Boynton Beach Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 307 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 170 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 74% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 168 beds and averages 143.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.50 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rights for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #96), as evidenced by the failure to provide showers in a dignified manner and access to the call bell.The findings included:Review of the policy titled, Procedural Guidelines, Shower, updated 09/2023, documented, in part, For a shower, place shower chair in shower for support.Review of records revealed that Resident #96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Hemiplegia following Cerebral Infarction affecting Left Non-Dominant side and Right Below Knee Amputation (BKA). Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #96 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 on a 0-15 scale indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The current care plan initiated 01/27/26 revealed Resident #96 required Substantial/ Maximal assistance of one for bathing.During an initial interview on 03/24/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0675 — failed to support quality of life — isolated
  Honor each resident's preferences, choices, values and beliefs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of life for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #108) as evidenced by the failure to assist with positioning in bed for meals.The findings included: Review of the record revealed that Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Rheumatoid Arthritis. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #108 required set- up assistance for eating and partial to moderate assistance for transitioning from lying to sitting in bed. The MDS also revealed that Resident #108 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 on a 0-15 scale indicating the resident had intact cognition.During an initial interview on 03/24/26 at 8:10 AM, Resident #108 was asked if she was in a good position to eat her breakfast and she stated, no, but I do not want to bother anyone. Resident #108 had her bedside table over the bed with her breakfast tray on the table and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow up on physician ordered urine culture for 1 of 3 sampled residents for urinary tract infections (Resident #4). The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had mild cognitive impairment and required partial/moderate assistance with activities of daily living.A review of Resident #4's orders revealed an order dated 03/19/26 for a urinalysis with culture. Further review of the resident's orders revealed an order for intravenous (IV) antibiotics dated 03/19/26.A review of Resident #4's records on 03/26/26 revealed no results for the ordered urine culture on 03/19/26.An interview was conducted with the Nurse Practitioner (NP) on 03/26/26 at 10:00 AM. The NP stated she expected staff to follow up with the ordered urine culture to identify the specific organism of the infection to ensure Resident #4 was receiving the appropriate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistive devices for 1 of 8 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to provide 2-handled cup to Resident #108.The findings included:Review of the policy titled, Rehabilitation Space, Equipment, & Supplies, revised on 08/2023, documented in part, 8. Resident specific equipment is issued by the treating therapist who provides instruction in the use of the equipment, and who documents the resident's response to the equipment in the medical record.Review of the record revealed that Resident #108 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Rheumatoid Arthritis. Review of Physicians' orders revealed an order dated 10/08/24 for Resident to receive 2 handled cup and scoop plate at all meals.An interview was conducted on 03/24/26 at 8:34 AM when Resident #108 was eating breakfast and had one 2 handled cup filled with orange juice and a regular coffee mug filled with tea. Resident #108 stated that it is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a resident with active wounds and a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line, for 1 of 6 sampled residents on EBP (Resident #3); and facility failed to implement infection control practices for a resident with a urinary catheter, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1.) The findings included: 1) Review of the policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions Chapter: Infection Prevention and Control revised 06/13/24 documented Enhanced Barrier Precautions are indicated . 2. Wounds, and/or indwelling medical devices even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with a Multi-Drug-Resistant Organism (MDRO). Indwelling devices: Indwelling urinary catheters, Gastronomy-feeding tubes, Central lines including PICC, Midline, tracheostomy tubes . Review of the record revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility 04/16/25. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) evaluation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, safe, clean, and comfortable interior for 2 of 3 resident units (200 and 300), 1 of 1 physical therapy room, and 1 of 1 main dining room. The findings included: During the initial resident tours conducted by the surveyors on 10/07/24 - 10/08/24, and the Environment Tour conducted with the Director of Maintenance on 10/11/24, the following were noted: 200 Unit: room [ROOM NUMBER]: Large areas of peeling room wallpaper, and numerous small black holes to room floor. room [ROOM NUMBER]: Exterior of wood bed frame in disrepair (A-bed). room [ROOM NUMBER]: Room floor had large cracks in the linoleum, exterior pf wood bed frame in disrepair (A-bed), Room floor stained and in disrepair, exterior of over-bed tables (X 2) stained and rust laden, room walls in disrepair, and exteriors of room dressers (x 2) worn, broken, and in disrepair. room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-14 · tag F0920 — pattern
  Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the main dining room space was not being properly utilized during meal service for 40 of 40 facility residents. The findings included: During the observation of the lunch meal in the Main Dining Room (MDR) on 10/07/24 at 12 PM, it was noted that the entire dining room space was not being utilized for the meal service. Specifically, approximately only half of the dining space was being utilized for the residents(38 wheelchair bound) . During the meal observation it was noted that 40 residents were in attendance and numerous residents complained and became upset and angry due to having their wheelchairs moved from their table so other residents in wheelchairs could get into the dining area. During the observations, three sampled residents (Resident 's # 40, #57 and #127 ) complained to the surveyor of constantly being moved during meal services (Lunch & Dinner). Staff (A, D, and E) were also noted to state to the surveyor about the difficulty the residents have constantly repositioning/moving during meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide 1 (Resident #127) of 1 sampled residents with the right to choose schedules and make choices that include sleeping and waking times. The findings included: On 10/07/24 at 1 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident #127, in the Main Dining Room (MD) concerning issues at the facility. The alert and oriented resident stated that she would like to be able to attend the breakfast meal in the MDR (8:30 AM) but staff will not get her up, provide morning care and dressed until 10 AM after numerous requests. The resident also stated that she is late for Skilled Therapy sessions daily, which are scheduled at 10 AM. She has repeatedly requested from nursing to be ready for the therapy session but this also has not been resolved. Following the interview the surveyor stated to the resident to request from nursing staff to be up and prepared for the breakfast meal in the MDR on 10/08/24. On 10/08/24 at 8:30 AM the surveyor observed the resident in her room who was awake and in bed. Staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities on an ongoing basis for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #62 and #81). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy Activity Program, revised 08/2023, documented: Each center provides an ongoing program of activities designed to meet (in accordance with the comprehensive assessment) the interests and physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Document the resident's participation in activities or refusal to participate in activities in the progress notes as need. 1. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included Dementia and Stroke. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent for activities of daily living. Resident #62 was care planned for person-centered care, with an intervention enjoys participating in their favorite activities. A record review for Resident #62…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to address high blood glucose levels for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #195). The findings included: Resident #195 was admitted to the facility for respite care on 09/20/24- 09/23/24. A review of Resident #195's orders revealed an order dated 09/20/24 for sliding scale insulin Novolog before meals and at bedtime. The resident was to receive 2 units of insulin for blood glucose level of 251-400. A review of Resident #195's blood glucose levels revealed a level of 438 on 09/22/24 at 6:51 AM. Further record review did not reveal any documentation of physician notification of a blood glucose level outside of the parameter of greater than 400. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/14/24 at 12:00 PM. The DON stated for a sliding scale insulin order, it will usually document to call physician if the blood glucose level is greater than 400. The DON further stated even if there was no order to call for a blood glucose level greater than 400, the nurse should have called as that was the standard of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $850K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL