No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

St Martha Center For Rehabilitation & Healthcare

470 Manor Ave, Downingtown, PA 19335 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (610) 873-8490 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (610) 873-8490 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
5033 Horseshoe Pike · (610) 518-2195 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
142 Wallace Ave # 106 · (484) 593-4321 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Mill Town Square, 150 E Pennsylvania Ave · (610) 935-1444 · Call to confirm hours
Park
403 Lloyd Ave · (610) 384-0600 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.3%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.5%6.2%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms46.4%10.8%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%3.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.2%17.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.9%20.0%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%93.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.8%25.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.1%17.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine43.7%68.7%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.0%22.5%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.3%9.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.551.621.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.821.181.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 133 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

32.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
55.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.42U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF32.9%CMS range 26.1–43.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.2–13.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge55.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified87.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.381.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.34
RN hours/ resident / day
1.02
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
48.1%
Total nursing turnover
20.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 108.8 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

12 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of the facility's policy, a clinical records review, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comprehensively investigate an injury of unknown origin for one of the two residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings: A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Prevention/Reporting, revised on February 25, 2025, revealed that procedures have been developed and implemented to properly screen, report, protect, investigate, and correct issues relating to abuse. Staff are trained to determine types of abuse, stress management tips, and recognition of signs and symptoms of abuse, which may include, but are not limited to, the following: bruises, skin tears, welts, etc., of unknown origin, unexplained injuries. The same policy revealed: The following is a list of methods to be used to conduct the investigation: Review of records; Observe and interview residents, staff members, accused personnel, witnesses, family members, and visitors; Compile written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility's policy, clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to comprehensively and accurately assess pain and provide pain management for one of two residents reviewed (Resident 1). Findings:A review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management, revised date May 2024, revealed Procedure in recognizing pain: Observe the resident during rest and movement for physiologic and behavioral (nonverbal) signs of pain. Evaluating pain: During the pain evaluation gather the following information; characteristic of pain (1) Intensity of pain (as measured on a standard pain scale) (2) description of pain (3) pattern of pain (4) location of pain and (5) frequency, timing and duration of pain. The same policy revealed Implement the medication regimen as ordered, documenting the results of the intervention.A review of Resident 1's diagnosis list includes Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA- An interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain), Alzheimer's disease (irreversible, progressive degenerative disease of the brain,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding oxygen and catheter care for 1 of 8 resident's reviewed (Resident 10).Findings include: Review of Resident 10's face sheet revealed medical diagnoses that include Obstructive and Reflex Uropathy (blockage in urinary tract), Urine Retention, Atrial Fibrillation (irregular often very rapid heart rhythm). Review of Resident 10's physician orders revealed orders dated September 5, 2025, to provide foley catheter care every shift. Review of Resident 10's December 2025, Medication Administration Report (MAR), revealed orders for foley catheter care every shift were not followed on December 2, 2025, day and evening shift, December 4, 2025, day shift, December 5, 2025, day shift, December 7, 2025, day shift, December 8, 2025, evening shift, December 9. 2025, day shift, December 12, 2025, day and evening shift, December 13, 2025, day shift, December 15, 2025, evening shift, December 20, 2025, evening shift, December 21, 2025,evening shift, December 22, 2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a review of facility policy, observations, clinical records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for two of 22 residents reviewed (Resident 86 and 164). Finding include: A review of the facility's policy regarding Enteral Nutrition, dated March 2020, revealed adequate nutritional support through enteral feeding will be provided to residents as ordered. A review of Resident 86's clinical records revealed medical diagnoses that include Dysphagia following other Cerebrovascular Disease (swallowing disorder that occurs after a stroke or other neurological disease), Muscle Wasting and Atrophy (loss of muscle mass), and Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (inadequate protein or calories in diet). Review of Resident 86's clinical records revealed a physician order dated January 9,2025, for Jevity 1.5 at 40ml/ per hour x20 hours via Kangaroo pump (pump that delivers nutrition through a tube inserted in the stomach or intestine that's programmed with desired feed rate and volume), total volume 800ml per day or until infused.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure appropriate indications and non-pharmacological interventions were provided before administering as-needed anti-anxiety medications for two of five residents reviewed (Residents 3 and 22). Findings include: A review of Resident 3's physician's order dated May 24, 2024, revealed an order for Ativan (anti-anxiety medication) gel 1mg/ml applied to the base of the neck topically two times a day for Anxiety. On September 24, 2024, an order for Ativan gel 1mg/ml applied to the neck every eight hours as needed for anxiety was ordered aside from the routine Ativan gel. A review of the November 2024, Medication Administration Record revealed that from November 1, 2024, until November 30, 2024, as needed Ativan gel was administered to Resident 3 seven times with no appropriate indication and was administered five times without attempting a non-pharmacological intervention. A review of Resident 22's physician's order dated January 16, 2025, revealed an order for Clonazepam 0.5 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, facility policy and procedure review, and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to obtain weights to maintain residents' nutritional status for four of 14 residents reviewed. (Residents 26, 74, 109, and 113) Findings Include: Review of facility policy and procedure titled Resident Weights, revised May 2022, revealed the nursing staff will measure residents' weights during the admission process which can take up to 24 to 48 hours from admission date. If no weight concerns are noted at this point, weights will be measured monthly thereafter. Weights will be recorded in each resident electronic medical record. Any weight change of 5% or more since the last weight assessment will be retaken. If the weight is verified, nursing will notify the Dietitian. Review of Resident 26's diagnosis list revealed a diagnosis of Diabetes (group of metabolic disorders characterized by a high blood sugar level over a prolonged period), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA- Stroke), Cerebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review, resident and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan intervention to prevent alteration in nutrition and hydration for one of eight residents reviewed (Resident R14). Findings include: Review of R14's records revealed a care plan dated May 12, 2020, documenting the resident has potential for self-care deficit. Interventions included resident requires eating assist x one person. Further review of R14's records revealed a care plan dated May 12, 2020, with a revision date of November 17, 2023, documenting R14 has the potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration. Intervention dated March 29, 2022, documented the need for staff to assess R14's ability to prepare food/fluids and feed self. Interventions also included the need to offer the resident assistance as needed. An intervention dated September 6, 2023, documented the need for adaptive equipment: lipped plate with meals. Observation of R14 on January 10, 2024, at 09:02 AM, revealed the resident having difficulty eating. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility failed to complete a discharge summary for a planned discharge for one of one residents reviewed. (Resident 112) Findings Include: Review of Resident 112's Physician Orders revealed an order dated January 8, 2024 for the resident to be discharged to a group home on January 8, 2024. Review of Resident 112's entire clinical record revealed there was no discharge summary completed upon discharge. Interview with the Director of Nursing on January 12, 2023 at 11:30 a.m. confirmed there was no discharge summary completed upon the discharge of Resident 112. 28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee 28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(2)(3) Management 28 Pa. Code 211.12(c)(d)(3) Nursing services

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician orders regarding medications were followed for two of the 24 residents reviewed (Residents 26 and 97). Findings include: Review of Resident 26's diagnosis list revealed a diagnosis of Diabetes (group of metabolic disorders characterized by a high blood sugar level over a prolonged period), Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA- Stroke), Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA- An interruption in the flow of blood to cells in the brain). Review of Resident 26's clinical records revealed Resident 26 had a Gastrostomy Tube (GT- A tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) due to Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident 26's physician order (POS) revealed an order initiated on December 20, 2023, for Insulin Gargline (Long-acting insulin) Subcutaneous Pen-Injector 100 unit/ml Inject 24 units subcutaneously at bedtime. Review of Resident 26's December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed resident was not administered with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy services provided medications timely for two of the 24 residents reviewed. (Resident 26 and 102) Finding include: Review of Resident 26's clinical record revealed Resident 26 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 26's physician order (POS) dated December 20, 2023, revealed an order for Onfi Oral Suspension (A medication used to treat seizures) 2.5 mg/ml given 3 ml every 12 hours for Seizures. The medication was scheduled for 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. Review of Resident 26's December 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the Onfi medication was not administered to the resident until the morning of December 25, 2023, five days after the medication was ordered. MAR review revealed that the resident had missed a total of nine doses of the Onfi medication. Interview with the Director of Nursing was conducted on January 12, 2024. The DON reported that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical records review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that laboratory test was obtained as ordered by the physician for one of the 24 residents reviewed (Resident 35). Findings include: Review of Resident 35's diagnosis list includes Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation (A-fib- An irregular, often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). Review of Resident 35's clinical records review revealed resident was receiving Jantoven (Warfarin) for blood clot prevention. Review of the Physicians order dated October 23, 2023, revealed an order for PT (Prothrombin Time- a test that measures how long it takes for a clot to form in a blood sample) and INR (International Normalized Ratio- a type of calculation based on PT test results) every other day, call the physician for INR >3, INR<1.5. Review of Resident 35's clinical records revealed that INR was done on October 25, 2023, but failed to reveal that the INR test was done on October 27, 2023. Clinical records review failed to reveal that the physician was notified that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-29 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, observations, and facility documentation review it was determined the facility failed to have adequate number of dietary staff to meet the needs of the residents. Findings Include: Interviews conducted with Resident R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 on August 29, 2023 between 9:15 and 9:50 a.m. revealed the breakfast trays are always late for the residents and arrive between 9:15 a.m. and 10:15 a.m. Observations of the breakfast tray delivery on August 29, 2023 revealed the last tray was delivered to a resident on the 600 hall at 10:10 a.m. Observation of the dining room during the breakfast meal revealed the dining room was not being used and a sign was posted to the door that it opens at 8:15 a.m. Interview with Dietary Director Employee E3 on August 29, 2023 at 10:35 a.m. revealed the kitchen was short staffed the day of the survey. The kitchen should be staffed with three staff on tray line, on staff member to pushed the completed carts to the units and one cook and one dishwasher, today the kitchen was staffed with one staff on tray line, on to push…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to CENTER MANAGEMENT GROUP — 16 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 53.2+1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.9+1.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 15 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.2★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BOEHM, CAROLINEIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/28/2023
GROS, CHARLES-EDOUARDIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/28/2023
GREYSTONE FUNDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/19/2020
ALLEN, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2014
BLACKWOOD, ROHANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/20/2022
LEVI, SHLOMOIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
PETROSKI, EDWARDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2018
KATARIA, VINODIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/31/2024
KLEIN, BARUCHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/03/2014
MARINO, BRANDIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/22/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+6.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 17%Other / private 12%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1 paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$458per resident / day
operating cost
$13,936per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$490per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Pennsylvania
$11,954/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$13,688/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,480/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395815. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next