Our Ladys Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 61.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 134 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 54% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 214 beds and averages 182.0 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 12/16/2024 at 10:08 AM during initial tour surveyor # 2 observed pillowcases tucked in the window of the bathroom on unit B room [ROOM NUMBER]. Also observed on unit B in room [ROOM NUMBER] A-side, surveyor # 2 observed the wall next to the bed with scratches and peeling paint. On 12/19/2024 at 09:54 AM during a tour of the Unit C and D nourishment room surveyor # 2 observed the following: 1. Under the sink there was a water bottle with a blue substance not labeled and a sponge open to air. 2. The ice machine was observed with white stains on the front and the tray was filled with water and rust was noted on the rack in the tray. 3. A stack of 3 paper cups were observed facing up and open to air. During an interview on 12/19/2024 at 09:57 AM with surveyor # 2, Registered Nurse/Unit manger #1 (RN/UM) said that the cups should be facing down to keep germs out. The RN/UM #1 also said that the blue substance was his/her own personal dish soap and that it should not have been in there. She removed the bottle and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-12-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all medications and biologicals were stored and labeled properly in medication carts. The deficient practice was identified for 4 of 5 medication carts reviewed under the Medication Storage and Labeling Task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/16/2024 at 12:47 PM, the surveyor inspected the D-Hall medication cart. At that time, the surveyor observed two, loose tablets in the second drawer of the medication cart. Secondly, the surveyor observed one, multi-use vial of Insulin Lispro (fast-acting medication used to treat blood sugar levels) and one, multi-use vial of Lantus (long-acting medication used to treat blood sugar levels) undated. Lastly, the surveyor observed loose vials of Heparin (medication used to thin the blood) placed in a plastic basket with the insulins. At that time, during an interview with the surveyor, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) # 1 said they [insulins] should be dated. She also removed the Heparin vials…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of a resident, specifically by having the resident's call device on the floor while the resident was in bed. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident # 320) reviewed under the Environmental Task. A review of Resident # 320's admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record revealed a diagnoses of but not limited to, Osteomyelitis of Vertebra, Sacral and Sacrococcygeal Region (Infection of the bone). On 12/16/2024 at 10:15 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 320 in bed. At that time, their call device was on the floor, outside of reach of Resident # 320. On 12/20/2024 at 9:40 AM, the surveyor observed Resident # 320 in bed. At that time, their call device was on the floor, outside of reach of Resident # 320. On 12/23/2024 at 9:15 AM during an interview with the surveyor, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator said the facility provided education regarding call devices to the Certified Nurse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility A.) failed to maintain medication records that were complete with staff signatures according to professional standards of clinical practice. This was identified for 1 of 32 residents reviewed (Resident #23) and it was determined that the facility B.) failed to follow the physician orders with regard to medications (meds) with parameters for 1 of 34 residents (Residents #51) reviewed. This deficient practice was identified by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case-finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide nail care to a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). This deficient practice occurred for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #122) reviewed for nail care and was evidenced by the following: On 12/17/24 at 12:38 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 sitting on the edge of their bed. The surveyor observed resident's both arms were shaking, and their nails were long, squared (Square shape) with sharp edges. On 12/18/24 at 11:47 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #122 sitting in their bed. Resident #122's nails were long, squared with sharp edges. Resident #122 stated I don't remember when my nails were cut last, and further stated, I am going to ask my family to bring me a nail cutter. On 12/18/24 at 11:54 AM, during an interview with the surveyor, the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) stated his responsibilities included feeding, bathing, and providing ADL care, such as grooming, shaving the resident, and cleaning…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medication administration times were sequenced to accommodate a resident's hemodialysis (HD) schedule in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed on hemodialysis (Resident #43), and was evidenced by the following: On 12/18/2024 at 09:17 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #43 in their room. Resident #43 stated that the facility gets him/her to dialysis on time. The surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #43. The medical reflected Resident # 43 had a primary diagnosis of but not limited to anemia and end stage renal disease. A review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, dated 12/1/2024 which reflected that the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and that the resident received hemodialysis (a procedure that uses special equipment to clean the blood). The care plan reflected an intervention to confer with physician and/or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-31 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the physician responsible for supervising the care of residents A.) conducted face-to-face visits and wrote progress notes at least every thirty days for the first ninety days of admission, B.) were seen by the physician or nurse practitioner every thirty days with a physician visit at least every sixty days. This deficient practice was observed for 4 of 34 residents (Resident #51, #52, #119, and #122) reviewed for physician visits. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1.) A review of Resident #51's hybrid (electronic and paper) medical records (MR) from May 2024 - December 2024 revealed the following: The admission Record reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but weren't limited to hypertension (high blood pressure), End Stage Renal [kidney] disease, Schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, and Anemia. A review of the quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to use appropriate infection control practices specifically, by staff not wearing a personal-protective gown while entering a room under Contact Precautions. The deficient practice observed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident # 320) reviewed for Transmission-Based Precautions under the Infection Control task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: Use personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately, including gloves and gown. Wear a gown and gloves for all interactions that may involve contact with the patient or the patient's environment. Donning PPE upon room entry and properly discarding before exiting the patient room is done to contain pathogens. https://www.cdc.gov/infection-control/hcp/basics/transmission-based-precautions.html A review of Resident # 320 admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnoses of but not limited to, Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY FACILITY F812 Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to handle potentially hazardous food and maintain sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 11/14/2023 at 9:20 AM the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. Upon entry to the walk-in refrigerator a previously opened box contained shelled eggs. The box was open, and the eggs were exposed. The box was sitting on the floor of the walk-in refrigerator. 2.- In addition, a bulk bottle of Ranch dressing and a bottle of bulk BBQ sauce were previously opened. The bottles did not have an open or use by date. A pan contained Jello and was covered with clear plastic wrap. The pan of Jello was undated, and the plastic wrap did not completely cover the Jello, exposing it to the air. 3. On a middle shelf of the walk-in refrigerator a white…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a clean, safe and sanitary environment. This was identified for 3 of 4 units and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of B hall on 11/14/2023 at 10:58 AM the surveyor observed the following; -privacy curtain between the beds in room B 09 had dark stains on it. -The floor at foot of A bed had a dark orange/brown stain. -The floor was observed to have brown pieces of debris scattered on it. -There was no foot board on A bed. On 11/15/23 at 9:23 AM, the surveyor observed the radiator cover between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] on B hall in disrepair, with chipped paint. Multiple doorways into resident rooms on B hall observed with chipped paint. During a tour of A hall on 11/17/2023 at 9:19 AM, the surveyor observed the following: -A Hall door jams where they meet floor were observed to have dark areas for rooms 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, and 14. -The privacy curtain in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ