Dumont Center for Rehabilitation and Nursing Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 344 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 82.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 294 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 186.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.40 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.27 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (iQIES Complaint 646935) Survey, the facility failed to ensure that residents' comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team periodically and after each comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that a quarterly care plan meeting was held for each resident. This was evident for three (3) (Residents #35, #209 and #149) of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, 1.) Resident #35's Abuse care plan was not reviewed and revised after each assessment, 2.) Resident #209, who had orders for intravenous hydration, had no care plan to address the intravenous fluid therapy, and 3.) Resident #149' quarterly care plan meeting was not held, as a result the resident was not able participate in the review and revision of their comprehensive care plan. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Care Plan dated 11/06/2018…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that food was served at an appetizing temperature during meal service. This was evident for two (2) of six (6) units observed during Dining Observation. Specifically, foods served during lunch meal service were not maintained at palatable and appetizing temperatures. The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled Food Temperatures reviewed 01/2026 documented all hot food items must be served to the resident at the temperature of at least 140 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of resident received the food.The Meal Delivery Schedule Sheet dated 12/07/2025 documented lunch for Unit 1 was served at 11:55 AM and Unit 2 North was served at 12:10 PM.On 01/20/2026 at 11:38 AM, Test trays were requested for 1st floor and 2nd floor. On 01/20/2026 at 11:50 AM, Food truck was delivered to 1st floor, and staff distributed meal trays to residents in the rooms until 12:10 PM.On 01/20/2026 at 12:10 PM, Test trays were conducted with Food Service Director on 1st floor. It revealed the following for Regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (iQIES Incident 646938), the facility failed to ensure that the resident or their representative participated in all aspects of person-centered care planning. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #211) of two (2) residents reviewed for care planning out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #211's representative was not afforded the opportunity to participate in the resident's care planning process. The facility's policy titled Resident Assessment Instrument and Care Planning Process dated 11/06/2025 stated resident and /or resident's family will be invited to attend the interdisciplinary care plan meeting for comprehensive assessments.Resident #211 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included Schizophrenia, Diabetes Mellitus, and Seizure Disorder.The quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented that Resident #211 was cognitively intact. The admission…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated (2680670) Survey, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the New York State Department of Health. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #35) of two (2) residents reviewed for Dignity out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, the Ombudsman reported to the Director of Nursing that Resident #35 alleged that a Nurse Practitioner verbally abused them. The incident was not reported to the New York State Department of Health.Cross Reference F610 Investigate/Prevent/Correct Alleged Violation The findings include: The undated facility's policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (iQIES Complaint 2680670), the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse were thoroughly investigated. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #35) of two (2) residents reviewed for dignity out of 35 total sampled residents. Specifically, on 01/05/2026, the facility received a report from the Ombudsman stating that Resident #35 alleged that Nurse Practitioner #1 verbally abused them. The facility failed to maintain evidence that the alleged violation of verbal abuse was thoroughly investigated. Cross Reference F609 Reporting of Alleged Violations The findings include:The facility's policy titled Investigation protocol for Resident Abuse Cases dated 02/2005 documented that the staff nurse will initiate an incident report and will inform the supervisor. The supervisor will initiate investigation of the incident and will inform the Director of Nursing if there is a potential for abuse. The Director of Nursing will immediately review the case and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (iQIES Complaint 646935) survey, the facility failed to ensure that services provided met professional standards of quality. This was evident for one (1) (Resident #209) of four (4) residents reviewed for Discharge out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #209, who had no discharge order for intravenous therapy, was discharged home with an intravenous access device left in place. In addition, the resident was given discharge medications that belong to a different resident. Cross Reference: F694 Parenteral/Intravenous Fluids The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled Day of Discharge Protocol and Procedure dated 03/18/2025 documented that the licensed nurses are responsible for verifying discharge medications. The policy documented that medications being sent home must be verified by two (2) nurses for accuracy. The licensed nurse must remove all medical appliances as per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-23 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification and Abbreviated (iQIES Complaint 646935) and Recertification survey, the facility failed to ensure that parenteral fluids were administered consistent with professional standards of practice. This was evident for one (1) of four (4) residents (Resident #209) reviewed for Discharge out of 36 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #209 did not receive appropriate care and services for their prescribed intravenous therapy. Medical records lacked ongoing monitoring of the resident's intravenous access device. The findings are:The facility's policy and procedure titled Intravenous Administration dated 12/01/2025 documented: 1) verify provider order: confirm medication/fluid, dose, volume, rate and frequency, review resident allergies. 2) prepare supplies 3) label intravenous bag, date/label intravenous tubing 4) set up intravenous/flow controller 5) start infusion 6) monitor infusion 7) discontinue intravenous: confirm…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 4/24/24 to 5/1/24, the facility did not maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment for 1 of 1 resident's rooms (Resident #44/Unit 3North room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment. Specifically, Resident #44 was in their room and a maintenance staff was repairing the flooring in their room with glue and there was an odor observed. On 4/24/24 at 2:08 PM Resident # 44 was observed lying in bed in their room while maintenance staff was repairing the flooring in their room. The bed was pushed diagonal to access the flooring that the maintenance staff was attempted to reglue, and the glue had an odor. On 4/25/24 at 2:10 PM Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff # 7, was asked if the resident should be in the room while repairs are being done in the room and Staff #7 stated the resident should not be in the room, but resident had an episode of emesis, so they did not want to remove them from room. 04/25/24 02:11 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review and interview during the recertification and abbreviated surveys (NY00333316), the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse and neglect were reported within 2 hours to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse. Specifically, Resident #94's family informed the facility of an allegation of sexual abuse on 2/10/24 and facility reported to New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) on 2/11/24. Findings include: Resident #94 was admitted to facility with diagnoses including diabetes, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, and a displaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 1/31/24 documented Resident #94 had moderately impaired cognition and no behavioral symptoms. Facility Accident/Incident investigation dated 2/10/24 documented that a family member of Resident #94 called the Nursing Supervisor on 2/10/24 around 4 PM, and reported that Resident #94 told them they were molested. Resident #94 stated a man entered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-01 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey from 4/24/24 through 5/1/24, the facility did not ensure a Minimum Data Set Discharge Assessment was completed and transmitted for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #150) reviewed for discharge. Specifically, Resident #150 was discharged from the facility on 2/16/24 and the Minimum Data Set Discharge Assessment had not been done at time of survey. The findings include: The facility policy and procedure titled Resident Assessment Instrument issued 10/1/2023, documented the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) is used, in accordance with specified format and timeframe's, in conducting comprehensive assessments. In addition, the assessment coordinator is responsible for ensuring the Interdisciplinary Team complete timely residents' assessments and reviews in accordance with CMS RAI Version 3.0 Manual, Chapter 2 assessment schedules: 1. admission within 14 days of residents' admission to the facility. 2. Quarterly review at least 92 days. 3.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY