Eldorado Rehab & Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 23 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 24% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 67.4 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 32 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.12 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.16 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional supplements as ordered for 2 of 3 residents (R1 and R13) reviewed for nutrition in the sample of 17.Findings include:1. R1's admission record dated 11/25/25 documents an admission date of 10/18/21. The same admission record documents diagnosis including but not limited to muscle weakness, vitamin deficiency, vitamin D deficiency, constipation, thrombocytosis, hyperlipidemia, osteoporosis, reduced mobility, and unsteadiness on feet.R1's physician order sheet dated 11/25/25 documents the following current orders including but not limited to health shake to be administered one time per day at lunch with a start date of 12/11/24, power pudding at lunch and supper, and ice cream at lunch both with a start date of 7/31/25.R1's current care plan documents a focus area indicating R1 is at risk for weight loss dated 10/18/21. Interventions for that focus area include but are not limited to antidepression medication as ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person centered Care Plan for 1 (R43) of 19 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans in a sample of 33. Findings include: R43's admission Record documents an admission date to the facility on 1/18/2025 with diagnoses including dementia, Alzheimer's dementia, acute kidney failure, urinary tract infection, atrial flutter, diverticulosis, diabetes mellitus type 2 and general anxiety disorder. R43's Care Plan in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented only two focus areas that included: Advanced directives and long term residency. The Care Plan is undated but lists an admission date of 1/18/2025. On 4/16/2025 at 9:15AM, V31 (Care Plan Coordinator) reviewed R43's EHR and said R43's Care Plan was never developed as far as she could tell. V31 said it only has two focus areas, advance directives and long term residency. V43 said it looks like R43's Care Plan was started but not finished. V43 said she was not the Care Plan Coordinator at the time R43's Care Plan was supposed to be developed. V31…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. R7's admission Record documented R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and include diagnoses of muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, and other reduced mobility. R7's MDS dated [DATE] documented a BIMS score of 14, indicating R7 was cognitively intact. In the section titled Functional Abilities under Self-Care, the MDS documented R7 requires substantial/maximal assist for showering/bathing, meaning the helper does more than half the effort . On 04/14/25 02:25PM, R7's hair appeared greasy and unkempt/uncombed. R7 stated We don't get our showers on time. We often only get a shower once a week. On 04/16/25 at 10:05 AM, R7 stated that her shower days are scheduled for Mondays and Thursdays. On 04/16/25 09:07AM, R7's Skin Monitoring Comprehensive CNA Shower Review documentation received from V1 from February 1, 2025 through April 12, 2025 documented that R7 received showers on printed shower sheets obtained from V1 documented R7 had showers on the following days: 2/2/25, 2/9/25, 2/14/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed rails/enablers were installed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations and specifications for 1 (R7) of 1 resident reviewed for bed rails in the sample of 33. Findings include: R7's admission Record documented R7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and included diagnoses of muscle weakness (generalized), unsteadiness on feet, other reduced mobility, cerebral infarction, unspecified, and hemiplegia, unspecified affecting left nondominant side. R7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] lists her functional limitation in range of motion impairment as on one side for upper extremity and lower extremity. R7 MDS documented she uses a wheelchair as a mobility device, and requires substantial/maximal assistance in the following areas: upper and lower body dressing, roll left and right: The ability to roll from lying on back to left and right side and return to lying on back on the bed, and for lying to sitting on side of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a plan for appropriate treatment and services for a resident with dementia for 1 (R43) of 19 residents reviewed for dementia care in a sample of 33. Findings include: R43's admission Record document she was admitted to this facility on 1/18/2025 and include a diagnosis of Alzheimer's dementia. R43's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented R43 has severe cognitive impairment and could not participate in cognitive testing. This same MDS documented R43 needs maximum to total assistance for all activities of daily living. R43's Care Plan documented two focus areas that included: Advanced directives and long term residency. The Care Plan is undated but lists an admission date of 1/18/2025. R43's Care Plan did not include a plan for R43's Alzheimer's dementia or cognitive decline. On 4/16/2025 at 9:15 AM, V31 (Care Plan Coordinator) reviewed R43's Care Plan in the EHR and said R43's Care Plan was never developed. V43 said it looks like R43's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were administered safely for 2 of 5 residents (R2 and R3) reviewed for medication administration in sample of 7. The findings include: R2's admission Record documents an admission date of 7/27/2017 and includes diagnoses of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Atrial Fibrillation, Reduced Mobility, Anxiety, and Major Depressive Disorder. R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documents in Section C, Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating R2 is cognitively intact. The same MDS documents in section E, Behaviors, is coded 0 for behaviors. R2's Order Summary Report dated 8/28/2024 does not include orders for Nystatin Powder. R2's Care Plan with a revision date of 7/27/24 does not include focus area or interventions addressing behaviors or R2's ability for self-administration of medications. On 8/28/2024 at 11:10 AM, R2 was observed sitting in her room. A bottle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespread
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to keep resident care areas and equipment clean and in a good state of repair. This has the potential to affect all 60 residents living in the facility. Findings include: On 02/06/24 at 12:14 PM, Dining room observed having brown ceiling tiles around ceiling vent area. On 02/08/24 at approximately 9:59 A.M., V4 (Maintenance Supervisor) and V11 (Regional Maintenance) were asked about the vent in the dining room with discolored tiles around it. V4 stated that he was aware of the discoloration of the ceiling tiles around the vent. V4 stated that it was on his list to do he has just been busy and it hasn't been that way long. V11 asked V4 if he had tiles available and V4 replied yes. On 02/06/2024 at 09:00 AM, observation in R10's room revealed the following: cove base in the bathroom ripped, dry wall exposed and ripped, dust and debris noted where the cove based stopped. On 02/06/2024 at 09:04 AM, observation in R24 and R212's room revealed the following: bathroom sink dripping, mildew build up around faucet and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that food items in the kitchen were properly stored/labeled and equipment was properly cleaned and maintained. This failure has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. The Finings Include: During the initial tour of the facility on 2/6/24 at 8:40 AM the following concerns were noted: 1. A one gallon container of milk was in the refrigerator without a lid and not dated/labeled. 2. An open bag of shredded white and yellow cheese was found in the reach in refrigerator opened and not dated. The white shredded cheese was not sealed open to air in original bag. 3. A tray of drinks not labeled, not dated and uncovered were found in the reach in refrigerator. V40 (Corporate Director of Culinary Services) stated that they are drinks for the day for the residents. 4. The deep fryer located next to the oven was found to have food crumbs on the edges of it and floating in oil. 5. The walk-in freezer was found with the door not latched and ice accumulation on the floor under the bottom rack…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview the facility failed to maintain documentation of holding quarterly Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement meetings (QAPI). This has the potential to affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. The Findings Include: During the investigation and review of facility records no evidence of quarterly QAPI meeting attendance or meeting information was found or produced by the facility. On 2/9/24 at 2:30 PM, V1 (Administrator) stated that he is not able to find any documentation of minutes or attendance sheets prior to January 2024 for the facility's quarterly QAPI meeting. V1 went on to state that he started his employment at this facility in January 2024 and no QA information is able to be accessed prior to that. The Long Term Care Facility application for Medicare and Medicaid dated 2/6/24, documents 60 residents reside in the facility.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities that met resident goals and preferences for five (R7, R13, R14, R26, and R27) of five residents reviewed for activities out of a sample of 40. Findings include: 1. The facility's February 2024 activities calendar documented 2/8/24 10:00 AM sensory, 10:30 AM Valentine's Day crafting, and 11:00 AM social gathering. On 2/8/24 at 10:16 AM, V5 (Activities Director) was in the main dining room directing the sensory activity. 3 residents were in their wheelchairs around the table. 1 of the residents was asleep, 1 of the residents did not have an activity device but was scrolling on her phone, and 1 was using a fidget board. On 2/8/24 at 10:19 AM, another resident was wheeled into the dining room to participate in the activity and fell asleep in her wheelchair. On 2/8/24 at 10:22 AM, 5 residents were sitting around the table in the dining room with 3 of them asleep in their wheelchairs, 1 blankly staring at nothing, and 1 was with a fidget board in front of her. On 2/8/24 at 10:30 AM, V5 placed a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to WLC MANAGEMENT FIRM — 18 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $271K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL