Bensonhurst Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 447 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 84.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 340 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.71 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 198.3 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 19% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/26/2025 to 01/13/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident or the resident's representative(s) were notified of a transfer or discharge and the reasons for the move in writing and in a language and manner they understand. This was evident for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 resident reviewed for Hospitalization, and 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for Discharge out of a sample of 38 residents. Specifically, the facility did not provide written notices of discharge at least 30 days prior to the discharge, and did not send written notices of transfer or discharge to the residents, their representatives, and a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Transfer or Discharge, effective date 06/22/2024 stated prepare a transfer form to send with the resident. Notify the representative (sponsor) or other family member. 1.Resident #6 was re-admitted to the facility on with diagnoses that included Fracture,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025 the facility did not ensure residents' person-centered comprehensive care plans were developed and implemented to meet residents' needs. This was evident for 1 (Resident #238) out of 6 sampled residents investigated for Activities of Daily Living out of 38 sampled residents. Specifically, a care plan to address Activities of Daily Living was not developed and implemented for Resident #238 who required substantial assistance with grooming and personal care. The finding is: The facility policy titled Care Plans - Comprehensive with a revision date of 03/20/2024 stated that an individualized comprehensive care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychological needs is developed for each resident. The policy also stated that each resident's comprehensive care plan is designed to incorporate identified problem areas, reflect treatment goals, and reflect currently recognized standards of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025, the facility did not ensure that residents or their designated representative were afforded the opportunity to participate in their care planning process. This was evident for 1 (Resident #38) of 1 resident reviewed for Care Planning out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, there was no documented evidence that Resident #38 or their representative were given the opportunity to participate in the review and revision of their care plan. The findings are: The facility policy and procedure titled Comprehensive Care Plan Meeting revised 5/30/2022 stated that care plan meetings will be scheduled by the Minimum Data Set Coordinator in accordance with the Minimum Data Set schedule set for each resident. The Comprehensive meeting list will be distributed to appropriate disciplines on a weekly basis by the Social Work Department. Care plan meetings are scheduled by the Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025, the facility did not ensure a resident received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers. This was evident for 1 (Resident #11) of 5 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers out of 38 total sampled residents. Specifically, Resident #11 was observed without a bunny boot, (a pressure-relieving device) on multiple occasions in accordance with the Physician's Order. The findings are: The facility policy titled Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers and Other Skin Conditions initiated 10/19/2024 stated that the facility ensures each resident receives the necessary care and services physical, mental and psychosocial wellbeing, in accordance with the comprehensive assessment and plan of care. A resident skin conditions are assessed upon admission, weekly, and as needed. The policy also stated that prevention and treatment include protecting skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews and conducted during the Recertification Survey and Complaint Survey (NY00331691) from 01/26/2025 to 01/31/2025, the facility did not ensure that sufficient nursing staff were available to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing of each resident. Specifically, the facility reported short staffing on weekends confirmed by a review of the Daily Staffing and the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report. The findings include but are not limited to: The facility policy titled Staffing Levels revised on 02/20/2024 stated that the facility will promote resident quality care and safety by ensuring adequate and competent staffing levels that are based on the Facility Assessment. The Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for the 4th quarter of 2024 (07/01/2024 to 09/30/2024) documented that excessively low weekend staffing was triggered. The Facility Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification/ Complaint Survey from 2/14/2023 to 2/22/2023, the facility did not ensure, to the extent practicable, that residents/resident representatives were involved in developing the comprehensive care plan and making decisions about their care. This was evident for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for Participation in Care Planning out of a sample of 38 residents (Resident # 139). Specifically, the facility did not ensure that residents and resident representatives were afforded the opportunity to participate in the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP) meetings with the interdisciplinary team. The findings are: The policy and procedure titled Care Planning and Notification of Care Plan Meetings to Families and Residents dated January 17, 2022, documented the Social Worker will notify the resident/designated representative of all initial, re-admission, quarterly, annual, significant change care plan meetings and encourage attendance and participation. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2020-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews during recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Specifically, hand hygiene was not performed prior to handling food, and the meat slicer was not properly cleaned after use. This was evident during the Kitchen Observation facility task. The findings are: 1) The undated policy and procedure titled Policy and Procedures for Handwashing, documented that handwashing is to be performed before putting on gloves, after cleaning, after handling trash or other contaminated objects. The undated policy and procedure titled Policy and Procedures for Using Gloves, documented that gloves must be changed or removed before starting another job and Don't forget always wash hands when you change gloves before starting another job. On 02/13/2020 at 08:19 AM, the Dietary Aide (DA #1) was observed touching the trash can lid without gloves as he discarded empty metal pudding cans. He then donned black cleaning gloves and proceeded to clean…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2020-02-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure that housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comvortable interior were provided. Specifically, 6 dirty wheelchairs, dusty and dirty AC units, scratched and chipped furniture, unpatched holes in the wall, torn privacy curtains, and chipped floor tiles were observed on resident units. This was evident for 2 of 6 units observed for the Environment (Units #4 and #5). The findings are: 1) The policy and procedure entitled Policy Title: Wheelchair, Geri Chair, Walkers, Canes dated 1/19/12 documented: Residents' wheelchairs, Geri chairs, walkers and canes are washed on a monthly basis and as needed. A schedule is given to the nursing staff which states when the housekeeper will be on the nursing unit to wash these items. On 02/12/20 at 10:39 AM, during the initial tour of Unit 5, six wheelchairs (w/c) were observed in the hallway lined up against the wall, opposite rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The wheelchairs…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2020-02-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that medications and biologicals drugs were stored, labeled, and discarded in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, (1) antibiotic eye ointment was not removed from the medication cart after the order was discontinued, (2) Enema set and Enema Mineral Lubricant were not discarded after the manufacturers expiration date. This was evident during the observation conducted for the medication cart and room (a cart on the 8th floor and medication storage room on the 4th floor). This was evident for 2 out of 6 floors assessed for medication storage and labeling facility task. The findings are: The facility policy titled Medication Storage dated 9/13/14 documented the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in clean, safe, sanitary, manners. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2020-02-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews conducted during the recertification survey, the facility did not ensure that each resident was treated with dignity and respect during care. Specifically, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) entered a resident room without knocking during medication administration. This was evident of 1 out of 2 residents observed (Resident #408) during medication pass, out of a total investigation sample of 39 residents. The findings are: The facility policy entitled Quality of Life - Dignity, effective 10/18/2016, documented under the section entitled Policy Interpretation and Implementation in number six (6) documented Residents' private space and property shall be respected at all times. Part A documented Staff shall knock and request permission before entering resident's rooms. 1.) Resident #408 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which include: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Atherosclerosis of Coronary Artery, and Hypertension. The Nursing admission progress note dated 2/13/2020 documented resident alert and oriented x 3. On 02/14/20 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY