Villa At Stamford, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 78.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 147 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 43% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 128 beds and averages 125.8 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.27 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.67 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure wound care physician recommendations were transcribed accurately. The findings include: F684Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for quality of care, the facility failed to ensure wound care physician recommendations were transcribed accurately. The findings include: Resident #1 had a history of Alzheimer's dementia and urinary incontinence. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/21/23 identified a toe wound. Interventions directed to observe for signs of infection and to provide treatments and dressing changes as ordered. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short- and long-term cognition deficits, and was dependent for ADL care. Nursing note dated 5/23/23 at 3:40 PM identified Resident #1 was seen by MD #1 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, facility documentation review, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for activities of daily living, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include documentation of personal care. The findings include: Resident #1 had a history of Alzheimer's dementia and urinary incontinence. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short- and long-term cognition deficits, and was dependent for ADL care. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 4/21/23 identified a self-care deficit. Interventions directed to provide ADLs and mouth care. Record review of the Personal Hygiene ADL task for May of 2023 identified documentation was missing (blank) on 5/1, 5/5, 5/7, 5/10, 5/11, 5/13, 5/16, 5/17, 5/18, 5/20, 5/22, 5/23, 5/24, 5/25, 5/26 and 5/28/2023 (missing on 16 shifts for the month). Interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DNS) on 4/30/26 at 10:45 AM identified the ADL Hygiene…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation review, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) reviewed for weight loss, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was complete and accurate to include timely meal intake documentation. The findings include: Resident #1 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and anxiety. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicative of being severely cognitively impaired and required maximum assistance for eating. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 6/23/25 identified Resident #1 had an ADL deficit related to Alzheimer's disease and tardive dyskinesia. Interventions directed to feed resident meals. Review of meal intake documentation for Resident #1 identified from 5/25 through 6/23/2025 the meal intakes identified the following: • Resident #1's breakfast was not documented on: 5/27, 5/31, 6/1, 6/10, 6/13,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the clinical record, facility documentation, facility policy, and interviews for two (2) of two (2) residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) reviewed for abuse, the facility failed to ensure that a resident (Resident #1)who had a history of speaking to another resident (Resident #2) in a deragatory manner were free from physical abuse. The findings include: 1. Resident #1 had diagnoses that included impulse disorder, unspecified intellectual disabilities, schizophrenia, and delusional disorder. The annual MDS dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 had short and long-term memory problems, was always incontinent of bowel and bladder, independent with wheeling the wheelchair, and dependent with ADLs. The care plan dated 12/12/24 identified Resident #1 has behavioral problems cries out frequently, diagnoses of developmental delay impulse disorder and delusions, accusatory towards other residents and staff, inappropriate hand gestures and language towards staff and other residents with interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility documentation, and staff interviews for one of three residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse the facility failed to ensure the medical record was complete and accurate to include documentation of visits provided by social services following an allegation of abuse. The findings include: Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following a cerebral infarction. The nursing admission assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #1 was alert and oriented. The Resident Care Plan (RCP) dated 9/4/24 identified Resident #1 had a self-care deficit. interventions directed to provide assistance with ADLS (ADL) and use of 1/4 side rails for bed mobility. Facility incident report dated 9/6/2024 identified Resident #1's family reported an allegation that a NA slapped Resident #1 on the back on 9/4/2024 about midnight. An assessment was completed with no injuries noted. The facility summary dated 9/11/2024…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, facility policy review, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #28) reviewed for dental services and for one sampled resident (Resident #45) with a surgical incision, the facility failed to follow dental orders as a prerequisite for a tooth extraction, and failed to administer the prescribed treatment to the left chest in accordance with the physician's order, The findings include: 1. Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, cellulitis of face, unspecified protein-calorie nutrition, other psychoactive substance dependence, in remission, and other specified anxiety disorders. The speech screen dated 1/19/2021 identified the resident had a mechanically altered diet related to complaints of difficulty or pain when swallowing and the summary identified the resident had a mechanically altered diet, and a swallowing disorder. A recommendation was made for a swallow evaluation. Review of the Speech Therapy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #23) reviewed for accidents, the facility failed to notify the resident's responsible party when the resident had an incident of smoking in their room. The findings include: Resident #23's diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and psychotic disorder with delusions. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 had intact cognition, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, was independent for eating, utilized set up or clean up assistance with oral hygiene and toileting, and required supervision for dressing and personal care. Resident #23's care plan dated 5/20/24 identified an ADL (activities of daily living) self-care performance deficit with interventions that included: limited assistance with a rolling walker on the unit, assistance with bathing/showering, personal hygiene and oral care. The care plan further noted Resident #23 was an elopement…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, review of facility policy, and interviews for one of five sampled residents (Resident #100) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to complete a screening for a resident who required one following short-term approval. The findings include: Resident #100's diagnoses include paranoid personality disorder, delusional disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and major depressive disorder, The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #100 had intact cognition, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent for all activities of daily living (ADL's.) The assessment further noted the resident's diagnoses were depression, psychotic disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Resident #100's care plan dated [DATE] identified the potential for behavioral problems related to paranoia, delusional, accusatory, towards staff makes fallacious statements. Interventions directed to administer medications as ordered, allow time to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, review of facility policy, and interviews for two of two sampled residents (Resident #23 & #45) reviewed for accidents and splints/medical equipment, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan following an incident of unauthorized smoking in the facility and for the use of an Aspen neck collar (a neck brace that limits movement of the neck) and an implanted loop recorder ( a small device that monitor heart's electrical activity that is inserted under the chest skin). The findings include: 1. Resident #23's diagnoses include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and psychotic disorder with delusions. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident #23 had intact cognition, utilized a walker and wheelchair for mobility, was independent for eating, utilized set up or clean up assistance with oral hygiene and toileting, and required supervision for dressing and personal care. Resident #23's care plan dated 5/20/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of the clinical record, review of facility policy and interviews for one sampled resident (Resident #1) or who utilized splints, the facility failed to ensure the resident had splints in place daily as outlined in the physician's orders. The findings include: Resident #1's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, legal blindness, rheumatoid arthritis, and vascular dementia. The Occupational Therapy Evaluation dated 4/1/2024 identified the upper extremity assessment was not tested due to contracture. The evaluation did not contain a rating that identified the degree/severity of the contracture. The MD/APRN progress note dated 6/19/2024 identified Resident #1 was evaluated by Occupational Therapy and identified physical exam findings of right hand in splint due to spasticity, Left hand with carrot. Strength was documented for bilateral upper extremities. The quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] identified Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in CT