No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sarasota Point Rehabilitation Center

2600 Courtland Street, Sarasota, FL 34237 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (941) 952-9070 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (941) 952-9070 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0609) — cited Sep 20221 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2650 Bahia Vista St · (941) 366-9711 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1630 S Tuttle Ave · (941) 366-2460 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
282 Shopping Ave · (941) 955-4204 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.9%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.6%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.8%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.5%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.4%26.1%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.2%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.762.131.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.981.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

37.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

37.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.54U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.27hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.21hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 75 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF37.3%CMS range 28.3–46.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 7.5–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting89.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 3.4–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.78
RN hours/ resident / day
0.60
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.09
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.47
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.55
RN hoursweekends
41.0%
Total nursing turnover
40.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 101.5 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.59 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-24)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2022-09-01)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

10 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2022-09-01 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's policies and procedures, observation, staff, and resident interview the facility failed to promptly obtain needed dental services for 1 (Resident #18) of 1 resident reviewed with repeated requests to see a dentist for dental pain. The findings included: The facility policy Dental Services SHC04004.08 revised 8/29/2017 read, The facility provides each resident with access to dental services. Residents will be referred to a dentist based on assessed need. The facility will obtain services of a qualified dental provider.Basic services will be provided in-house. Facility staff will assess dental status through the interdisciplinary resident assessment process and daily provision of care. The physician, residents and family/responsibility party may request dental services at any time . Social Services designee will be responsible for coordinating dental services in the facility. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Dietary Staff B) of 1 dietary staff observed operating the dishwasher was trained, and competent to test the sanitizing solution of the low temp dishwasher to ensure dishes were properly sanitized to prevent foodborne illnesses of residents consuming an oral diet. The findings included: The facility's policy and procedure titled, Testing Sanitizer & Temperature in Low Temp Dish Machines revised 8/2023 noted, Test sanitizing solution and temperature before cleaning each meal's dishes . Test the sanitizer with chlorine test strips obtained by the chemical vendor or food distributor. A proper level is 50 ppm (part per million) chlorine in the rinse water. An appropriated temperature is 120 - 160 F (Fahrenheit) . Record water temperature and sanitizer levels on the Dishwashing Temperature/Sanitizer Record. On 10/24/2024 at 9:20 a.m., during a tour of the kitchen with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM), Food and Nutrition Aide Staff B was observed using the low temp dishwasher. In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to update the care plan to accurately reflect safety precautions for 1 (Resident #30) of 2 sampled residents at risk for elopement. The findings included: Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included non-Alzheimer's dementia. The Elopement risk evaluations completed on 4/26/24, 5/21/24, and 10/14/24 noted Resident #30 scored 2, indicating the resident was at risk for elopement. Review of the care plan initiated on 5/21/24 and revised on 10/14/24 noted Resident #30 was at risk for elopement. The goal was Attempts to prevent resident from eloping from facility will be provided. The interventions included an alerting bracelet (alerts staff when the resident leaves a designated safe area) placed to the right ankle. The care plan specified to check the alerting bracelet function and placement every day. Review of the Order Summary Report revealed a physician's order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in accordance with physician's orders to meet the needs of 1 (Resident #30) of 1 resident observed with edema (swelling) of the legs. The findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #30 revealed an admission to the facility of 4/25/24. Diagnoses included heart failure. The physician's orders dated 6/10/24 noted to apply [NAME] hose (compression garment to legs to help circulation and lower swelling) in the morning and off in the evening for edema. The care plan initiated on 4/25/24 noted Resident #30 was at risk for altered cardiovascular status related to hypertension and congestive heart failure. The goal was for the resident to have decreased risk of signs and symptoms of cardiac complications. The interventions included to observe for changes in lung sounds, edema or changes in weight. The care plan initiated on 5/6/24 noted Resident #30 is resistive to care and medications related to adjustment to admission, and new environment, and on 6/10/24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation of medication administration, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents #74 and #38) of 3 sampled residents were free from significant medication error related to the administration of transdermal pain patches. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #74 revealed a physician's order dated 5/25/23 for Lidocaine (topical anesthetic) External Patch 4%, apply to hip topically in the morning for pain and remove per schedule. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2024 revealed the Lidocaine Patch was scheduled to be applied every day at 6:00 a.m. and removed every day at 6:00 p.m. The MAR for October 2024 had an order dated 5/12/23 to validate the Lidocaine Patch to the right hip was present every shift. The diagnoses for the Lidocaine Patch was fracture of the right femur. On 10/22/24 at 9:10 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff A was observed administering medications to Resident #74. An undated Lidocaine Patch was observed on the resident's right thigh, near…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe, functional, sanitary and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public in 3 (Halls 100, 300 and 400) of 4 halls observed. The findings included: During a tour of the facility on 6/4/24 multiple environmental issues were observed, including: Common hallways with tiles cracked, missing or stained throughout the building. Photographic evidence obtained The hallway handrail near the activity director room was missing with an exposed nail. Photographic evidence obtained rooms [ROOM NUMBER] were observed with damage to the wall near the window and electrical outlet for the air conditioning unit with wall plaster missing, cracked, peeled paint and dirty surfaces. Photographic evidence obtained Rooms 330, 105, 328 and 408 had cracked tiles in the residents' rooms and bathrooms. photographic evidence obtained room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom had plaster missing off the wall and peeled paint. Photographic evidence obtained room [ROOM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-09-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, staff and resident interviews , the facility failed to immediately report an alleged violation that could constitute neglect within specified time frame to the State Survey and Certification Agency for 1 (Resident #75) of 3 residents reviewed for incidents. The findings included: The Facility policy titled, Incident Reporting for Residents or Visitors revised 1/13/2017 noted, All accidents and unusual occurrences involving a resident or visitor will be documented and reported so as to meet all regulatory (state and federal) . requirements. Unusual Occurrence or Event. Any event not consistent with routine resident care; Any event reportable to federal and state agencies as defined by those agencies; An event or happening involving a resident . with unintended, undesirable, or unexpected results or outcomes. Review of the clinical record revealed Resident #75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 5-day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-02-04 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate remained below 5%. Three errors occurred while observing five licensed nurses on two different shifts with 27 medication administration opportunities. Three medication errors were identified resulting in an 11.11% error rate. The failure to administer medications as per the pharmacy labeling and manufacture guidelines placed the residents at risk for harmful errors, sub-optimal therapy, or pharmacological effects. The findings included: Facility policy SHCRC30004.01 Medication Pass Guidelines (revised 4/25/2017) specified The nurse is responsible to read and follow precautionary or instructions on prescription labels and Check the Do Not Crush list before crushing medications. 1. On 2/1/21 at 10:15 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was observed administering nine different medications to Resident #486 including Ventolin 90 micrograms inhaler (used to prevent and treat shortness of breath), and Trelegy EL (100-62.5-25) inhaler (used for chronic lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain evidence of investigation and resolution of expressed grievances for 1 (Resident #60) of 6 residents reviewed for grievances. The findings included: Review of the facility's policy 'Grievances' (revised 10/30/19) read: 2. Grievances may be submitted orally or in writing; they may be submitted anonymously. The resident, or anyone acting on their behalf submitting the grievance, should be encouraged to utilize the Grievance Report. When a grievance is submitted orally, the facility employee accepting the grievance must document it on the Grievance Report. 5. The Grievance Official will document receipt of all grievances on the Grievance QAPI Log. 7. The Grievance Official will review the conclusion with the person investigating the grievance to determine what corrective actions need to be taken. 8. The resident, or anyone acting on their behalf filing the grievance, will be communicated with regarding the conclusion of the investigation and the corrective actions that will be taken. On 2/1/21 at 10:30…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to secure medications in 2 of 3 (Lido and Siesta halls)) medication carts reviewed. The facility also failed to have a system of record keeping ensuring an accurate inventory and reconciliation of controlled substances stored for destruction. The findings included: 1. On 2/1/21 at 11:00 a.m., observation of the Lido 2 medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff U revealed five whole unidentified pills and four half tablets of unidentified pills in drawer of the medication cart. LPN Staff U confirmed the observation of loose, unidentified pills in the drawers. Photographic evidence obtained. 2. On 2/1/21 at 11:42 a.m., the medication cart on the Siesta hall was observed unlocked and unattended. Several staff and 2 residents were observed passing by the unlocked cart. The cart contained medications used for residents on the Siesta hall. On 2/2/21 at 11:47 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed the medication cart was unlocked and unattended. She proceeded to lock the cart. Photographic evidence obtained. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.1+0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 42 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.7★, per CMS)
1 of 5Abercorn Rehabilitation CenterSavannah, GA 1 of 5Sunnybrook Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 2 of 5Lake Worth Rehabilitation CenterLake Worth, FL 2 of 5Monroe Rehabilitation CenterMonroe, NC 2 of 5Pinellas Point Nursing And Rehab CenterSaint Petersburg, FL 2 of 5Riviera Palms Rehabilitation CenterPalmetto, FL 2 of 5Rocky Mount Rehabilitation CenterRocky Mount, NC 3 of 5Bayshore Pointe Nursing And Rehab CenterTampa, FL 3 of 5Lanier Rehabilitation CenterJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Lincolnton Rehabilitation CenterLincolnton, NC 3 of 5Medicana Nursing And Rehab CenterLake Worth, FL 3 of 5Port Orange Nursing And Rehab CenterPort Orange, FL 3 of 5Raleigh Rehabilitation CenterRaleigh, NC 3 of 5Tiffany Hall Nursing And Rehab CenterPort Saint Lucie, FL 3 of 5Treyburn Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 4 of 5Atlantic Shores Nursing And Rehab CenterMelbourne, FL 4 of 5Bonifay Nursing And Rehab CenterBonifay, FL 4 of 5Boulevard Rehabilitation CenterBoynton Beach, FL 4 of 5Braden River Rehabilitation Center LLCBradenton, FL 4 of 5Hunters Creek Nursing And Rehab CenterOrlando, FL 4 of 5Metro West Nursing And Rehab CenterOrlando, FL 4 of 5Northdale Rehabilitation CenterTampa, FL 4 of 5Ocala Oaks Rehabilitation CenterOcala, FL 4 of 5Orange City Nursing And Rehab CenterDebary, FL 4 of 5Pettigrew Rehabilitation CenterDurham, NC 4 of 5Royal Oaks Nursing And Rehab CenterTitusville, FL 4 of 5Silas Creek Rehabilitation CenterWinston-Salem, NC 4 of 5Warner Robins Rehabilitation CenterWarner Robins, GA 4 of 5Zebulon Rehabilitation CenterZebulon, NC 5 of 5Arbor Trail Rehab And Skilled Nursing CenterInverness, FL 5 of 5Boynton Beach Rehabilitation CenterBoynton Beach, FL 5 of 5Crestview Rehabilitation Center, LLCCrestview, FL 5 of 5Cypress Pointe Rehabilitation CenterWilmington, NC 5 of 5Fort Walton Rehabilitation Center, LLCFort Walton Beach, FL 5 of 5Jacksonville Nursing And Rehab CenterJacksonville, FL 5 of 5Macclenny Nursing And Rehab CenterMacclenny, FL 5 of 5Marianna Health And RehabilitationMarianna, FL 5 of 5Moultrie Creek Nursing And Rehab CenterSaint Augustine, FL 5 of 5Palm City Nursing & Rehab CenterPalm City, FL 5 of 5Parkview Rehabilitation Center At Winter ParkWinter Park, FL

Showing 40 of 42; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2013
CRONQUIST 2015 FAMILY TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2015
JOHN J NOTERMANN BUSINESS TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/12/2017
MANGINE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/25/2012
BERKADIA COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 09/23/2014
HEALTH SERVICES PROPERTIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
TWENTY SIX HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
CHERY, DAWNIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/08/2017
KAAR, SUSANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2003
LANDY, FREDERICKIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2022
SOUTHERN HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
CRONQUIST, ROYCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2018
KRALIK, SHADRICKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/03/2025
MELTON, DONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/15/2009
MORROW, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/27/2024
NOTERMANN, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
NOTERMANN, BRENDAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/05/2026
FORVIS MAZARS LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE DISBURSEMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2013
KELLY, MICHELLEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 11/16/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$563K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 15%Other / private 10%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $563K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$366per resident / day
operating cost
$11,136per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$349per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106102. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next