Lincoln Park Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 769 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 401 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 547 beds and averages 527.4 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.41 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents on 3/19/2026 and 3/24/2026, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe environment to ensure adequate supervision to prevent the elopement of a resident (Resident #2). Resident #2, who was noted to exhibit in the presence of staff exit seeking behavior, was transferred to a secure unit on 03/04/2026. Resident #2 also had a Wander Guard in place since admission to the facility since 2024. This device would initiate an alarm and alert staff in the event of an attempt to leave the secured unit. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 (Resident #2) reviewed for elopement. During the survey a finding that constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified under CFR 483.12(a) (1) for F689. The facility failed to maintain a safe environment on a secured unit with adequate supervision to prevent an elopement of Resident #2 who was a known elopement risk. On 03/08/2026, between 9:00 PM-10:00…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to prepare resident meals in the proper consistency for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #53, #224, and #326) reviewed on a modified diet during dining observation.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/8/25 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #53 in the 2nd floor dining room. Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA#1) provided Resident #53 with their lunch tray. The surveyor observed the resident received whole French fries. Surveyor interviewed CNA#1, who stated Resident #53's diet is chopped consistency. CNA#1 cut Resident #53's French fries to the chopped consistency prior to eating.On 12/8/25 at 12:19 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #53's electronic medical record (E-mar). A review of the resident's Face sheet (FS) (an admission summary) revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: dementia (loss of cognitive functioning thinking,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — widespread
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that resident's dietary preferences were consistently implemented and followed for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #53, #134, #224, #326 and #501) reviewed for dietary preferences during meal observations.This deficient practice was evidenced as follows:1. On 12/8/25 at 12:17 PM, the surveyor was observing the lunch meal on the second-floor dining room. The surveyor observed Resident #53's tray, per the tray ticket, Resident #53 was supposed to receive an egg salad sandwich, 1/2 cup fortified mashed potatoes and 4 ounces (oz) sherbet, all three items were missing from the resident's tray. On 12/8/25 at 12:19 PM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #53's electronic medical record (E-mar). A review of the resident's Face sheet (FS) (an admission summary) revealed Resident #53 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included: dementia (loss of cognitive functioning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness.On 12/04/25 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director observed the following during the kitchen tour:1. In preparation area #1, the surveyor observed dietary aide (DA#1) and the Chef both wearing hooped earrings. DA#1 stated hooped earrings are ok as long as they do not hang down to your shoulders.2. In the walk-in freezer, the surveyor observed multiple items stored higher than 18 inches from the ceiling and a full tray of meatloaf labeled with a use by date of 12/2/25. Per the FSD the meatloaf was mislabeled and the 12/2/25 date was when the item was placed into the freezer and was not the use by date but would dispose of the meatloaf due to the mislabeling. 3. In the walk-in refrigerators, the surveyor observed two containers of egg salad and tuna salad with use by labels dated for 12/3/25. Per the FSD those items should have been disposed of yesterday.On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-15 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for residents, staff, and the public by failing to keep the dumpster and surrounding area free of garbage and debris.This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following:On 12/4/25 at 9:24 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) toured the kitchen and garbage area and found the following: There was garbage debris that included carboard, food wrappers, food containers, cups, gloves, paper products, plastic bottles, medication cups, and around the dumpster and surrounding areas. The FSD stated the maintenance department should have cleaned the area.On 12/4/25 at 1:24 PM, the FSD provided the surveyor with a facility policy titled, Refuse Receptacle/Dumpster Use with a revised date of December 2008. The policy interpretation and implementation revealed, 4. Outside dumpsters provided by garbage pickup services will be kept closed and free of surrounding litter.On 12/10/2025 at 1:50 PM, the surveyor met…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident's call device was readily accessible. The deficient practice was identified for 8 of the 35 residents (Resident #3, 6, 9, 13, 135, 209, 365, and #481) reviewed for reasonable accommodations of needs/preference.The deficient practices were evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/8/25 at 7:30 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #135 in bed. The surveyor observed that the call bell was wrapped around the light, on the wall above the bed, which was not within the resident's reach. A review of Resident #135's admission Record reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to; dementia and schizophrenia (a brain disorder that disrupts how a person thinks, behaves, and feels, leading to a distorted perception of reality). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 9/17/25, reflected that the resident had a brief interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents on 4 of 13 units and was evidenced by the following.On 12/10/25 at 9:10 AM, the surveyor knocked on the door of room W218 and asked Resident #11 if he could inspect their bathroom. The surveyor entered the bathroom in W218 and observed approximately a 7-foot white trim molding, one urinal, and one bucket inside the bathtub. The bathtub which contained staining in the front near the faucet. On 12/10/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor showed the picture of the bathroom to the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator who stated that those items should not be inside the bathtub and that he was going to the room and have the items removed. The surveyor toured Unit 3 [NAME] on 12/04/2025 at 11:30 AM. On 12/4/25 at 11:30 AM, the surveyor observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] that the bathroom floor, toilet seat, and toilet bowl were heavily soiled with a yellow substance. On 12/4/25 at 11:33 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed (a).to ensure that a medication was administered according to the physician orders (PO) and acceptable standards of practice in accordance with the New Jersey Board of Nursing. This deficient practice was identified in 2 of 34 residents (Resident#7 and Resident #11) observed during the medication review and 1of 6 residents (Resident #584) observed during medication administration and b) accurate reconciliation and administration of narcotic medication with potential for drug diversion.Repeat deficiency The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a communication device for Resident #468 identified with a language barrier. This deficient practice was identified for one (1) of six (6) residents (Resident #468) observed during the medication administration and was evidenced by the following: Reference: According to the manufacturer's specifications for Breo Ellipta (fluticasone furoate and vilanterol trifenatate powder) section 2.3 Administration Information: After inhalation, the patient should rinse his/her mouth with water without swallowing to help reduce the risk of oropharyngeal candidiasis (fungal infection in the mouth, and the throat). On 12/9/25 at 8:30 AM, the surveyor observed the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) prepare medications for Resident #468 that included, Breo Ellipta 100-25 milligram (mg), give 1 puff by mouth, one time a day for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD; a progressive lung condition that blocks airflow, making breathing difficult). The physician order for Breo was started on 4/16/25.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #2561471 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility-provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that incontinence care was provided to dependent residents in a timely manner for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #302, #320, and # 275) observed for incontinence care on 1 of 2 units (3rd-floor North Nursing Unit).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/8/25 at 7:30 AM, the surveyor completed an incontinence tour on the 3rd floor Nursing Unit and observed the following: 1.On 12/8/25 at 8:06 AM, the surveyor, accompanied by the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) observed Resident #302 in bed. The CNA exposed Resident #302's incontinence brief, and the surveyor observed that it was saturated with urine. The CNA confirmed that the brief was saturated with urine. A review of Resident #302's admission Record reflected that the Resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Repeat Deficiency Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policies it was determined that the facility failed to clarify the medication route for a resident from the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) monthly medication review for 1 of 6 Residents, (Resident #425).The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/4/25 at 11:19 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #425 in their bed with their eyes closed. The surveyor observed an enteral feeding machine (delivers liquid nutrition through a flexible tube directly into the stomach or small intestine) and enteral feeding (TF) products at bedside.On 12/4/25 at 11:45 AM, the surveyor reviewed Resident #425's electronic medical record (e-MAR) which revealed the following: A review of Resident #425's admission Record (an admission summary) documented that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to; dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made surgically for the introduction of food), and unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,645 — penalty dated 2026-03-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $7.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ