No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westhampton Care Center

78 Old Country Road, Westhampton, NY 11977 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (631) 288-0101 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (631) 288-0101 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Jan 20221 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
80 Riverhead Rd · (631) 288-7746 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
87 Sunset Ave · (631) 288-1897 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Lidl1.8 mi
70 Sunset Ave
Park
700 Stewart Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.2%14.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%5.8%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms98.4%19.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%3.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened6.5%12.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.5%13.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%6.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.9%19.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.3%13.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.6%78.8%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%20.6%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%9.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.931.701.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.451.361.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 817 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
69.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.48U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.25hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 69.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 328 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 28% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.0%CMS range 57.0–63.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 9.2–12.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge69.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge75.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.6%CMS range 4.6–8.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.391.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.84
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.57
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.34
RN hoursweekends
40.9%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 170.2 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.57 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.69 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-10)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-01-11)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2022-01-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review during the Recertification Survey and the Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00276066), completed on 1/18/2022, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one (Resident #364) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #364 required total dependence of two persons for bathing. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5 provided a shower to Resident #364 without the assistance of another staff member. Resident #364 fell out of the shower chair and sustained a fall with a head injury. Subsequently, Resident #364 was transferred to the hospital and was admitted with a diagnosis of a subdural hematoma. This resulted in actual harm to Resident #364 that is not Immediate Jeopardy. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Abuse Mistreatment and Neglect dated July 2019 documented the term neglect shall mean failure to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews during the recertification survey initiated on 6/3/2025 and completed on 6/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that food was stored and/or served in accordance with professional standards for food safety. This was identified during the Kitchen task observation on 6/6/2025. Specifically, there was no system in place to monitor the temperatures of cold food items. The finding is: A facility policy and procedure titled Food Temperature (effective 1/2024), documented How to Keep Cold Food Cold: cold holding equipment (i.e. refrigerator, serving station, salad bar, deli bar) must keep food temperature at 40 degrees Fahrenheit or lower; check product temperature often, as directed. The facility policy contained a Hot Food Temperature Chart that did not include a space to record cold temperatures for food items other than milk. The chart documented All items must be held at 40 degrees or lower/141 degrees or higher. During an interview on 6/6/2025 at 11:44 AM, [NAME] #1 stated they take the food temperature when they set the items on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/3/2025 and completed on 6/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that a comprehensive patient-centered care plan was implemented to include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical and nursing needs. This was identified for one (Resident #143) of one resident reviewed for the environment (Call Bell). Specifically, Resident #143 was admitted with diagnoses that included Legal Blindness and Glaucoma and there was no documented evidence that a care plan was developed to address the resident's visual impairment. The finding is: The facility's Comprehensive Care Plan Policy revised on 11/2019 documented a Comprehensive Care Plan for resident's needs shall be developed within 14 days of admission. The Comprehensive Care Plan meeting (with the inclusion, by invitation, of the resident and /or family) will be conducted within 21 days from admission. Within 14 days of the resident's admission, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/3/2025 and completed on 6/10/2025, the facility did not ensure that all biologicals were stored in locked compartments in accordance with accepted professional principles. This was identified for one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for Dental Services. Specifically, on multiple occasions, Resident #12 was observed with Flonase (Fluticasone) (nasal spray with steroids) 50 micrograms Nasal Spray at their bedside and there was no staff in the vicinity on both occasions. The Flonase order was discontinued by the resident's Physician on 12/9/2024. Resident #12 did not have a physician's order and was not assessed to self-administer their medication. The finding is: The facility's Self-Administration of Medication Policy and Procedure revised in 9/2020 documented that upon determining the resident's desire and ability to self-medicate an order from the attending should be obtained. This order must be specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 6/3/2025 and completed on 6/10/2025, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. This was identified for one (Resident #88) of three residents reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions. Specifically, Resident #88 had a physician's order for Contact Precautions due to Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (antibiotic-resistant bacteria) and Osteomyelitis (bone infection) to the right great toe. During the initial tour on 6/3/2025, the Contact Precautions signage was not posted in a conspicuous location outside the resident's room. A visitor was observed in the resident's room without the use of Personal Protective Equipment and was coming in contact with the resident's bed. The finding is: The facility policy and procedure titled Transmission-Based Isolation, dated October 2024,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews conducted during the Recertification survey initiated on 1/3/2024 and completed on 1/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that each resident was cared for in a manner that maintained or enhanced his or her dignity. This was identified for one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for Dignity. Specifically, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 2 was observed responding to Resident # 12's call bell in an undignified manner. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated September 2019 documented the resident has the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Resident # 12 has diagnoses that include Morbid (severe) Obesity, Generalized Chronic Pain Syndrome, and Osteoarthritis of both knees. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, which indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition. The resident had no verbal or physical behavior problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, conducted during the Recertification survey initiated on 1/3/2024 and completed on 1/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that it promoted and facilitated resident self-determination through support of resident choice. This was identified for one (Resident #12) of one resident reviewed for Choices. Specifically, Resident #12 was observed complaining of pain in their legs to Licensed Practical Nurse # 2 and requested that their heel booties be removed. Licensed Practical Nurse #2 denied the resident's request and walked out of the resident's room without providing an explanation or exploring alternate interventions. Resident #12 was upset and appeared in pain as evidenced by squinting their eyes and pursing their lips. In lieu of Resident #12's response, the surveyor requested Registered Nurse #4 to intervene, who then assessed the resident and removed the resident's heel booties. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated September 2019…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY 00319951) initiated on 1/03/2024 and completed on 1/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that the resident or designated representative was notified when the need to discontinue a treatment was identified. This was identified for one (Resident #149) of one resident reviewed for Notification of Change. Specifically, Resident #149 had a physician's order to administer Heparin (blood thinner medication) 5000 units every 12 hours and Aspirin (blood thinner) 81 milligrams one time daily. The vendor pharmacy identified a drug to drug interaction and a medical alert was generated in the Electronic Medical Record. The Heparin 5000 unit was discontinued as per the resident's physician's orders. There was no documented evidence that the resident or the resident's representatives were notified of the change in the resident's medication regimen. The finding is: The facility's Policy and Procedure titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey initiated on 1/03/2024 and completed on 1/11/2024, the facility did not implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to meet the resident's medical and nursing needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. This was identified for one (Resident #81) of one resident reviewed for Dementia Care. Specifically, Resident #81 with a diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, had a Physician's order to monitor blood sugar via finger sticks every morning and to notify a Physician of blood sugar results of less than 60 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) or greater than 350 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) . There was no documented evidence that Resident #81's finger sticks were performed from 12/15/2023 through 1/08/2024 to obtain the blood sugar levels as per the physician's orders. The finding is: The facility's policy titled, Diabetic Finger Stick Parameters Policy last reviewed in July 2019, documented that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interviews during a Recertification survey initiated on 1/3/2024 and completed on 1/11/2024, the facility did not ensure each resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice in accordance with the resident's plan of care. This was identified for one (Resident #136) of one resident reviewed for Intravenous (IV) access. Specifically, Resident #136 had a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. The physician's orders included measuring the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter length and the resident's arm circumference weekly and changing the injection cap of the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter line access weekly. There was no documented evidence that the physician orders were followed for three of four weeks on the December 2023 Treatment Administration Record. The finding is: The policy and procedure for the Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter line dated July 2019 documented procedures and assessments to include -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interviews conducted during a Recertification Survey initiated on 1/3/2024 and completed on 1/11/2024, the facility did not ensure that food was stored, prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was identified during the Kitchen observation conducted on 1/3/2024. Specifically, the reach-in refrigerator was observed with multiple trays of assorted desserts and nourishments that included three trays of vanilla pudding, one tray of applesauce, two trays of crushed pineapple, one tray of strawberry applesauce, and one tray of butterscotch pudding. The items on the trays were not labeled and dated. The finding is: Facility's policy titled Dating Food last reviewed on 1/5/2023 documented that all refrigerator items will be placed in the refrigerator with labels that identify the items and are dated. All prepared foods will be identified as to the date of preparation. Facility policy titled Food Storage last reviewed on 1/5/2023 documented that all containers of food will be stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews during the Recertification Survey completed on 1/18/2022 the facility failed to ensure an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases including COVID-19 infection was implemented on 2 of 5 nursing units. Specifically, 1) during the medication pass observation on Unit 2 on 1/11/2022, the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #1 did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing medications and checking blood sugar for Resident #26 who was on contact and droplet precautions; in addition, LPN#1 did not wear gloves while administering insulin; 2) on Unit 2 two certified nursing assistants (CNA #1 and #2) did not wear appropriate PPE when adjusting Resident #68 in bed, who was on contact and droplet precautions; 3) on Unit 4, a family member of Resident #55, who was on contact and droplet precautions, was observed exiting the resident's room and walking down the hallway wearing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00277754) completed on 1/18/2022 the facility did not ensure that each resident's representative was immediately informed when there was a need to alter treatment significantly. This was identified for one (Resident #314) of one resident reviewed for choices. Specifically, Resident #314's family member was not informed when the facility staff initiated a gradual dose reduction of the antipsychotic medication, Seroquel, on 5/5/2021. The finding is: The facility Family Notification policy dated 7/2019 documented that the facility must immediately notify the resident's interested family member when there is a need to alter treatment significantly. Resident #314 was admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia, Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features, and Functional Quadriplegia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #314 had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint #NY00276066) completed on 1/18/2022, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment were reported to the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) for one (Resident #364) of four residents reviewed for Accidents. Specifically, Resident #364 was care planned for two-person assistance for bathing. however, the resident was showered only by one Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and was not properly secured with a safety belt while sitting on the shower chair. Subsequently, Resident #364 fell to the floor and sustained a head injury resulting in a Subdural Hematoma. The facility did not report the incident to the NYSDOH. The finding is: The facility's policy titled Abuse Mistreatment and Neglect dated July 2019 documented the term neglect shall mean failure to provide timely, consistent, safe, adequate, and appropriate services,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews during the Recertification Survey and Abbreviated Survey (Complaint # NY00277754) completed on 1/18/2022 the facility did not ensure that all residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #314) of one Resident reviewed for choices. Specifically, Resident #314 had a history of receiving Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) per day in the community. Resident #314 was hospitalized after a fall at home and was discharged to the facility with recommendation to receive Seroquel 37.5 mg total daily. The facility Physician prescribed Seroquel 12.5 mg daily without obtaining Resident #314's history for Seroquel usage and did not obtain a psychiatry consult until 20 days after the gradual dose reduction when the resident started to exhibit behavioral changes. The finding is: The facility's Gradual Dose Reduction and Psychoactive Medication policy dated 7/2019 documented all residents on psychoactive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
BOEHM, SHLOMOIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF80%since 01/01/2018
SCHLESINGER, ERNESTIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF17%since 01/01/2018
GREYSTONE FUNDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 12/27/2019
ANREDER, LEWISIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
BRADY, KELLYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
MAZZIE, KRISTINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
MONTANARO, JANEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
VINITSKY, AVROHOMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
HOOPER, PATRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/10/2019
KLEIN, BARUCHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018
LEVI, SHLOMOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$35.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$5.5M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 49%Medicare 35%Other / private 16%

This home reported $5.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$501per resident / day
operating cost
$15,243per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$590per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NY

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New York Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New York
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,729/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,110/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 335782. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next