Oakview Nursing & Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 43% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 63.1 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 27 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for 1 (R16) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents in the sample of 42. This failure resulted in R16 acquiring a laceration to her left lower leg resulting in 12 sutures being placed. This past noncompliance occurred between 11/27/24 and 11/28/24. The findings include: R16's admission Record documented an admission date of 7/15/2024, and diagnoses including neurocognitive disorder with lewy bodies, weakness, and unspecified diastolic (congestive) heart failure. R16's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented under section GG- Mobility that R16 is dependent, which means helper does more than half the effort. Helper lifts or holds trunk or limbs and provides more than half the effort for a chair/bed-to chair transfer. R16's Care Plan documents focus areas of potential impairment to skin integrity, with an initiation date of 7/18/24, and Potential for falls/injury r/t (related to) dx (diagnoses) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from falls with serious injury, transferred safely with a mechanical lift using two staff members, and fall interventions were implemented to prevent falls for 4 of 4 residents (R3, R4, R8, and R9) reviewed for falls in a sample of 42. This failure resulted in R9 falling backwards out of the transport van approximately three feet onto the ground, which resulted in a fracture of her back in two places. Findings Include: 1. R9's admission Record, with a print date of 11/20/24, documents R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include diabetes, fibromylagia, hypertension, and difficulty in walking. R9's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 10/11/24, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R9 is cognitively intact. A facility Initial Report, with an incident date of 11/11/24 for R9, documents, (R9) was transported per facility vehicle to doctors appointment. Upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-03 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure garbage was removed in a timely manner. This deficient sanitation practice has the potential to affect all 60 residents who reside in the facility.Findings include:On 6/3/26 at 10:04 AM, V6 (Registered Nurse/ RN) said the facility's garbage disposal company did not come to empty the dumpsters for a week and the 2 dumpsters in the parking lot were overflowing with garbage. V6 said during this time, there was an abundance of garbage being left in the facility's soiled utility rooms.On 6/3/26 at 11:47 AM, V5 (Housekeeper) said the weekend prior to Memorial Day, 5/25/26, and a few days after Memorial Day, the facility's dumpsters were overflowing with garbage. V5 said the facility was keeping garbage in the soiled utility rooms until the dumpsters could get emptied. V5 said there was increased odor in the facility during that time.On 6/3/26 at 12:38 PM, V3 (Housekeeping Supervisor) said she was not working 5/23/26- 5/26/26. V3 said when she came back on 5/26/26 the dumpsters in the parking lot were full and overflowing.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the enhanced barrier precautions of wearing a gown and maintaining aseptic technique while performing indwelling catheter care for 1 (R5) of 4 residents reviewed for indwelling catheter care in a sample of 31. Findings included:R5's admission Record documented an admission date of 6/1/2018, with diagnoses including type chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes mellites without complications, uninhibited neuropathic bladder, not elsewhere classified, and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified.R5's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, showing R5 had severe cognitive impairment. This same document had documented under Section H-H:0100. Appliances: Indwelling catheter (including suprapubic catheter and nephrostomy tube) with yes.R5's Physician Order Sheet (POS) documented on 7/1/2024 an order, (R5) placed on enhanced barrier precautions related to suprapubic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-28 · tag F0729 — widespread
  Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Certified Nursing Assistant was certified by verifying continuous employment on the Health Care Worker Registry. This has the potential to affect all 80 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility undated Resident Matrix provided to this surveyor on [DATE] documents 80 residents reside at the facility. The untitled and undated staff roster given to this surveyor on [DATE] documents V11 (Certified Nursing Assistant/CNA) was hired by the facility on [DATE]. V11's Health Care Worker Registry Check, dated [DATE], documents under Work Eligibility: Eligible. The registry documents the following statement. In addition to Work Eligitibility, Employers are responsible for checking Training and Work History and Certifications to determine if person is eligible to work in a position that requires certification, such as CNA. This same Health Care Worker Registry Check documents V11's employement was verified on [DATE] and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide activities to residents for 4 of 4 (R31, R43, R52, and R129) residents reviewed for activities in a sample of 42. The Findings Include: R31's admission record documents an admission date of 7/16/24, and includes the following diagnoses: muscular dystrophy, cerebral palsy, and depression. R31's quarterly Minimum Date Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in Section C a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating R31 is cognitively intact. On 1/16/25 at 9:30 AM, R31 complained there is not enough to do in the facility, especially on the weekends. R31 stated they sometimes get coloring sheets printed off to color on over the weekend, but not every weekend. During the resident council meeting on 1/15/25 at 10:21AM, R31, R43, R52, and R129, who were all alert to person, place, and time, all stated there is not enough to do on the weekend for activities. Review of resident council minutes for 12 months has no documentation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) coding for 3 (R7, R63, R40) of 5 residents reviewed for MDS assessments in the sample of 42. Findings include: 1. R7's admission Record documented an admission date of 1/12/2022, with diagnoses including unspecified bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and paranoid schizophrenia. R7's MDS with an assessment reference date of 10/25/2024, documents under A1500. Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), Is the resident currently considered by the state level II PASRR process to have serious mental illness and/or intellectual disability or a related condition? with a response of No. R7's Care plan, dated 8/9/2024, documented a focus area of potential for communication problems related to diagnoses of dementia, hallucinations, panic disorder, paranoid schizophrenia, delusional disorders, bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety with appropriate interventions. R7's PASRR Level II, dated 4/26/2024,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) was completed for a resident with a diagnosed mental disorder for 1 (R23) of 4 residents reviewed for PASRR Screening in the sample of 42. Findings Include: R23's admission Record documented an admission date of 12/30/2022, with diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance, dysphasia and an additional diagnosis of bipolar disorder added 8/28/24. R23's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented an assessment date of 11/18/2024. Under section I: Active Diagnosis: I5900 it documents a Psychiatric/Mood Disorder diagnosis of bipolar disorder. On 1/15/2025 at 1:14 PM, V5 (Business Office Manager/BOM) stated R23's electronic health record (EHR) documented a diagnosis of bipolar disorder entered on 8/28/2024. V5 stated she was not employed at the time of this diagnosis, but does verbalize R23 should have been referred for a Level II PASRR. R23's Order Summary, dated 1/17/2025, listed active orders that included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain range of motion for 1 of 1 (R52) residents reviewed for range of motion in a sample of 42. The Findings Include: R52's admission Record documents an admission date of 9/12/23. This same document includes the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, other specified joint disorders, morbid obesity, and other intervertebral disc displacement, lumbar region. R52's quarterley MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 2/23/24, documents in Section GG that her functional limitation in range of motion that she has an impairment on one side of lower extermity. R52's most recent quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documents in Section C that R52 has a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) of 15, indicating R52 is cognitively intact. Section GG documents for functional limitation in range of motion that R52 has an impairment on both sides for lower extremities. Section GG also documents for self care that R52 is dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 1 of 1 (R52) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications in a sample of 42. The Findings Include: R52's admission record documents an admission date of 9/12/23. This same document includes the following diagnoses: major depressive disorder and anxiety disorder. R52's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documents in section C, Cognitive Patterns, that R52 has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R52 is cognitively intact. R52's January 2025 Order Summary Report includes the following medication orders: Ativan 1 milligram tablet by mouth every 6 hours as needed related to anxiety disorder. Ativan has a start date of 1/7/25 and an end date of 1/21/25. Buspirone 10 milligrams tablet by mouth two times a day related to anxiety disorder. This had an original start date of 9/12/23. Escitalopram 20 milligrams tablet one time a day related to major…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide meals at a palatable temperature when delivering hall trays for 3 of 3 (R59, R69, and R74) residents reviewed for food palatability in a sample of 42. The The findings Include: 1. R59's admission record documents an admission date of 6/19/24, and includes the following diagnoses: Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, anxiety disorder, pressure ulcer of left heel, muscle weakness, and unspecified open wound to foot. R59's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE] Section C, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15, indicating he is cognitively intact. On 1/15/25 at 12:06PM, R59 stated he chooses to eat in his room for all meals. R59 stated most of the time, all of his food is cold when it is delivered to him. R59 went on to state he sees the tray get delivered to the hallway, but there are times it takes over 20 minutes for the nursing staff to then get the trays passed out. 2. R69's admission record documents an admisison date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents timely. This failure has the potential to affect all 78 residents currently residing at the facility. Findings Include: The facility Resident Matrix dated 11/14/24 documents 78 residents currently reside at the facility. 1. R1's admission Record, with a print date of 11/20/24, documents R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's Disease, atrial fibrillation, urinary incontinence, weakness, and dementia. R1's MDS (Minimum Data Set), dated 11/8/24, documents a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 04, which indicates a severe cognitive deficit. This same MDS documents R1 is at risk for pressure ulcers with treatments documented as pressure reducing device for chair and bed, turning and repositioning program, and application of ointments/medications. R1's current Care Plan documents a Focus area of, The resident has an ADL…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,660 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,660 — penalty dated 2025-01-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $384K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL