No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Heartland Nursing & Rehab

410 Northwest Third, Casey, IL 62420 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 81 certified beds · (217) 932-4081 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (217) 932-4081 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2025
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
934 N Rt. 49 · (217) 932-4061 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
Iga0.3 mi
505 N Route 49 · (217) 932-5228 · Call to confirm hours
Park
401 E Monroe Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
101 E Alabama Ave · (217) 932-5736

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased24.8%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%6.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.6%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.1%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.5%14.3%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.8%18.3%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.9%4.8%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.4%20.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table22.7%21.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.4%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.6%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.4%13.9%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.812.021.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.972.221.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

45.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
50.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.33U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 50.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 22 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF45.4%CMS range 32.8–54.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 8.9–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge50.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge40.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.9–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.20
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.57
RN hoursweekends
40.4%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 81 beds and averages 50.9 residents a day — about 63% occupied, or roughly 30 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.20 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.55 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.57 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-29)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-13)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

42 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This failure has the potential to affect all 53 residents residing at the facility.The Long-Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid form dated 1/26/26 documents 53 residents reside in the facility. On 01/27/2026 at 11:51 AM the facility's walk-in cooler was observed with a dark brown substance puddled onto the floor beneath a rack of raw meat. A large portion of meat wrapped in plastic was sitting on a cardboard box on the bottom shelf of the cooler with accumulating fluids on top of the box that were dripping down the side of the box. The walk-in freezer was observed with loose carrots and unknown debris on the floor.On 01/27/2026 at 11:53 AM V3 Dietary Manager stated the meat wrapped in plastic, located on bottom shelf, was pork and confirmed the accumulation of fluid on top of the box and identified it as drippings from the meat. V3 Dietary Manager verified the presence of the unknown brown substance accumulating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have quarterly Quality Assessment Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings and failed to ensure required staff members attended meetings. These failures have the potential to affect all 53 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On January 28, 2026, V1, Administrator provided three sign-in sheets for the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee dated 10/28/25, 7/17/25 and 3/14/25.On 1/28/26 at 1:15 PM V1, stated these are the only sign-in sheets I have for QAA meetings. The QAA sign in sheet dated 7/17/25 does not document V15 Medical Director's signature. The Facility undated policy titled Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee states The facility will have QA (Quality Assurance) meetings every quarter and the required attendance of the following members: Medical Director, Director of Nurses, Administrator and Infection Preventionist. V1, Administrator confirmed on 1/29/26 at 1:40 PM Yes, I can only find 3 QA meeting sign-in sheets. The last one dated 10/28/25 was my first meeting for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement a Legionella surveillance program. This failure has the potential to affect all 53 residents who reside in the facility.Findings Include:The facility's Long-Term Care Application for Medicare and Medicaid Services form dated 1/26/26 documents 53 residents residing at the facility.The facility's Safe Water Policy dated 2/1/24 states Maintenance Supervisor must be able to demonstrate sound knowledge and specific skills in service being provided. This may include the maintenance of water systems equipment/services such as: Water storage tanks, vessels, and connecting pipework above and below ground. Sanitary appliances and associated taps, thermostatic mixing valves, and other fittings. Fire Fighting Services.On 1/29/26 at 2:51PM V17, Maintenance Supervisor stated All I check is the water temperature in rooms. I am kind of new to this position and I don't know what to do to check for Legionella.On 1/29/26 at 2:30PM V1, Administrator verified no surveillance for Legionella was being done.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure interventions for safe smoking were followed for three of 27 residents (R2, R43, R39) reviewed for accident hazards in a sample list of 27. Findings Include: R2's Care Plan documents an admission date of 07/08/2025 with the following diagnoses: Constipation, Tobacco Use, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery Without Angina Pectoris, Asthma, Gastric Ulcer, Presence of Right Artificial Shoulder Joint, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Depression, and Heart Failure. R2's Care Plan documents a focus area dated 7/09/2025 documenting the resident is a smoker with a goal of maintaining safety while following smoking protocol. R2's Smoking – Safety Screen dated 12/27/2024 documents R2 has been educated on smoking safety, that R2 uses a vape on occasion, and that R2 knows to turn her smoking materials into the nurse. The Safety Screen documents R2 lets staff know when she is going outside to smoke and when she comes back in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications timely and according to physician orders for three (R2, R40, R43) of fifteen residents reviewed for medication administration on the sample list of 27. These failures resulted in three medication errors out of twenty-five opportunities resulting in a 12% medication error rate. Findings include: On 1/27/2026 at 12:49 PM, V7, (Registered Nurse (RN)), administered both the scheduled dose of Insulin Aspart and the sliding scale dose of Aspart to R40 after the noon meal.R40's Physicians Order Sheet (POS) dated 11/19/2025 documents an active order for routine administration of Insulin Aspart before meals. Additionally, R40's POS includes an order dated 12/16/2024 for sliding scale Insulin Aspart to be administered before meals based on the resident's blood sugar reading.R40's Medication Administration Audit Sheet dated 1/27/2026 at 12:50 PM, documents that V7 (RN) administered R40's Insulin Aspart after the noon meal. On 1/27/2026 at 12:53 PM, V7, (RN), administered both the scheduled dose of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label nasal spray dispensers with the opened date for three (R1, R7, R48) of fifteen residents reviewed for medication administration on a sample list of 27. Findings include:On 1/28/2026 at 2:32 PM, the facility's North-South Medication Cart was inspected in the presence of V10, (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)). During the inspection R1, R7, and R48's nasal spray multidose dispensers were found without a documented date of opening.Review of R1's Physician's Order Sheet dated 10/02/2025 confirmed that R1 has an active order and is currently receiving Fluticasone Nasal Spray.Review of R7's Physician's Order Sheet dated 11/19/2025 confirmed that R7 has an active order and is currently receiving Fluticasone Nasal Spray.Review R48's Physician's Order Sheet dated 7/02/2025 confirmed that R48 has an active order and is currently receiving Fluticasone Nasal Spray.On 1/28/2026 at 2:35 PM, V10, (LPN), stated that any medication in a multi-dose container should be labeled with the date opened and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor/ manage a gastrostomy feeding tube and report changes to the dietitian/physician for one (R52) of one resident reviewed for feeding tube in a sample of 27 residents. Findings include: R52's face sheet documents R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Urinary Tract infection, Dysphonia, Dysphagia, Epilepsy with Status Epilepticus, Status Post Gastrostomy, Left Hemiparesis, Left Hemiplegia, and History of Stroke, and was discharged to an acute care hospital 10/30/25. R52's Progress Note dated 10/29/25 at 6:00PM by V14, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) documents Nurse entered residents' room to give medications via g-tube (Gastrostomy Tube). Placement confirmed with stethoscope, nurse heard gurgling sound after pushing 5ml (Milliliters) of air through tube. 400ml of content was aspirated from g-tube. Nurse started continuous feeding at 60ml/hr (hour) after giving meds and flushing with 70cc (Cubic Centimeters) of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-10-20 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain full mechanical lifts in safe/operable condition. This failure has the potential to affect eight of eight residents (R3-R10) reviewed for full mechanical lifts in the sample list of 10. Findings include:On 10/20/25 at 10:10 AM R3 was sitting on a full mechanical lift sling in her wheelchair. R3 stated yesterday the full mechanical lift wasn't working so V7 Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) used the sit to stand lift to transfer R3 from her wheelchair into bed. R3 stated during the transfer R3 said Dear Jesus please don't let me fall. R3 stated there have been frequent problems with the full mechanical lift not working properly and yesterday the lift would not raise, it would only lower.On 10/20/25 at 1:02 PM R4 was sitting on a full mechanical lift sling in R4's room. R4 stated the staff had trouble getting the full mechanical lift to work this morning and had to go get another lift. At 1:17 PM V15 and V17 CNAs entered R4's room and used a full mechanical lift to transfer R4. V16 CNA went to use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to properly transfer a resident (R3), for one of three residents (R3) reviewed for falls in a sample list of ten. Findings include:On 10/20/25 at 10:10 AM R3 was sitting on a full mechanical lift sling in her wheelchair. R3 stated R3 fell during a staff assisted transfer in July 2025 that resulted in right leg fracture. R3 stated since then R3 has received therapy, R3 can't use her legs to walk so she transfers with a full mechanical lift. R3 stated yesterday the full mechanical lift wasn't working so the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), V7, used the sit to stand mechanical lift to transfer R3 from the wheelchair into bed. R3 stated during the transfer, R3 said Dear Jesus please don't let me fall. R3's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R3 as cognitively intact and is dependent on staff for transfers. R3's active diagnosis list includes nondisplaced comminuted fracture of shaft of right femur, subsequent encounter for closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse by another resident. This failure affects one resident (R3) out of three reviewed for abuse on a sample list of eight. Findings include: R2's Medical Diagnoses list dated 8/20/25 documents R2 was diagnosed with Autism. Dementia. Anxiety, Insomnia, and Recurrent Depression. R2's Census Details of the same date document R2 had resided at the facility since 10/5/21. R3's Medical Diagnoses List dated 8/20/25 documents R3 was diagnosed with Dementia and Depression. R2's Census detail of the same date documents R3 had resided at the facility since 1/13/22. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R2 exhibits verbal behaviors such as screaming, threatening, and cursing, and physical behaviors such as hitting, kicking, pushing, grabbing, and scratching, directed at others which disrupt the living environment. This same Minimum Data Set documents R2 is independent in dressing and walking up to 150…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 32 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement fall and accident prevention interventions according to a resident's care plan and physician orders. This failure affects one resident (R3) out of three reviewed for falls on the sample list of eight. Findings include: R3's Face Sheet dated 8/20/25 documents R3 had a legally established power of attorney. R3's Medical Diagnoses list of the same date includes Dementia, Major Depression, Hypertension, and Osteoarthritis of the Right Knee. R3's Census Detail of the same date documents R3 was admitted to the facility 1/13/22. R3's Physician order Sheet dated 8/22/25 documents R3 has physician orders to include non-skid strips on the floor in front of her recliner initiated 7/1/24, and to wear (cloth protective leggings) initiated 5/31/25. R3's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R3 requires staff supervision and assistance for all aspects of daily living including hygiene, dressing, bathing, transfers, and transitioning between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a qualified director of food and nutrition services. This failure affects all 42 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 12/10/24 at 9:55 AM, V5, Dietary Manager, was actively supervising and directing the food preparation and wares sanitation processes in the facility kitchen. At 11:50 AM and 12:08 PM, V5 was actively supervising and directing the meal service for lunch. On 12/10/24 at 9:55 AM, V5 stated she was the Dietary Manager. V5 further stated she had a (national company) cooking sanitation certificate. V5 continued to state she did not have a Certified Dietary Manager certificate (CDM, 6 to 9 month clinical nutrition curriculum), nor a Certified Food Protection Professional certificate (CFPP, CDM equivalent). V5 stated the facility utilized the services of a Registered Dietician one day per month on a consultant basis. V5 concluded by stating she did not meet the state requirements for a Director of Food Services nor meet the definition of a Dietetic Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain kitchen utensils to prevent potential contamination of food, and failed to prevent food contamination by storing utensils in bulk food containers. These failures have the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 12/10/24 at 10:15 AM, there was a metal, long handle measuring scoop located inside the bulk sugar bin. The handle of the scoop was in direct contact with, and partially buried by, the sugar. On 12/10/24 at 10:15 AM, V5, Dietary Manager, and V6, Regional Dietary Representative, both stated the scoop should not be left in the sugar. On 12/10/24 at 10:20 AM, there was a silicone blade spatula in a kitchen utensil drawer with a broken corner approximately three-quarters of an inch diagonal, exposing the granulated and rough internal material of the spatula. This granulated surface potentially would crumble off and contaminate food during preparation, and was not easily cleanable. On 12/10/24 at 10:20 AM, V5 removed the spatula from the drawer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to trend the facility's monthly infections. This failure has the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: The facility did not provide an Infection Control Surveillance and Monitoring Policy and no documents were provided for how the facility trends monthly infections to prevent further infection throughout the facility. The facility has no documentation for the identified infections pattern/trend and interventions. On 12/10/24 at 02:10 PM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) Infection Preventionist (IP) stated V2 has not kept up with a log for infections for residents, and only has October and November 2024, for infection logs and only for residents and not for employees. V2 stated V2 and does not complete any Quality Assurance (QA) on infections that reoccur. V2 also stated there has been no completed trending for the facility's infections. The facility's The Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 12/10/24, documents there are 42 residents residing in the facility.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an infection prevention and control program that includes an antibiotic stewardship program and failed to review this policy annually. This failure has the potential to affect all 42 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: On 12/11/24 at 10:40 AM, V2 Director of Nursing (DON) stated V2 has not completed an Antibiotic Stewardship Program for the facility. V2 stated there are no antibiotic protocols or a system to monitor antibiotics in place. The facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program stated the purpose of the policy is to monitor antibiotic use of the residents. This policy has a date of 2/7/23, which has not been updated annually. The facility's The Long Term Care Facility Application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 12/10/24, documents there are 42 residents residing in the facility.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to act on grievances from residents/family promptly, explain to residents how to file a grievance, inform residents where the survey book is located, and address lack of meal substitutes offered at mealtimes and not offering snacks at bedtime. This failure affects four of four residents (R3, R13, R21 and R25) reviewed for grievances in the sample list of 26. Findings include: On 12/11/24 at 10:00 AM, R3, R13, R21, and R25, all stated they can complain but that's as far as it goes. The residents stated staff say they will look into their concerns but the residents can not tell anything has been done. The residents stated they do not know about filling out a grievance form and they do not fill out grievances. The residents stated V9 Activity Director takes the complaints but then after that they do not hear anything more about it. The residents stated staff do not pass out snacks at bedtime and when asked about it they are only offered peanut butter and jelly (PBJ). The residents stated there is no anytime menu…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change, date and store oxygen tubing, humidifier bottles, nebulizer masks, and suctioning equipment in a sanitary manner for four of five residents (R4, R14, R34, R350) reviewed for oxygen in the sample list of 26. Findings Include: The facility policy Departmental Respiratory Therapy Prevention of Infection dated reviewed 4/27/24 documents the oxygen administration supplies consist of oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle. This policy documents to change the oxygen tubing cannula every seven days, and to discard the entire administration set up every seven days. 1. R34's Medical Diagnoses list dated December 2024 documents R34 is diagnosed with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Respiratory Failure. R34's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated December 2024 documents an order for oxygen per nasal cannula at three liters continuously. R34 also has an order for nebulizer treatments every four hours as needed. The oxygen tubing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on Interview and record review, the facility failed to follow through with contacting Physicians for unaddressed Pharmacist recommendations, and failed to maintain documented evidence of Physician responses to Pharmacist recommendations. This failure affects four residents (R12, R16, R22, R26) out of six reviewed for unnecessary medications on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: 1. R16's Registered Pharmacist Consultant recommendation recorded in R16's Nursing Progress Notes dated 11/25/24 documents a Pharmacist recommendation to conduct an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS) assessment to monitor for side effects of long-term Antipsychotic use. There was no documented evidence of a physician response, and no documented evidence of follow-up by the facility to obtain a physician response, in R16's electronic medical record (EMR). As of 12/11/24 at 11:20 AM, there was likewise no record of an AIMS assessment conducted for R16 historically. 2. R22's Registered Pharmacist Consultant Report dated 1/25/24 documents, This resident currently has an order for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct psychotropic medication assessments, failed to maintain accurate documentation in psychotropic medication assessments, failed to conduct abnormal involuntary movement assessments for Antipsychotic medications, failed to obtain a time period duration for PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications, and failed to attempt gradual dose reductions for residents receiving anti-psychotic medications. These failures affect five residents (R12, R16, R22, R26, and R29) out of six reviewed for unnecessary medications on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: 1. R16's Medical Diagnoses list dated 12/13/24 documents R16 experiences medical conditions including Alzheimer's Disease and Dementia. R16's current Physician Order Sheet dated 12/13/24 documents R16 has physician orders for psychotropic medications including Sertraline (antidepressant) 25 milligrams (mg) daily, and Olanzapine (Antipsychotic) 2.5 mg daily. This same Physician Order Sheet documents R16…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect resident's dignity by failing to place a urinary catheter collection bag inside a covering or pouch. This failure affects two residents (R22 and R33) out of two reviewed for urinary catheters on the sample list of 26. Findings include: On 12/10/24 at 10:50 AM, R33's urinary catheter collection bag was positioned under his wheelchair without any covering, exposing approximately 400 cubic centimeters (cc's) of yellow colored urine inside the collection bag. On 12/10/24 at 10:55 AM, V2, Director of Nursing, shook her head no to indicate she did not like residents' catheter collection bags to be exposed and without a dignity pouch or bag. On 12/10/24 at 1:29 PM, V7, Private Caregiver for R22, stated it is about 50/50 whether the staff keep R22's urinary catheter collection bag covered. V7 stated there have been times when R22's family takes R22 out of the facility and she has had to run around the facility to look for a covering bag. On 12/10/24 at 1:50 PM, V1, Administrator, stated it is his expectation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review PASARR II Screening for (R26) who has a diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder and is receiving Antipsychotic medication. R26 is one of one resident reviewed for PASARR screening on a sample list of 26. Findings Include: R26's Medical Diagnosis sheet dated 12/13/24 lists (R26's) Primary Medical Diagnosis for admission on [DATE] as Interstitial Pulmonary Disease. Included with the list of diagnoses is Schizoaffective Disorder with date of 9/2/2022. The Medical Diagnosis Sheet states under the column Classification for the Schizoaffective Disorder as During Stay. R26's PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Screen ,which is required for admission to the nursing facility, was completed on 8/8/2021 and documents (R26) did not need to be screened for a Level II screening. This PASARR screening was done when (R26) was a resident of a different nursing facility. On 12/12/24 at 12:50…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document a discharge summary that includes a recapitulation of stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and a post discharge plan of care. This failure has the potential to affect one of one resident (R49) reviewed for discharge on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: The facility's Discharge Summary and Plan Policy Statement dated 2/17/24 documents when a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and medication plan will be developed to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment. The discharge summary will include a recapitulation of the resident's stay at this facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of the discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident. The discharge summary shall include a description of the resident's course of illness, treatment, or therapy since entering the facility, current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide complete antibiotic doses for a urinary tract infection for one resident (R42) of one resident reviewed for infections on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: R42's Nursing Notes dated 11/9/24 at 2:13 PM, document per urology orders replaced indwelling catheter, also dip-tested urine to reveal abnormal urine sample, sending to lab for urine analysis (UA) and culture and sensitivity. R42's Nursing Notes dated 11/12/24 at 2:10 PM, document V22 Medical Director aware of UA results, new order received for Bactrim DS everyday for five days. R42's Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated November 2024, documents Bactrim DS tablet 800-160 milligrams (Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim) one tablet by mouth twice a day for urinary tract infection for five days, with a start date of 11/12/24 at 8:00 AM. This same MAR has no indication that this antibiotic was given on 11/16/24 as the 8:00 AM dose and the 5:00 PM dose are not documented as given. R42's Nursing Notes dated 12/8/24 at 3:12 PM, document R42's family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess for smoking safety and failed to provide supervision for a potential smoking accident for one of one resident (R6) assessed for smoking safety on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: R6's Care Plan dated 1/31/2023 documents the following diagnoses: Presence of Right Artificial Shoulder Joint, Dependence on Renal Dialysis and Tobacco use. The same care plan for R6 documents a goal of (R6) will maintain safety while following smoking protocol. This was dated 7/9/24. An intervention for the goal was R6 is supervised while smoking. Date initiated 07/09/24. Another intervention for the goal was smoking materials are kept secured by staff. Date initiated 07/09/24. R6's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] which was a re-admission assessment documents 15 for (R6's) BIMS ( Brief Mental Status) score. R6 is cognitively intact. The facility's assessment titled Smoking Assessment for (R6) on the following dates 8/2/24,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's physician of significant weight loss and failed to develop a plan of care to adequately address a resident's significant risk for weight loss. These failures affected one of one resident (R350) reviewed for nutrition on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: The facility's Weight Assessment and Intervention policy dated September 2008 documents the multidisciplinary team will strive to prevent, monitor, and intervene for undesirable weight loss for residents. Any change of 5% or more nursing will notify the Dietician and Primary Care Physician. Greater than 5% loss within one month will be considered severe weight loss. R350's Medical Diagnoses list dated December 2024 documents R350 is diagnosed with Dysphagia and Gastrostomy Status. R350's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated December 2024 documents orders for R350 to be NPO (Nothing by Mouth) and for Enteral Feed, four times a day related to Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. R350 is to be weighed weekly for four weeks. R350's Weight record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to monitor and obtain a physician order regarding Gastrostomy site monitoring, dressing changes and self administration of medication via Gastrostomy tube. These failures have the potential to affect one of one resident (R350) reviewed for Gastrostomy Tube on the sample list of 26. Findings Include: R350's Medical Diagnoses list dated December 2024 documents R350 is diagnosed with Dysphagia and Gastrostomy Status. R350's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated December 2024 documents orders for R350 to be NPO (Nothing by Mouth) and for Enteral Feed, four times a day related to Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition. On 12/10/24 at 11:32 AM R350 stated she administers her own feedings and medications through her gastrostomy tube. On 12/11/24 at 2:50 PM V2 Director of Nurses confirmed R350 administers her own feedings and medications via her gastrostomy tube. V2 confirmed there were no orders for self administration of medication, gastrostomy site maintenance/dressings or monitoring by staff, and no documentation that nursing staff had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medication in a timely manner for one resident (R10) of four residents reviewed for timely medication in a sample list of ten residents. Findings Include: R10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) documents R10 is scheduled to receive the following medications at 8:00AM: Ascorbic Acid 500Mg (Milligrams), Cholecalciferol 50Mcg (Micrograms), Famotidine 40Mg, Fluoxetine 20 Mg, Furosemide 40Mg, Gabapentin 100Mg, Phentermine 15Mg, Potassium Chloride 20Meq (Milliequivalents), Spiriva one puff, Symbicort 160/4.5Mcg one puff, Bupropion 100Mg, Cranberry Tab 900Mg, and MiraLAX 17Gm (Grams). On 8/6/24 at 10:17AM V5, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed preparing the above medications for R10 in the hall at the medication cart outside R10's room. V5 verified the medications were R10's 8:00AM doses. V5 stated the medications are late because I had another resident going in for cataract surgery and I got behind. It does happen sometimes especially when there is only one nurse working. R10's MAR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for oxygen and maintenance of supplemental oxygen for three residents (R1, R5, R6) of six residents reviewed for oxygen in a sample list of ten residents. Findings Include: 1. R5's Care Plan updated 7/24/24 includes the diagnosis: Chronic Respiratory Failure. On 8/5/24 at 10:00AM R5 was observed sitting in his room with oxygen in place at three liters per minute flow per nasal cannula. On 8/5/24 at 10:30AM R5's physician's orders did not document a physician's order for supplemental oxygen. R5's Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for August 1, 2024, to August 31, 2024, does not document a physician's order specifying when oxygen tubing/humidification bottle should be changed. 2. R6's Care Plan updated 7/30/24 documents (R6) has an Activities of Daily Living Self Care Performance Deficit: Activity Intolerance, Confusion, Dementia, Shortness of Breath. This Care Plan also documents a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. On 8/5/24 at 10:06AM R6 was observed sitting in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to prevent the potential for physical cross-contamination of food. This failure has the potential to affect all 49 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. On 11/6/2023 at 10:02 AM, two ice scoops were stored in a container located adjacent to the facility ice maker. One scoop was made of white plastic and the other scoop was clear plastic. Both scoops were heavily chipped on the leading edges and missing pieces of plastic up to a quarter of an inch in size. On 11/6/2023 at 12:16 PM, V3 (Dietary Manager) was using the white colored ice scoop from above to obtain ice from the ice maker for residents. On 11/07/2023 at 12:12 PM, the white ice scoop from above remained in the storage container. V3 was present and stated no (she doesn't know where the missing chips of plastic from the scoops are located). 2. On 11/6/2023 at 12:16 PM, a can opener was mounted on a food prep table in the kitchen. The opener was soiled with accumulations of metal shavings where the cutting blade makes contact with canned food items…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-08 · tag F0848 — pattern
    Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure arbitration agreements provide for the selection of an arbitration venue convenient to both parties. This failure has the potential to affect five residents (R48, R102, R202, R204, R208) of five reviewed for arbitration agreements on the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility arbitration agreements signed by R48, R102, R202, R204, and R208 do not include any language providing for the selection of an arbitration venue convenient to both parties. The contract documents the arbitration will occur in the county where the facility is located. On 11/8/2023 at 10:39 AM, V4 (Business Office Manager) reported the facility arbitration agreement does not have the required language related to arbitration venue selection.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to honor the choice to refuse the influenza vaccine for one (R22) of five residents reviewed for immunizations on the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility's Influenza Vaccine policy with a revised date of August 2016 documents, Between October 1st and March 31st each year, the influenza vaccine shall be offered to residents and employees, unless the vaccine is medically contraindicated, or the resident or employee has already been immunized. This policy also documents, A resident's refusal of the vaccine shall be documented on the Informed Consent for Influenza Vaccine and placed in the resident's medical record. R22's Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccine Consent/Declination form signed on 9/25/23 by V20 (R22's Power of Attorney) documents V20 declined to have R22 receive the Influenza Vaccine and the Pneumococcal (PCV20) Vaccine. This form is also signed by V9 Licensed Practical Nurse/Infection Preventionist. R22's electronic immunization record documents R22 was given the Influenza Vaccine on 9/22/23 in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to evaluate and obtain orders for self administration of medications for two (R6, R26) of two residents reviewed for self administration of medications from a total sample list of 31 residents. Findings include: The facility provided Administering Medications Policy dated December 2012 documents that residents may only self-administer medication if the attending physician in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team has determined that they have the decision making capacity to do so safely. The facility provided Self-Administration of Medications Policy dated December 2016 documents that the staff and practitioner will assess each resident's mental and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medication is clinically appropriate for the resident including a full and complete assessment of the resident's ability to self-administer medications. The staff and practitioner will document their findings of the assessment. R6's November 2023 Medication Administration Record documents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately code Minimum Data Set assessments for two (R50, R27) of 17 residents reviewed for assessments on the sample list of 31. Findings include: 1. R50's Nursing Notes dated 9/06/2023 at 10:49 AM, documents R50 was discharged and medications including narcotics were sent with R50. R50's Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documents R50 was discharged to the hospital. On 11/8/23 at 3:00 PM, V18 Regional Nurse Consultant stated R50 was discharged to home not the hospital and that the Discharge Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] was coded incorrectly. 2. R27's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents that R27 is on an antipsychotic medication. R27's August Medication Administration Record documents no anti-psychotic medications were ordered for R27. On 11/7/23 at 11:26 AM, V8 Minimum Data Set Coordinator stated, I must have mis-coded R27's Minimum Data Set. She has never been on an antipsychotic.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a pressure relieving intervention (cushion) for one of three residents (R22) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample list of 31. Findings Include: The facility's Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries policy with a revised date of July 2017 documents, Review the resident's care plan and identify the risk factors as well as the interventions designed to reduce or eliminate those considered modifiable. This policy also documents, Teach residents who can change positions independently the importance of repositioning. Provide support devices and assistance as needed. Remind and encourage residents to change positions. R22's Face Sheet documents diagnoses including Pseudobulbar Affect, Vascular Dementia and Hypothyroidism. R22's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R22 is at risk for developing pressure ulcers, has a pressure reducing device for the chair and documents R22's mobility devices as a walker and a wheelchair.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide safe transport for one of three residents (R42) reviewed for accidents on the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility's Operation Instructions for the shower chair with the model # SC9200 MS documents, Precautions: Exaggerated user movement in any direction or sitting on the edge of the seat may cause the chair to tip. This policy also documents, Safety/Maintenance Information: Make certain chair is assembled according to the enclosed instructions. R42's Face Sheet documents a diagnosis of Altered Mental Status, Morbid (Severe) Obesity and Weakness. R42's electronic medical record documents R42's weight on 11/5/23 was 246.6 pounds. R42's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R42 has moderately impaired cognition, R42 does not walk and R42 is totally dependent on two staff for bathing. On 11/6/23 at 10:44 AM, R42 was being pushed down the hallway from R42's room to the shower room, approximately 35 feet, in a shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide oxygen per physician's orders for one of one resident (R42) reviewed for oxygen administration in the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility's Oxygen Administration policy with a revised date of October 2010 documents Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. This policy also documents, Adjust the oxygen delivery device so that it is comfortable for the resident and the proper flow of oxygen is being administered. R42's Physician Order dated November 2023 documents a diagnosis of Chronic Diastolic Congestive Heart Failure and documents an order for Oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula continually. R42's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documents R42 uses oxygen. R42's Electronic Medication Administration Record dated November 2023 documents an order for Oxygen at 2 liters per nasal cannula with a start date of 8/31/23. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to relieve pain by failing to provide pain medication as ordered for three (R9, R32, R47) of three residents reviewed for pain on the sample list of 31 residents. Findings include: The facility Administering Medications Policy dated December 2012 documents that medication must be given as ordered including any required time frame. 1.) R9's undated diagnosis sheet documents Chronic Kidney Disease, Leg pain and Lymphedema. On 11/6/23 at 10:43 AM, R9 was sitting up in wheelchair and rubbing shoulder and hands stating that she was in pain. On 11/6/23 at 10:44 AM, R9 was sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room and stated, My pain patch ran out on Thursday, and they still haven't gotten it for me. I have been having a lot of pain. I have to get out of bed at night and sit up in my wheelchair to help with the pain, but I need my patch. R9's October and November Medication Administration Record documents an order for a Butrans 10 micrograms per hour pain patch to be administered weekly (Thursdays). On 11/7/23 at 1:14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pain medication as ordered by the physician for two (R9 and R32) of two residents reviewed for pain on the sample list of 31 residents. Findings include: The facility Administering Medications Policy dated 12/2012 documents that medication must be given as ordered, including any required time frame. 1.) R9's October and November Medication Administration Record documents an order for a Butrans 10 micrograms per hour transdermal pain patch to be administered weekly (Thursdays). On 11/6/23 at 10:44 AM, R9 was sitting in a wheelchair in the dining room and stated, My pain patch ran out on Thursday, and they still haven't gotten it for me. I have been having a lot of pain. I have to get out of bed at night and sit up in my wheelchair to help with the pain, but I need my patch. On 11/7/23 at 1:14 PM, V7 Registered Nurse stated, (R9) should have had her patch weekly. (R9) missed 12 days, from October 26 until November 6, 2023. On 11/6/23 at 3:20 PM, V22 Medical Director stated, I can tell you exactly when I got the fax…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess the need for psychotropic medications and reassess the need for as needed antianxiety medication for three of five residents (R6, R22, R29) reviewed for unnecessary medications on the sample list of 31. Findings include: The facility's Antipsychotic Medication Use policy with a revised date of December 2016 documents, Antipsychotic medications may be considered for residents with dementia but only after medical, physical, functional, psychological, emotional, psychiatric, social and environmental causes of behavioral symptoms have been identified and addressed. Antipsychotic medications will be prescribed at the lowest possible dosage for the shortest period of time and are subject to gradual dose reduction and re-review. Residents who are admitted from the community or transferred from a hospital and who are already receiving antipsychotic medications will be evaluated for the appropriateness and indications for use. Diagnosis of a specific…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess a bed rail for areas of entrapment for one of one (R29) resident reviewed for bed rails on the sample list of 31. Findings include: On 11/06/23 at 10:33 AM, R29 was lying in bed. There was a half side rail at the end of the bed. The gaps between the rails on the bed rail were greater than 4.5 inches. The gaps between the rail measured approximately 10 inches. V21 Caregiver stated the rail was added to the bed two weeks ago. R29's medical record did not contain a bed rail assessment to identify areas of entrapment. On 11/08/23 at 1:27 PM, V18 Regional Nurse Consultant stated that they did not have a bed rail assessment to identify areas of entrapment when the bed rail was placed on the bed.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive person centered care plan for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for care plans in the sample list of three. Findings include: R1's undated Face Sheet documents R1's diagnoses as unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physical condition, Non-traumatic Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage, unspecified Intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, sequela, unspecified Mental Disorder due to known Physiological Condition, unspecified Mood. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R1 as moderate cognitive impairment and inattention and disorganized thinking. R1's Departmental Notes dated 7/27/23 at 9:48 PM, documents R1 was reported by north wing nurse that she was able to punch front door code and go outside. R1's Departmental Notes dated 8/15/23 at 10:00 AM, documents resident exited the front door of the facility to go to (a fast food restaurant), staff followed her (R1) out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for a resident (R1) at risk for eloping from the facility. This failure affects one of three (R1) residents reviewed for elopement in the sample list of three. Findings include: R1's undated Face Sheet documents R1's diagnoses as unspecified Psychosis not due to a substance or known physical condition, Non-traumatic Chronic Subdural Hemorrhage, unspecified Intracranial injury with loss of consciousness of unspecified duration, sequela, unspecified Mental Disorder due to known Physiological Condition, unspecified Mood. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R1 as moderate cognitive impairment, inattention and disorganized thinking. R1's Departmental Notes dated 7/27/23 at 9:48 PM, documents R1 was reported by north wing nurse that she was able to punch front door code and go outside. R1's Departmental Notes dated 8/15/23 at 10:00 AM, documents resident exited the front door of the facility to go to (a fast food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.8+0.2 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 53.7-0.7 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 51.8+1.2 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 51.5+0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 03/01/2019
STOUT, SCOTTIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 03/01/2018

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+7.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$240K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 57%Medicare 16%Other / private 27%

This home reported $240K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$255per resident / day
operating cost
$7,743per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$276per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 145416. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next