resident 93's clinical record included the following documents: An indwelling catheter care plan, initiated on 10/17/22, was last revised on 12/14/22. An acute pain related to urinary catheter placement care plan, initiated 6/4/23, had not been since revised. In a concurrent interview and record review, on 11/15/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain nail care for one Resident (Resident 8) of 33 sampled residents, when Resident 8's fingernails were long and packed with a brownish-black substance. This failure decreased the facility's potential to maintain Resident 8's nail care and prevent infection. Findings: A review of an admission record indicated Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions). A review of Resident 8's Care Plan, dated 8/21/20, indicated Resident 8 had activities of daily living self-care performance deficit related to confusion, impaired balance, and unawareness of safety needs. Care plan further indicated Resident 8 could require assistance at a dependent to extensive level for safe completion of personal hygiene. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/13/23 at 10:05 a.m. in the activities room with Resident 8, Resident 8's fingernails were long and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to post the total number and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for residents' care per shift on a daily basis, for a census of 109. This failure resulted in staffing information not being provided to visitors and staff. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/14/23 at 2:20 p.m., with the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) in the main facility hallway where daily nurse staffing schedules were posted, the ADON confirmed the last posted daily staffing schedule was dated 11/3/23. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/15/23 at 8:45 a.m., with the Director of Nursing (DON) in the main facility hallway where daily nurse staffing schedules were posted, the DON confirmed the daily staffing schedule had not been updated since 11/3/2023. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/16/23 at 8:31 a.m., with the Administrator (ADM) in the main facility hallway where daily nurse staffing schedules were posted, the ADM confirmed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly secure the expired or discontinued controlled medications (medications with high potential for abuse or addiction), when the storage file cabinet was not permanently affixed to a permanent structure. This failure had the potential to increase risk of drug diversion and misuse. Findings: During an observation on [DATE] at 11:08 a.m. in the Director of Nursing's (DON) office, a file cabinet with discontinued controlled medications was observed to be not securely mounted to the wall or floor. During a concurrent observation and interview on [DATE] at 11:10 a.m. with the DON, the DON confirmed the cabinet was not secured firmly to the ground or wall. The DON stated, It could be picked up and walked off with. During a review of facility policy, titled, Disposal of Medications - related supplies, dated [DATE], The DON and consultant pharmacist are responsible for facility's compliance with federal and state laws and regulations in the handling of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication administration error rate of five percent or below was maintained for a census of 109, when three medication errors were observed during medication pass out of 32 medication pass opportunities. This failure resulted in medication error rate of 9.38%. Findings: 1. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility late 2022 with diagnoses which included hypertensive heart disease (high blood pressure), unspecified atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat) and atherosclerotic heart disease (the build-up of fats in artery walls). During an observation of medication pass on 11/14/23 at 8:55 a.m. with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, LN 2 was observed preparing seven medications for Resident 45 which did not include Resident 45's metoprolol extended release (a long-acting medication to treat high blood pressure) 25 mg (milligrams, unit of measure). LN 2 stated, We don't have it. It's not here. During a review of Resident 45's Order Summary Report (OSR), dated 11/15/2023, the OSR indicated, metoprolol Succinate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs for two out of 33 sampled residents (Resident 20 and Resident 32) were in good repair, when Resident 20's wheelchair had a broken brake handle on the right handle, and Resident 32's wheelchair had a torn right arm rest. This failure had the potential to compromise the health and safety of the two residents. Findings: A review of the clinical record for Resident 20 indicated, an admission to the facility in 2014 with diagnoses including, a history of a stroke, and memory problems with behaviors. A review of Resident 20's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/10/23, indicated Resident 20 was using a wheelchair for mobility and was able to self-propel with one leg. During an observation on 11/13/23 at 8 a.m., Resident 20 was observed self-propelling in the wheelchair on Hall 1. The wheelchair was semi-reclined and each of the handles behind the chair had brake handles. The brake handle on the right side was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light was within reach for four out of 33 sampled residents (Resident 93, Resident 96, Resident 106, and Resident 217). This failure decreased the potential for the residents to get assistance from staff in a timely manner when needed. Findings: In a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/13/23 at 8:16 a.m., Resident 96 and Resident 217 were awake and sitting in their beds. Resident 96's call light was hanging on the wall to the right of his bed and Resident 217's call light was on the floor to the left of her bed. Certified Nursing Assistant 1 (CNA 1) confined the call lights were out of the residents' reach and stated they were supposed to be close to them. In a concurrent observation and interview, on 11/13/23 at 9:01 a.m., Resident 93 was asleep in his bed and his call light was hanging on the wall to the left of his bed. CNA 1 confirmed the call light was out of his reach. A review of an admission record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary, clean and comfortable environment was provided for one of 33 sampled residents (Resident 61), when Resident 61's room had a broken closet door, two missing drawers, trash in the bottom drawer, and an unclean bathroom. This failure had the potential to result in Resident 61 not attaining his highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings: Resident 61 was admitted to the facility in late 2022 and readmitted in the middle of 2023 with diagnoses which included gender identity disorder and depression. During a review of a facility document titled, Work Order #4248, dated 7/10/23, the work order indicated, Drawer for [Resident 61] broken .removed. During a review of a facility document titled, Work Order #4253, dated 7/10/23, the work order indicated, Closet Door is broken . [Resident 61's] room .removed. During a review of Resident 61's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/31/23, the MDS indicated Resident 61 had memory impairment and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit the results of an abuse allegation investigation involving two of four sampled residents (Resident 1 and Resident 2) to the Department of Public Health within 5 working days of the incident. This failure decreased the potential for the facility to protect residents from abuse. Findings: On 10/2/23, the Department received faxed notification from the facility indicating Resident 2 had struck Resident 1 with a stick from a tree earlier that day. The Department had not received an investigative summary from the facility by the time an on-site visit was made on 10/10/23, eight working days after the alleged incident. A written summary of the investigation was not provided on site to the Department on 10/10/2023. An interview, on 10/10/23 at 2:43 p.m., the Administrator (ADM) confirmed the 5 day follow up should have been sent on 10/7/23. ADM stated no one but her would have faxed it to the Department. ADM further stated she had no fax confirmation it was sent to the Department. ADM stated the reason for a 5 day follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one of four sampled residents (Resident 1) from unconsented sexual contact, when Resident 2 was found on top of Resident 1 engaging in the act of sexual intercourse. This failure by the facility violated Resident 1's right to be free from sexual abuse. Findings: Resident 1 was admitted early 2022 with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), and psychotic disorder with delusions (abnormal thinking and perception). During a review of Resident 1's Face Sheet (a document that has patient information), the Face Sheet indicated Resident 1's son was listed as the responsible party. During a review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) completed 6/8/23, the MDS indicated severe cognitive (thinking and reasoning) impairment. Resident 2 was admitted early 2023 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and delusional disorder (mental health condition in which a person cannot determine reality from what is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 67) when: 1. Showers were not provided, as scheduled; 2. Food preferences and dislikes were not honored, and not included on the meal ticket; and 3. Physician's order for diet was not followed. These failures resulted in resident's unmet needs, and had the potential to result in the resident not attaining the highest practicable physical, psychosocial, and mental well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 67 was admitted in early 2021 with diagnoses which included morbid obesity, acid reflux disease, and depression. During a review of Resident 67's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 9/8/21, the MDS indicated Resident 67 was total dependent with bathing. During a review of Resident 67's chart document titled, Bathing: Support Provided, dated 11/26/21 [Friday], 11/28/21 [Sunday], 11/30/21 [Tuesday], 12/2/21 [Thursday], and 12/3/21 [Friday], the document indicated showers were done, but there were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-12-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff were able to describe the safe storage of medication pass supplements for a census of 101. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for for foodborne illness. Findings: During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/7/21, at 9:18 a.m., in Hall 4 with Licensed Nurse (LN) 2, a medication pass supplement carton with an open date of 12/7/21 was found in the cooler on the medication cart. LN 2 indicated the medication pass supplement was good for the whole day and should be discarded at the end of the day. LN 2 indicated the supplement was opened at 8:00 a.m. that morning. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/7/21 at 9:22 a.m., in Hall 2 with LN 4, a medication pass supplement carton with an open date of 12/7/21 was found in the cooler on the medication cart. LN 4 indicated the medication pass supplement was good for the whole day and should be discarded at the end of the day. LN 4 indicated the supplement was opened at 8:05 a.m. that morning. LN 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices for a census of 101, when: 1. Staff were unable to demonstrate how to effectively check for the concentration of sanitizing solution in the red buckets; 2. Staff were unable to verbalize how to properly sanitize the beverage dispenser system (BDS); 3. Health shakes were thawed in refrigerator but not discarded after two weeks per manufacturer guidelines; 4. Peanut butter and jelly sandwiches were not refrigerated per the grape jelly manufacturer guidelines; 5. Steam table pans were stored wet in the ready-for-use area, and a spatula was found wet in a drawer indicating it was ready to use; 6. A strainer was found ready to use but contained embedded rice in the rim of the strainer; 7. Multiple pans with deeps scratches were found hanging, ready to use and three oven mitts were found with large holes through the fingertips; 8. A bulk bin containing oatmeal was found with a chipped lid corner, leaving it unable to seal tightly; 9. A metal storage rack was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect privacy rights for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 61), when Certified Assistant Nurse (CNA) 3 sat on Resident 61's bed while assisting the resident with eating. This failure had the potential to be seen by Resident 61 as an invasion of personal space. Findings: Resident 61 was admitted to the facility at the end of 2017 with diagnoses which included memory impairment and depression. During an observation on 12/7/21, at 12:40 p.m., in Resident 61's room, CNA 3 sat on Resident 61's bed, in the process of assisting Resident 61 to eat. Resident 61 was observed to be sitting in a chair next to the head of the bed. During an interview on 12/7/21, at 12:46 p.m., with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated, I usually don't sit on the bed but I need to be sitting down to feed her. I know I'm not supposed to sit on the bed. There's no chair. During an interview on 12/8/21, at 11:10 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, The CNA should not sit on the resident's bed. It's their personal space…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 61) with dignity and respect, when a staff member referred to Resident 61 as a feeder in a public area. This failure had the potential to affect the emotional well-being of Resident 61, along with other residents who overheard the comment. Findings: Resident 61 was admitted to the facility at the end of 2017 with diagnoses which included memory impairment and depression. During an observation on 12/7/21, at 12:25 p.m., in a resident hallway, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3 stated, She's a feeder so I have to stay with her, after being handed a tray to pass to Resident 61. During an interview on 12/7/21, at 12:31 p.m., with CNA 3, CNA 3 stated, I didn't mean it to be derogatory. I could have said someone who needs assistance eating. I just wanted her [staff handing out trays] to know I had to stay with the resident. During an interview on 12/08/21 at 11:40 a.m., with the Director of Staff Development (DSD), the DSD stated, We train and train. We just went over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident needs were accommodated for four of 21 sampled residents (Resident 8, Resident 10, Resident 21, and Resident 67) when: 1. Call light was not in reach for Resident 8, 2. Showers were not provided as scheduled for Resident 10 and Resident 67, and 3. Staff did not allow Resident 21 to participate in the social dining program despite his request. These failures had the potential to result in residents' decreased independence, risks for falls, and risks for unmet needs. Findings: 1. Resident 8 was admitted to the facility in the spring of 2017 with diagnoses which included dementia (memory impairment). During a review of Resident 8's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/12/21, the MDS indicated Resident 8's memory was severely impaired and she required supervision and one person assistance with her Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). During a review of Resident 8's nursing care plan (CP) titled, I am…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure privacy during personal care for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 95 and Resident 48) when curtains were missing or did not cover the window area of the bedroom. This failure had the potential to result in residents' embarrassment and humiliation. Findings: 1. Resident 95 was admitted to the facility in early 2018 with diagnoses which included dementia (impaired memory), anxiety and depression. During a review of Resident 95's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/24/21, the MDS indicated Resident 95 had severe memory impairment, was independent and required limited assistance for most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). During an observation on 12/6/21, at 8:39 a.m., Resident 95 had no curtain at the foot of her bed, and no curtain on the window side of her bed to ensure privacy. During a concurrent observation and interview on 12/6/21, at 8:59 a.m., with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 1, CNA 1 verified there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an accurate assessment was completed for 1 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 121). This failure resulted in Resident 121 having an inaccurate medical record. Findings: Resident 121 was admitted to the facility in summer of 2021 with multiple diagnoses which included muscle weakness, a history of falling, and chronic pain. During a review of Resident 121's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 6/26/21, the MDS indicated Resident 121 had been discharged to an acute care hospital on 6/26/21. During a review of Resident 121's Discharge summary, dated [DATE], the Discharge Summary indicated, Discharge Disposition: Home with son. During a review of Resident 121's physician order, dated 6/25/21, and signed by the medical provider on 6/28/21, the order indicated, Resident is scheduled to discharge home with family on 6/26/21 .DC [discharge] home . During a review of Resident 121's progress notes, dated 6/26/21, the notes indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-12-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a desirable body weight for one of 21 sampled residents (Resident 7), when the weight loss was not documented. This failure resulted in a severe undesirable weight loss for Resident 7, and had the potential to result in further decline in the resident's nutritional status. Findings: Resident 7 was admitted in the middle of 2021 with diagnoses which included memory impairment, hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes mellitus (abnormal blood sugar levels), iron deficiency anemia (low/insufficient iron in the body), hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat particles in the blood), and depression. During a review of Resident 7's, Weights and Vitals Summary (W/VS), the W/VS indicated the following: On 5/11/21, Resident 7 weighed 107.4 lbs. (pounds, a measurement of weight); On 11/11/21, Resident 7 weighed 95 lbs; and On 12/2/21, Resident 7 weighed 92.4 lbs. During a review of Resident 7's, Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), dated 8/11/21, the MNA indicated Resident 7 had no weight loss during the period…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe and secure labeling and storage of medications and biological's for a census of 101, when: 1. Expired glucose monitoring test strips were found in the medication storage room; 2. Sterile needles were found in a box labeled with an expired date, in the medication storage room; 3. Refrigerated medications and vaccines were stored below acceptable temperature ranges; and 4. Two expired emergency medication kits (e-kits) were found in the refrigerator. These failures had the potential to negatively affect the health and well-being of the facility residents. Findings: 1. During an observation on 12/7/21, at 11 a.m., with Nursing Supervisor (NS) 1, of the medication storage room, an open box of, Professional Monitoring Blood Glucose Monitoring Strips was found on a shelf. The expiration date on the box was 10/17/21. During an interview on 12/7/21, at 11:05 a.m., with NS 1, NS 1 acknowledged that the strips were expired, and stated, It [the box of strips] should not be in here. It is expired. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident preferences were accommodated for two of 21 sampled residents (Resident 67 and Resident 21), when: 1. Resident 67's food dislikes were included in the meal tray; and 2. Resident 21 was not provided with a beverage of choice with a meal. This failure resulted in residents' emotional distress, and had the potential to result in residents' health complications. Findings: Resident 67 was admitted in early 2021 with diagnoses which included morbid obesity, acid reflux disease, and depression. During a review of Resident 67's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 9/8/21, the MDS indicated Resident 67 had memory impairment. During a review of Resident 67's, Dietary Profile (DP) dated 1/12/21, the DP indicated Resident 67 disliked spinach and broccoli. During a review of Resident 67's Nutritional Assessment (NA) dated 1/14/21, the NA indicated [Resident 67] prefers no spinach, broccoli . During a concurrent observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-12-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program for a census of 101, when: 1. A bench used by multiple residents was split and missing pieces of upholstery with an exposed padding; 2. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 3, sat on Resident 61's bed while assisting the resident with eating; 3. Proper wearing of face masks by staff was not enforced; and 4. A nursing staff member wore a torn and soiled face mask while around residents. These failures had the potential risks to result in transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings: 1. During multiple observations on 12/7/21 at 3:05 p.m. and 12/8/21 at 8:08 a.m., one to three residents were seen sitting across from the small dining room on a bench which had split upholstery with part of the upholstery missing. Two splits were 8-10 inches long. One split had approximately one to two inches in width missing. During a review of the Work Orders (WO) dated 11/1/21 to 12/9/21, the WO had no request for repair of the upholstered bench. During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WINDSOR — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 1 of 53.0-2.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WINDSOR HAYSAC HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2010
ANTELOPE HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
WINDSOR OXFORD HOLDING COMPANY, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2011
ROBIN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
TRESS, AVROHOMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2022
SHAW, PAMELAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$180K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 84%Medicare 1%Other / private 15%

About 84% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $180K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$355per resident / day
operating cost
$10,787per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555717. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-12-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next