Bellhaven Center for Rehab and Nursing Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 289 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 235 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 234.7 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.44 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.80 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.54 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2025-09-05 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview during the abbreviated survey (NY00375947) the facility did not review the risks and benefits of bed rails with the resident or resident representative and obtain informed consent prior to installation of bed rails for four (4) of 27 residents (Resident #1, #2 and #3, #4) reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure the bedrails did not pose a risk of entrapment, asphyxiation, suffocation or injury. The facility failed to protect all four (4) residents from the likelihood of entrapment. This resulted in no actual harm with likelihood of serious harm that is Immediate Jeopardy and Substandard Quality of Care to all residents' using bedrails health and safety. The findings are: The facility policy titled Seizure Precautions and Care dated 06/2018, and revised 01/2023, documented Residents with a seizure diagnosis will have bilateral side rails with padding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-07-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews during the Recertification and Abbreviated Survey (NY00303374) initiated on [DATE] and completed on [DATE] the facility did not ensure that each resident receive adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents. This was identified for one (Resident #82) of two residents reviewed for falls. Specifically, Resident #82 required total assistance of two staff members for all areas of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including bed mobility as per the Comprehensive Care Plan (CCP). During morning care on [DATE] Resident #82 fell in their room, when the Temporary Nursing Assistant (TNA) #1 turned the resident on their right side away from them (TNA #1) without the assistance of another staff member. Subsequently, Resident #82 fell from their bed and sustained Bilateral Femur (upper leg) Fractures. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #82 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The facility Policy on Fall Prevention was revised in [DATE], documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews during the abbreviated Survey (complaint # NY00375947) the facility did not ensure it was administered in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified for four (4) (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) of twenty-seven (27) residents with the potential to affect all 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure that the bedrails did not pose a risk of entrapment, asphyxiation, suffocation or injury. Additionally, the facility had blankets and pillows attached with tape to the siderails of four (4) of four (4) residents siderails in place of side rail pads further adding to the likelihood of entrapment. The facility failed to protect all four (4) residents from the likelihood of injury caused by entrapment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the abbreviated survey complaint # (NY00375947) the facility did not ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee developed and implemented appropriate plans of action to correct identified issues with the facility's side rail padding concern identified for four (4) of twenty-seven (27) residents (Resident #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to assess the residents for risk of entrapment from bed rails prior to installation and failed to ensure that the bedrails did not pose a risk of entrapment, asphyxiation, suffocation or injury. Additionally, the facility had blankets and pillows attached with tape to the siderails of four (4) of four (4) residents siderails in place of side rail pads further adding to the likelihood of entrapment. The Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Committee did not address, review, analyze, and act on available data on the identified issue to make improvements and to ensure improvements are sustained.Cross Reference:F 700 F 609The finding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY 00336468) initiated on 8/14/2024 and completed on 8/21/2024, the facility did not ensure that all incidents including an injury of unknown origin were thoroughly investigated. This was identified for one resident (Resident #430) of six residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, on 3/19/2024 Resident #430 sustained a fracture of their left leg, an injury of unknown origin. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the incident to identify the root cause of the injury to rule out abuse, neglect, and mistreatment. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Accidents/Incidents Involving Residents revised in July 2021 documented the facility's aim is to protect all the residents from accidents and incidents. If a resident has an accident, incident, or fall, including but not limited to an injury of unknown origin, appropriate treatment is provided, applicable persons are notified, and there is a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/14/2024 and completed on 8/21/2024 the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. This was identified for one (Resident #132) of two residents reviewed for hearing and vision. Specifically, Resident #132 did not speak English as their primary language. The Comprehensive Care Plan did not identify that Resident #132 had a language barrier. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Language Services dated July 2023, documented that in the event a resident is admitted who does not speak English as their preferred language, the facility will attempt to locate staff that speak the language to communicate with the resident; however, the facility also makes use of a phone service that provides a translator in the language of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the Recertification Survey initiated on 8/14/2024 and completed on 8/21/2024 the facility did not ensure that a Physician reviewed each resident's total program of care, including treatments and medications. Specifically, Resident #132's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form documented the resident is to be intubated (when a tube is inserted through a person's mouth or nose to open an airway) and provided with long-term mechanical ventilation (to use a ventilator for breathing), including tracheostomy (an opening into the trachea from outside of the neck). Resident #132's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form was not reviewed since the form was first completed on 7/20/2023. Resident #132's physician orders documented the resident was not to be intubated, which did not match the Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form. The finding is: The facility's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment policy last revised in March…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews conducted during the recertification survey initiated on 8/14/2024 and completed on 8/21/2024 the facility did not ensure that all residents were provided with medically-related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. This was identified for one of two residents reviewed for Advanced Directives. Specifically, Resident #132's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment dated 7/20/2023 indicated the resident was to be intubated (when a tube is inserted through a person's mouth or nose to open an airway) and provided with long-term mechanical ventilation (to use a ventilator for breathing), including tracheostomy (an opening into the trachea from outside of the neck). The facility did not review/revise Resident #132's Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment form since the form was first completed on 7/20/2023. Additionally, Resident #132's Comprehensive Care Plan and the advance…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (NY00308707) initiated on 7/19/2023 and completed on 7/28/2023, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury are reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) within the required timeframe. This was identified for one of four sampled residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #230 was first identified on 1/14/2023 with a right hip fracture and the facility did not report the injury to the NYSDOH until 1/16/2023. The finding is: The Facility Abuse Mistreatment and Neglect Policy dated 1/2023 documented that the facility will report all instances where there is reasonable cause to believe abuse has occurred as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 7/19/2023 and completed on 7/28/2023, the facility did not ensure that accurate preadmission screening for individuals with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability was conducted. This was identified for one of 35 residents reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). Specifically, Resident # 143 had a Level I (one) PASARR screening partially completed; therefore, the necessity of a Level II screen could not be determined. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) last revised June 2021 documented to obtain a pre-admission screen for all new admissions and to review the PASARR screen for every new admission. Upon acceptance of a new admission from the hospital or community, the admissions staff will be responsible to obtain a PASARR screen prior to admission. The PASARR screen dated 6/9/2023, completed at the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey, initiated on 7/19/2023 and completed on 7/28/2023 the facility did not ensure that each resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive person-centered care plan. This was identified for one (Resident #60) of two residents reviewed for Respiratory care. Specifically, Resident #60, with a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), had a Physician's Order to administer continuous oxygen at 3 liters per minute via a nasal cannula (tubing used to deliver supplemental oxygen). The resident was observed in the dining room with an empty oxygen tank. The finding is: The Oxygen Concentrator/Oxygen Policy last revised on 1/2023 documented that the facility will utilize oxygen concentrators for residents who require long-term oxygen use unless the use for liquefied oxygen is indicated. The use of concentrators will follow general oxygen use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews during the Recertification survey initiated on 7/19/2023 and completed on 7/28/2023, the facility did not ensure a resident requiring dialysis services received such services consistent with professional standards of practice. This was identified for one (Resident #83) of one resident reviewed for Dialysis. Specifically, Resident # 83 received Dialysis services twice per week at a Dialysis Center not located within the facility. There was no documented evidence that ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services was established for Resident #83 from 7/16/2023 to 7/24/2023. The finding is: The facility's policy and procedure titled Dialysis last revised July 2018 documented that the staff will assure the coordination of care and communication with the dialysis center. The facility will be monitoring resident's status before and after dialysis. A dialysis Center/Facility Communication Book will be prepared…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $5.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY