Lake Worth Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.49 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 80% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-06-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record and policy review; the facility failed to ensure reporting of 2 of 2 incidents involving events with major injuries both affecting 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #11) reviewed for accidents. The findings included: The facility's Abuse and Neglect Prohibition policy effective 10/24/22 and revised 8/2023 revealed, The center will report such allegations to the state, as per state/federal regulation. The center will report immediately but no later than 2 hours after forming the suspicion of the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury. The center will report reportable investigation findings in accordance with State law, including to the state survey agency within 5 days of the incident, and if the alleged violation is verified, appropriate corrective action will be taken. The surveyor requested a policy on falls and was told by Staff D, Registered Nurse, Regional Nurse Consultant on 06/13/25 at 2:49 PM that there is no fall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review; the facility failed to thoroughly identify and investigate the alleged witnessed fall and unwitnessed fall for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #11). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Change in Condition effective 1/2023 and updated 9/2023 revealed All completed incident reports must be forwarded to the Director of Nursing and Administrator for review within 24 hours of the event. The facility's Abuse and Neglect Prohibition policy effective 10/24/22 and revised 8/2023 revealed The center will investigate any alleged abuse/neglect or misappropriation of resident property in accordance with state or federal law. A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Unspecified; Unspecified dementia; and Anxiety. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 7 on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to collect a urine test to rule out a urinary tract infection (UTI) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment, required substantial/maximum assist with activities of daily living and had been on antibiotics. A review of Resident #1's physician orders revealed an order dated 01/09/26 for urinalysis. Further review of the resident's records did not reveal the urinalysis was ever collected. Furthermore, there was no indication the physician was notified, nor a documented reason the urinalysis was not collected.An interview was conducted with Resident #1's power of attorney (POA) on 02/09/26 at 12:00 PM. The POA stated Resident #1 was prone to have UTIs. The POA further stated the resident started to exhibit familiar signs to her of developing a UTI, and she asked the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident had a current order for a nebulizer treatment medication, failed to secure that medication observed at the bedside for 1 of 16 sampled residents receiving nebulizer treatments (Resident #85), and failed to ensure the resident received a psychotropic medication at the prescribed time for 1 of 4 sampled residents observed for medication administration (Resident #85). The findings included: Resident #85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Anxiety Disorder. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score on a quarterly Minimum Data Set with a target date of 05/01/25 was 15. This indicated she was cognitively intact. On 06/10/25 at 10:19 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #85. The resident stated she is supposed to get a medication for anxiety early in the morning and she never gets it early. She stated she feels…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to prevent complications for a resident who received enteral feeding. This affected 1 of 1 sampled resident, (Resident #300), who was reveiwed for enteral feeding (tube feeding). This had the potential to affect 4 residents who were dependent on enteral feeding for nutrition at that time. The findings include: A review of the facility's Procedural Guidelines for Enteral Nutrition effective 01/2023 stated that the nurse must administer the enteral feeding regimen according to the formula, the system type, and the method of delivery ordered by the physician. It also stated that feeding tube orders must include the following information: the product to be used, the rate and/or timing of administration, the total volume to be given per 24-hour period, the total calories provided per 24-hour period, the route of delivery (i.e. via gastrostomy tube, jejunostomy tube), the method of administration (i.e. pump, bolus), and the volume of water given…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the Administrator failed to carry out her duties as outlined in her job description which included risk management and overall management of the facility which affected 1 of 2 sampled resisdents reviewed for accidents (Resident #11). The findings included: A review of the signed job description for the Administrator revealed the Administrator serves as risk manager for the facility and is responsible for the overall management of the facility. The Administrator ensures all required records are maintained and submitted, as appropriate, in an accurate and timely manner. A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Unspecified; Unspecified dementia; and Anxiety. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 7 on the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 05/29/24. This indicated at that time she was severely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide an environment free of pests in 4 of 15 rooms on the 2 South Unit (room [ROOM NUMBER], #241, #250 and #251). The findings included: Review of the second floor Maintenance Report Logbook, located at the nurse's station, revealed the following: - Concern regarding roaches in room [ROOM NUMBER]-A on 06/12/24, documented as 'fixed' on the same day. - Infestation of roaches in room [ROOM NUMBER] and 241 on 07/28/24 reported by staff. During a room-by-room tour on 08/12/24 at 10:05 AM, the following observations were made: In room [ROOM NUMBER], 2 (two) live juvenile roaches and multiple dead roaches were observed behind the [NAME]. There was also one dead juvenile roach observed on the resident's bed, while the resident was sleeping. In room [ROOM NUMBER], 2 (two) live and mature roaches were observed on the wall and floor behind vacant bed-A. In room [ROOM NUMBER], 2 (two) live juvenile roaches were observed on the floor in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for residents on 1 of 2 units/floors in the facility (2nd floor secured unit). This affected Residents #67, #24, #85, #51, #79, #57, #58, #68, #40, #31, #59, #32, #91, #28). The findings included: The following observations were made during environmental tours on 02/26/24 and 02/27/24 in the secured unit on the second floor of the facility (photographic evidence obtained): room [ROOM NUMBER]B - overbed light string was off; Resident's daughter stated the string pulls off very easily. The daughter must pull on the short little string to turn the light on or off. The toilet in bathroom has debris. room [ROOM NUMBER]A - Stained privacy curtains, bedside chairs, and linens. room [ROOM NUMBER]B - Rust on bottom rail of bed; light string missing from over-bed light and lying over bedside nightstand. room [ROOM NUMBER]B - Over-the-bed table with corner in disrepair. When asked how long it had been…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-01 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program based upon assessments, care plans, and personal preferences, for 2 of 2 residents who voiced concerns related to the lack of activities (Resident #51 and #9), and for 5 of 5 residents observed only in their rooms, with a lack of sensory stimulation, and or assessed as needing either one-to-one activities or friendly visits (Residents #79, #91, #37, #43, and #40). The findings included: Review of the Activities Policy implemented 10/16/23 and revised 02/07/24 documented, 3. Our activity programs consist of individual and small and large group activities that are designed to meet the needs and interests of each resident and include, as a minimum: . (The policy then describes multiple different types of activities provided by the facility.) This policy lacked any information for one-to-one or sensory type activities for the cognitively impaired residents. At the time of the survey, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-01 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain resident care equipment in a safe and sanitary condition related to specialized mattress and wheelchairs for 7 of 32 sampled residents (#24, #68, #40, #32, #91, #21, #28). The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a large pressure injury to his sacrum. This wound healed and re-opened in June 2023. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living and had two pressure injuries. Review of the orders documented the initiation of a low airloss specialty mattress as of 10/14/22. This order documented to check for placement and settings every shift. During an observation on 02/26/24 at 11:28 AM, Resident #28 was noted in bed, lying on a specialty air mattress. Observation of the specialty air mattress pump control unit revealed clear packing-type tape wrapped around the cord…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure showers as per resident preference and schedule for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for choices (Resident #51). The findings included: Review of the policy Shower Policy implemented 10/10/22 documented, Procedures: 1) Administer resident shower twice weekly and/or as often as necessary as per facility protocol. 2) If reasonably practicable, try to accommodate resident's preference in the shower schedule. 3) Shower refusal by the resident shall be relayed by the assigned CNA to the charge nurse. 10) document. Review of the record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating he was cognitively intact. Further review of this MDS documented Resident #51 needed substantial assistance for showering. Review of the Annual MDS assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 of 32 sampled residents related to oxygen use for Resident #91 and discharge status for Resident #57. The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], was transferred to the hospital on [DATE], and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current orders documented to keep the resident's oxygen saturation at 90% or greater as of 02/07/24. Although the orders lacked a specific order for as needed oxygen, review of the oxygen saturation levels from 02/07/24 through 02/13/24 in the vital sign section of the electronic medical record (EMR) documented oxygen use on 5 of those 7 days. Review of the current MDS assessment dated [DATE] lacked any documented oxygen use for Resident #91. Review of the corresponding care plan initiated 02/25/24 documented Resident #91 was at risk for altered respiratory status and to administer oxygen as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-06-13

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL