Raleigh Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 175 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 71 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.47 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 78% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 157 beds and averages 135.1 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.15 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.30 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to safely transport a resident back to her room via wheelchair (Resident #5) when she requested to be put back to bed. Resident #5's left leg got caught under the left side of her wheelchair without leg rests attached while being pushed by a Nurse Aide (NA) and resulted in a nondisplaced fracture of the left proximal (near the center of the body) tibial (shinbone) metaphysis (neck portion of the long bone) and plateau (cartilage that covers the top end of the tibia). As a result, the resident endured acute (short-term) pain that was treated with medication. This was for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #5). Findings included: Resident #5 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included end stage renal disease (ESRD) with hemodialysis (HD), osteoporosis, osteoarthritis of the left knee, and stroke with left sided weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly assessment dated [DATE]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2023-10-12 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
  Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews with resident and staff, the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee failed to maintain implemented procedures and monitor the interventions the committee put into place in order to sustain compliance. This included a recited deficiency in the area of Supervision to Prevent Accidents (F689) as evidenced by repeat citations resulting in harm to residents. During the [DATE] recertification and complaint investigation survey, deficient practice at F689 resulted in the resident sustaining a spleen laceration, subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the surrounding membrane) and rib fractures. During the [DATE] complaint investigation survey, deficient practice at F689 resulted in the resident sustaining a subdural hematoma (collection of blood outside the brain), pain to her right thigh, and temporary amnesia. During the [DATE] complaint investigation survey, deficient practice at F689 resulted in the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and Responsible Party (RP) and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written grievance summaries for 4 grievances filed by Resident #136's responsible party. The deficient practice occurred for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for grievances (Resident #136).Findings included: Review of facility policy dated 08/2023 titled Resident Rights/Grievances read in part: The Administrator is responsible for overseeing the grievance process. The process includes receiving and tracking grievances, leading investigations while maintaining the confidentially of all information associated with grievance, reaching conclusion, and taking appropriate actions.The resident, or anyone acting on their behalf filing the grievance, will be communicated with regarding the conclusion of the investigation and the corrective actions that will be taken. The resident or anyone acting on their behalf has the right to obtain a copy of the written conclusion. The Administrator will validate the completion of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the area of use of anticonvulsant medication for 1 of 39 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed (Resident #128). The findings included: Resident #128 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder, dementia with other behavioral disturbances, and anxiety disorder. Resident #128 had a physician order dated 6/03/25 for lamotrigine (an anticonvulsant medication) 25 milligram (mg) oral tablet; give one tablet by mouth two times a day for bipolar disorder. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2026 revealed Resident #128 was administered the lamotrigine medication as ordered.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] and completed by MDS Nurse #2, revealed Resident #128 had severely impaired cognition. Resident #128 was not coded for anticonvulsant medication use during the 7-day lookback period.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain an accurate Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 1 of 39 residents reviewed for accurate medical records (Resident #139).The findings included:Resident #139 was admitted into the facility on 4/9/25.Resident #139 had a physician's order dated 4/9/25 for Lidocaine External Patch (topical anesthetic) 4% apply to bilateral shoulders topically in the morning for pain.Resident #139's September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated that the Lidocaine patches were not documented as administered on 9/1/25 and 9/9/25 by Nurse #1.Resident #139's October 2025 MAR indicated that the Lidocaine patches were not documented as administered on 10/6/25 and 10/20/25 by Nurse #1.An interview with the Unit Manager on 3/25/26 at 7:55 AM revealed that all nurses should ensure medications were documented at the end of their shift.A telephone interview on 3/25/26 at 4:00 PM with Nurse #1 revealed that she could not remember if she applied the Resident #139's Lidocaine patches or not. She further revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment in the areas of vision (Resident #69), and for the use of a wander elopement alarm and hypoglycemic (medications that help lower blood sugar levels in people with diabetes) medication (Resident #74) for 2 of 26 residents whose MDS assessments were reviewed. The findings included: 1. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (eye condition that can cause vision loss and blindness in people with diabetes). The vision provider visit note dated 5/15/24 revealed Resident #69 was legally blind. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) significant change assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #69 was cognitively intact and was coded for adequate vision. An interview was conducted on 12/16/24 at 1:51 pm with Resident #69 who reported he was blind. An interview was conducted with Nurse Aid #2 on 12/18/24 at 12:27 pm who revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to change the disposable inner cannula for 1 of 1 resident observed for tracheostomy care (Resident #111). The findings included: Resident #111 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic respiratory failure and tracheostomy (a surgical opening through the front of the neck into the windpipe for an air passage to help breathe). Resident #111 had an active physician order dated 11/14/23 to perform tracheostomy care every shift and as needed. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #111 was coded for tracheostomy care. The care plan last reviewed on 11/22/24 revealed Resident #111 had a tracheostomy related to impaired breathing mechanics. During a continuous observation of tracheostomy care on 12/18/24 at 11:01 am through 11:13 am Nurse #1 was observed to perform hand hygiene, put on clean gloves and remove the soiled tracheostomy gauze and discard in trash. She…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to: discard expired zinc supplement tablets for 1 of 2 medication rooms (Unit 3 Medication Storage Room), discard an opened bottle of aspirin that had no expiration date for 1 of 3 medication carts (4 B Medication Cart), and dispose of loose and unidentified pills for 2 of 3 medication carts (Medication Cart 3A and Medication Cart 4B) reviewed for medication storage. The findings included: a. An observation of the Unit 3 medication storage room on [DATE] at 3:50 PM revealed an unopened bottle of Zinc 50mg (milligrams) 100 tablets with an expiration date of [DATE]. b. An observation of the 3A medication cart with Nurse #3 on [DATE] at 3:27 PM revealed 3 pills (one round white pill, one oblong shaped white pill, and one white capsule) were loose in the medication cart. Nurse #3 revealed she was not aware the loose pills were in the cart. Nurse #3 stated she could not identify the loose pills. Nurse #3 stated the loose medications were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the area surrounding the dumpsters free of debris and failed to close the doors to dumpsters that contained waste for 2 of 3 dumpsters observed. This practice had the potential to attract pests and rodents. The findings included: During an observation of the dumpster area with the Assistant Dietary Manager (DM) on 10/9/23 at 10:23 AM, 2 bags of trash and 2 empty cardboard boxes were found in between dumpster #1 and dumpster #2. A bag of trash was also found in front of dumpster #3. The top and left doors to dumpster #1 and the left door to dumpster #2 were found open. The assistant DM stated that the dumpster area was in this state upon arrival for her shift, and the housekeeping department was assigned to maintaining the dumpsters. During an interview with the assistant DM on 10/9/23 at 10:37 AM, she revealed that maintenance or housekeeping managed the dumpster area. If anything was left on the ground, housekeeping usually cleaned it up. An interview was conducted with the Housekeeping Manager on 10/11/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-10-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP), who had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, to be responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The findings included: During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/11/2023 at 9:16 A.M. she revealed the Infection Preventionist (IP) was responsible for the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program. The DON stated the IP was new to the position and had not completed the required training program for the IP position yet. The DON stated did not have any staff members with specialized training to meet the qualifications for the IP role. An interview was conducted with the IP on 10/11/2023 at 11:04 A.M. She revealed she was new to the position and the facility planned for her to attend the next training session on 11/8/2023, to complete the required specialized training. She stated she was shown how to monitor infections in the facility but had not had the specialized training regarding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-10-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and Responsible Party (RP) interview, the facility failed to provide an ongoing resident centered activities program that included activities to meet the interests of a resident that did not participate in group activities for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities (Resident #100). The findings included: Resident #100 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke and anxiety. Resident #100's care plan dated 7/28/23 revealed his past hobbies included watching college sports, golf, soccer, and football. The interventions included providing a program of activities to accommodate Resident #100's communication abilities which included listening to music, television, and conversation that required little to no response. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #100 had severely impaired cognition and unclear speech. Resident #100 was coded for depressed feelings during the look back period and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to invite the resident or resident responsible party to participate in the care planning process for 1 of 27 residents whose care plans were reviewed (Resident #77). Findings included: Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Social Service progress note dated 12/6/22 at 1:47 PM revealed a quarterly care plan meeting was held with Resident #77. Review of a Social Service progress note dated 2/2/23 at 10:55 AM revealed the interdisciplinary team (IDT) met with Resident #77 about his care plan. His family member joined by phone halfway through the meeting. The most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #77 had been assessed as moderately cognitively intact. Review of Resident #77's care plan revealed it had been reviewed and revised on 7/14/23, but there was no indication that the resident or responsible party had participated in the care plan meeting. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$48,754 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $48,754 — penalty dated 2023-10-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $788K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NC