No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Royal Oaks Nursing And Rehab Center

2225 Knox McRae Dr, Titusville, FL 32780 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (321) 267-0060 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (321) 267-0060 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 9 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (30% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
766 Country Club Dr · (321) 264-1052 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2175 Cheney Hwy · (321) 268-0911 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Publix0.9 mi
2000 Cheney Hwy · (321) 267-9606 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2115 Knox McRae Dr · (321) 759-7601

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.0%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%0.7%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.3%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.9%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened1.0%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.6%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control1.2%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table2.3%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.4%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.9%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.812.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.991.151.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 549 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
90.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.75U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.36hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 90.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 274 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.3%CMS range 53.5–61.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.5%CMS range 11.2–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge90.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge82.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge87.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.3%CMS range 6.7–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.60
RN hours/ resident / day
1.08
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.32
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.00
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.25
RN hoursweekends
30.0%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.00 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.32 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.22 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.74 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-25)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

9 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for all residents who ate their meals in the west wing dining area, by serving the resident's meals on serving trays at the table in an institutional manner.Findings:On 2/22/26 at 12:56 PM, during meal observation on the west wing, 5 residents were observed seated at the tables in the dining area. Each resident was noted to have a serving tray on the table in front of them which contained the lunch meal. The plates, cups, bowls and eating utensils remained on the tray and were not removed from the tray at the table.On 2/23/26 at 1:00 PM, during meal observation on the west wing, 7 residents were observed seated in the dining areas. Staff were observed as they served meals to residents on serving trays. Staff placed the trays on the table in front of each resident but did not remove items from the tray. A family member visiting one of the residents in the room was observed as she removed the items from the serving tray in front of the resident and placed them on the table in front of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct medication self-administration assessment to ensure safety for 3 of 5 residents reviewed for choices out of a total sample of 34 residents, (#31, #55, #75).Findings 1Resident #31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, congestive heart failure and chronic kidney disease.Review of the medical record showed the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/16/26 revealed resident # 31 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 14 out of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. The MDS also revealed that the resident's vision was adequate and she wore corrective lenses.Physician's orders included Refresh Tears Ophthalmic Solution 0.5 % (Carboxymethylcellulose Sodium (Ophthalmic)) and nurses were directed to instill 2 drops in both eyes two times a day for dry eyes.On 2/22/26 at 12:19 PM, resident #31…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement resident-directed care and treatment consistent with the resident's physician orders for removal of a central venous catheter for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for intravenous lines and for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for limited range of motion, of a total sample of 34 residents, ( #6,#70).Findings: 1.On 2/22/26 at 11:43 AM resident #6 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. Resident was noted to have a single lumen midline to her right upper arm with a date of 2/20/26 on the dressing. Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dislocation of internal right hip prosthesis, infection following a procedure, and non-pressure chronic ulcer. Review of Infectious Disease note 2/20/26 revealed that on 2/3/26 the resident was assessed and her left buttocks wound was noted to be red and a foul smell. An order was given for culture and sensitivity of left buttock wound which was positive for Proteus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a catheter drainage bag per infection control standards, to prevent contamination and the spread of infection for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for a bladder catheter of a sample of 34 residents. Findings:Resident #14 was admitted to the facility 1/30/26 with diagnoses of congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, urinary retention, peripheral vascular disease, right femoral embolism, & chronic kidney disease. On 2/22/26 at 10:35 AM, resident #14 was asleep in his chair, his catheter bag on the ground. At 12:12 PM he sat in his chair, and the urine collection bag was on the floor. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed that resident #14 was cognitively intact, used a walker with minimal supervision, and needed moderate assistance for activities of daily living. The resident's care plan from 12/20/25 contained a goal of decreased risk of signs and symptoms of a urinary tract infection (UTI) and other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain food cooking equipment in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent physical contaminants that may inadvertently enter food eaten by the residents of the facility. Finding: On Sunday, 6/23/24, at 10:58 AM, the facility's kitchen was inspected with the facility cook. The deep fryer was not clean with food debris noted on the metal surfaces of the deep fryer. Inside the fryer itself, food debris particles were observed floating on top of the cooking oil, almost covering the entire surface. The cooking oil was very dark colored and appeared not to have been changed for some time. The cook verified the condition of the deep fryer and stated she had not used the deep fryer this morning and explained it was usually used for cooking chicken and french fries. When asked about the cleaning schedule for the cooking equipment, the cook said she did not know the last time the deep fryer had been cleaned or the cooking oil changed.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a systematic approach to ensure residents were not over hydrated due to health conditions and followed physician ordered fluid restrictions to promote the highest practicable outcome for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition/hydration issues, of a total sample of 38 residents, (#5). Findings: On 6/24/24 resident #5 was observed in his room on the [NAME] Wing of the facility at approximately 1:34 PM. The resident was awake with some confusion and his wife was in the room with him. She explained her husband was incontinent and it took a long time for staff to change him. The resident's wife indicated her husband had not been in the facility very long and hoped he would return home. She expressed concern he was about to change rooms and be placed in a room on the East Wing where the staff were not familiar with her husband's care. Medical record review revealed resident #5's most recent admission to the facility on 6/09/24. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity related to missing front teeth affecting the resident's self-esteem for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dignity, out of a total sample of 52 residents, (#53). Findings: Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including polyneuropathy, and major depressive disorder. On 12/12/22 at 11:39 AM, resident #53 stated she lost her upper partial denture back in June, 6 months ago. She recalled she filed a grievance at that time and was told the facility would pay to have it replaced. She stated she had not seen a dentist and explained she had never been without teeth and really wanted to have the partial denture replaced. On 12/14/22 at 3:48 PM, resident #53 clarified it was the [NAME] Wing Unit Manager who told her the facility would pay to replace her partial denture. She noted she was unsure why it was taking so long to have the denture replaced. Resident #53 stated she had been a public speaker and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-15 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for dental services, out of a total sample of 52 residents, (#53). Findings: Resident #53 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of polyneuropathy, cardiac pacemaker and major depressive disorder. On 12/12/22 at 11:39 AM, resident #53 stated she lost her upper partial denture 6 months ago, in June. She recalled she filed a grievance at that time and was told the facility would pay to have it replaced. She stated she had not seen a dentist since that time and added she had never been without teeth and wanted to have the partial denture replaced. On 12/14/22 at 2:01 PM, the Social Services Assistant (SSA) confirmed a grievance was filed June 15, 2022. She stated she did not know what happened to resident #53's partial denture but a replacement was in the works. On 12/14/22 at 3:04 PM, the Social Services Director (SSD) stated when a resident reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline/interim care plans in a timely manner related to intravenous (IV) antibiotics and psychotropic medication use for 1 of 1 newly admitted resident reviewed for IV antibiotic therapy and mood/behavioral services of a total sample of 52 residents, (#311). Findings: Resident #311's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses of severe sepsis, alcohol induced pancreatitis, enterocolitis due to clostridium difficile toxin, pneumonia, and alcohol withdrawal delirium. Resident #311 was observed on 12/12/22 at 10:35 AM, lying in bed with his spouse sitting at the bedside. He was noted to have a right upper arm IV line with bag of antibiotics (Vancomycin) currently infusing via IV pump and empty bag IV antibiotics (Zosyn) hanging from pole. The wife said he had been on a lot of drugs to help manage his anxiety and agitation. On 12/13/22 at 3:40 PM, resident #311 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.2+0.8 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Abercorn Rehabilitation CenterSavannah, GA 1 of 5Sunnybrook Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Lake Worth Rehabilitation CenterLake Worth, FL 2 of 5Monroe Rehabilitation CenterMonroe, NC 2 of 5Pinellas Point Nursing And Rehab CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 2 of 5Riviera Palms Rehabilitation CenterPalmetto, FL 2 of 5Rocky Mount Rehabilitation CenterRocky Mount, NC 3 of 5Bayshore Pointe Nursing And Rehab CenterTampa, FL 3 of 5Lanier Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Lincolnton Rehabilitation CenterLincolnton, NC 3 of 5Medicana Nursing And Rehab CenterLake Worth, FL 3 of 5Port Orange Nursing And Rehab CenterPort Orange, FL 3 of 5Raleigh Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 3 of 5Tiffany Hall Nursing And Rehab CenterPort Saint Lucie, FL 3 of 5Treyburn Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 4 of 5Atlantic Shores Nursing And Rehab CenterMelbourne, FL 4 of 5Bonifay Nursing And Rehab CenterBonifay, FL 4 of 5Boulevard Rehabilitation CenterBoynton Beach, FL 4 of 5Braden River Rehabilitation Center LLCBradenton, FL 4 of 5Hunters Creek Nursing And Rehab CenterOrlando, FL 4 of 5Metro West Nursing And Rehab CenterOrlando, FL 4 of 5Northdale Rehabilitation CenterTampa, FL 4 of 5Ocala Oaks Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Orange City Nursing And Rehab CenterDebary, FL 4 of 5Pettigrew Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 4 of 5Sarasota Point Rehabilitation CenterSarasota, FL 4 of 5Silas Creek Rehabilitation CenterWinston-Salem, NC 4 of 5Warner Robins Rehabilitation CenterWarner Robins, GA 4 of 5Zebulon Rehabilitation CenterZebulon, NC 5 of 5Arbor Trail Rehab And Skilled Nursing CenterInverness, FL 5 of 5Boynton Beach Rehabilitation CenterBoynton Beach, FL 5 of 5Crestview Rehabilitation Center, LLCCrestview, FL 5 of 5Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, NC 5 of 5Fort Walton Rehabilitation Center, LLCFort Walton Beach, FL 5 of 5Jacksonville Nursing And Rehab CenterJacksonville, FL 5 of 5Macclenny Nursing And Rehab CenterMacclenny, FL 5 of 5Marianna Health And RehabilitationMarianna, FL 5 of 5Moultrie Creek Nursing And Rehab CenterSaint Augustine, FL 5 of 5Palm City Nursing & Rehab CenterPalm City, FL 5 of 5Parkview Rehabilitation Center At Winter ParkWinter Park, FL

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2014
CRONQUIST 2015 FAMILY TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2015
JOHN J NOTERMANN BUSINESS TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/12/2017
MANGINE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2012
BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/23/2014
FL ROYAL OAKS HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/19/2009
HEALTH SERVICES PROPERTIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/19/2009
CHERY, DAWNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/08/2017
GERRITY, HENRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2014
KAAR, SUSANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2003
SOUTHERN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2003
CRONQUIST, ROYCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2018
MCKINNEY, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
MELTON, DONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2009
NOTERMANN, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
OCHOA, ALUINOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2020
NOTERMANN, BRENDAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/28/2025
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE DISBURSEMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/19/2009
KELLY, MICHELLEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$16.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$805K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 29%Other / private 15%

This home reported $805K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$366per resident / day
operating cost
$11,118per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105793. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next