Riviera Palms Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 186 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 112 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.54 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 11 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one resident (#59) out of two residents sampled for abuse/neglect. The facility neglected to properly report, assess, document, and intervene in a timely manner for Resident #59 related to an unwitnessed fall with major injury that occurred on [DATE]. This lack of intervention resulted in physical pain and suffering for the resident until his death on [DATE]. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #59 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on [DATE] and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings included: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: dementia, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-05 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nursing staff were knowledgeable and competent to provide care and services for four residents (#59, #74, #29, and #35) out of forty residents sampled related to: 1) failure to recognize and provide treatment for an unwitnessed fall; 2) failure to follow physician orders for laboratory testing; 3) failure to provide a safe hazard free environment; and 4) failure to complete resident identification prior to administration of medications. This failure created a situation that resulted in a worsened condition and the likelihood for serious injury and or death to Resident #59 and resulted in the determination of Immediate Jeopardy on 6/04/2025. The findings of Immediate Jeopardy were determined to be removed on 6/05/2025 and the severity and scope was reduced to a D after verification of removal of immediacy of harm. Findings included: 1. Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a home-like environment for two rooms (124, 174) out of twenty-nine rooms sampled. Findings included: During a facility tour on 06/02/2025 at 9:30 a.m. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s bathroom was observed with a towel wrapped around the bottom of the toilet. During an interview on 6/2/2025 at 10:30 a.m. with Staff V, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), she stated she has to put a towel on the bathroom floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] for the resident's safety. She stated whenever the toilet is flushed, water leaks on the floor. She stated she had reported the problem to maintenance. During an interview 06/05/2025 at 10:37 a.m. with Staff X, Maintenance Assistant. Staff X stated he was notified about the toilet in room [ROOM NUMBER] a week ago, but he had to order a part to do the repair. He stated the parts came in last Thursday, but he did not have time to fix the toilet. During an interview on 06/05/2025 at 10:37 a.m. with Staff W, Regional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor side effects of Antipsychotic and Antidepressant medications for one (Resident #82) out of five residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 06/02/2025 at 10:12 a.m., Resident #82 was observed sitting in a wheelchair in her room sleeping. During an observation on 06/02/2025 at 1:16 p.m., Resident #82 was observed sleeping in a wheelchair in the 2nd floor dining room. Review of Resident #82's admission record revealed an admission date of 03/24/2025. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Major Depressive Disorder, Recurrent, Unspecified, Unspecified Dementia, Unspecified Severity, Without Behavioral Disturbance, Psychotic Disturbance, Mood Disturbance, And Anxiety. Review of Resident #82 Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed Section C. Cognitive Patterns, revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 out of 15 showing severe cognitive impairment. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one resident (#59) out of 40 sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: dementia, coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, failure to thrive, major depression disorder, insomnia, and cardiac pacemaker. The resident was placed in Hospice care on 2/7/2025. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #59 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 00, indicating severe cognitive impairment. A review of the Order Summary Report, dated May 2025, for Resident #59 revealed the following: -Regular diet, soft and bite sized texture, thin liquids consistency -Alerting bracelet: located on left ankle, check for placement every shift -Do Not Resuscitate, Palliative Care -Hospice Diagnosis: Cerebral Atherosclerosis -May go on leave with supervision -Citalopram Hydrobromide oral tablet 40 milligram (mg)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to ensure a person centered care plan was implemented related to communication for one resident (#31) out of 24 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 06/02/2025 at 9:46 a.m., Resident #31 was observed lying in bed dressed in a hospital gown. Resident #31 was only able to respond to yes or no questions. Review of Resident#31 admission record revealed and admission date of 10/29/2021. Resident #31 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral Infarction Affecting Left Non-Dominant Side, Essential (Primary) Hypertension, Anemia, Unspecified, Hyperlipidemia, Unspecified, Aphasia, Muscle Weakness (Generalized), Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility, Dysphagia, Oral Phase, Personal History of Transient Ischemic Attack (Tia), And Cerebral Infarction Without Residual Deficits. Review of Resident #31's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section B.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to offer resident centered activities for two dependent residents (#77 and #99) of two reviewed for activities. Findings included : During an observation and interview on 6/4/25 at 12:33 P.M., Resident #99 was sitting in a wheelchair close to her over the bed table with a writing pad. When spoken to the resident pointed to her family member to respond. The family member said Resident #99 is not capable of doing activities on her own. The family member stated when the resident resided on the first floor he would take her outside. Review of Resident #99's admission record revealed an initial admission on [DATE] and an admission date on 5/30/25 with diagnoses to include apraxia (neurological disorder that affects movement), dysphonia (voice impairment), dysarthria and anarthria, disorder of the central nervous system, abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of Resident #99's activities evaluation dated 5/30/25, revealed current interests…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from hazards for one (Resident #29) out of 24 residents sampled. Findings Included: During an observation on 06/02/2025 at 9:55 a.m., A pink disposable razor was identified on top of the toilet bowl of Resident #29's bathroom. (photographic evidence obtained) During an interview on 06/02/2025 at 2:13 p.m., Resident #29 stated she uses the restroom in her room. She stated she was not sure whose razor was in the bathroom and thought it may belong to her roommate. During a phone interview on 06/04/2025 at 10:40 a.m., Resident #29's family member stated he would not bring in a razor for Resident #29 because it is sharp and would not be safe for her to use on her own. Review of Resident #29's admission record revealed a re-admission date of 05/15/2020 and an initial admission date of 01/08/2020. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility with diagnosis to include Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis Following Cerebral…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to reflect the current care status for two residents (#66 and #3) of forty-two sampled residents, related to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for eating assistance (#66), and impaired mobility and contracture management (#3). Findings included: 1. On 1/23/2023 at 12:30 p.m. Resident #66 was observed in her room and lying on her side on top of the bed eating her lunch meal. Her lunch meal tray was on the bedside table which was positioned slightly above head level and she was observed feeding herself with no problems. She appeared slow to eat but comfortable and able to feed herself. No staff were present in the room from 12:30 p.m. to 1:08 p.m. when a staff member came to remove the lunch tray. On 1/24/2023 at 7:45 a.m. Resident #66 was observed resting comfortably in bed with her eyes closed and the lights off. Further observation at 7:56 a.m. revealed Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-01-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure communication between the facility and dialysis centers consistent with professional standards of practice for ensuring ongoing assessment and oversight of the resident before, during, and after dialysis treatments for three residents (#6, #97, and #90) out of three sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Interview was conducted with Resident #90 on 01/23/2023 at 11:31 a.m. She confirmed she received hemodialysis treatment at a community provider three days per week. She stated she was not aware of any communication forms sent between the facility and the provider. On 01/25/2023 at 2:32 p.m. the resident was interviewed and confirmed she had been to the dialysis center for treatment that day. Review of Resident #90's medical record was conducted. The admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dependence on renal dialysis. The Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs for one resident (#5) related to not placing the call light within the resident's reach of six residents sampled for environmental concerns. Findings included: On 01/23/23 at 9:32 a.m. Resident #5 was heard calling from her room stating, Can you help me? Put this call light where I can reach it. Resident #5 was observed sitting in her wheelchair facing towards the foot of her bed. The call light was observed clipped to the head of the bed out of her reach. Staff K, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) came into Resident #5's room and moved the call light from the head of the bed to the foot of her bed and within her reach. Review of Resident #5's admission Record revealed she was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her medical diagnoses included but were not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting the left non-dominant side, polyneuropathy,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure a care planned intervention related to having the bed positioned in the lowest position was implemented for one resident (#3) of forty-two sampled residents for three days (1/23/2023, 1/24/2023, and 1/26/2023) of four days observed. Findings included: On 1/23/2023 during a tour of the facility at approximately 10:45 a.m., Resident #3 was observed in her room lying in bed. Resident #3 was lying on a specialized mattress with raised bolsters to assist with fall prevention. The bed was elevated approximately three feet above its lowest position. The bed adjustment remote was placed on the foot of the bed and no staff were present in or around the resident's room. On 1/23/2023 at 2:00 p.m. Resident #3 was again observed in her room with the bed elevated approximately three feet from the lowest position with the remote at the foot of the bed. An attempt to interview the resident about her bed positioning indicated she was not able…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$181,100 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $181,100 — penalty dated 2025-06-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $608K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL