Northdale Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 247 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 117 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 115.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0645 — pattern
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to complete the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following a qualifying mental health diagnosis for 10 (Residents #17, #36, #60, #84, #88, #10, #8, #58, #73, and #87) out of 21 residents sampled for PASRRs. Findings included: Review of Resident #17's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record showed diagnoses to include Bipolar disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of a level I PASRR for Resident #17 dated 01/27/24 showed a blank PASRR and the qualifying diagnoses were not checked. Review of Resident #36's admission record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission record showed diagnoses to include Major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. Review of a level I PASRR for Resident #36 dated 11/09/23 showed a blank PASARR and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure proper medication storage for six (Residents #57, #60, #97, #88, #8 and #10) out of 21 residents sampled for three of three days. Findings included: During a facility tour on 05/19/24 at 11:48 a.m., Resident #57 was observed with a bottle of a medication labeled (Mucus relief) at bedside. The resident did not answer when asked how often he took the medication. Review of an admission record for Resident #57 showed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed the resident had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12, which indicated his cognition was moderately impaired. Review of physician orders for Resident #57 dated 05/22/24 revealed the resident did not have self-administration orders. The orders showed the resident was not prescribed this medication. Review of a care plan dated 10/28/23 revealed Resident #57 did not have a focus to keep medications at bedside or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-05-22 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure their pest control program was effective during three of four days of survey in six (Rooms #69, #70, #133, #135, #143 and #157) out of 26 rooms and affecting one (Resident #88) out of 21 sampled residents. Findings included: During multiple facility tours on 05/19/24, 05/20/24, and 05/21/24, observations were made of live and dead insects and ants in resident rooms #69, #70, #133, #135, #143 and #157. On 05/19/24 at 11:45 a.m., the Environmental Services (EVS) manager and surveyor observed a live insect crawling outside room [ROOM NUMBER]. She stated the insect was a cockroach. She stated their process was to kill the bug and document on the maintenance log. She stated she would disinfect the area where she stomped at the insect and let maintenance know. On 05/19/24 at 11:47 a.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #88 who was alert and oriented with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 15. He stated he had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to reasonably accommodate the needs of one (Resident #45) of 21 residents related to not placing the call light within the resident's reach. Findings included: On 05/19/2024 at 1:00 p.m., the call light was observed on the floor, behind the headboard of Resident #45's bed. (Photographic Evidence Obtained.) On 5/20/2024 4:46 p.m., the call light was observed on the floor, behind the headboard of Resident #45's bed. The call light had not been moved from the previous day. (Photographic Evidence Obtained.) On 5/21/2024 11:57 a.m. the call light was observed on the floor, behind the headboard of Resident #45's bed. The call light had not been moved from the previous day. (Photographic Evidence Obtained.) Review of Resident #45's admission Record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her medical diagnoses included but were not limited to repeated falls. Review of Resident #45's Minimum Data Set (MDS),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Air Conditioning (A/C) filters were maintained in a safe and sanitary manner in seven (69, 70, 132, 133, 135,136 and 157) of 26 resident rooms during three of three days of survey. Findings included: During multiple facility tours on 05/19/21, 05/20/21 and 05/21/24 observations were made of A/C filters with dirt and blanketed debris in rooms 69, 70, 132, 133, 135,136 and 157. (Photographic evidence was obtained). On 05/22/24 at 9:32 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Director of Maintenance (DOM) and the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA). The NHA stated they did not have a policy on A/C maintenance but would contact their corporate to obtain a copy. The DOM stated the A/C filters were last cleaned on 02/23/24. He stated they had a checklist they followed to make sure they covered all the rooms. He stated their policy was to clean the filters and change them quarterly. He stated he had just looked at some of the rooms. He said, I looked at the A/C filters. Some of them were very bad and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plan was updated related to falls for one (Resident #58) of four sampled residents. Findings included: During an observation on 05/21/2024 at 1:15 p.m., Resident #58 was sitting at bedside in the wheelchair. She was dressed and groomed for the day. White, open back sliders were on her feet. A pair of tennis / enclosed shoes were next to the wall. She had fluids at the bedside. A scoop mattress was in place. The bed was in the lower position. The call light was within reach. Review of the care plans showed Resident #58 was at risk for falls as evidenced by history of repeat falls due to confusion, gait/balance problems, and generalized weakness and was initiated on 11/01/2023. Interventions included to offer / assist to watch TV in the dining room before dinner as of 05/13/2024 and anti-tippers to wheelchair as of 05/19/2024. Resident #58 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2022-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation of the dish machine, review of the dish machine records and service provider's report, and interview with facility and service provider staff, the facility failed to ensure the dietary staff were following the manufacturer's guidelines for the dish machine, related to monitoring the temperature of the wash and rinse water, or monitoring the level of chemical sanitizer used by the dish machine. Findings included: An observation was made of the dish machine in the main kitchen on 03/07/2022 beginning at 9:30 a.m. Staff I, Dietary Aide was observed running dish racks with breakfast dishes through the dish machine. She was asked to describe the procedure she followed to ensure the dish machine was running correctly. She reported she attaches a small stick (T stick) to a dinner plate and runs the plate through the dish machine. The strip turns black when the water temperature is 160 degrees Fahrenheit (F). She confirmed she did not know the temperatures that were required for either the wash or the rinse temperature. (Instructions on the T stick read: Insert tip in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop baseline care plans for one residents (#196) out of 34 sampled residents, related to the provision of pain management and the prevention of falls for newly admitted residents with fall risks. Findings included: A review of Resident #196's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnoses including dislocation of right humerus, unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbances and anxiety disorder. An observation of Resident #196 on 03/07/22 at 04:05 PM revealed the resident lying in her bed, which was noted to be in the low position. The resident was noted to be pushing her roommates over-bed table away from her and voiced that she didn't want it that close to her bed. The residents' roommate voiced that she thought Resident #196 was trying to get out of bed unassisted. An observation of Resident #196 on 03/08/22 at 10:25 AM revealed the resident was noted to be in bed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to respiratory care and treatment for one resident (#59) of three residents reviewed for respiratory care. Findings included: A review of Resident #59's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included metabolic encephalopathy, morbid obesity due to excess calories, and history of sleep apnea. A review of the Evaluation Scoring Report dated 2/2/22 revealed a Brief Review for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. An observation of Resident #59's room was conducted on 03/07/22 at 10:40 AM. The resident was noted to have a nebulizer machine at the bedside on the night stand. The machine was noted to have a clear clasp where the mask was noted to be clipped to. The mask was not bagged or stored to prevent contamination. Photographic evidence obtained. A review of the resident's current order summary for March 2022…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-03-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to accurately assess the weight and to notify the physician of a significant weight gain for one resident (#12) following a transfer to an acute care facility for diuresis of fluid out of thirty-four sampled residents. Findings included: Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] following a transfer to an acute care facility on 2/24/22. The admission Record included diagnoses not limited to unspecified heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and chronic pulmonary embolism. A progress note dated 2/28/22 at 2:47 p.m. identified the staff had spoken with an acute care facility regarding Resident #12. The note indicated the resident was having excessive fluid removed and had been transferred from the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to the Cardiac Unit. A review of Resident #12's Weights and Vitals Summary indicated the resident weighed 248.2 pounds (lbs.) on 2/23/22, one day prior to the residents transfer to an acute care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to SOVEREIGN HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS — 43 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

9 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $680K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL