Atlantic Shores Nursing And Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 119 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.67 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.29 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment for 6 out of 12 resident rooms on the South wing, resulting in an environment that did not promote resident comfort and safety.Findings:During environmental tours conducted between 6/08/26 and 6/11/26 on the South wing of the facility, the following observations were made:1. In room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, a hole on the wall above the baseboard with crumbling dry wall between beds A and B was observed on 6/08/26 at 9:30 AM, on 6/09/26 at 2:30 PM, and on 6/10/26 at 11:10 AM. On 6/08/26 at 9:30 AM, the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] bed B said she did not recall how long the hole in the wall above the baseboard was there, but she did not like to see the hole on the wall. 2. In room [ROOM NUMBER]-B, the wall next to the bed had been patched but an area measuring approximately 1 foot by 1 foot was still not sanded nor painted on 6/08/26 at 9:40 AM, on 6/09/26 at 12:47 PM, and on 6/10/26 at 11:25 AM.3. In room [ROOM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain an effective infection prevention and control program to prevent the spread of infection by ensuring staff performed hand hygiene while assisting the residents in the dining room before, during and after lunch, in one of two dining rooms of the facility, (South wing). Findings:On 6/08/26 at 11:30 AM, residents were sitting in the South wing dining room in their wheelchairs waiting for the lunch meal service. On 6/08/26 at 11:52 AM, two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA)s and the Infection Prevention nurse (IP) were in the dining room providing beverages to the residents, setting up the residents' lunches in preparation for them to eat their meal. Staff placed items from each resident's meal tray to the table, helped to open the condiment packages and cut up food items for several residents. CNA F brought the lunch tray from the tray cart to a resident sitting at a table, cut the resident's food then opened the condiment packages for that resident. The CNA returned to the tray cart where the other residents' lunch…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise and review a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the resident's needs for their highest well-being, for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for hearing/sensory aids, of a total sample of 41 residents, (#88, and #14).Findings: 1. Review of the medical record revealed resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and brain bleed.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/05/25 showed section B-hearing revealed resident had minimal hearing difficulty/difficulty with some environments and no hearing aids present. Section C for memory recall showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13 out of 15, which meant the resident had normal cognitive function.Review of the MDS Quarterly assessment with ARD of 3/24/26 showed section B hearing revealed resident had a minimal hearing difficulty/difficulty with some…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-11 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice that took account of the resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers which could cause re-traumatization of the resident, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for diagnosis of Post Traumatic Disorder (PTSD), of a total sample of 41 residents, (#11).Findings:Resident # 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included wedge compression fracture of T11-T12 vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia and PTSD.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date of [DATE] showed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status Score of 8 out of 15, which indicated her cognition was moderately impaired. The assessment listed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-11 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely review pharmacy consultant recommendations and implement the physician's revised medication order for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, of a total sample of 41 residents, (#5).Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #5, an [AGE] year-old male was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 5/25/24. The resident's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, history of pulmonary embolism, and dementia with psychotic disturbance.The most recent Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 4/28/26 indicated during the look-back period, resident #5 had severely impaired cognitive daily decision making skills, short term and long term memory problems, was dependent on staff to complete activities of daily living/functioning, able to propel himself in a wheelchair up to 150 feet, and sustained one fall with minor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, nurses failed to follow physician's orders and failed to monitor condition changes in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for Change of Condition, of a total sample of 4 residents, (#4). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #4, an [AGE] year old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE], re-hospitalized on [DATE], and re-admitted from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke), aphasia (language communication dysfunction), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), end stage kidney disease, seizures, encephalopathy (brain dysfunction), hypertensive (high blood pressure) urgency, dialysis dependence, anemia, primary hypertension, and coronary (heart) artery disease (CAD). The Minimum Data Set 5-Day assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 11/06/24 showed during the look back periods, resident #4 scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct medication self-administration assessment to ensure safety for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medications, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#57). Findings: Resident #57 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including pneumonitis due to inhalants of food and vomit, adult failure to thrive, hypertensive heart disease, anemia, CVA with Left-sided hemiparesis. Review of the Minimum Data Set admission assessment with an assessment reference of 8/30/24 revealed resident #57 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 2 out of 15, which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. On 9/23/24 at 11:59 AM, resident #57 was observed lying on her back in bed watching television. Her nightstand had a square basket with personal items, including a bottle of 15 millimeter (ml) Visine eye drops and B& C Ointment wound dressing with a 60-gram tube observed at the bedside. The resident, unable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses administered Intravenous (IV) medications according to physician's orders for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for Quality of Care and Treatment, of a total sample of 10 residents, (#1). Findings: A review of the medical record revealed resident #1, a [AGE] year old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses of fractures of the right arm and shoulder, severe aortic (main heart artery) valve stenosis (narrowing), severe malnutrition, need for assistance with personal care, and osteoporosis. On 2/09/24, she was diagnosed with a stage four pressure wound to her sacrum (tailbone), sacral osteomyelitis (infection of bone), deep tissue pressure wounds to her left and right heels and ankles, and a non-pressure wound to her right elbow. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Modified admission assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 1/19/24 noted resident #1 scored 15 out of 15 for the Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to involve residents and/or their representatives in the care planning process for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for care planning of a total sample of 42 residents, (#19, #44, #67). Findings: 1. Review of resident #19's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, depression, and anxiety. Review of resident #19's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Change in Status assessment with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 9/08/22 revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0 which indicated she was severely cognitively impaired. On 12/20/22 at 9:29 AM, during a telephone interview, resident #19's daughter and Power of Attorney (POA) stated she had only been invited to and attended one care plan meeting since her mother was admitted to the facility. She explained the care plan meeting was held around the summer time and she had not heard of any other care planning meetings since then. On 12/20/22 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2022-12-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for 1 of 1 resident receiving oxygen, failed to follow physician ordered dosage for oxygen administration for 2 of 2 residents, and failed to monitor water in the oxygen humidifier for 1 of 1 resident out of 8 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy of a total sample size of 42 residents, ( 89, 551, 76, 38). Findings: 1. Resident #89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety disorder, vascular dementia, and transient ischemic attack. Review of the resident's medical record showed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] that did not show oxygen therapy. Review of the care plan dated 9/26/22 showed no focus, goals, or interventions for oxygen. Review of the resident's physician orders active and discontinued from 9/26/22 to current showed no orders for oxygen. On 12/19/22 at 10:49 AM and 12:16 PM, resident #89 was noted with oxygen via nasal cannula infusing at 2 liters per…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $659K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL