No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wabash Senior Living & Rehab

216 College Boulevard, Carmi, IL 62821 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 156 certified beds · (618) 382-4644 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$93,679 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $93,679 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-03)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
402 Plum St · (618) 382-4193 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
311 Plum St · (618) 382-8400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1208 Oak St · (618) 308-7428 · Call to confirm hours
Park
225 E Main St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased26.1%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.0%6.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.4%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.0%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.4%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.5%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened21.2%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.3%18.3%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.3%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.9%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine68.1%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission35.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.1%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.792.021.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.802.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

39.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 147 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

39.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF39.8%CMS range 31.4–48.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.5–15.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge33.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified82.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.4%CMS range 6.0–14.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.49
RN hours/ resident / day
0.47
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
61.1%
Total nursing turnover
68.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 104.9 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 51 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-03)
2
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2026-06-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify the physician when a pressure ulcer deteriorated for 1 (R6) of 4 residents reviewed for physician notification in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in an abrasion to the right gluteus progressing to a Stage 4 pressure ulcer that became infected, requiring R6 to be hospitalized with sepsis on two occasions and requiring surgical wound debridement. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 03/23/2026 when R6's wound was identified as deteriorating and the physician was not notified to obtain new treatments or implement new interventions. The Administrator (V1) and the [NAME] President of Clinical Services (V21) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 5/27/26 at 2:36 PM. The Immediacy was removed on 5/27/26, but noncompliance remains at Level Two because additional time is needed to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the in-service training.1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 5/26/26 documents R6 was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-06-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and observation the facility failed to prevent resident to resident physical abuse for 1 of 1 (R42) residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 52. This failure resulted in R42 being attacked on 5/19/2026 by R38, causing a skin tear to her left wrist, bruise to her left thumb, and becoming fearful for her safety.Findings Include:R42's admission Record documents an admission date of 12/18/2025 with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, unsteadiness on feet, need for assistance with personal care and muscle weakness among others. R42's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/24/2026 documents R42 with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15 which indicates R42 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R42 uses a walker for ambulation and is independent with most activities of daily living.R38's admission Record documents an admission date of 11/19/2025 and diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, dementia with other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to ensure an effective treatment was implemented for a newly identified wound and report worsening of the wound for 1 of 4 (R9) residents reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in deterioration of R9's arterial wound to the right leg.Findings Include:R9's admission Record with a print date of 5/26/26 documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include iron deficiency anemia, depression, cognitive communication deficit, muscle weakness, hypertension, diabetes, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 03, indicating a severe cognitive deficit.R9's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, I have the potential/actual risk for pressure ulcer development or altered skin integrity r/t (related to) impaired mobility. 05/12/2026 Unstageable pressure ulcer Right lateral calf with an initiation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2026-06-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain orders and implement interventions for 1 (R6) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 40. This failure resulted in an abrasion to the right gluteus deteriorating and becoming infected, requiring R6 to be hospitalized with sepsis on two occasions and requiring surgical wound debridement and the development of a Stage 2 pressure ulcer on R6's left heel. Findings Include:1. R6's admission Record with a print date of 5/26/26 documents R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and included diagnoses of major depressive disorder, atrial fibrillation, obesity, osteoarthritis, and pressure ulcer of left heel. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R6 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R6 requires substantial/maximal assistance to roll left and right in bed and is dependent on staff for transfer. Under Section M, Skin Conditions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 (R77) of 10 residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 38. This failure resulted in R77 experiencing a significant medication error in which 5 additional doses of diuretic medication were administered resulting in dizziness, abnormal lab values, Intravenous Fluid administration, supplemental Potassium medication, and a hospital admission for an Acute Kidney Injury. This past non-compliance occurred between 3/14/24 and 3/19/24. Findings Include: R77's admission Record documented R77 was [AGE] years old with an admission date to the facility of 03/08/2023. Diagnoses listed in their entirety on this document are: Alzheimer's Disease with late onset; Essential Hypertension; Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. R77's Progress Note dated 3/8/2024 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to promote dignity for 4 of 7 (R9, R29, R50, and R54) residents reviewed for resident rights in the sample of 40. Findings Include: 1. R9's admission Record with a print date of 5/21/26 documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include dysphagia, depression, cognitive communication deficit, and diabetes. R9's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, indicating a severe cognitive deficit. R9's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, Nutritional Risk r/t (related to) dx (diagnosis) DM (diabetes mellitus) type 2, depression. Below IBWR (ideal body weight range) with recent wt (weight) gain. Varied intake leaves 25% or more uneaten. 4/10/26 change from reg (regular) cons (consistency) to mech (mechanical) soft. Date Initiated: 09/16/2025. This Focus area includes the interventions of: serve diet as ordered and encourage oral intake. 2. R29's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-03 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to follow the menu and serve the complete serving size of altered diet textures for 5 (R9, R18, R34, R64, R87) of 5 residents reviewed serving sizes in a sample size of 40. Findings include: The diet spreadsheet dated day 9 lunch documents: pureed country fried steak # 6 scoop (5.33 ounces), thick cream gravy 2 ounces, mashed potatoes with thick gravy #8 scoop, pureed seasoned pasta #8, pureed buttered soft bread #16, and pureed mandarin oranges #10. The diet spreadsheet dated day 9 lunch dental soft (mechanical soft) documents: ground country fried steak with cream gravy #8 scoop (4 ounces), mashed potatoes with gravy #8 scoop, seasoned pasta #8 scoop, buttered soft bread 1 slice, and Mandarin oranges #8 scoop. The diet spreadsheet dated day 12 lunch documents: pureed panko mustard chicken #6 scoop, pureed scalloped potatoes #8 scoop, pureed pickled beets #12 scoop, pureed buttered bread #16 scoop and pureed peach parfait #8 scoop. The diet spreadsheet dated day 12 lunch dental soft (mechanical soft) documents:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-03 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, observation, and record review the facility failed to provide a resident access to personal property for 1 of 1 resident (R80) reviewed for resident rights in a sample of 40.Findings Include:R80's admission Record documents an admission date of 6/27/2025 with diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, dysphagia and venous insufficiency among other. R80's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 3/13/26, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15 out of 15 total which indicates R80 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R80 has impairment to bilateral legs, uses a wheelchair for locomotion, is dependent on staff for toileting and needs substantial/maximum assistance with showers and dressing.On 5/18/2026 at approximately 9:15am, R80 said about a week ago, he was moved to this new room on a different hall because he and his roommate got into a fight. R80 said the facility did not move his belongings when they moved him and it has been over a week since he had access to his belongings. R80 said he was very mad at the facility for not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan fall interventions for 1 of 6 residents (R81) reviewed for accidents in the sample of 40. Findings Include: R81's admission Record documents an admission date of 12/1/23 with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's disease, repeated falls, insomnia, and polyneuropathy. R81's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R81 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating resident was unable to answer questions due to her poor cognition which puts her at risk for poor self-safety awareness. The same MDS documents R81 requires assistance of a walker for ambulation, requires supervision and/or touch assist for transfers from bed to chair, sitting to standing and transition from lying to sitting on side of bed, and R81 has a history of falls. R81's Fall Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a fall risk score of 14 indicating R81 continues to be at risk for falls. R81's Care Plan documents a focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to maintain equipment that was present on the crash cart and available for use for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for emergency events in a sample of 36. This failure has the potential to effect 32 residents (R4-R36) residing in the facility with active orders to attempt resuscitation/CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation). The findings include:R1's admission Record documents an admission date of [DATE] and includes diagnoses of Acute and Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypercapnia and Hypoxia, Nonrheumatic Tricuspid Insufficiency, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Atelectasis, Oxygen Dependent, Pulmonary Hypertension, Peripheral Vascular Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease. R1'S MDS Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R1 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents R1 is dependent on staff for hygiene, bathing, and dressing. Transfers were not attempted due to medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments for 2 (R20 & R25) of 2 residents reviewed for timely MDS submission in the sample of 45. The findings include: 1. R20's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 11/20/2024 and included diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Anxiety, and Depression. This same document listed a discharge date of 12/5/24. R20's last transmitted MDS was an admission assessment and was completed on 11/27/24. 2. R25's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 10/29/2024 and included diagnoses of repeated falls, anemia, type 2 diabetes, and muscle weakness. This same document listed a discharge date of 11/26/24. R20's last transmitted MDS was an admission assessment and was completed on 11/5/24. On 4/23/25 at 11:00 AM, V4 (MDS Coordinator) stated that she just took over this job in March of 2025 and recognizes that R20 and R25's assessments are showing up as overdue quarterly assessments, however a discharge assessment should have been completed and transmitted with a due date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct medications in accordance with their physician's orders for 2 (R83, R92) of 7 residents reviewed for significant medication errors in the sample of 45. This past noncompliance occurred between 3/17/2024 and 4/1/2025. Findings include: 1. R83's admission Record documented an admission date of 3/13/2024 and included diagnoses of unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance mood, anxiety disorder, unspecified, and unspecified atrial fibrillation. R83's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5, which indicates severe cognitive impairment. R83's Physician Order Summary documented divalproex (seizure and/or mood stabilization treatment) oral tablet delayed release 500mg (milligrams) -1 tablet by mouth twice a day, acetaminophen (pain reliever) oral tablet 500mg-give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transfer a resident safely for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 6. This past non-compliance occurred between 12/01/2024 to 12/13/2024. The findings include: R1's admission Record documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and includes diagnoses of cerebral aneurysm, non-ruptured, contracture of muscle, multiple sites, adult failure to thrive, altered mental status, delusional disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 01, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. The same MDS documents that R1 has impairment on both upper and lower extremities, is dependent for showers, bed to chair transfers, and getting in and out of shower. R1's Care Plan documents that R1 has an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. Documented interventions include that R1 requires…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a window alarm was in working order for a resident at a high risk for elopement for 1of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement in the sample of three. This past non-compliance occurred between 11/9/23 and 11/16/23. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 5/19/23 and listed diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia, Severe, with Anxiety, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Depression, and Hypertension. Elopement Risk Assessments for R1 were completed on 10/5/23 and 11/10/23. The Elopement Risk Assessments document the following: Residents are at a high risk for elopement when yes is answered to both questions in section A or a score of 5 or greater. R1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 19.5 and R1's Elopement Risk assessment dated [DATE] documents a score of 18.5, indicating R1 is a high risk for elopement. Both questions in section A of the Elopement Risk Assessments completed on 10/5/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide written documentation which stated the reason the facility could not meet the resident's needs for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for discharge procedure in the sample of 3. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: pneumonitis due to inhalation of food and vomit, dysphagia, unspecified intellectual disorders, autistic disorder, insomnia. R1's care plan documented R1 had several physical behaviors such as hitting, pinching, and biting staff. R1's 6/22/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented R1 was severely cognitively impaired. On 8/24/23 at 10:11 AM, V1 (Administrator) said R1 was admitted after a hospital stay due to aspiration pneumonia. V1 said R1 was going to work with speech therapy and be discharged back to the group home R1 was residing prior to hospital stay. On 8/24/23 at 12:29 PM, V2 (R1's Legal Guardian) said R1 was living in a group home and was transferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$93,679 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $93,679 — penalty dated 2026-06-03

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.8+0.2 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
STOUT, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-26.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$406K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 8%Other / private 30%

This home reported $406K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$330per resident / day
operating cost
$10,047per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$261per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next