Fairview Rehab & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

35.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 58 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 36.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 76 beds and averages 56.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.80 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.17 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.69 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.85 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.18 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement risk in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in a cognitively impaired resident (R1) exiting the facility without staff knowledge and being found approximately two miles away from the facility. The failure required the sheriff to call an ambulance that transported R1 to a local hospital Emergency Room. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 2/2/25 at 1:46 am when R1 exited the facility through the bird room double doors without supervision and was found by the sheriff's office approximately two miles from the facility. This past non-compliance occurred from 2/2/25 to 2/2/25. V14 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2/5/24 at 11:04 AM. The Surveyor confirmed by observation, record review and interview that the immediacy was removed on 2/2/25. Findings Included: R1's Facility's admission Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for elopement risk in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in a cognitively impaired resident (R1) exiting the facility without staff knowledge and being found approximately one- and one-half blocks away requiring police calling an ambulance and transporting R1 to a local hospital Emergency Room. This failure resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy, which was identified to have begun on 9/13/23 at 9:17am when R1 exited the facility through the entrance door without supervision and was found by police approximately one- and one-half blocks from the facility. This past non-compliance occurred from 9/13/23 to 9/13/23. V1 (Administrator) was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 2/27/24 at 8:30am. The Surveyor confirmed by observation, record review and interview that the immediacy was removed on 9/13/23. Findings include: R1's face sheet documented admission to the facility on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of abnormal vital signs and a change in resident's condition for 1 of 4 residents (R1) reviewed for physician notification in a sample of 9. Findings include: R1's admission record documents an admission date of 11/16/2024 and the following diagnoses in part, unspecified fracture of shaft of humerus, right arm, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, unspecified displaced fracture of first cervical vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing need for assistance with personal care. R1's Minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 15, indicating that R1 was cognitively intact. R1's progress notes documents on 12/10/2024 at 12:01am, This nurse went into pt's (patient's) room and son visiting had pulse oximeter on his mother's finger and it was reading 90%. He states when it first was put on it was 80. This PT very anxious. Color natural skin w/d (warm/dry).…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• No harm found · Bcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide 80 square feet of living space per resident bed for 4 of 4 residents (R10, R20, R27, and R44) reviewed for adequate room space in a sample of 30. Findings include: On 05/15/24 at 10:30 AM, V10 (Maintenance Director) measured R10 and R27's room with a measuring tape. The room measured 143 inches (11.92 feet) by 152.5 inches (12.7 feet), equaling 75.7 square feet per resident living space. The room contained: two beds, two bedside tables and an inset dresser. V10 did not include the closet or the inset dresser space in the measurements. At that time, R10 and R27 were sitting in their room watching TV. R10 and R27 who are alert to person, place and time, stated, they have no concerns with their room size. On 05/15/24 at 10:40 AM, V10 measured R44 and R20's room with a measuring tape. The room measured 143 inches (11.92 feet) by 152.5 inches (12.7 feet), equaling 75.7 square feet per resident living space. The room contained: two beds,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• No harm found · Ccited before2023-06-15 · tag F0912 — widespread
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the required 80 square feet per resident bed for 42 residents of 42 residents (R1-R6, R8-R15, R17-R22, R24-R27, R29, R31-R34, R36- R39, R41-R46, R49, R50, and R111) reviewed for room size in the sample of 52. Findings Include: On 6/14/23 beginning at 2:45 PM, V5 (Assistant Maintenance Director) accompanied by this surveyor measured resident rooms that didn't meet the required 80 square foot per resident. The measurements were as follows: A hall room [ROOM NUMBER], 2, and 3 measured at 141 1/2 (inches) x 150 1/8 which equals 147.52 square (sq) feet, which indicates 73.76 sq feet per person. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured at 150 x 150 1/8 which equals 156.38 sq feet, which indicates 78.19 sq feet per person. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured at 141 1/4 x 149 1/2 which equals 146.65 sq feet, which indicates 73.32 sq foot per person. room [ROOM NUMBER] measured at 146 x 150 which equals 152.08 sq feet, which indicates 76.04 sq feet per person.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• No harm found · Bcited before2022-07-14 · tag F0912 — pattern
  Provide rooms that are at least 80 square feet per resident in multiple rooms and 100 square feet for single resident rooms.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview, observation and record review the facility failed to provide at least 80 square feet of space per resident bed for 44 of 44 residents (R1-R9, R11-R26, R29-R31, R33-R34, R36-R37, R39-40, R42-R50, R52, and R153) reviewed for room size in the sample of 54. Findings include: On 7/13/22, V1 (Administrator) and V8 (Maintenance Supervisor) both said all resident bedrooms rooms on A and B Hall did not provide the minimal 80 square feet of space per resident bed as required. V1 and V3 both verified the rooms that provided less than 80 square feet per resident bed were A1-A12, A14-A15 and B1-B13. V1 confirmed all rooms were Medicare/Medicaid certified for two residents. During this survey observations were made of rooms A1-A12, A14-A15 and B1-B13. These rooms were adequate to meet the needs of the residents. No complaints were voiced regarding room size from residents or family. The facility provided a census sheet on 7/11/22 documenting that R1-R9, R11-R26, R29-R31, R33-R34, R36-R37, R39-40, R42-R50, R52, and R153 reside in rooms A1-A12, A14-A15 and B1-B13.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,972 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-02-06
• $13,627 — penalty dated 2024-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $233K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL