No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Fairfield Senior Living & Rehabilitation LLC

305 N.w. 11th Street, Fairfield, IL 62837 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 104 certified beds · (618) 842-3036 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (618) 842-3036 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 20234 actual-harm citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)3 actual-harm citations CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$126,045 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • inspectors recorded 4 serious findings as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $126,045 in federal fines (most recent 2026-04-28)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
207 NW 10th St · (618) 842-3813 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
700 W Main St · (618) 842-3784 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
709 W Main St · (618) 842-5040 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.5%13.4%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%6.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.6%54.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury8.7%3.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened28.0%14.3%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication18.1%18.3%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.1%91.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.2%4.8%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%20.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.7%21.7%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication5.6%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine65.2%63.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission42.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit33.5%13.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.982.021.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.462.221.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 34 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.9%CMS range 26.3–54.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 6.4–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge36.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.5–15.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.121.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.32
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.01
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.63
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 104 beds and averages 49.8 residents a day — about 48% occupied, or roughly 54 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.05 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.92 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.10 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
9
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-28)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

45 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to supervise a known elopement risk resident and complete wander guard tests to ensure a wander guard was working for 1 of 5 residents (R1) reviewed for supervision in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1 eloping from the facility, falling down three steps onto asphalt in R1's wheelchair, and sustaining a laceration to the head requiring sutures. The Immediate Jeopardy began on 6/18/24 at approximately 2:00 AM when R1 was unable to be located by facility staff and was found to have eloped from the facility and had fallen down three steps in R1's wheelchair. V1 (Administrator), V7 (Regional Clinical Director), and V8 (Vice President of Operations) were notified of the Immediate Jeopardy on 7/31/24 at 2:40 PM. The surveyor confirmed by observation, interview, and record review that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed, and the deficient practice corrected, on 6/20/24, prior to the start of the survey and was therefore past noncompliance. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2026-04-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 not receiving his seizure medication as ordered for 5 days resulting in R1 experiencing a seizure that lasted 10 minutes and an emergency department visit.This past non-compliance occurred between 04/07/2026 and 04/13/2026.Findings Include:R1's admission Record documented an admission date to the facility of 03/14/2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left dominant side, type 2 diabetes mellitus, alcoholic cirrhosis of liver, chronic pancreatitis, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and epilepsy.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 03/13/2026 documented R1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 12 indicating R1 has moderate cognitive impairment.R1's Order Summary Report with a print date of 04/23/2026 documented an order for R1 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe mechanical lift transfer for 1 of 1 resident (R1) reviewed for falls in a sample of 12. This failure resulted in R1 becoming scared she would fall and anxious during the transfer and becoming afraid of of future mechanical lift transfers. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 7/6/23 and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disorder, Diabetes Type 2, and Anxiety disorder. R1's Care Plan dated 8/20/24 documented problem areas,I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care/ mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit, and, I use anti anxiety medications. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R1 has minimal deficits in cognition and is totally dependent on staff for transfers. On 9/17/24 at 10:55am, R1 was alert and oriented to person, place, and time. R1 stated that on the morning of 9/16/24, V4, Certified Nursing Assistant, was getting her out of bed and ready for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and evaluate potential hazards/risks and implement interventions to ensure safe transfers via mechanical lifts for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accident hazards and injuries of unknown origin in the sample of 6. This failure resulted in R1 sustaining injuries of bruising to the tops of both feet and a hematoma under the nail of the right great toe. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, and cerebrovascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/23/24 at 1:00 PM, R1's right great toenail was black with blood under the nail. R1's feet had greenish yellow bruising to the tops of both feet measuring approximately 3 inches x…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide additional nourishment as ordered in the form of nutritional supplements and fortified foods for five (R50, R31, R36, R44, and R45) of 12 residents reviewed for nutrition in a sample of 38. This failure resulted in R50 experiencing a significant weight loss of 17.5% in 3 months, and R31 experiencing a significant weight loss of 6.68% in 1 month or 8.58% in 3 months. Findings Include: 1. R50's Transfer/Discharge report documents an admission date of 01/26/24 with diagnoses including: Alcohol abuse with alcohol induced mood disorder, Alcohol Dependence with alcohol induced persisting dementia, Cognitive Communication Deficit, Unspecified Dementia, Wernicke's Encephalopathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Mood Affective Disorder. R50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R50's MDS section GG documents eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement planned fall interventions to prevent falls for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for falls in a sample of 5. This failure resulted in R1 falling, fracturing his right hip and undergoing surgical repair of the fractured hip on 4/2/2024. This past non-compliance occurred from 3/31/2024 to 4/1/2024. Findings included: Per R1's EHR (electronic health record) R1 was admitted to this facility on 11/7/2024 with diagnoses of Alzheimer's, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Weakness and Insomnia. Per R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 1/23/24 under section C, R1 was assessed with a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) in which R1 scored 3 out of 15 total, indicating R1 has severe cognitive impairment. This same MDS under section GG, documents R1 as needing substantial/maximum assistance from staff for all transferring activities and uses a wheelchair for locomotion about the facility. A Fall Risk Assessment for R1, dated 4/1/2024, documents R1 is a high risk for falls. R1's care plan (initiation date of 11/30/23)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2024-02-20 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer regularly scheduled ordered pain medication for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for pain management. This failure resulted in R1 experiencing loss of sleep and significant pain to R1's shoulders, back, and knees due to missing R1's 2/5/24 pm dose of her regularly scheduled pain medication. This past noncompliance occurred between 2/05/2024 - 2/09/2024. Findings: R1's face sheet documents an admission to the facility on 4/19/2023 with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3 Unspecified, Malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified, other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, other sleep apnea. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating she is cognitively intact. R1's MDS Section J, Pain Management, documents she has a scheduled pain medication regimen. R1's Care Plan documents a Focus of: R1 has…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · G2023-09-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments, implement interventions to reduce pressure, and complete readmission assessments to identify any skin changes for 1 of 3 residents (R1) reviewed for being at risk for pressure injury in the sample of 3. This failure resulted in R1 developing pressure wounds. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 6/15/23 and diagnoses including: chronic kidney disease, hypertension, dementia, hyperkalemia. R1's 9/15/23 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 6, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1's 9/15/23 MDS documented R1 required extensive two person assist with bed mobility, transfer, locomotion, dressing, and personal hygiene. R1's 7/3/23 Braden Observation documented a score of 18, indicating R1 was at risk for pressure wounds. R1's 9/15/23 Skin & Wound Evaluation documented a deep tissue injury related to pressure that was in-house…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement appropriate interventions and supervision required to prevent an elopement for 1 (R2) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 6.The Findings Include:R2's admission Record documents an admission date to the facility of 12/01/2023 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, unspecified dementia, type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, insomnia, and conductive hearing loss. R2's MDS (Minimum Data Set) with a date of 02/13/2026 documented Section C0100- Should Brief Interview for Mental Status be conducted? 0 was coded indicating that R2 is rarely / never understood and the assessment should not be completed. Section E-Behaviors documents under Wandering-Presence and Frequency documents the behavior was not exhibited. Section GG of the same MDS documents that R2 is independent for sit to lying, lying to sitting, sit to stand, walk 10 feet, walk 50 feet with two turns and walk 150 feet.R2's current Care Plan has a focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to document and report a fall for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 4.The past noncompliance occurred between [DATE] and [DATE].The Findings Include:R1's admission record dated [DATE] documented that R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease without Dyskinesia, depression, sleep apnea, benign prostatic hyperplasia, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, and unspecified dementia.R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set) quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 08 indicating R1 has moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Care Plan documents a focus area of Fall Risk - at risk for falls related to unsteady gait, interventions include: [DATE]- offer to assist resident bed when appears to be tired,[DATE] - all regular socks removed from room, gripper socks to be used as resident complies, [DATE] - bolster mattress will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly stored at appropriate temperatures and lock medication cart. This failure has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include:On 7/23/25 at 11:40 AM, V8 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) was observed administering insulin to R10. V8 gathered her supplies from the medication cart, left the cart unlocked, and entered R10's room. The cart was out of V8's visual control during the administration of the insulin. No observations were made of residents or staff near the unlocked cart.A list of ambulatory residents living at the facility dated 7/25/25 documented a total of 8 ambulatory residents.On 7/24/25 at 3:20 PM, V2 (DON) stated she re-educated V8 about the importance of keeping the medication cart locked when out of the nurses visual control.The facility's Storage of Medications Policy dated April 2007 documented, #7.Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the dish machine was effectively sanitizing dishes to prevent cross contamination. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include:On 7/22/25 at 9:00 AM, during the initial kitchen observation, the dish machine was being used to wash dishes. V6 (Dietary Aide) was asked to check the sanitizer level in the dish machine at this time. V6 was unable to get the test strip to register a sanitizer level, so V7 (Dietary Manager) got a new set of test strips to check the level. V7 was unable to get a level of sanitizer to register on the new strips and instructed V6 to begin washing dishes in the 3-compartment sink. On 7/22/25 at 11:00 AM, V7 stated that they are to check the sanitizer level 3 times a day prior to washing each meals dirty dishes. V7 stated it should be checked before breakfast, lunch and dinner dishes to ensure it is properly sanitizing the dishes.The dish machine sanitizer log was provided on 7/22/25 at 11:00 AM, and no level was recorded for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the building had effective pest control for flies an gnats. This has the potential to affect all 47 residents residing in the facility. Findings Include: 1.On 7/22/25 on 9:00 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the dish machine area had gnats and flies observed near the drain and the garbage disposal. At this same time, a wet towel was seen under the garbage disposal and crumbs and food debris were visible under the dish machine table as well. A this time, V4 (Dietary Aide) stated that the gnats and flies can get really bad down there if the floor is not kept clean and dry. V4 stated that they do pour bleach down the drain sometimes to help reduce the number of flies/gnats that accumulate down there. On 7/22/25 at 9:30 AM, the delivery door outside the kitchen entrance was observed to have a gap at the bottom as well as in the middle where the double doors meet, and the outside was visible through these gaps. These gaps leave a potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure that resident wheelchairs are cleaned and free of dirt and debris for 2 (R28 and R38) of 2 residents reviewed for clean equipment in a sample of 31. The Findings Include:On 7/23/25 at 10:00 AM, R38 was observed in his room sitting in his wheelchair. R38 was noted to be alert and oriented. The cushion of R38's wheelchair and the seat of the chair had a dried white substance and several crumbs from food dried in the same place. R38's handles were also dirty from where he had self propelled and dust and dirt were observed on the outside of his seat as well. R38 stated he thought the white substance may have been from his drinks spilling. R38 stated that he was unaware of the last time his chair was cleaned.On 7/23/25 at 10:30 AM, R28 was observed sitting in the common area by the nurse's station watching television. R28 was noted to be alert and oriented. R28's wheelchair had dust and dried food debris/crumbs on the seat and on the outside of the seat near the self-propelled wheels. R28 stated that he was unaware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a nutritional supplement in accordance with physician orders for one (R31) of three residents reviewed for dining in the sample of 31.Findings include:R31's admission Record documented an admission Date of 10/30/24 and included diagnoses of Vascular Dementia, Severe, with Agitation. R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that R31 has severe deficits in cognition. R31's Care Plan dated 5/8/25 documented a problem area of, I am at nutritional risk of weight loss related to poor intakes, secondary to Dementia, with a corresponding intervention, Supplements/alternates per order.R31's Current Orders documented a 5/22/25 diet order for regular texture, regular liquid consistency, add fortified pudding at lunch.On 07/22/2025 at 12:23 PM, lunch service was observed in the facility's dining room. R31, who was alert and oriented only to herself, received a regular texture lunch tray. The diet card specified the tray…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's call light was in working order for 1 (R8) of 3 residents reviewed for resident call system in a sample of 12. Findings Include: R8's Face Sheet documented an admission date of 12/05/2024 with diagnoses that included weakness, unsteadiness on feet, unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility, a unilateral primary osteoarthritis to right knee and personal history of transient ischemic attack. R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented under Cognitive Patterns a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R8 is cognitively intact. Under Functional Abilities for Self Care, the MDS documented that R8 requires staff assistance for toileting hygiene, showering/bathing, and dressing. R8's current Care Plan documented a Focus Area of I have a self care deficit r/t (related to) osteoarthritis in right knee and weakness with a Goal of Assistance will be provided to meet needs. On 2/14/24 at 11:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers and timely assistance with showers and incontinence care for five of twelve residents (R1, R2, R3, R6, R7) reviewed for ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care in the sample of twelve. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented an admission Date of 7/6/23 and listed Diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Diabetes Type 2, and Morbid Obesity. R1's Current Care Plan a problem area, I have an ADL self-care/ mobility performance (functional abilities) deficit, with a corresponding intervention, Shower/Bathe self: I take a shower/bath (and) my usual performance is dependent on staff. The same Care Plan documented a problem area, I have a potential for impairment to skin integrity related to decreased mobility, (and)incontinence, with a corresponding intervention, Keep skin clean and dry. R1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] documented that R1 is totally dependent on staff for bathing/showering and toileting and is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide direct care staff in adequate numbers to ensure safe and timely resident care. This has the ability to affect all 34 residents living on the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls. Findings include: A Resident Council Meeting note dated 9/12/24 documented, New business: Nursing-hard to find (staff) when needing assistance. A Room Roster dated 9/14/24 documented a total of 34 residents living on the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls. A Daily Staff Schedule for Friday 8/31/24 documented one nurse and two CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) working the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls on the 6am to 6pm shift. A Daily Staff Schedule for Sunday 9/15/24 documented one nurse and one CNA working the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls on the 6pm to 6am shift. A Daily Staff Schedule for Monday 9/16/24 documented one nurse and 3 CNAs working the [NAME] and Daisy/Tulip halls on the 6am to 6pm shift. On 9/17/24 at 9:55am, R3 was alert and oriented to person, place and time. R3 stated night shift (6pm to 6am) is especially short staffed because call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of potential abuse and neglect allegations, including an injury of unknown origin for 2 (R1 and R4) of 4 residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 6. Findings include: 1. R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, and cerebrovascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/23/24 at 1:00 PM, R1's right great toenail was black with blood under the nail. R1's feet had greenish yellow bruising to the tops of both feet measuring approximately 3 inches x 3 inches. R1 said he did not know how his feet had been injured. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/26/24 documented R1 did not have any bruising to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and complete a timely and thorough investigation of an injury of unknown origin for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse/neglect investigations in the sample of 6. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, and cerebrovascular disease. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. On 8/23/24 at 1:00 PM, R1's right great toenail was black with blood under the nail. R1's feet had greenish yellow bruising to the tops of both feet measuring approximately 3 inches x 3 inches. R1 said he did not know how his feet had been injured. R1's Hospice Visit Note dated 7/26/24 documented R1 did not have any bruising to the feet.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to 2 (R1 and R4) of 3 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care in the sample of 6. Findings include: R1's Face Sheet documented an initial admission date of 7/23/20 with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of prostate, unsteadiness of feet, lack of coordination, abnormalities of gait and mobility, adult failure to thrive, cerebrovascular disease. R1's 8/6/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating R1 had moderate cognitive impairment. R1's Order Summary Sheet printed 8/26/24 documented a 7/16/24 order admit to (Hospice Company) for end of life. On 8/23/24 at 10:59 AM, V4 (Hospice Registered Nurse/RN) stated that on one occasion, she had found R1's urinary catheter to be leaking. V4 said R1's bed was saturated with urine, with a brown ring around it. V4 said R1 had to be wet for a long time to form a brown ring. On 8/28/24 at 2:23 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide enough staff to supervise residents ensuring residents do not elope for 1 (R1) of 5 residents reviewed for supervision out of a sample of 5. Findings include: 1. R1's face sheet documented an admission date of 6/30/21 with diagnoses including: dementia, hypertension, atherosclerotic heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, presence of cardiac pacemaker. R1's 7/8/24 Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R1's care plan documented an initiated 8/30/23 focus area documenting in part . I am an elopement risk/ wanderer due to exit seeking, Resident wanders aimlessly . and an initiated 7/6/21 focus area documenting in part . I am at risk for fall/ injury (related to) wandering and poor safety awareness . R1's Order Summary Report documented an 8/6/23 order for Wanderguard (elopement alert device) check function on dayshift every Sunday. On 7/29/24 at 1:04 PM, V5 (Certified Nursing Assistant/ CNA) said she was caring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet residents' needs and provide timely assistance with care. This failure has the potential to affect all 59 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Midnight Census Report dated 6/16/24 documents 59 residents currently reside at the facility. 1. R1's Transfer/Discharge Report dated 6/17/24 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diarrhea, hypertension, clostridium difficile, flaccid neuropathic bladder, and morbid obesity. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 is dependent on staff for toilet transfers, is occasionally incontinent of urine, and frequently incontinent of bowel. R1's current Care Plan does not document a focus area for incontinence care/toileting. On 6/17/24 at 2:52 PM, V4 (Care Plan/MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure incontinence care was provided timely for three residents (R1, R2, and R6) of 9 residents reviewed for incontinence care in the sample of 9. Findings Include: 1.R1's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/17/24 documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diarrhea, hypertension, clostridium difficile, flaccid neuropathic bladder, and morbid obesity. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R1 has a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 14, which indicates R1 is cognitively intact. This same MDS documents R1 is dependent on staff for toilet transfers, is occasionally incontinent of urine, and frequently incontinent of bowel. R1's current Care Plan does not document a focus area for incontinence care/toileting. On 6/17/24 at 2:52 PM, V4 (Care Plan/MDS Coordinator) stated he just missed it when he did R1's care plan. On 6/17/24 at 10:50 AM, R1 stated that recently, he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and observation, the facility failed to provide enough staff to meet residents needs and provide timely assistance with care. This has the potential to effect all 67 residents residing at this facility. Findings included: 1. On 5/20/2024 at 11:37 AM, R57 still had a half eaten breakfast tray sitting on the bedside table. R57's bed was not made and a pile of urine soiled sheets were wadded up and sitting in R57's bedside chair. At 11:40 AM, V4 (Licensed Practical Nurse/LPN) verified the linens were soiled with dried brown urine rings and were from R57's bed. R57's private bathroom was noted to have two urine soaked briefs/pads in the trash can and a strong scent of urine was present. 2. R113's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility on 5/8/2024 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction. R113's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/9/2024 documented a score of 15, indicating R113 is cognitively intact. R113's Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the approved menu and failed to make a reasonable effort to provide menus in accordance with religious/cultural needs of residents. This failure has the potential to effect all 67 residents residing at the facility. Finding include: 1. The facility's Diet Spreadsheet dated Day 16 Monday documents: Lunch: Regular: beef & broccoli Stir fry #8 dip x 2, steamed rice #8 dip, vegetable blend 4 oz spdl, egg roll 1, blushing pears 4 oz spdl. Pureed: pureed beef & broccoli stir fry with sauce #8 dip x 2, pureed rice with gravy or sauce #10 dip with gravy, pureed vegetable blend #12 dip, pureed egg roll #10 dip, pureed blushing pears #10 dip. On Monday 05/20/24 at 11:15 AM, V22 (Cook) stated they were not having the beef and broccoli stir fry listed on the menu for lunch because they did not have it. V22 stated it should be on the truck that arrived today, so they are having fish instead and the substitute is the leftover pot stickers from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prepare and serve food in a safe and sanitary environment and on sanitary dishes. This has the potential to effect all 67 residents residing at the facility. Findings include: On 05/20/24 at 9:30 AM, upon the initial tour of the kitchen, the large stand mixer had dried food splashes on the head of the mixer. In the cooler, there was a bowl of what appeared to be pudding that was undated and unlabeled and a container of sliced meat that was undated and unlabeled. There was a large can of opened sweet potatoes that was undated and unlabeled and a partial pan of what appeared to be lasagna in the cooler that was unlabeled and undated. On 05/20/24 at 11:15 AM, V22 (Cook) stated items in the cooler should be labeled, the kitchen is messy, they are doing the best they can. On 05/20/24 at 9:30 AM, there were five plastic portion cups, a fork, a plastic drinking cup, a plastic bag and a pudding cup on the floor under the prep table. Under the second prep table there were three portion cups, two butter packets, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, homelike environment for 10 of 38 residents (R57, R113, R2, R15, R16, R19, R57, R214, R11, R22) reviewed for homelike environment in a sample of 38. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 9:45 AM, R2 was noted sitting in his bedside recliner. R2's bedroom floor had food debris and paper trash scattered about and trailed out into the hallway. On the morning of 5/20/2024, 5/21/2014 and 5/22/2024 at 2:00 PM, R2's bathroom was noted to have dark yellow odorous urine in the toilet bowl and two urine soaked adult briefs were noted in the bathroom trash can. One of the two urine soaked briefs were marked in ink with surveyor's initials on the edge of the brief on 5/20/2024 and the same ink mark was present on the brief on 5/21/2024 at 2:00 PM. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM, R113 was observed laying in his bed in his room with a finished breakfast tray sitting on his bedside table. Food debris and paper trash was noted about the floor in R113's room. A urine soaked adult brief was noted in R113's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for residents who require assistance for 4 (R113, R48, R11, R214) of 5 residents reviewed for assistance with Activities of Daily Living in a sample of 38. Findings included: 1. R113's Face Sheet documented an admission date to the facility on 5/8/2024 with diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. R113's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 5/9/2024 documents R113 scored 15 out of 15 total, indicating R113 is cognitively intact. R113's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents R113 needs substantial/maximum assistance from staff for bathing, dressing and transferring. On 5/20/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM, R113 was observed laying in his bed in his room. R113's appearance was disheveled, had greasy dirty hair and had a strong scent of urine and body odor about his person. On 5/22/2024 at 12:46 PM, V2 (Director of Nursing/DON) said R113 has not received a shower since…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-28 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature for 4 (R214, R38, R48 and R3) of 4 residents reviewed for palatable temperatures in a sample of 38. Findings include: 1. R214's admission Record documents an admission date of 05/16/24 with diagnoses in part of End Stage Renal Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, dependence on renal dialysis, Anemia, Hypertension, Seizures, Hyperkalemia, and Hyperprolactinemia. R214's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] is currently in progress and does not document anything in section C or GG. On 05/20/24 at 12:30PM, R214 was alert and oriented to person, place and time and stated that the food is always cold if she eats in her room. R214 said that she only ate in her room a couple of times, but that the food was always cold when she did. R214 said that she started going to the dining room just so she could have a warm meal. 2. R38's Transfer/Discharge report, undated documents an admission date of 07/06/23 with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure newly admitted residents were offered to formulate Advanced Directives for three of five residents (R12, R62, and R113) reviewed for Advanced Directives in a sample of 38. Findings included: 1. R62's Face Sheet documents an admission date to the facility on [DATE]. A Progress note in R62's EHR (Electronic Health Record) dated [DATE] at 14:29 (2:29 PM) documented the following in part: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) called this writer (V11 Registered Nurse/RN) to resident's (R62) room. Resident was laying with head resting on arm on bedside table. No respirations, no pulse radial or carotid palpated . (V14 RN) checked chart for POLST (Physician's Order for Life Sustaining Treatment/Advanced Directives). None found. V6 (RN) began CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation) time of death called by EMS (Emergency Medical Service) at 12:47 PM. On [DATE] at 12:10 PM, V2 stated R62's Advanced Directive was not in his EHR due to it being out for his doctor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-28 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a PASRR (Preadmission Screeening and Resident Review) level two screening for a resident with a newly diagnosed Severe Mental Illness for 1 (R11) of 2 residents reviewed for PASRR in a sample of 38. R11's Face Sheet dated 5/23/24 documents an admission date of 03/10/2014 with a diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder. R11's OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) I Initial Screen documentation dated 03/05/2014 lists Reasonable Basis to Suspect a Mental Illness .The individual has been formally diagnosed with a mental illness which substantially impairs the person's cognitive, emotional and /or behavioral functioning with a corresponding box that is marked No. R11's Physician Order documents an order on 08/04/22 to add Schizoaffective Disorder to R11's diagnosis list as evidenced by assessment with behaviors. On 05/23/24 at 2:10 PM, V8 (Social Service Director/SSD) stated that a new PASRR screen should have been completed when R11 received the new diagnosis of Schizoaffective Disorder on 8/4/2022. V8 stated that she…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-20 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ordered pain medication was refilled in a timely manner for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. This past noncompliance occurred between 2/05/2024 - 2/09/2024. Findings: R1's face sheet documents a facility admission date of 4/19/2023 with diagnoses of Chronic Kidney disease, Stage 3 Unspecified, Malignant neoplasm of uterus, part unspecified, other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbar region, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site, other sleep apnea. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating R1 is cognitively intact; Section J, Pain Management, documents R1 has a scheduled pain medication regimen. R1's Physician's Orders dated 4/19/2023 documents Acetaminophen 500mg (2 tabs) every 4 hours as needed for pain; 4/21/2023 documents Percocet 5/325mg three times a day for pain (Unspecified Osteoarthritis, Unspecified site; Other Intervertebral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents. This has the potential to affect all 65 residents who currently reside at the facility. Findings Include: The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents dated 6/20/23 documents 65 residents reside in the facility. 1. R5's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarct, seizures, diabetes, heart failure, anemia, difficulty in walking, and Parkinson's Disease. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/25/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R5 requires assist of two staff for transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. R5's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of (R5) voids in inappropriate places. With interventions that include, Toilet before and after meals to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep food contact surfaces clean and sanitized to prevent cross contamination. These failures have the potential to affect all 65 residents in the facility. The Findings Include: On 6/20/23 at 9:30 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen the following items were found: 1. The countertop slicer in the kitchen was covered with a plastic bag. When the bag was removed the bottom side of the blade and the base of the slicer were found to have dried food debris on them. At this time, V3 (Dietary Supervisor) stated that the plastic covering indicated that it is ready for use. V3 immediately instructed V12 (Cook) to clean and sanitize the slicer. 2. A measuring scoop was found in the bulk sugar bin with the handle laying in the sugar. V3 removed the scoop at this time. The Resident Census and Condition of Residents dated 6/20/23, documents 65 residents reside in the facility.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) were provided per current standards of practice for 4 of 5 (R2, R5, R22, and R55) residents reviewed for ADL's in the sample of 69. Findings Include: 1. R5's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include cerebral infarct, seizures, diabetes, heart failure, anemia, difficulty in walking, and Parkinson's Disease. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/25/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents under Section G, R5 requires assist of two staff for transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. R5's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of (R5) voids in inappropriate places. With interventions that include, Toilet before and after meals to decrease behavior. On 6/22/23 at 1:31 PM, R5 was observed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-23 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare the pre-planned menu for 15 of 15 residents (R2, R5, R6, R9, R11, R12, R19, R29, R31, R42, R43, R47, R48, R50, and R54) reviewed for menus being followed in a sample of 69. The Findings Include: The lunch menu for 6/20/23 lists chicken patty on bun, peas and potato logs as the planned meal. On 6/20/23 at 10:30 AM, V12 (Cook) provided a menu revision that replaced carrots for the peas on the lunch menu. At this time, V12 was preparing the meals for the mechanical soft and puree residents. V12 was observed removing chicken from a pot of boiling water. V12 then mechanically chops the boiled chicken for the mechanical soft and blends to a smooth consistency for the puree diets. On 6/20/23 at 11:25 AM, V12 was observed preparing the steam table with the lunch items to be served. At this time, when asked why boiled chicken was used for the puree and mechanical soft diets, V12 stated that they did not have enough chicken patties for all residents. V12 was then asked why the puree and mechanical soft diets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were kept within reach for 1 of 24 (R22) residents reviewed for call lights in the sample of 69. Findings Include: R22's Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include heart disease, heart failure, diabetes, and unspecified abnormalities of gait and mobility. R22's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/8/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicates R22 has a moderate cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents under Section G, R22 requires two person physical assistance for transfers. R22's current undated Care Plan documents a care area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit. This care area includes the following interventions, I require a (mechanical lift) with 2 staff assistance for transfers, and Encourage me to use the bell call for assistance. On 06/20/23 at 1:33 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the temperatures of the rooms were kept within a comfortable temperature range for 2 of 4 (R15 and R25) residents reviewed for temperatures in a sample of 69. Findings Include: 1. R25's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, shortness of breath, diabetes, hypertension, and morbid obesity. R25's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/17/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates R25 is cognitively intact. On 6/20/23 at 1:50 PM, V18 (Maintenance Director) stated the room temperatures should be less than 80 degrees. V18 stated the air conditioner motors are out (not working) in a few of the rooms. V18 stated they were monitoring the rooms the best they could and encouraging the residents to spend time out of the rooms. V18 stated the motors were out in R15's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 (R31) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse in a sample of 69. The findings include: On 06/21/23 at 11:32 AM, R31 was in the dining room during lunch time. Noted was a very large raised, non-uniform scaly growth on the top of his forehead/head area. R31 was also observed in the hallway throughout this day propelling in his wheelchair and does not appear to be in any distress or discomfort. On 06/22/23 at 10:00 AM, the top of R31's forehead/head previously observed to have a large growth was now covered with a large bandage that was blood soaked. When asked what happened to R31's head, V11 (Licensed Practical Nurse - LPN) stated R60 hit him with a walker last evening. V11 stated she had become aware of this when reading the nursing communication documentation when starting her shift that morning. V11 stated there were also notes in each resident's record. R60's Face Sheet documents admission to this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to immediately report a resident-to-resident altercation to the Administrator or designee for 1 (R31) of 2 residents reviewed for abuse reporting in a sample of 69. The findings include: R31's Face Sheet documents admission to this facility on 03/02/20 with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease, schizoaffective disorder, and seizures. R31's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, indicating he is severely cognitively impaired. On 06/21/23 at 11:32 AM, R31 was in the dining room during lunch time. Noted was a very large raised, non-uniform scaly growth on the top of his forehead/head area. R31 was also observed in the hallway throughout this day propelling in his wheelchair and does not appear to be in any distress or discomfort. On 06/22/23 at 10:00 AM, the top of R31's forehead/head previously observed to have a large growth was now covered with a large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor oxygen saturation levels as ordered by the physician for 1 (R70) of 1 residents in a sample of 16 reviewed for for oxygen saturation. The Findings Include: R70's admission record documents a date of birth as 4/17/91 and an admission date of 5/22/23. R70's order summary report dated with active orders for May of 2023 lists that oxygen saturation be monitored every day and night shift. This same report includes the following diagnosis: down syndrome, unspecified asthma, unspecified intellectual disabilities, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and pneumonia due to other streptococci. R70's weight and vital summary report during the length of his stay from 5/23/23 to a discharge date of 5/25/23 have no oxygen saturation levels documented. No oxygen saturation levels were documented in the nursing progress notes. On 6/22/23 at 1:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) confirmed that he was unable to find any documentation of oxygen saturations in the medical chart. On 6/23/23 at 1:00 PM, V15 (Physician) stated that he expects…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide range of motion (ROM) exercises for 1 (R55) of 1 resident reviewed for ROM in the sample of 69. This failure has the potential to affect 64 residents (R1-R50, R52, R54, R55, R57-R63, R66, R173, R174, R321) who receive ROM exercises. Findings Include: An undated untitled list of all residents who receive restorative programs. This list documents (R1-R50, R52, R54, R55, R57-R63, R66, R321) have current orders for restorative programs. 1. R55's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include muscle spasm, spinal stenosis, and diabetes. R55's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/12/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 10, which indicates R55 has a moderate cognitive impairment. This same MDS under Section G, documents R55 requires assist of two staff for bed mobility, toilet use, and transfers. R55's current undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed and personal protective equipment donned per current standards of practice, when providing incontinence care for 1 of 1 (R5) residents reviewed for infection control during incontinence care in the sample of 69. Findings Include: R5's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include diabetes, heart failure, difficulty in walking, Parkinson's Disease, and unspecified intellectual disability. R5's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 4/25/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 06, which indicates R5 has a severe cognitive deficit. R5's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus area of I have an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit R/T (related to) CVA (Cerebrovascular Accident). The interventions documented for this Focus area include, .Toilet Use: I need extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-23 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure antibiotics were prescribed following current standards of practice for 1 of 1 (R25) residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship in the sample of of 69. Findings Include: R25's facility Transfer/Discharge Report with a print date of 6/23/23 documents R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, urinary tract infections, obstructive and reflux uropathy, and overactive bladder. R25's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 5/17/23 documents a BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) score of 13, which indicates R25 is cognitively intact. R25's current undated Care Plan documents a Focus Area of indwelling catheter with diagnosis documented as neurogenic bladder. The same care plan includes interventions to position the catheter bag below the level of the bladder, monitor and document intake and output, monitor for signs/symptoms of discomfort. On 6/21/23 at 10:00 AM, R25 stated the facility staff don't…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$126,045 in federal fines across 8 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $15,935 — penalty dated 2026-04-28
  • $16,065 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
  • $16,065 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
  • $16,065 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
  • $16,801 — penalty dated 2024-05-28
  • $14,050 — penalty dated 2024-04-09
  • $14,050 — penalty dated 2024-02-20
  • $17,014 — penalty dated 2023-09-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-25 for 94 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-13 for 19 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.8-1.8 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.7-1.7 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.8-0.8 vs chain
Quality measures 1 of 51.5-0.5 vs chain
The other 17 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.8★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LINDNER, LONIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2025
STOUT, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/25/2024
WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2025
BROSTER, ALICEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2025
DONELSON, JEANANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 11/01/2024
FLICK, JOHNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2025
TAULBEE, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2025
TWEEDY, MICHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/10/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 10%Medicare 5%Other / private 86%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$310per resident / day
operating cost
$9,422per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$261per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Illinois Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Illinois
$8,304/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,216/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,219/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 146000. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next