St Francis Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 135 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 53% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 273 beds and averages 252.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.51 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.41 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observation, review of clinical record, and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents/resident's next of kin/legal guardian/power of attorney are notified of changes in resident's care related to ankle monitoring bracelet for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R175). Review of facility policy on notification and change of condition, revised May 2025, revealed that the facility shall utilize a notification process when there is change in the resident's medical condition and or status. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the residents' representative Review of Resident R175's clinical record revealed that Resident R175 has a diagnosis of anxiety disorder (intense, excessive, persistent worry or fear) and unspecified dementia (decline in memory or other thinking skills severe enough to reduce a person's ability to perform everyday activities). Observation conducted on June 2, 2026, at 11:24 a.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide written notice of a room change for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R105). Findings Include:Review of Resident R105's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was cognitively intact. Interview with Resident R105 on June 2, 2026, revealed on May 28, 2026, his/her room was moved from room [ROOM NUMBER] to room [ROOM NUMBER]. Resident R105 further reported being unhappy with the room move and was not informed why he/she needed to move.Review of Resident R105's entire clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the resident or resident representative were notified of the room change and subsequent response from the resident or resident representative.Interview with the Director of Nursing, Employee E2, on June 2, 2026, confirmed there was no documented evidence of the room move process/notification to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide proper notification to the physician in a timely manner for one of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R26).Findings Include:Review of Resident R26's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 14, 2026, revealed the resident has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status - cognitive assessment) Score of 7 (severe cognitive impairment) and diagnoses of anemia (lack of healthy red blood tissues), osteoarthritis (degenerative joint disease) , and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body). Resident R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Continued review of Resident R26's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident required partial/moderate assistance from staff for rolling left/right and sitting to lying.Review of Resident R26's comprehensive care plan revealed the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff and resident interviews it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete, accurate, and thorough investigation of alleged abuse and neglect for two of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R37 and R26). Findings Include: Review of facility policy Abuse Prevention/Reporting revised February 25, 2025, revealed the facility will investigate of all suspected cases of abuse. Further review of the facility policy revealed the facility will collect written documentation such as signed witness statements, statements of accused personnel, medical records, incident reports and other pertinent information. Review of Resident R37's quarterly MDS (an assessment of resident needs) dated May 3, 2026, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and diagnosed with obstructive uropathy (blockage in the urinary system). Review of the MDS revealed Resident R37 used a supra pubic catheter for urinating (a tube inserted through a small…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observation, interviews with resident and staff it was determined that the facility failed to provide quality of care in accordance with physician orders for two of 37 residents reviewed (Resident R287 and R78). Findings Include: Review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the tongue (tongue cancer) and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories, leading to loss of fat and muscle). Continued review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed a physician order dated May 24, 2026, to use Infuvite Adult Intravenous (IV) Solution (multiple vitamin) at 80 milliliter/hour (ml/hr) intravenously one time per day. Further review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed a physician order dated June 2, 2026, for Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution 0.9% (Sodium Chloride - used to maintain fluid and electrolyte balance) administered at 75 ml/hr…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to obtain a physician order for tracheostomy size for one of one resident reviewed with tracheostomy (Resident R2).Findings:Review of facility policy Tracheostomy Care revealed tracheostomy tubes should be changed as needed or as ordered. Preparation and assessment include checking the physician order. Review of Resident R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated May 1, 2026, revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of respiratory failure (not enough oxygen passes from your lungs to your blood). Review of Resident R2's MDS revealed the resident received tracheostomy care (a surgically created hole in your trachea that allows for breathing).Review of Resident R2's care plan revised June 11, 2025, revealed the resident had altered respiratory status related, but not limited to, tracheostomy and pulmonary edema.Observations on June 3, 2026, at 12:30 p.m. revealed Resident R2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals were labeled in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 37 residents observed (Resident R287).Findings Include:Review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses of malignant neoplasm of the tongue (tongue cancer) and protein-calorie malnutrition (inadequate intake of protein and calories, leading to loss of fat and muscle).Continued review of Resident R287's clinical record revealed a physician order dated May 24, 2026, to use Infuvite Adult Intravenous (IV) Solution (multiple vitamin) at 80 milliliter/hour (ml/hr) intravenously one time per day.Further review of Reisdent R287's clinical record revealed a physician order dated June 2, 2026, for Sodium Chloride Intravenous Solution 0.9% (Sodium Chloride) administered at 75 ml/hr intravenously every shift for four days.Observations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, observations, and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program related personal protective equipment for one of 37 residents observed (Resident R2).Findings Include: Review of facility policy on personal protective equipment revealed that personal protective equipment appropriate to specific task requirements is available at all times. Further review of facility policy revealed employees required to perform tasks that may involve exposure to blood/body fluids will be provided appropriate protective clothing and equipment. Review of Resident R2's clinical record revealed that Resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of, but not limited to, Anoxic Brain Damage (when the brain is deprived of oxygen) and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (the lungs cannot supply enough oxygen to the blood). Observation conducted on June 5, 2026, at 9:52 a.m. revealed that an enhanced barrier…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-18 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Facility failed residents with food preferences.Based on interviews with residents, observations of the food service and a test tray evaluation, interviews with dietary staff, reviews of policies and procedures and reviews of resident council and food committee meeting minutes, it was determined that each resident was not receiving foods and drinks to accommodate their individualized preferences. Appealing food and drink options of similar nutritive value were not being planned and provided on facility menus. (Residents R58, R47, R164, R145, R 207, R208, R220, R77, R117, R196, R64, R194, R144, R219, R86, R50, R234 and R115). Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled resident food committee dated March 2020 revealed that the facility staff were responsible for supporting the food committee established by the residents. The purpose of the residents meeting was to review the menus planned by the Food and Nutrition Department, review special food activities and give the residents a chance to voice concerns about facility food. The policy also said the food service…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in a safe manner during medication administration. Findings include: Review of facility policy on Medication Storage date March 2020, section Policy Statement revealed that the facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation #1. The nursing staff shall be responsible for maintaining medication storage AND preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. #2. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. #3. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals unless permitted by the physician. #7. Drugs shall be stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Each resident's medications…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA