Abercorn Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 87.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents during incontinence care for one (Resident (R) 295) of four sampled residents reviewed for accidents. The failure resulted in a fall with injury, two fractured knees, and a fractured hip, requiring transfer to the hospital for evaluation. Findings include: Review of R295's Clinical Census located under the Census tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which included anxiety, muscle weakness, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting left dominant side. R295 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Review of R295's Care Plan located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR revealed the resident had an ADL self-care deficit related to debility and impaired mobility that was initiated on 08/16/22 with an intervention that two staff were required to assist with bed mobility. Review of R295's Progress…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Food Storage Principles, the facility failed to ensure opened food items in the walk-in cooler/freezer were labeled and dated. In addition, the facility failed to discard one food item by the expiration date. This had the potential to affect 80 residents receiving oral diets from the kitchen. Findings Include:Review of the Food Storage policy, revised 11/14/2025, documented under procedure 1. Train employees regarding proper food storage procedures. 5. Label opened food items with 'Date Opened.' Observation and interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 02/24/2026 at 9:05 am, revealed inside the freezer there was a bag of what appeared to be meat that was labeled with a prepared date of 2/8 without a use by date, a bag of meat that was not labeled or dated, and an item labeled Chix with a prepared date of 1/28/2026. The Dietary Manager confirmed that all of the items should be labeled with an open date, and a use by date.Observation and interview with the DM on 2/24/2026 at 9:45 am, revealed inside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews and review of the facility policy titled Hand Washing/Hygiene, the facility failed to ensure that staff were washing or sanitizing their hands while passing out lunch trays to the residents. The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for infections from cross contamination.Findings include: Review of the Hand Washing/Hygiene Policy, revised 8/2023, documented Procedure. 3. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid State Operations Manual indicates that hand hygiene should be performed: (d), before and after assisting a resident with meals. Observation of dining on 02/25/2026 at 12:10 PM, revealed the residents were brought into the dining area and sat at the tables without washing their hands. The residents were not offered wet wipes, hand sanitizer, or soap and water by facility staff. The staff were also observed not washing or sanitizing their hands in between serving trays, staff did not satanize hands before opening straws or passing out drinks. Observation of dining on 02/26/2026 at 12:20 PM revealed that staff were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered, comprehensive care plan for one resident (R) (R102) of 43 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility did not develop a care plan for R102 for oxygen (O2) therapy. The deficit practice had the potential to place R102, at risk for medical complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings Include:A request for a Care Plan policy was made on 02/26/2026 at 2:30 PM and 3:00 PM and was not provided by the facility prior to survey conclusion. Review of R102's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, stage 2.Review of R102 's Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order dated 09/15/2025 for O2 at 2 liters per minute (LPM) continuously via a nasal cannula (NC) Review of R102's Comprehensive Care Plan, reviewed 02/24/2026 revealed no documented care plan for oxygen use.Observations on 02/25/2026 at 9:44 AM and 10:09 AM revealed R102 receiving O2 by an O2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that two bathrooms (one shared bathroom between room [ROOM NUMBER] and 14, and one private bathroom room [ROOM NUMBER]) had water temperatures under 120 degrees Fahrenheit and two resident rooms (Room TB 045A and Room TB 053A) were free of chemicals from a total of 54 rooms. The deficient practice increased the risk to residents for burns and other injuries. Findings include: 1. Observation on 02/24/2026 at 11:42 AM in Room TB 045-A revealed that there was one pressurized aerosol container stored on the bedside table in the resident's room. Observation on 02/24/2026 at 1:04 PM of Room TB 053-A revealed that there were two pressurized aerosol containers and two liquid disinfectant solution containers stored on the bedside table in the resident's room. Second Observation on 02/25/2026 at 12:18 PM of Room TB 045-A bedside table revealed that the one pressurized aerosol container was still located on the bedside table in the resident's room. Second…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, the facility failed to ensure that oxygen (O2) was administered according to physician orders for one of six residents (R) (R102) reviewed for oxygen administration. This failure had the potential to place R102 at risk of respiratory complications and unmet needs.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised 08/2023, documented a resident will need oxygen therapy when hypoxemia (low oxygen in blood) occurs. Pulse oximetry monitoring and clinical examination determine the adequacy of oxygen therapy. The resident's disease, physical condition, and age will help determine the most appropriate method of administration.Review of R102's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, chronic atrial fibrillation, and chronic kidney disease, stage 2.Review of R102 's Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order dated 09/15/2025, for O2 at 2 liters per minute (LPM) continuously via a nasal cannula (NC.)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and facility policy titled, Medications Storage Room, the facility failed to ensure one of four medication carts and two of three medication rooms were free of expired medications. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of receiving expired medications.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Room, updated 06/28/2024, documented under section Medications: . that discontinued or expired medications are not present, and medications packages are properly labeled, including expiration date.Observation and interview with LPN Unit Manager KK on 02/25/2026 at 2:09 PM revealed that in a red bin in the Transitional Care Unit (TCU) hallway medication room were two 1000 milliliter intravenous bags of 0.45 percent sodium chloride with the outer protective covering removed. The bags were not labeled or dated. An interview with LPN Unit Manager KK confirmed that the bags were not labeled, and she did not know how long they were out of the outer covering.Observation and interview with LPN Unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-24 · tag F0554 — pattern
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure four (Resident (R) 93, R23, R95, and R34) of 90 facility residents observed during initial screening had medications available for self-administration and stored at the bedside only when assessed to do so safely and with a physician's order. These failures placed all four residents at risk for medication errors, overdose, or misappropriation of medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Self-Administration of Medications, dated 06/28/24, revealed, The resident has the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team [IDT] has determined that this practice is clinically appropriate . A resident may only self-administer medications after the IDT has determined which medications may be self-administered . Based on the interdisciplinary team's assessment, a decision is made as to whether the resident is a candidate for self-administration. This will be recorded on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were clean, creating a homelike environment for three (Residents (R) 63, R59, and R46) of eight residents reviewed for homelike environment. This failure had the potential to negatively impact residents' environment and overall well-being. Findings include: 1. Review of R63's Profile, located in the electronic medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R63 was initially admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Review of R63's Medical Diagnosis, located in the EMR under the Diagnosis tab revealed R63 had a diagnosis of dementia. Review of R63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/01/24 revealed the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R63 was cognitively intact. Review of R63's Care Plan located in the EMR under the Care Plan tab revealed interventions to address cognitive impairment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse within two hours after the allegation for two residents (Resident (R) 36 and R294) of seven sampled residents. The deficient practice could result in residents being abused. Findings include: Review of R36's Clinical Census located under the Census tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R36's Medical Diagnoses located under the Med Diag tab in the EMR revealed the resident had diagnoses including dementia and cognitive communication deficit. Review of R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/29/24, located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of 15, which indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of R36's Care plan located under the Care plan tab of the EMR, revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-24 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care within 48 hours of admission for one (Resident (R) 94) of six sampled residents. Failure to develop and implement a baseline care plan could place residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of R94's Clinical Census located under the Census tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R94's Medical Diagnoses located under the Med Diag tab in the EMR revealed the resident had diagnoses that included amputation of right great toe, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left foot and heel, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and fracture of left great toe. Review of R94's Administration Record dated January 2025, located under the Orders tab in the EMR, revealed R94 was prescribed levofloxacin and linezolid (antibiotics) for osteomyelitis (an infection),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,868 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,868 — penalty dated 2025-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $453K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA