Cass County Senior Living & Rehabilitation LLC
530 East Beardstown Street, Virginia, IL 62691 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 71 certified beds · (217) 452-3218 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.7% | 13.4% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 6.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 15.6% | 54.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.4% | 14.3% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 26.3% | 18.3% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.7% | 91.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.7% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.5% | 20.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 9.6% | 21.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.2% | 1.4% | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 42% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 71 beds and averages 28.1 residents a day — about 40% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to secure a treatment orders promptly, and delayed the implementation of new interventions once skin breakdown was discovered to prevent worsening of a pressure wound for one of two residents (R23) reviewed for pressure ulcers in the sample of 24. These failures resulted in R23's facility acquired pressure wound worsening to a stage three.Findings include:The Prevention of Pressure Ulcers/Injuries policy dated 07/2017 documents The purpose of this procedure is to provide information regarding the identification of pressure ulcer/injury risk factors and interventions for specific risk factors. Risk Assessment 4. Inspect the skin on a daily basis when performing or assisting with personal care or ADL's (Activities of Daily Living). a. Identify any signs of developing pressure injuries (i.e. (example), non-blanchable erythema). b. Inspect pressure points (sacrum, heels, buttocks, coccyx, elbows, ischium, trochanter, etc. (etcetera). Prevention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents are without significant medication errors for one (R1) of three reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:The Facility's undated Telephone Orders Policy documents Verbal telephone orders may only be received by licensed personnel. Orders must be recorded in the resident's medical record.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Hypertension, Osteoarthritis, Dementia, Parkinsonism, Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, and Cerebrovascular Disease.R1's laboratory results dated [DATE] document a Prothrombin Time result of 47.8 (high) and an INR (International Normalized Ratio) result of 5.1 (Critically High). The purpose of a Prothrombin Time and INR is to measure how quickly blood forms a clot.R1's Nurses Note dated 2/12/26 at 5:48 PM documents Facility received a faxed request from V5 (Medical Director) for results of PT/INR for R1 that was to be drawn on 2/9/26. Upon review of R1's records, no lab was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) worked at least eight hours daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents residing within the facility.Findings include: The facility's Nurse Schedule, January 1st through February 28th, 2026, documents the facility did not have the services of a registered nurse at least eight hours a day on 01/31/26, 2/14/26, 2/15/26, and 2/28/26.On 3/1/26 at 11:24 AM V2/RN/Prior Director of Nursing verified the provided nurse schedules were accurate and on 1/31/26, 2/14/26, 2/15/26, and 2/28/26 no RN worked those days. V2/DON stated, I am responsible for scheduling the nurses. We have a hard time finding any RNs to work. That's why we cannot provide RN coverage eight hours per day. It's been like that since I started in August 2025.The facility's CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Form 671 dated 3/1/26 and signed by V1/Administrator documents 26 residents reside within the facility.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the food items opened in the kitchen's dry storage, refrigerator and freezer were dated and labeled. These failures have the potential to affect all 26 residents residing in the facility.Findings include: The facility's Food Storage (Dry, Refrigerated, and Frozen) Policy, dated 3/31/25, documents Guidelines: Food shall be stored on shelves in a clean, dry area, free from contaminants. Food shall be stored at appropriate temperatures and using appropriate methods to ensure the highest level of food safety. Procedure: 1. a. All food items will be labeled. The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded.On 3/1/26 at 8:43 AM, a tour was conducted with V7/Cook. The facility's stand-up freezer in the kitchen contained a one-gallon clear baggy with two egg rolls (undated/labeled and not stored in original packaging) and a half-opened bag of frozen dinner rolls (undated/labeled). The stand-up refrigerator/freezer located in the kitchen had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician in a timely manner following a significant change in condition (fall with head injury) while receiving an anticoagulant medication Eliquis, for one (R27) of one resident reviewed for physician notification out of a sample list of 24. Findings include:The facility's Change in a Resident's Condition or Status policy, revised 5/2017, documented the facility shall promptly notify the resident, the resident's attending physician, and the resident's representative of changes in the resident's medical or mental condition and/or status. The policy further documented the nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or on-call physician when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident and document the notification in the resident's medical record.R27's Risk Management Assessment documented R27 experienced a fall on 2/27/26 in his room while with Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). R27's Nurse Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document an appropriate diagnosis and target behaviors to warrant the use of anti-psychotic medications for two of six residents (R1 and R29) reviewed for anti-psychotic medication use with the diagnosis of Dementia in the sample of 24. Findings include: The facilities Psychotropic Medication Use Policy, dated 2/2025, documents Policy Statement: Residents do not receive psychotropic medication that are not clinically indicated and necessary to treat a specific condition documented in the medical record. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. Medications in the following categories are considered psychotropic medications and are subject to prescribing, monitoring, and review requirements specific to psychotropic medications: Antipsychotics. 3. Psychotropic medication management is an interdisciplinary process that involves the resident, family, and/or the representative and includes: A. determining adequate indications for use.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect current interventions implemented for mobility and fall prevention for one (R26) of one resident reviewed for care plan revision in a sample of 24 residents.Findings include: The facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered policy revised 12/2016 documents Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents condition changes. On 3/03/2026 at 9:30 AM, R26 was observed lying in bed with the bed pushed against the wall and a fall mat positioned next to the bed. A high-back wheelchair with a foot board and stability cushion was observed in R26's room.On 3/03/2026 at 9:32 AM, R26's Comprehensive Care Plan did not include the fall mat next to the bed as a fall intervention and did not contain documentation of a scoop mattress. Further review revealed the care plan documented a non-slip mat was to be used in R26's wheelchair to prevent R26 from slipping out of the chair; however, no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide ordered medication for one of one resident (R17) reviewed for quality of care in the sample of 24.Findings include:The Ombudsman Residents' Rights Booklet documents Your facility must treat you with dignity and respect and must care for you in a manner that promotes your quality of life. Your facility must provide services to keep your physical and mental health at their highest practical levels.R17's Face Sheet documents that R17 is a [AGE] year-old that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Age Related Osteoporosis, Chronic Fatigue, Muscle Weakness, and Genetic Related Intellectual Disability.R17's Hospital Discharge Medication List dated 2/6/26 at 11:43 AM, documents Testosterone Transdermal Gel 20.25 mg (milligram)/1.25 gm (gram) Apply two pumps transdermal one time a day to R17's shoulders. R17's Nursing Note written by V20/Registered Nurse/RN dated 2/6/26 at 3:44 PM, documents V20 called V21/Hospital Doctors…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accident hazards and received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for one (R27) of one resident reviewed for accidents in the sample list of 24. This failure resulted in (R27), a resident prescribed a blood thinner (Eliquis), falling from a wheelchair and striking his head on the floor, sustaining a large, painful discolored area to the back of the head. Findings include: The facility's Change in a Residents' Condition or Status policy revised 5/2017 documents our facility shall promptly notify the resident, his or her attending Physician, and representative of changes in the resident's medical/mental condition and/or status (changes in level of care, resident rights, etcetera) The Nurse will notify the residents attending physician on call when there has been an accident or incident involving the resident. The nurse will record in the resident's medical record information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to replace oxygen tubing and humidifier bottle for one two residents (R1) reviewed for oxygen in the sample of 24.Findings include:The facility Oxygen Administration policy dated 10/2010 documents The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration.The Administering Medication through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer dated 10/2010 documents The purpose of this procedure is to safely and aseptically administer aerosolized particles of medication into the resident's airway. Steps in the Procedure 30. Change equipment and tubing every seven days, or according to facility protocol.R1's Face Sheet documents that R1 is a [AGE] year-old that was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Acute Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Vascular Dementia, Mild, with Other Behavioral Disturbances.R1's Care Plan documents that R1 is at risk for Respiratory complications and requires…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to apply a gown prior to providing high-contact care for a resident with a wound for one of one resident (R6) reviewed for EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) in the sample of 24. Findings include: The Enhanced Barrier Precautions Sign, undated, documents Everyone Must: Clean their hands, including before entering and when leaving the room. Providers and Staff Must Also: Wear gloves and a gown for the following High-Contact Resident Care Activities- Dressing, Bathing/Showering, Transferring, Changing Lines, Providing Hygiene, Changing Briefs or Assisting with Toileting, Device Care or Use: Central Line, Urinary Catheter, Feeding Tube, Tracheostomy, Wound Care (any skin opening requiring a dressing).The facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions Policy, dated 3/28/24, documents Definition: EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions) expand the use of PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and refer to an infection control intervention designed to reduce…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 10 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with hot water in their personal showers and sinks for two of three residents (R2, R3) reviewed for adequate hot water temperatures in the sample of four.Findings include:The facility's Resident Rights policy, dated 12/2016, documents Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: a dignified existence; self-determination; privacy and confidentiality; have the facility respond to his or her grievances.The facility's Water Temperatures, Safety of policy, dated 12/2009, documents Water heaters that service resident rooms, bathrooms, common areas, and tub/shower areas shall be set to temperatures of no more than 110 F, or the maximum allowable temperature per state regulation. Maintenance staff is responsible for checking thermostats and temperature controls in the facility and recording these checks in a maintenance log.The facilities bath, shower/tub policy, dated 2/2018, documents The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a diagnosis of hemiplegia, was transferred safely to prevent skin tear injury to their affected arm, for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for injury in the sample of four.Findings include:The facility's Safe Lifting and movement of Residents policy, dated 7/2017, documents In order to protect the safety and well-being of staff and residents, and to promote quality care, this facility uses appropriate techniques and devices to lift and move residents to reduce the risk of injury where possible. Resident safety, dignity, self-initiated movement during transfer, comfort and medical condition will be incorporated into goals and decisions regarding the safe lifting and moving of residents.R1's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/16/26, documents R1 requires assistance of one staff to transfer and has an upper body impairment on one side.R1's Care Plan, dated 10/11/25, documents R1 has diagnoses of dizziness, reduced mobility, traumatic hemorrhage of right cerebrum without loss of consciousness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to implement a surveillance plan for identifying, tracking, and monitoring infections, communicable diseases, and outbreaks among residents and staff. These failures have the potential to affect all 27 residents residing within the facility.Findings include:The facility's Resident Listing Report dated 9/19/25 documents 27 residents currently reside within the facility.The facility's Surveillance for Infections policy dated 09/2027 documents, The facility will conduct ongoing surveillance for Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) and other epidemiologically significant infections that have substantial impact on potential resident outcome and that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions. a. For residents with infections that meet the criteria for definition of infection for surveillance, collect the following data as appropriate: Identifying information. Diagnoses. admission date, date of onset of infection (may list onset of symptoms, if known, or date of positive diagnostic test);…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-09-21 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview the facility failed to designate a qualified infection preventionist to implement the facility's infection prevention and control programs. This failure has the potential to affect all 27 residents residing within the facility.Findings include:The facility's Resident Listing Report dated 9/19/25 documents 27 residents currently reside within the facility.The facility's Infection Preventionist Job Description dated 10/12/20 documents, The Infection Preventionist is responsible for the effective direction, management, and operation of the infection prevention program. Position Qualifications and Credentials: Specific training in Infection Prevention and Control through accredited continuing education program.The facility's Facility assessment dated 2025 does not include an Infection Preventionist as part of the facility's staffing plan based on their current census and needs.On 9/19/25 at 10:45 AM V1 (Administrator) stated, (V2/Director of Nursing) is the facility's infection preventionist and is responsible for the facility's infection control…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-09-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement a plan of care to address a resident's UTI (Urinary Tract Infection) for one of three residents (R1) reviewed for UTIs in the sample of three.Findings include:The facility's Person-Centered Comprehensive Care Plan policy dated 12/2016 documents, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. The Interdisciplinary Team will review and update the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition, when the desired outcome is not met, when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay, and at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS assessment. R1's Urine Culture Final Report dated 9/13/25 documents, Final Report: greater than100,000…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers in the resident's bathrooms were free of a brown/black furry textured substance, water was available in one shower room, faucets were in good working order, cracked tile in the shower rooms was repaired, unconnected piping wasn't exposed, and functioning ventilation fans in resident rooms. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents who reside in the facility. Findings Include:The Facility's current resident census sheet dated 7/16/2025, documents 26 residents reside in the facility.The Facility's Safety and Supervision of Residents policy dated 11/14/2024 documents, Policy Statement, our facility strives to make the environment as free from accident hazards as possible. Resident safety and supervision and assistance to prevent accidents are facility-wide priorities. Facility-Oriented Approach to Safety, 2. Safety risks and environmental hazards are identified on an ongoing basis through a combination of employee training, employee monitoring, and reporting processes; QAPI reviews…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide eight consecutive hours of a Registered Nurse, daily. This failure has the potential to affect all 26 residents who reside in the facility.Findings Include:The Facility's current resident census sheet dated 7/16/2025, documents 26 residents reside in the facility.The Facility's Staffing policy (not dated) documents, Policy Statement, our facility provides sufficient numbers of staff with the skills and competency necessary to provide care and services for all residents in accordance with resident care plans and the facility assessment.The Facility's staffing sheets dated 6/16/2025-7/16/2025 document all days with no Registered Nurse for eight consecutive hours, 6/28, 6/29,7/3, 7/3, 7/5, 7/6, 7/10, 7/12, 7/16.On 7/16/2025 at 1:00 PM V6 (Director of Nursing) stated I am the only Registered Nurse on staff, I am also responsible as Director of Nursing, MDS (minimum data set) Coordinator. V6 states she will work the floor, and she is also the only nurse manager to cover if a nurse or certified nurse aid calls in. V6…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to use a gait belt, or a two person assist for a transfer for one resident (R3) of two residents reviewed for falls in the sample of 20. Findings include: The Fall Policy dated 7/2014 document To ensure that the resident's environment remains as free of accident hazards as possible, and that each resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents. The Gait belt Policy dated 3/16/2020 documents Purpose: To give guidance as to the proper use of a gait belt to reduce injury to staff and resident. Policy: Staff will utilize gait belt at all times while transferring or ambulating a resident as outlined in this policy. Procedure: 1. The gait belt is part of the C.N.A (Certified Nursing Assistant) uniform and is the responsibility of the C.N.A to have on their person at all times. R3's admission Record documents that R3 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinsonism, Unspecified Convulsions, Type 2 Diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two residents (R19 and R24) of two residents reviewed for EBP in the sample of 20. Findings include: The Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy (not dated) documents Purpose: Reduce the spread of Infection. Procedure Providers and staff must clean hands before entering and leaving the room, wear gloves and gown for the following high-contract resident care activities - dressing, bathing/showering, and transferring, changing linens, providing hygiene, changing briefs, or assisting with toileting for residents with devices such as a central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy. Wound Care: any skin opening requiring a dressing. 1. R24's admission Record documents that R24 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Essential (Primary) Hypertension. R24's Minimum Data Set/MDS assessment dated [DATE] documents that R24 has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the Facility failed to store and label open food items in the Facility refrigerator and freezer. This failure has the potential to affect all 28 Residents residing in the Facility. Findings include: Facility Cold Food Storage Policy, revised 9/15/22, documents: cold food storage is maintained to prevent foods from becoming hazardous with growth of microorganisms and reduce cross contamination and food borne illness; all cold food will be refrigerated, and temperatures will be monitored to assure proper temperature is maintained; all foods will be labeled with date prepared and time; and discard all potentially hazardous foods. The Facility Resident List Report, dated 1/2/24, documents 28 Residents residing in the Facility. On 1/2/24 at 10:10 am, the Facility Refrigerator contained an open and undated bag of shredded cheddar cheese, half of an onion, half of a tomato, container of lettuce and a block of cheese. The Facility freezer contained an open, unsealed, and undated bag of meatballs, chicken patties and hamburger patties. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.8 | -1.8 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 3.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.8 | -0.8 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 2 of 5 | 1.5 | +0.5 vs chain |
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| STOUT, SCOTT | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/01/2025 |
| WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| BROSTER, ALICE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| LINDNER, LON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| PHERIGO, ASHLEY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| SCHROEDER, JENNIFER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| TWEEDY, MICHELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
| WHITE, BRYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146100. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.