No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Windsor The Ridge Rehabilitation Center

350 Iris Drive, Salinas, CA 93906 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 103 certified beds · (831) 449-1515 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (831) 449-1515 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
(831) 770-0444 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
110 E Laurel Dr · (831) 754-1551 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
965 N Main St · (831) 784-0144 · Call to confirm hours
Park
915 Victor St · (831) 758-7217 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.1%10.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.0%4.0%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.2%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%7.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.4%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%1.6%3.3%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%9.8%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%13.7%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%98.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.7%10.2%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.9%12.0%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%93.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%23.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.2%11.2%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.942.251.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.241.571.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 193 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

58.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF58.7%CMS range 52.1–64.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 7.0–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 2.7–9.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.89
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
30.6%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 103 beds and averages 96.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.64 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-11-25)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to explain the risks and benefits of psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) during the consent process to the responsible party for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 108).This failure resulted in Resident 108's responsible party not fully informed about the psychotropic medications, including their nature, degree, duration, probability of side effects, significant risks, and potential interactions with other drugs the resident is receiving.Cross reference to F0757.Findings:Review of Resident 108's admission record indicated, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cervical spinal stenosis (a condition where the spinal canal in the neck becomes narrowed, putting pressure on the spinal cord and nerves), bacteremia (the presence of bacteria in the bloodstream), depression (a serious mood disorder characterized by persistent sadness, loss of interest, and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure one of 5 residents ( Resident 8) receiving medication to treat a specific diagnosed condition, when Resident 8 has an order for Depakote ER oral tab 250 mg one tab by mouth at bedtime for Dementia in other Diseases Classified Elsewhere, moderate, with other Behavioral Disturbance manifested by verbal sexual disinhibition.This failure has potential for residents receiving unnecessary medication.Review of admission Record of Resident 8, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including: Dementia (a brain disorder that causes decline in memory and thinking) in other disease classified elsewhere, moderate with other behavioral disturbances, Anxiety Disorder ( a mental condition like persistent worry, fear and nervousness), Depression( condition with persistent sadness, hopelessness and loss of interest, Urinary Tract Infection ( infection of the urinary tract caused by bacteria). During an observation on 9/22/25 at 11 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that restorative care services were provided to one resident (Resident 11) by not applying the resident's Ankle Foot Orthosis (AFO-a brace that you wear on your lower leg and foot to help you walk better and more safely) as ordered by the physician.This failure to implement restorative interventions as ordered had the potential to contribute to functional decline, increased risk of falls, and reduced quality of life for Resident 11. Findings:A review of Resident 11 admission record dated 9/25/2025, the admission record indicated, Resident 11 had contracture (muscle or joint gets stuck in one position and can't move properly anymore) left foot, muscle weakness and Alzheimer's (brain condition that slowly affects a person's memory, thinking, and ability to do everyday tasks) Disease .During observation on 9/24/2025 at 10:22AM, resident was lying in bed watching television without AFO on Resident 11 left foot.During an interview 11 on 9/24/2025 at 10:23AM with Resident 11, Resident 11 stated, I want it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor and supervise one of three sampled residents, Resident 23, who repeatedly left the premises without the facility's knowledge.This failure posed risks to Resident 23's health and safety, including heat or cold exposure, being struck by a vehicle, dehydration, and other medical complications, potentially affecting their overall well-being.Findings:Review of Resident 23's admission record indicated, was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar) with other skin complications, hypertension (high blood pressure), alcohol dependence, depression, muscle weakness, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.Review of Resident 23's Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated resident assessment tool) dated 7/13/25 indicated a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status-an assessment tool used by facilities to screen and identify memory, orientation, and judgement status of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a prescribed psychotropic (a medicine that affects your brain and changes how you think, feel, or behave) medication was ordered and available for one of one sampled residents (Resident 34), resulting in a delay in administration.This failure had the potential to compromise Resident 34 mental health stability, disruption of therapeutic treatment, and adverse effects on the resident's psychosocial well-being. During a medication pass observation conducted on 9/24/2025 at 10:20 AM, front of room [ROOM NUMBER], a psychotropic medication Seroquel 25mg was not available for Resident 34.Interview on 9/24/2025 at 10:21AM with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1, LVN 1 stated, Seroquel ( a medicine that helps balance chemicals in the brain to improve mood, thinking, and behavior) is not available, I don't know what happened, I think I ordered it last Saturday (9/20/2025), I faxed the refill order to the pharmacy. I need to call pharmacy. When asked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the medication for 1 resident (Resident 8), was changed in response to identified irregularities, when during a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) by pharmacist, gave recommendation for approved diagnoses for use of Depakote Extended Release (ER).This failure has potential for residents receiving unnecessary medications.Review of admission Record, admitted on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses including: Dementia (a brain disorder that causes decline in memory and thinking) in other disease classified elsewhere, moderate with other behavioral disturbances, Anxiety Disorder ( a mental condition like persistent worry, fear and nervousness), Depression( condition with persistent sadness, hopelessness and loss of interest, Urinary Tract Infection ( infection of the urinary tract caused by bacteria). During a record review, Order Summary Report, dated September 25.2025, the Order Summary Report indicated, Depakote ER Oral Tablet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 5 sampled residents (Resident 108) was free from unnecessary drugs when Quetiapine (also known as Seroquel - a drug used to treat schizophrenia, a serious mental health condition) was administered to treat Resident 108's post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition that can develop after a person experiences or witnesses a traumatic event) related delirium (a sudden, temporary state of confusion that can cause a person to have trouble paying attention, thinking clearly, and being aware of their surroundings). Additionally, Quetiapine was not indicated in Resident 108's discharge medication list and physician's assessment and plan.This failure resulted in Resident 108 receiving unnecessary drugs and place residents on psychotropic medications at risk for adverse health consequences which could negatively impact the residents' mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being.Findings:Review of Resident 108's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of three residents (Resident 1) when the facility did not administer medication as ordered by a physician for Resident 1. Finding: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including essential hypertension (HTN-high blood pressure). Review of Resident 1's physician's order, dated 7/31/24, indicated Norvasc (a hypertension medication) oral tablet 10 milligrams (mg- metric unit of measurement, used for medication dosage and/or amount), give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential hypertension, hold for SBP (systolic blood pressure) <110 and HR (heart rate) <60. Review of Resident 1's November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated Norvasc oral tablet was administered from 11/1/24 to 11/11/24, except on 11/3/24, which documented sleeping. There was no documented BP or HR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one of two residents when the facility did not follow the physician's order to monitor Resident 1's inappropriate behavior. This failure had the potential to compromise residents' safety and health in the facility. Findings: Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of parkinsonism (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement), mood disorder (a mental health condition that affects emotional state), and mild cognitive impairment (decline in memory and thinking). Review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 2/20/24, indicated he had a brief interview for mental status (BIMS, a structured cognitive [relating to the mental process involved in knowing, learning, and understanding things] test) score of 14 (cognitively intact). Review of Resident 1's care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to attempt, offer, and document the use of bed rail (adjustable metal or rigid plastic bars that attach to the bed) alternatives for 17 of 67 residents (Resident 6, 10, 15, 19, 24, 29, 31, 40, 43, 54, 61, 62, 66, 80, 81, 84, and 94) , and obtain informed consent for one of 67 residents (Resident 199) prior to installation of the bed rails. These failures had the potential to put the residents at risk for entrapment and serious injury. Findings: During the initial tour observation on 3/24/24 at 2:25 p.m., Resident 6, 10, 15, 19, 24, 29, 31, 40, 43, 54, 61, 62, 66, 80, 81, 84, 94, and 199 had upper bed rails elevated and in use. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/27/24 at 3:02 p.m. with the Director of Staff Develement (DSD), the DSD confirmed above residents had bed rails elevated and in use. She stated the bed rails were for turning and repositioning. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/28/24 at 9:08 a.m. with the Medical Record Director (MRD), Resident 199's bed rail consent was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-29 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: 1. The recipe for Spinach was followed according to ingredient list for approximately 15 of 96 sampled residents 2. Accurate diets were not served according to resident preferences for two of 96 sampled residents (Resident 36 & Resident 51) These failures had the potential for adverse reactions to foods added to recipes without residents being aware, and for residents to not eat foods according to personal preferences. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/26/24 at 11:59 a.m. with [NAME] A, [NAME] A added cooked red bell peppers to the cooked spinach. [NAME] A stated, I am adding them for some more color. During a review of Club Spinach recipe (undated), recipe indicated, Ingredient spinach, chopped, granul [sic] garlic, black pepper, margarine. During an interview, on 3/28/24 at 10:04 a.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM stated, there are no red bell peppers in the spinach recipe. I told the cook to add them in for extra color. We should follow the ingredient lists. 2.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices in the kitchen when: 1. Dietary Aide (DA) C did not perform hand hygiene after cleaning the floor and touching dirty surfaces; 2. Multiple food items were kept in the freezer after the use by date; and 3. Canned food with major dents were not identified and removed from dry storage shelf These failures had the potential to spread food-borne illness to residents in the facility. Findings: 1. During an observation on 3/26/24, at 11:28 a.m., in the kitchen, DA C cleaned the floors with a broom, then threw trash into the trash can touching the surface of the trash can with his bare hands. DA C then went to the sink and washed his hands with only water for approximately 15 seconds, then dried his hands. DA C then walked over to the dishwasher and began unloading clean utensils with his bare hands. During an interview on 3/26/24, at 11:30 a.m., with DA C, DA C stated, I did not wash my hands with soap after cleaning, I should have used soap before unloading the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. Review of Resident 91's admission Record indicated, Resident 91 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including aphasia (a language disorder wherein the person is unable to communicate effectively to others) following cerebral infarction (also called stroke), hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body/a severe or complete loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a relatively mild loss of strength in the arm, leg, and sometimes face on one side of the body) following unspecified cerebrovascular disease (CVA - also referred to as stroke) affecting right dominant side (more skillful side), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (an enlarged prostate [a gland just below the bladder]) with lower urinary tract symptoms (examples include leaking urine, having sudden and frequent urges to pee, having a weak stream or feeling like unable to empty the bladder). Review of Resident 91's minimum data set (MDS - an assessment tool) Admission/5-day assessment, dated 3/2/2024, indicated, Resident 91's brief interview for mental status…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their policies on self-administration of medication (resident takes medication without staff assistance) when there were no assessments performed for self-administration of medications, and medications were left at the bedside for 2 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 84 and 3). These failures had the potential for unsafe and improper administration of medications. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated, Resident 84 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (broken thigh bone), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions), fall on same level from slipping, tripping, and stumbling, and cognitive communication deficit (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions). Review of Resident 84's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Significant change in status and 5-day scheduled assessment, dated 2/10/2024, indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide two of three sampled residents (Resident 13 and 83) with the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN, a financial liability notice). This failure could lead to resident unknowingly assume financial liability for receiving services that were not covered by Medicare. Findings: During a review of Resident 13's face sheet (a document that contains a summary of a resident's personal and demographic information) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage ((NOMNC, a notice that indicates when a resident's stay at a SNF is no longer paid by Medicare), it indicated Resident 13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his stay was paid by Medicare (federal health insurance for anyone age [AGE] and older, and some people under 65 with certain disabilities) until 12/19/23 and currently resided at the facility. During a review of Resident 83's face sheet and NOMNC, it indicated Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a clinical assessment tool) for one of 24 sampled residents (Resident 63). Failure to accurately assess the resident had the potential to compromise the facility's ability to provide resident-centered care plan interventions. Findings: During a review of Resident 63's face sheet (a document that contains a summary of a resident's personal and demographic information), it indicated Resident 63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness that causes unusual shifts in mood). During a review of Resident 63's level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a federal requirement to help ensure individuals with mental disorders and intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) dated 6/1/22, the PASRR indicated Yes for Section III - Serious Mental Illness Screen: 10. Does the individual have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review, a federal requirement to help ensure individuals with mental disorders and intellectual disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) was completed for two of 24 residents (Residents 41 and 61). This failure had the potential to put the residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care and services for their mental health conditions. Findings: Review of Resident 41's clinical record indicated they had diagnoses including paraplegia (the inability to move the lower part of the body, schizophrenia (a mental condition) and morbid obesity (too much body weight). Review of Resident 41's record, indicated Resident 41 had a positive Level I PASRR screen, completed on 9/28/21. Review of Resident 41's record also indicated the Level II PASRR was not completed due to the reason The Individual was isolated as a health and safety precaution, in a letter dated 2/18/22. During an interview on 3/27/24 at 1:52 p.m. with the Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement individualized, resident-centered care plans for 3 of 24 sampled residents (Residents 74, 3 and 18) when care plans for: 1. Resident 74's feeling of sadness was not developed and implemented; 2. Oxygen (a colorless, odorless gas) and anticoagulant (sometimes called blood thinning medications) used for Resident 3 was not developed; and 3. Oxygen used for Resident 18 was not developed. These failures had the potential to result in the residents not receiving the care and services necessary to maintain their health, safety and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 74's admission Record indicated, Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including hypo-osmolality (a condition where the levels of electrolytes, proteins, and nutrients in the blood are lower than normal) and hyponatremia (low sodium [can be found in table salt or in processed foods] level in blood), adult failure to thrive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents received the necessary care and services for two of six residents (Residents 148 and 15) when licensed nurses did not follow the physician's order for oxygen supplement (a therapy that provides extra air to breathe in) for Residents 148 and 15. These failures had the potential to affect the residents' care and could jeopardize their health and well-being. Findings: 1. Review of Resident 148's admission Record indicated, Resident 148 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (a condition when lungs cannot release oxygen to blood causing shortness of breath) with hypoxia (occurs when oxygen level in the body organs are low), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD - a long lasting lung disease). Review of Resident 148's Order Summary Report, indicated Resident 148 had an order for continuous oxygen administration at 2 liters (L, metric unit of volume) per minute (min) via (thru) nasal cannula (NC, a device that consists of plastic tube that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (those with high potential for abuse and addiction) reconciled with the corresponding Medication Administration Records (MAR) for four of nine randomly sampled residents (Residents 7 ,37 ,58, and 76). The medications were signed out of the Controlled Drug Record (CDR, an inventory sheet that keeps record of the usage of controlled medications) but did not document on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) to indicate the controlled medications were given to the residents. This failure had the potential for misuse or diversion of controlled medications. Findings: The CDR for four random residents (Residents 7 ,37 ,58, and 76) receiving as-needed controlled medications were requested for review during the survey. 1. During a review of Resident 7's medical record indicated a physician's order, dated 10/31/23, for Tramadol (a controlled pain medication) Hydrochloride (HCL a salt added to drugs to make them stable) 100 milligrams (mg, unit of measurement), take 1 tablet by mouth every 6 hours…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility had an eight percent medication error rate when two medication errors out of 25 opportunities were observed during medication pass for one of six residents (Residents 72). These failures had the potential to compromise the health and safety of the residents. Findings: During a medication pass observation on 3/25/24 at 9:54 a.m. with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) I, LVN I was observed preparing and administering ten medications to Resident 72. Review of Resident 72's clinical record indicated a physician's order of Zyrtec (antihistamine to treat allergy, hives, and itching) 10 milligram (mg, unit of measurement) dated 3/11/23 and MiraLAX (laxative to treat constipation) Oral Powder 17 grams (gr, unit of measurement) /scoop dated 2/2/24 for medication to be given. During a concurrent interview and record review on 3/25/24 at 10:40 a.m., with LVN I, LVN I confirmed the order indicated Zyrtec 10 mg tablet and MiraLAX Oral Powder 17 grams and she did not administer those two medication to Resident 72. LVN I further stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were labeled appropriately when: 1. One opened Refresh Tears lubricant eyedrop without resident's name and an open date was found in medication cart AA; 2. One opened Vyzulta (used to lower intraocular [eye] pressure with open - angle glaucoma [eye condition that can cause blindness] or ocular hypertension) 0.024 % Ophthalmic (used to treat eye infections) Solution was found without an open date; and 3. One opened Brimonidine Tartrate (used to treat open-angle glaucoma or high fluid pressure in the eye) ophthalmic solution was found without an open date. These failures had a potential for residents to receive medications with unsafe and reduced potency from being used past their discard date which could lead to unsafe and ineffective medications for the residents. Findings: During a medication cart inspection on 3/26/24 at 10:54 a.m., on South Wing of the facility, medication cart AA was inspected with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) L. The inspection identified a bottle of opened Refresh…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to serve food at an appetizing temperature for one test tray food item out of seven sampled food items. This failure had the potential for residents to not wish to eat the sampled food item due to colder temperature. Findings: During an observation on 3/26/24, at 11:59 a.m., [NAME] A added cooked red bell peppers to the cooked spinach, which completed the cooking process for the spinach at this time. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/26/24, at 1:20 p.m. with the Dietary Manager (DM), the DM tested the internal temperature of 7 food items on the sampled test tray, after all residents in the facility were served the noon meal. One food item, the regular texture Club Spinach's internal temperature read 125 degrees Fahrenheit. DM stated, all hot foods on the tray line should be maintained to 140 degrees Fahrenheit. During a review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) titled, Food Preparation, dated 2013, the P&P indicated, B. Hot foods should be held prior to service at 140 degrees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the physician- prescribed therapeutic diet (a diet order as part of treatment for a disease or clinical condition to decrease or increase specific nutrients in the diet) to four of 96 sampled residents when: 1. Three residents (Resident 29, Resident 41 & Resident 57) who were ordered a Controlled Carbohydrate Diet (The focus of the diet is eating the same amount of carbohydrates every day in an attempt to keep blood sugar levels stable) were served the wrong dessert item; and 2. One resident (Resident 92) who was ordered a Fortified Diet ( a diet with additional high calorie items to help prevent or treat weight loss), did not receive the fortified food item for noon meal. These failures had the potential to result in weight loss and/or unstable blood sugar for the residents who did not receive their therapeutic diets as ordered. Findings: 1. During a review of the Facility's Therapeutic Diet Spreadsheet, dated 3/26/24, the spreadsheet indicated, for the noon meal the dessert item for Controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were implemented when: 1. Certified nursing assistant O (CNA O) did not perform hand hygiene while serving and setting up lunch trays in between residents (Residents 14, 71 and 58); and 2. Nasal cannula (NC - a device that consists of plastic tube that fits behind the ears, and a set of two prongs that are placed in the nostrils for oxygen administration) was not stored properly when not in use (Resident 44). These failures had the potential to compromise resident's health and safety in the facility. Findings: 1. During observation on 3/25/2024 at 12:07 p.m., inside dining room BB (DR BB), CNA O was observed assisting Resident 14 to drink. CNA O held Resident 14's cup of thickened water, pat Resident 14's shoulder and moved the cup of water towards Resident 14's mouth to drink. CNA O placed Resident 14's cup of water back on the table and went to Resident 71's table. CNA O did not perform hand hygiene. CNA O held Resident 71's cup of water, touched Resident 71's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure to provide a safe, functional, and comfortable environment for two of 24 sampled Residents: 1. Resident 94's bed controller was not functioning for two days; and 2. Resident 41's toilet paper holder was broken for three days without being reported and fixed. These failures had the potential to affect the comfort of the residents. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview on 3/25/24 at 9:21 a.m. in Resident 94's room, Resident 94's bed controller was disconnected from the bed, his head of the bed was elevated. Resident 94 stated, he came back from the hospital two days ago, and he had been sleeping with the head of the bed elevated for two nights now. It was not comfortable for him. During an interview on 3/25/24 at 9:30 a.m. with Occupational Therapist (OT) O, who stopped by Resident 94's room to drop off some clean clothes, she stated she was not aware of the bed situation, but she would let the maintenance know. During an interview on 3/26/24 at 4:14 p.m. with the Maintenance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to update the fall care plan for one of 8 residents (Resident 84) when interdisciplinary team (IDT, team composed of members from different departments involved in resident's care) did not review and revised Resident 84's fall risk care plan with subsequent falls. This failure resulted in Resident 84's two more subsequent falls. Findings: Review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated, Resident 84 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (broken thigh bone), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions), fall on same level from slipping, tripping, and stumbling, and cognitive communication deficit (problems with a person's ability to think, learn, remember, use judgement, and make decisions). Review of Resident 84's Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) Significant change in status and 5-day scheduled assessment, dated 2/10/2024, indicated Resident 84's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure fall management policy and procedure were implemented for one of eight residents (Resident 84) when: fall risk assessment was not performed when Resident 84 had a significant change in status and the interdisciplinary team (IDT, team composed of members from different departments involved in resident's care) did not develop and implement appropriate new interventions after a fall. These failures resulted in Resident 84's subsequent falls and had a potential to sustain serious injuries. Findings: 1a. Review of Resident 84's admission Record indicated, Resident 84 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (broken thigh bone), Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and mental functions), fall on same level from slipping, tripping, and stumbling, and cognitive communication deficit (problems with a person's ability to think, learn,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from physical abuse for one out of three residents (Resident 1) when Resident 2 (who was of moderate mental capacity) slapped Resident 1 in the mouth causing injury to Resident 1's top lip and first aid being administered. Resident 2's act of slapping Resident 1 in the mouth was a deliberate act to inflict harm or injury, not accidental; therefore, his action was deemed as a willful act and considered abuse. This failure had the potential of both physical and emotional harm to all residents. Findings: On 10/17/22, the facility submitted a facsimile (FAX, a telephonic transmission of scanned printed material) to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) about an incident between Residents 1 and 2. The FAX indicated Resident 2 slapped Resident 1 in the mouth and Resident 1 sustained a minor injury of the upper gingiva (gums) and upper lip. Review of Resident 1's clinical record indicated she had diagnoses which included metabolic encephalopathy (a problem in the brain caused by a chemical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three sampled residents (Resident 1) received medication as ordered. The facility also failed to notify the physician when Resident 1 did not receive this medication. These failures had the potential to compromise Resident 1's health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 1's medical record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia (an abnormally high concentration of fats in the blood). Review of Resident 1's [Hospital] Patient Summary, dated 5/24/23, indicated she received rosuvastatin (medication used to treat hyperlipidemia) while she was in the hospital prior to her admission to the facility. The [Hospital] Patient Summary further indicated Resident 1 was to continue receiving rosuvastatin at the facility. Review of Resident 1's Order Summary Report from the facility indicated she had a physician ' s order, dated 5/24/23, for rosuvastatin 20 milligrams (mg, unit of dose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-08-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Review of Resident 30's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with anxiety disorder (people with anxiety disorders frequently have intense, excessive and persistent worry and fear about everyday situations) diagnosis. Review of Resident 30's physician order indicated she had an order for buspiron (used to treat anxiety) 15 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass) every 12 hours for anxiety started on 5/20/21. Review of Resident 30's medical record indicated there was no side effect monitoring for buspiron. During an interview with the director of nursing (DON) on 8/6/21 at 9:21 a.m., she reviewed Resident 30's clinical record and confirmed there was no side effect monitoring for buspiron. DON stated Resident 30 should have been monitored for the side effects of buspiron. Review of the facility's policy Psychoactive Drug Use, dated 11/28/2017, indicated Assess patient to determine if psychoactive is effective or may be reduced or eliminated by determining: . Whether the patient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable temperature for three non-sampled residents (Residents 44, 45, and 77) when the residents complained about the food temperature. This failure had the potential to result in decreased food intake and weight loss, compromising the resident's nutritional status. Findings: During an initial tour with Resident 77 on 8/2/21 at 9:41 a.m., Resident 77 stated the hot food was served cold and cold food was served warm. During an initial tour with Resident 45 on 8/2/21 at 10:31 a.m., Resident 45 stated the hot food was cold. During a group meeting on 8/4/21 at 12:54 a.m., Resident 44 stated the hot food was cold when they served the tray. During an observation and interview with thedistrict dietary manager (DDM) on 8/5/21 at 1:49 p.m., the test tray temperature of the pureed beans was 116 degrees Fahrenheit (°F, unit of measurement), orange juice 60 °F, green bean salad 60°F, coleslaw 50°F,and pureed marinated salad 60°F. DDM stated the cold food should have been served 42°F below…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under the sanitary conditions when: 1. An unlabeled big container of sliced bread with cheese dated 7/16/21 was inside the refrigerator; 2. coffee maker machine's daily cleaning was not followed per manufacturer's guidelines; 3. There were three electric fans with grayish black substance; 4. water filter for coffee maker was dated 3/1/2020; 5. undated and unlabeled open bag of chocolate chips; 6. kitchen cook did not perform hand hygiene when changing gloves. These failures had the potential to cause foodborne illness (illness resulting from contaminated food) to the residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings: 1. During an initial kitchen observation on 8/2/21 at 9:15 a.m., an unlabeled big container of sliced bread with cheese dated 7/16/21 was inside the refrigerator. During a concurrent interview with kitchen aide D (KA D), she stated the sliced bread with cheese was more than two weeks old and it was not good to eat. During an interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. During an observation in the dining room on 8/2/21 at 12:44 p.m., certified nursing assistant N (CNA N) put on gloves without washing her hands, picked up the fried chicken leg and thigh on Resident 43's plate, and shredded it for Resident 43 to eat. During a concurrent interview with CNA N, she stated she should wash her hands and put on gloves before touching the resident's food. Review of the facility's policy Food: Preparation, dated 9/2017, indicated All staff will practice proper hand washing techniques and glove use. 3. During an observation of medication administration on 8/2/21 at 3:53 p.m., after checking Resident 45's blood sugar, licensed vocational nurse J (LVN J) threw the lancet and the strip with blood into a blue cup, removed the glove from one of her hands, held the blue cup in that hand, held the glucometer in the other gloved hand, walked out of Resident 45's room, and threw the blue cup with the lancet and the strip with blood in the trash can of the medication cart which was parked at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 8 residents (37) had informed consent (written permission before implementing a healthcare intervention) prior to initiating psychotropic medication (medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior). This failure resulted in the resident receiving psychotropic medications without being informed about their risks and side effects. Findings: Review of Resident 37's admission Record indicated she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with bipolar disorder (a mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings that include emotional highs and lows) diagnosis. Review of Resident 37's physician order, dated 5/27/21, indicated she had an order for valproate sodium (used to treat bipolar disorder) 250 milligrams (mg, a metric unit of mass)/5 milliliters (ml, a metric unit of volume) three times a day related to bipolar disorder, but no informed consent was found for valproate sodium 5 ml three times a day. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate residents' needs for three of 19 sampled residents when: 1. Resident 41 had been waiting 21 minutes for transfer assist in a commode. 2. Resident 64 waited for more than 15 minutes for his perineal care after bowel movement. 3. Resident 74's call light device was not within reach to accomodate his needs. These failures had the potential to result in the residents' needs being unmet and affecting residents' well-being. Findings: 1. During review of Resident 41's clinical record, Resident 41 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses included amputation (action of surgically cutting off a limb) of left lower leg, diabetes mellitus (high blood sugar), and muscle weakness. During review of Resident 41's quarterly MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 41 was cognitively intact and required limited assist with one person during transfer and toilet use. During concurrent observation and interview on 08/02/21 at 9:50 a.m., Resident 41's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe, orderly, and sanitary homelike environment for two of nineteen sampled residents when: 1. Resident 44's toilet was not working and was clogged with stool; 2. The toilet paper dispenser for Resident 26 had no toilet paper because the roller was broken. These failures had the potential to place the residents at risk for an unsafe and uncomfortable environment. Findings: 1. During an interview with Resident 44 on 8/3/21 at 3:30 p.m., she stated that her toilet was clogged up for a few days now. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/4/21 at 1:18 p.m., with certified nursing assistant G (CNA G), he verified that Resident 44's toilet would not flush and the toilet bowl still had brown stools. He also stated that he had already reported the incident in the maintenance log, two days ago, 8/2/21. Review of the facility's undated Repair and Preventative Maintenance Log, Resident 44's clogged toilet was reported on 8/2/21 and nobody followed up. During an interview on 8/4/21 at 2:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability) screening document was accurately completed for one of five residents (27). This failure had the potential for mentally ill residents not to receive the required care and services. Findings: Review of Resident 27's PASRR Level I Screening Document, dated 3/12/21, indicated Resident 27 was noted to have no diagnosis of a neurocognitive disorder or a mental disorder. Review of Resident 27's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life) and psychotic disorder (severe mental disorder that causes abnormal thinking and perceptions) with delusions (false believes that are based on incorrect interpretations of reality). During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident 64's admission Record indicated he was admitted to the facility with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a lung disease that makes it hard to breathe) diagnosis. Review of Resident 64's physician order, dated 7/30/2020, indicated he had an order for Symbicort Aerosol (an inhaler that is used to treat COPD) 160/4.5 micrograms (mcg, a metric unit of mass) 2 puff inhale orally two times a day related to COPD. During an observation of medication administration on 8/3/21 at 9:40 a.m., after administering 2 puffs of Symbicort Aerosol to Resident 64, licensed vocational nurse I (LVN I) gave Resident 64 a cup of water to rinse his mouth. Resident 64 rinsed his mouth and swallowed the water. During an interview with LVN I on 8/3/21 at 10:19 a.m., she stated she should instruct Resident 64 to spit out the water after he rinsed his mouth. Review of the Package Insert (Drug Information) for Symbicort 160/4.5 mcg indicated Advise the patient to rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an on-going activity program to support the resident in her choice of activities for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 65) when the facility did not provide in-room visits to Resident 65. This failure could potentially affect the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 65's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), hypertension (increase blood pressure), muscle spasm, and aphasia (loss of ability to express speech). Review of Resident 65's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/25/21, indicated she was severely impaired in decision making, required staff assistance for bed mobility, transfer, dressing, eating, toileting, and personal hygiene. The MDS also indicated the resident activity preferences were listening o music and choosing clothes to wear. Review of Resident 65 activities care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 65) when the restorative nursing aide (RNA, helps residents to gain an improved quality of life by increasing their level of strength and mobility) program was not implemented related to contractures (condition of hardening, shortening of muscles and tendons) care plan. This failure had the potential for Resident 65 to decline in activities of daily living (ADL's such as bed mobility, transfer, personal hygiene, toileting, and bathing) and prevent physical deterioration. Findings: Review of Resident 65's clinical record indicated she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), contracture (condition of hardening, shortening of muscles and tendons) of left knee, contracture of left lower leg, contracture of muscle, and abnormal posture. Review of Resident 65's minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 7/25/21,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care to prevent accidents for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident 67) when certified nursing assistant C (CNA C) transferred Resident 67 with Hoyer lift (lifting machine) by herself. This failure had the potential for accidents and injury to the resident. Findings: Review of Resident 67's clinical record indicated he was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including paraplegia (paralysis of the legs and lower body), morbid obesity (excessive body fat), schizophrenia (a mental disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), and diabetes (increased blood pressure). During an observation with Resident 67 on 8/2/21 at 10:36 a.m., CNA C brought the Hoyer lift to Resident 67's room and CNA C transferred Resident 67 with the Hoyer lift by herself. During a concurrent interview with CNA C, she confirmed she transferred Resident 67 with the Hoyer lift by herself. During an interview with the director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately monitor intravenous (IV, catheter inserted into blood vessel for administration of fluids and/or medication) access/lines for three of 19 residents (Residents 143, 36, and 64). This failure had the potential of losing IV access for the resident and/or the incorrect amount of fluid being administered to the resident, and affecting the residents' health and well-being. Findings: 1. Resident 143 had a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line for access to a large blood vessel to administer antibiotics. During an interview on 8/03/2021 at 10:34 a.m. with licensed vocational nurse M (LVN M), LVN M stated she mainly just monitors Resident 143's PICC line by just looking at Resident 143's arm to make sure it does not look red or swollen. During an interview on 8/03/2021 at 10:40 a.m. with the assistant director of nursing (ADON), ADON stated there were no physician orders for the PICC line dressing changes. ADON stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 64), who was physician-ordered to receive respiratory services of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, machine uses a hose and mask or nosepiece to deliver constant and steady air pressure) received this service and the care was accurately documented. This failure had the potential to result to impact resident's health and well-being. Findings: Review of Resident 64's clinical record, Resident 64 was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe), obstructive sleep apnea (sleep-related breathing disorder) and seizures (sudden, uncontrolled electrical disturbance in the brain). Review of Resident 64's annual MDS dated [DATE], indicated Resident 64 was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with two-person physical assist during ADLs. During concurrent observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident 84 and Resident 19), were provided with the appropriate and necessary pain management when: 1. Resident 84's left lower back pain was not addressed promptly; 2. The pain medication order for Resident 19 was not followed accurately. These failures had the potential to result in the resident's poor quality of life and discomfort. Findings: 1. During a concurrent observation and interview of Resident 84 on 8/2/21 at 11:06 a.m., the resident was lying in his bed with episodes of facial grimacing when he was trying to move around his bed. When asked if he was ok, the resident stated he had pain on his left lower back, with pain scale of four out of 10 (moderate pain). He stated he had pain for about an hour, and he had left lower back pain for thirty to forty-five days now. During an interview with Resident 84 on 8/2/21 at 1:39 p.m., the resident still complained of pain, and stated the pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care to one resident (77) on dialysis (process of removing excess water, solutes, and toxins from the blood in people whose kidneys no longer perform these functions naturally) when the access site for bruit (swishing sound that indicates patency heard by auscultating the dialysis shunt) and thrill (vibration that indicates arterial and venous blood flow and patency felt by palpating the dialysis shunt) for post dialysis were left blank on Resident 77's Dialysis Communication Records, and the licensed nurses did not assess Resident 77's vital signs (reflect essential body functions, including the heartbeat, breathing rate, temperature, and blood pressure) after dialysis as ordered. These failures had the potential for Resident 77 not to receive the appropriate nursing care, delayed detection, and management of complications from the dialysis access site. Findings: Review of Resident 77's admission Record indicated she was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility had a 14.29% medication error rate when five medication errors of 35 opportunities were observed during the medication administrations for two sampled residents (49 and 64). These failures had the potential to negatively affect the residents' health and well-being. Findings: During an observation of medication administration with licensed vocational nurse I (LVN I) on 8/3/21 at 9:03 a.m., LVN I instilled 3 drops of artificial tears (eyedrops used to lubricate dry eyes) in Resident 49's right eye and 2 drops in Resident 49's left eye. LVN I also administered 1 tablet of vitamin D3 25 micrograms (mcg, a metric unit of mass) to Resident 49. Review of Resident 49's physician orders indicated she had orders for artificial tears 0.2-0.2-1% instill 1 drop in both eyes four times a day for eye dryness, started on 4/5/21, and vitamin D3 50 mcg two times a day for vitamin D insufficiency, started on 7/3/21. During an interview with LVN I on 8/3/21 at 9:34 a.m., she reviewed Resident 49's physician order and confirmed she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ staff with the appropriate competency and skills to carry out functions of the food and nutrition service when the kitchen cook (KC) did not properly dip the test strip in the sanitizer water per manufacturer's recommendation. This failure could affect proper washing and sanitation which could cause foodborne illness to the residents in the facility. Findings: During an observation and interview with kitchen cook (KC) on 8/4/2021 at 11:13 a.m., KC was asked to demonstrate the sanitation process using the sanitizer strip when she dipped into sanitized water for two seconds and KC stated she should have dipped the strip for 20 seconds. KC stated the color result was 400 parts per million. During an interview with district dietary manager (DDM) on 8/4/2021 at 11:32 a.m., she stated the sanitizer strip should have been dipped for 10 seconds. Review of the facility's undated policy, Hydrion Quat Dispenser, indicated to dip the strip into the sanitizing solution for 10 seconds and then compare the resulting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the recipe procedure when the cook and kitchen aide did not follow the ingredients for pureed diet. This failure had the potential to decrease food intake and cause weight loss. Findings: During a kitchen observation on 8/4/21 at 11:00 a.m., the kitchen cook (KC) added a scoop of canned ketchup to the blender and the cooked meatloaf for pureed diet. During a concurrent interview with the KC, she stated she added a scoop of canned ketchup to the cooked meatloaf and she did not follow the procedure for pureed diet. During a kitchen observation on 8/5/21 at 11:38 a.m., the kitchen aide added more salad dressing to the blender and marinated mixed vegetables for the pureed diet. During an interview with the director of clinical operation (DCO) on 8/5/21 at 11:59 a.m., she stated the menu procedure should have been followed for pureed diet. During a test tray with the DCO on 8/5/21 at 2:02 p.m., she stated the marinated mixed vegetables was sour. Review of the facility's undated recipe, Salad, Marinated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-06 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During an observation on 8/2/21 at 1:34 p.m., Resident 390 was sitting in his wheelchair having lunch of sliced bread, noodles, meat, vegetables and a slice of regular cake, by himself and consumed about 20 percent of his meal. Resident 390's dietary menu slip for 8/2/21, indicated he would have pureed dinner roll/bread and pureed chocolate chip cake with white frosting. During a concurrent observation and interview on 8/2/21 at 1:34 p.m., with certified nursing assistant H (CNA H), she verified Resident 390 had a slice of regular cake, not pureed chocolate chip cake and he had no pureed dinner roll, but sliced bread instead. Review of Resident 390's Order Summary Report dated 8/3/21, indicated he had an order of Therapeutic Lifestyle Change (TLC) Diet, Dysphagia Mechanical Soft Texture Diet, Nectar Thick Consistency, and large portion entrée, ordered on 7/29/21. Review of Resident 390's admission Record dated 8/3/21, indicated he was a [AGE] year old male with the diagnoses of unspecified dysphagia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose the garbage when the garbage container had no lid to cover it. This failure had the potential to attract pests and transfer harmful microorganism to food leading to foodborne illness to the residents. Findings: During a kitchen observation and interview with kitchen aide D (KA D) on 8/2/2021 at 9:55 a.m., there were garbage bags with flies and no lid for the garbage container. During a concurrent interview with KA D, she stated the garbage container had no lid and should have been covered. During an interview with the maintenance director (MD) on 8/3/2021 at 3:12 p.m., MD stated the garbage container should have a lid to cover the garbage container. Review of the facility's 8/2017 policy, Dispose of Garbage and Refuse, indicated all garbage and refuse will be collected and disposed of in a safe and efficient manner. Appropriate lids are provided for all containers.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WINDSOR — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.4+2.6 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.0+2.0 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WINDSOR NORCAL 13 HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/30/2023
ANTELOPE HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
ROBIN, AARONIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
TRESS, AVROHOMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/30/2023
NEWGEN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
BRUTON, RACHYLIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2003
PATTON, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/02/2014
SHAW, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023
350 IRIS DR PROCO, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025
ANTELOPE REALTY HOLDINGS I, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/15/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$190K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 63%Medicare 13%Other / private 25%

This home reported $190K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$408per resident / day
operating cost
$12,410per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$429per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the California Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in California
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,178/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,000/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 555060. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next