Pinckneyville Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 38.4 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.61 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · K2024-10-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from peer to peer sexual abuse by (R1) for 3 of 11 residents (R2, R3, R7) reviewed for peer to peer sexual abuse in a sample of 11. This failure resulted in R2, R3, and R7, all of whom are cognitively impaired and incapable of giving informed consent to sexual activity, witnessing masturbation, being touched on the breasts and genitals, and having unsolicited sexual comments directed toward them. These actions would cause a reasonable person to experience feelings of fear, embarrassment, anger, and shame. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 9/23/24 when R1 touched R2's breast, and a plan for effective supervision and monitoring of R1's behavior was not implemented. R1 subsequently went on to sexually abuse R3, and R7. V1, Administrator, was notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 10/22/24 at 9:03am. The Surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observations, and record review the facility failed to implement surveillance measures to detect, treat, and prevent the spread of potential scabies infestation for 7 of 9 residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7) reviewed for infection control in a sample of 9. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing intense itching for over 1 month resulting in signs and symptoms of distress of crying, facial grimacing, and experiencing a loss of appetite. This failure has the potential to affect all 41 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: 1.R1's admission Record documents an admission date of 2/24/2023 including diagnoses of Anxiety, Anorexia, Hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer's Disease, and Dementia. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1 indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. R1's Care Plan documents a risk for alteration in skin integrity dated 2/24/2024 with interventions including: Medication for complaint of itching…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-10-24 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident free of physical restraints for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for physical restraints in the sample of 9. This failure resulted in R1 being tied down in a wheelchair with a bath blanket for an undisclosed amount of time. An independent reasonable person would respond to being restrained to a wheelchair with feelings of fear, anxiety, frustration, agitation, and humiliation. This past non-compliance occurred between 10/12/23 and 10/13/23. The Findings include: R1's Face Sheet dated 10/23/2023 documents R1 being admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, recurrent, unspecified, Frontotemporal dementia, Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia, unspecified, Type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, Obstructive sleep apnea (adult) (pediatric), Need for assistance with personal care, Unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, Dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, unspecified severity,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely for 1 of 1 (R13) resident reviewed for dignity in the sample of 28. Findings Include: R13's admission Record with a print date of 03/25/2026 documents R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spastic hemiplegia, dementia, lack of coordination, muscle weakness, and history of traumatic brain injury. R13's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 07, indicating a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R13 is dependent on staff for toileting. R13's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of Self-care deficit r/t (related to) Seizures, Hemiplegia, lack of coordination. Date Initiated: 4/5/2025. This Focus area includes the interventions of, Assist with toileting and showers/bath. Date Initiated: 04/05/2025.On 3/23/26 at 12:07 PM, R13 was sitting in a reclining chair in the dining room, waiting for lunch to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Interview, record review, and observation the facility failed to properly check gastrostomy tube placement per professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 (R21) resident reviewed for tube feeding in a sample of 28.The Findings include: R21's admission Record documents an admission date of 03/09/26, with diagnoses in part of gastrostomy status, dysphagia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and need for assistance with personal care. R21's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C. a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 which indicates severely impaired cognition. Section GG documents eating as dependent. Section K documents feeding tube (e.g. nasogastric or abdominal tube) as yes. R21's undated Care Plan documents a focus area of I require tube feeding Depression, Dysphagia with documented interventions of: Check for tube placement and gastric content/residual volume per facility protocol and record. R21's Order Summary documents an order dated 03/24/26 to flush peg tube with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate the process to timely obtain a prescription medication for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for medications in the sample of 7.This past noncompliance occurred from 7/27/25 and 7/28/25.Findings include:R1's admission Record documents an admission date of 6/20/25, a discharge date of 7/28/25, and listed diagnoses including hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, other cerebral infarction due to occlusion or stenosis of small artery, other specified symptoms and signs involving the circulatory and respiratory systems, bradycardia, unspecified, cerebral infarction, unspecified, and peripheral vascular disease.R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating that R1 had severe cognitive impairment.R1's Care Plan documented R1 had COPD and a history of a recent Cerebral Vascular Accident (Stroke). Both focus areas have interventions including giving…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the services of a Registered Nurse for 8 consecutive hours per day seven days per week. This failure has the potential to affect all 42 residents living in the facility. Findings Include: On 04/10/25 at 9:57AM V6 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) stated that most of the time the facility does have a Registered Nurse for 8 consecutive hours a day seven days a week. V6 stated that V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) usually works Monday-Friday, and he covers the Registered Nurse coverage during the week. V6 stated that V4 (Registered Nurse/RN) works every other Saturday on the floor. V6 stated that she doesn't think that they have Registered Nurse coverage on Sunday's. On 04/10/25 at 11:40AM V7 (LPN) stated that the facility does not have Registered Nurse coverage 8 consecutive hours a day seven days a week. V7 stated that on her weekend that she works there in no Registered Nurse coverage on Saturday or Sunday. V7 stated that her next weekend to work is on 04/12/25 and 04/13/25. V7 stated that V4 (RN) does not work her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 7 residents (R1) reviewed for quality of care in a sample of 9. Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission date of 2/24/2023 with diagnoses including Anxiety, Anorexia, Hyperlipidemia, Alzheimer's Disease, and Dementia. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. R1's Care Plan documents a risk for alteration in skin integrity dated 2/24/2024 with interventions including: Medication for complaint of itching to be given as ordered by MD (physician) dated 9/18/24 and referred to (name of local dermatology clinic) dated 10/11/24. R1's Progress Notes document the following: 9/18/2024: rash all over, itching and crying. Prednisone 20mg x 2 days then 10mg x 4 days. Benadryl 25mg every 6 hours as needed. 10/3/2024: Prednisone 10mg x 3 days, wash laundry in hypoallergenic soap, if not cured make…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representatives of peer to peer sexual abuse for two of 11 residents (R3, R7) reviewed for representative notification in the sample of 11. Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission Date of 9/13/24 and listed Diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation, Adjustment Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and Chronic Viral Hepatitis C. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R1 had moderate deficits in cognition, had no deficits in range of motion, and ambulated independently. R1's Care Plan dated 10/11/24 documented, I am demonstrating inappropriate behaviors, exposing privates to female workers, making inappropriate comments to female workers, masturbating in doorway of room, walking around refusing to wear pants ,exposing self, etcetera. 1. R3's admission Record documented an admission Date of 9/11/24, listed V12 as POA (Power of Attorney), and listed diagnoses including Unspecified Dementia and Diabetes…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report peer to peer sexual abuse to the Administrator for three residents (R1, R3, R7) of eleven residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of eleven. Findings include: 1. R1's Nursing Progress Notes dated 9/26/24, authored by V13, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated,(R1) sitting at nurses station, resident (R3) was standing next to (R1). (R1) attempted to lift (R3) shirt while this writer was walking back up to desk. Behavior was stopped. There was no documentation in either R1 or R3's record that the incident had been reported to the facility's Abuse Coordinator, nor investigated. R1's admission Record documented an admission Date of 9/13/24 and listed Diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation, Adjustment Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and Chronic Viral Hepatitis C. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R1 had moderate deficits in cognition, had no deficits in range of motion, and ambulated independently. R1's Care Plan revised 10/11/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective behavior interventions for 1 of 11 residents (R1) reviewed for behaviors in the sample of 11. Findings include: R1's admission Record documented an admission Date of 9/13/24 and listed Diagnoses including Atrial Fibrillation, Adjustment Disorder, Alzheimer's Disease, and Chronic Viral Hepatitis C. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R1 has moderate deficits in cognition, and ambulates independently. An Illinois Department of Public Health (IDPH) Final Report dated 10/4/24 stated, On 9/23/24 at approximately 12:55pm this afternoon, (V1, Administrator) notified that resident (R1) made unwanted contact toward resident (R2) It was witnessed by (V13, Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN), that R1 lifted the shirt of R2 and touched her breast. Residents were immediately separated, and (V1) was notified. Nurse assessment completed, noting no issues. (R2) was interviewed, and she could not give any details of such incident and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a sufficient amount of staff to ensure residents receive showers, and assistance with care. These failures have the potential to affect all 45 residents living in the facility. Findings include: Resident Matrix dated 10/2/2004 documents there are 45 residents living in the facility. 1. On 10/3/24 at 2:39pm, R5 stated his care is pretty good here. R5 stated he wasn't sure if he got showers like he was supposed to, but they keep him clean. R5 stated they need some more staff badly. R5 stated they are a little slow on the lights, but it is more of an issue at night. R5 stated if you are in the bathroom, the staff are quick to respond, but the regular room lights not so much. R5 stated he is supposed to call for help to transfer, especially to the bathroom, but sometimes he just can't wait on them any longer. R5 stated he even has a sign in his bathroom that says he should call for help. R5 stated he did have a recent fall, he was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide dependent residents timely ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assistance for 5 of 7 residents (R4, R5, R6, R7, R9) reviewed for ADL assistance in the sample of 9. Findings include: 1. R4's admission record documents an admission date of 1/6/24, with diagnoses in part; Alzheimer's disease, late onset, Unspecified dementia, depression, dizziness, delusional disorders and vertigo. R4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], records a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9, indicating that R4 is mildly cognitively impaired. R4's current care plan documents that she is at risk for falls, has behaviors and is totally dependent on staff for Completing ADL's. On 10/02/2024 at 9:16am, an attempt to interview R4 was made and R4 was not interviewable. R4's shower days documented in is Summary Order Report are Wednesdays and Saturdays. R4 has a document titled Skin Observation: Comprehensive shower review for Saturday 9/14/24 (bed bath)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$100,864 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $92,674 — penalty dated 2024-10-07
• $8,190 — penalty dated 2023-10-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $234K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL