Bishop McCarthy Center For Rehab & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 153 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 175.1 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.43 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  COMPLAINT #2572162 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 7/31/25 and 8/1/25, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident with cognitive impairment who required assistance with all activities of daily living and accompaniment to outside doctor's appointments and was sent to an out-of-state doctor's appointment and eloped. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). On 7/23/25 at 10:15 A.M., Resident #1 was sent to an out-of-state (OOS) doctor's appointment unaccompanied via medical transport. At 4:00 P.M., the facility received a telephone call from the OOS provider's office that Resident #1 could not be located. The facility received another telephone call on 7/24/25 at 8:30 P.M., that the resident was found at a nearby park approximately twenty-eight and a half hours later. Resident #1 was transported to the hospital and admitted for five days with an acute kidney injury that was likely due to dehydration and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain kitchen sanitation in a safe and consistent manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 06/06/2025 from 09:54 to 10:27 AM the surveyor, accompanied by the Food Service Director (FSD), observed the following in the kitchen: 1. Upon entry to the kitchen the surveyor went to observe the high temperature dish machine that was actively washing dishes at the time. The surveyor requested to see the dish machine temperature log. The June 2025 Dish Machine Temperature Log indicated that on 6/6/25 at breakfast the high temperature dish machine had the following temperatures prior to washing dishes: Wash = 180 and Rinse = 16 (confirmed by FSD to be 160 degrees Fahrenheit(F)). The surveyor asked the FSD what the minimum temperatures were for the wash and rinse on the high temperature dish machine and the FSD replied wash was to be at least 160 degrees F and rinse was to be at least 180 degrees F. On 06/06/2025 at 10:06 AM the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive plan of care for a resident on long-term use of anti-depressant and anti-psychotic medications. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #81) reviewed for behavioral and emotional care and was evidenced by the following: On 6/6/2025 at 10:36 AM, during the initial tour of the facility, Resident #81 was observed by Surveyor #1 resting in bed fully dressed but did not respond to the surveyor's greeting. On 6/9/2025 at 9:11 AM, Surveyor #2 observed the resident awake in bed and fully dressed. The resident did not engage in conversation with the surveyor. On 6/9/2025 at 11:00 AM, Surveyor #2 reviewed the electronic medical record for Resident #81. A review of the admission Record revealed that the resident had diagnoses which included but were not limited to dementia, bipolar disorder (a mental illness characterized by extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels), and depression. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to; a) ensure proper administration of medication during medication pass observation for 1 of 4 residents observed (Resident #164); b) document the notification to the physician when a medication was not administered as ordered for 1 of 2 residents sampled for dialysis (Resident #24); c) administer pain medications within scheduled parameters on various shifts for 1 of 3 residents investigated for pain management (Resident #141); d) provide antibiotic therapy according to a physician's orders for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for antibiotic therapy (Resident #222), in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was evidenced as follows: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint # NJ181256 Based on observation, interview, review of closed medical records and review of other facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a resident with pressure ulcers the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcer development for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #222). The evidence was as follows: On 6/11/2025 at 12:37 PM, the surveyor reviewed the closed electronic medical records (EMR) for Resident #222 who had been discharged from the facility. A review of the admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #222 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but limited to, acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot, orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, complete traumatic amputation of two or more left lesser toes, and Type 1 Diabetes. A review of the Minimum Date Set, an assessment tool, dated 12/31/2024, indicated that Resident #222 was cognitively intact and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to store medications securely in their packaging inside the medication cart. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 8 medication carts reviewed under the Medication Storage task. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/9/2025 at 12:00 PM, in the presence of Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1), the surveyor inspected the short hall medication cart. The surveyor found 3 loose tablets. LPN #1 stated that there should not be loose medications in the cart. On 6/9/2025 at 12:12 PM, in the presence of LPN #2, the surveyor inspected the long hall medication cart. The surveyor found 11 loose tablets. LPN #2 stated that there should not be loose medications in the cart because it was a safety hazard and sanitation issue. On 6/16/2025 at 1:50 PM, during an interview with the survey team, the Director of Nursing stated that there should not be loose pills in the medication carts. A review of the facility-provided policy titled Medication Storage dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to prevent the potential for cross contamination by not initiating and implementing Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms) for a resident with an infected wound in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines and standards of clinical practice. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #166) reviewed for pressure ulcers and was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated 6/28/2024, EBP are recommended for residents with indwelling devices or wounds . because devices and wounds are risk factors that place these residents at higher risk for carrying or acquiring a MDRO (multidrug-resistant organisms) and many residents colonized with a MDRO are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-26 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint #: NJ00175475 Based on observations, interviews, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation on 09/26/2024, it was determined that the facility failed to follow standards of clinical practice for documenting the administration of medication in the electronic Medication Administration Record (MAR). The facility also failed to follow its policy titled Administering Medications. This deficient practice was identified for 26 of 29 residents reviewed on MAR and was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 09/26/2024 at 10:00 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 (one) of 2 (two) residents (Resident # 100) reviewed for respiratory services. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the admission Record (AR) Resident #100 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, cerebral infarction (stroke) and chronic respiratory failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 02/23/24, indicated that the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive to total care with all aspect of activities of daily living (ADLs). The MDS also indicated that the resident required tracheostomy care (a surgical opening in your neck that delivers oxygen to your lungs). On 03/18/24 at 10:13 AM, during tour, the surveyor observed Resident #100 lying in bed with a tracheostomy (trach). The resident was pleasant and did not have any complaints. The resident communicated by typing on his/her phone. The surveyor did not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint: NJ171634 Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to serve hot and cold foods at an acceptable temperature for the residents. This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 3 nursing units (Third Floor Dining Room) during the lunch meal service. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 03/27/24 at 11:15 AM, the surveyor met with the Dietary Director (DD) in the kitchen and informed her a temperature test tray was requested for the Third Floor. On 03/27/24 at 11:31 AM, the dining staff started plating trays for the food cart for the Third floor. The surveyor observed the DD calibrate a digital thermometer in a cup of ice water, and the temperature read 32 degrees Fahrenheit (F). On 03/27/24 at 11:43 AM, the surveyor observed the cook plate a regular meal and the DD tested the food temperatures on the test tray: Sliced roast beef, 144.9 degrees F. Mashed potatoes with gravy, 146.5 degrees F. Mixed vegetables, 146.5 degrees F. Individual cups of pineapple chunks, 60.3 degrees…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility documentation it was determined that the facility failed to maintain equipment and kitchen areas in a manner to prevent microbial growth and cross-contamination. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 03/18/24 from 09:43 AM until 10:33 AM, the surveyor toured the kitchen in the presence of the Dietary Director (DD) and observed the following: 1. On the clean pots and pans drying rack, there were two sets of two 4-inch long pans nested, with clear liquid between the pans. The DD acknowledged that the pans were wet nested and stated that it was important to make sure the pans were dried correctly for bacterial prevention. 2. On the clean pots and pans rack there were: two large red cutting boards with brown smudges and scratches; one white cutting board with brown stains, black smudges, and scratches; one green cutting board with black smudges; two white cutting boards with brown stains and black smudges; and one dark green cutting board with black smudges and scratches. The DD acknowledged the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ