Ignite Medical Resort Crown Point LLC
1555 S Main Street, Crown Point, IN 46307 · For profit - Corporation · 70 certified beds · (219) 323-8700 Medicare only — no Medicaid
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (44) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.8% | 79.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.7% | 22.2% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.7% | 10.8% | 12.0% | better |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
63.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 650 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 77.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 357 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.97 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 63.9%CMS range 60.0–67.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 14.1%CMS range 12.1–16.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 77.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 63.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 74.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 99.5% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 99.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.0%CMS range 6.1–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 70.1 residents a day — about 100% occupied, or roughly -0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.74 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.79 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.69 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.59 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.79 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
44 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and served under sanitary conditions related to dirty food equipment, boxes stored on the floor, dirty dishes stored on food equipment, and lack of sanitation of the food thermometer for 1 of 1 kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) This had the potential to affect the 68 residents who received food from the kitchen. Findings include:1. During the Kitchen Sanitation Initial Tour on 3/29/26 at 9:55 a.m. with [NAME] 1, the following was observed:a. The grill had an accumulation of crumbs and debris on it.b. There was a stack of dirty pans and dishes on top of the flat-top grill.c. There were multiple boxes of food stored on the floor of the walk-in freezer. Some of the boxes were open and tipped over.d. There were multiple boxes of food and non-food items stored on the floor in the dry storage area. Some of the boxes were open and tipped over.e. There were multiple boxes of cups and straws stored on the floor in the hallway outside the kitchen.During an interview at that time, [NAME] 1 indicated all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespreadMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to keep the kitchen clean and in good repair related to dirty floors and shelved for 1 of 1 kitchen. (The Main Kitchen) Finding includes:Findings include:During the Kitchen Sanitation Initial Tour on 3/29/26 at 9:55 a.m. with [NAME] 1, the following was observed:a. An accumulation of dirt and debris was observed on the floor in front of the oven.b. An accumulation of dirt and debris was observed on the floor in between the oven, grill, and fryer.c. An accumulation of dried food spillage, dirt, and debris was observed on the shelf underneath the grill.d. An accumulation of dried white and pink substance was on the bottom shelf of the prep table.During an interview at that time, [NAME] 1 indicated all of the above was in need of cleaning. A facility policy, titled, Dietary Cleaning Policy, indicated, .Keep floor of kitchen free of debris. Staff will use a 'clean as you go' technique to keep the facility and neighborhood kitchen areas clean, functional and attractive.the following areas and equipment will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-04-02 · tag F0680 — patternEnsure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Activities Program was directed by a qualified professional who met required training and certification standards prior to assuming the role of Activities Director. This failure had the potential to affect 69 of 69 residents who relied on the activities program to meet their psychosocial, emotional, and social needs. Finding includes: The employee records were reviewed on 4/1/26. The Activity Director was hired on 10/20/25. There was a certificate, dated 12/31/25, for Hospitality Management Studies. There was no indication she had completed the Activities Director course. During an interview on 4/1/26 at 11:25 a.m., the Activities Director indicated she had a certificate in hotel hospitality and she had not completed the Activity Director course. She indicated she was not aware it was necessary. She did not have 2 years prior experience and was not a therapeutic recreations specialist or an activities professional. The policy and or qualifications was requested from the Director of Nursing (DON). During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor a resident's food preferences for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for food choices. (Resident 104) Finding includes:On 3/29/26 at 1:51 p.m., Resident 104 was observed sitting in his room with his daughter. The resident indicated he wanted soup for lunch and he was told they did not have any. The resident's daughter indicated she had to go upstairs to his Assisted Living apartment to get a can of soup for him to eat for lunch. They both indicated he did not always receive what he ordered from the menu.Record review for Resident 104 was completed on 4/1/26 at 9:02 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].During an interview on 4/1/26 at 9:08 a.m., the A Unit Manager indicated the resident's daughter filled out his meal tickets for the week and the kitchen had his meal tickets.The Lunch Meal Ticket, dated 4/1/26, indicated the resident chose:-soup of the day-small salad with French dressing-chilled peachesOn 4/1/26 at 1:42…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions were attempted prior to administering as needed (PRN) antipsychotic medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident G)Finding includes:Resident G's record was reviewed on 3/31/26 at 8:45 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, mood disorder and metabolic encephalopathy.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/24/26, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment and received antipsychotic medications.A Physician's Order, dated 2/18/26, indicated to give quetiapine fumarate, (an antipsychotic) 12.5 milligrams (mg) every eight hours as needed for agitation. The order was discontinued on 2/20/26.A Physician's Order, dated 2/20/26, indicated to give quetiapine fumarate, 12.5 mg every eight hours as needed for psychotic behaviors for 14 days. The order was discontinued on 2/24/26.A Physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) comprehensive assessment was accurately completed related to oxygen use for 1 of 22 MDS assessments reviewed. (Resident M)Finding includes:On 3/29/26 at 11:10 a.m., Resident M was observed lying in bed. The resident had oxygen on via a nasal cannula and attached to a concentrator. The flow rate was set at 4 liters. The resident indicated she had been on 3 liters of oxygen since she was admitted to the facility and was unsure why it was set at 4 liters.Record review for Resident M was completed on 3/30/26 at 2:00 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and respiratory failure. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A Physician's Order, dated 2/2/26, indicated the resident was to receive oxygen at 3 liters every shift.The admission MDS assessment, dated 2/9/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was implemented for pressure ulcers for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident F)Finding includes:During an interview on 3/29/26 at 12:59 p.m., Resident F indicated she was receiving treatment for multiple pressure ulcers that were causing a lot of pain and she received antibiotics for an infection in the wounds.On 4/2/26 at 10:23 p.m., Resident F's wound care was observed for the left and right buttocks wounds and the left lateral posterior thigh with the Wound Nurse. The Wound Nurse indicated the wounds had been infected and the resident had been receiving antibiotics for wound infections. The resident was noncompliant with offloading and wound care.Resident F's record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 1:33 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, local infection of skin and subcutaneous tissue.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/25/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had two stage IV pressure ulcers, two unstageable pressure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents received showers or baths as scheduled for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. (Residents H and J)Findings include: 1. On 3/29/26 at 11:37 a.m., Resident H was observed in his bed. His hair was uncombed and he was unshaven. The resident was unable to communicate if he had a shower recently or preferred to be clean shaven.Resident H's record was reviewed on 4/1/26 at 3:44 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 3/1/26, indicated the resident was rarely or never understood, and was dependent for toileting, bed mobility, and transfers.The ADL Care Plan, dated 2/26/26, indicated the resident had self-care deficits, performance deficit, and limitations in physical mobility. Interventions included, but were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure activities were provided to a dependent resident as care-planned for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for activities. (Resident 51)Finding includes: On 3/29/26 at 2:20 p.m., Resident 51 was observed in her bed. She indicated she liked to go to activities, but nobody would take her to them. Resident 51's record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 2:12 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute respiratory failure and morbid obesity. The Leisure Preferences Care Plan, dated 2/12/26, indicated the resident would participate in leisure activities as desired through the review period. Interventions included, but were not limited to, creative arts, music, puzzles and trivia, and music.The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/18/26, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment and needed substantial maximum assistance for transfers. During an interview on 3/31/26 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure weekly weights were obtained as ordered for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident G) The facility also failed to ensure physician's orders were in place for a bandage and an abrasion and a bruise were assessed and monitored for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Residents K and L)Findings include:1. Resident G's record was reviewed on 3/31/26 at 8:45 a.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia, diabetes mellitus and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A Nutritional Care Plan, dated 2/17/26, indicated the resident had potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration. Interventions included, but were not limited to, obtain and document weights per physician order and facility protocol. A Physician's Order, dated 2/17/26, indicated to obtain a weekly weight every Sunday. A Physician's Order, dated 3/16/26, indicated to weigh…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care was provided as ordered for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. (Resident F)Finding includes:During an interview on 3/29/26 at 12:59 p.m., Resident F indicated she was receiving treatment for multiple pressure ulcers that were causing a lot of pain and she received antibiotics for an infection in the wounds.Resident F's record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 1:33 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, local infection of skin and subcutaneous tissue.The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/25/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and had two stage IV pressure ulcers, two unstageable pressure ulcers, and two venous/arterial ulcers. The resident was also receiving antibiotic treatment.The Wound Round Notes, dated 3/24/26, indicated the resident had a stage IV pressure ulcer to the right buttocks measuring 9.0 cm long by 17.0 cm wide by 2.0 cm deep. She had an unstageable pressure ulcer on the left lateral posterior thigh measuring 9.5 cm long by 5.0 cm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure safety was maintained related to fall interventions not in place for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident 79)Finding includes:On 3/29/26 at 1:30 p.m., Resident 79 was observed lying in bed watching television. There were no floor mats in place on either side of the bed.On 3/30/26 at 9:17 a.m., Resident 79 was observed lying in bed. There were no floor mats in place on either side of the bed.On 3/31/26 at 11:40 a.m., Resident 79 was observed lying in bed. There were no floor mats in place on either side of the bed.Resident 79's record was reviewed on 3/31/26 at 9:34 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was discharged to the hospital on 3/16/26 and returned to the facility on 3/28/26. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was still in progress.A Baseline Care Plan, initiated on 3/8/26, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling urinary catheter bag and tubing was placed below the level of the bladder and not on the floor for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for catheters. (Residents 115 and F)Findings include: 1. On 3/29/26 at 12:04 p.m., Resident 115 was observed seated in her wheelchair in the Main Dining Room. Her catheter bag was hanging from the back rest of her wheelchair, not below the level of the bladder. On 3/29/26 at 1:25 p.m., Resident 115 was observed seated in her wheelchair with family pushing her down the hallway towards her room. Her catheter bag was hanging from the back rest of her wheelchair, not below the level of the bladder. On 3/31/26 at 12:52 p.m., Resident 115 was observed seated in her wheelchair in the Main Dining Room. Her catheter bag was hanging from the bottom of her wheelchair with the bag touching the floor. The record for Resident 115 was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 2:46 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure. A Care Plan, updated 3/25/26, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure to follow-up and implement recommendations from the Registered Dietician for a resident with documented weight loss and lack of documentation of meal intakes for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Residents F and C)Findings include:1. Resident F's record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 1:33 p.m.On 3/15/26, the resident weighed 186 pounds (lbs). On 3/20/26, the resident weighed 156 lbs. On 3/29/26, the resident weighed 159 lbs, which was a -14.52% weight loss from 3/15/26 to 3/29/26.A Care Plan, dated 2/23/26, indicated the resident had the potential for alterations in nutrition and hydration. Interventions included, but were not limited to, evaluate any weight changes, determine percentage changed and follow facility protocol for weight change, monitor/record/report to the physician any signs/symptoms of malnutrition, significant weight loss (3 lbs in 1 week, greater than 5% in a month, and greater than 10% in six months); Registered Dietician (RD) to evaluate and make diet change recommendations as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary respiratory care and treatment related to incorrect oxygen flow rate and not monitoring oxygen saturation levels every shift as ordered for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident 51 and C) and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident M) The facility also failed to ensure pre and post nebulizer assessments were completed and the licensed nurse remained with the resident during the nebulizer treatment for one resident observed during medication pass (Resident 51) and 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident M)Findings include:1. On 3/29/26 at 2:20 p.m., and 3/30/26 at 9:00 a.m., Resident 51 was observed in her bed with her oxygen on via nasal cannula. The oxygen concentrator was flowing at 1 liter per minute (lpm). The resident's record was reviewed on 3/30/26 at 2:12 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to timely address a pharmacy recommendation as requested for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident L). Finding includes:Record review for Resident L was completed on 3/31/26 at 1:38 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited, heart failure, Guillain-Barre syndrome (immune system attacks peripheral nerves), and atrial fibrillation. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].A Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations to Nursing form, dated 3/20/26, indicated the resident's current order for sacubitril-valsartan (heart medication) 24/26 mg (milligrams) was for once a day. Per the hospital discharge summary, the resident was to receive the medication twice a day. Please clarify with the prescriber and update accordingly.There was a lack of documentation to indicate the recommendation was clarified with the prescriber and updated until 3/31/26.During an interview on 3/31/26 at 2:46 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurately documented related to a Qualified Medication Aide documenting administration of injectable medications for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for anticoagulant administration. (Residents B and D)Findings include:1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 3/31/26 at 2:16 p.m.The Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 3/13/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and received anticoagulant and antiplatelet medications while a resident.A Care Plan, dated 1/29/26, indicated the resident received anticoagulant medications. Interventions included, but were not limited to, administer anticoagulant medications as ordered by the physician.A Physician's Order, dated 1/15/26, indicated Lovenox (anticoagulant) injection solution prefilled syringe 40 milligrams/0.4 milliliters, inject 0.4 milligrams (mg) once a day for blood clot prevention.The January and February 2026 Medication Administration Record (MAR) indicated QMA 1 marked the Lovenox injection as administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were in place and implemented related to guidelines for residents in EBP (Enhanced Barrier Precautions), and staff not wearing a gown during a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) medication administration during random infection control observations. (Residents L, 104, and E) Findings include:1. On 3/29/26 at 11:47 a.m., Resident L was observed lying in bed. There were no signs on the doorway or in the room that indicated the resident was on any infection control precautions.Record review for Resident L was completed on 3/31/26 at 1:38 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited, Guillain-Barre syndrome (immune system attacks peripheral nerves), and urinary tract infection in the past 30 days. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].The admission MDS assessment, dated 3/23/26, indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident had an impairment to both sides of his upper…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to care for a midline catheter (inserted into a vein in the upper arm for intravenous [IV] treatments) in accordance with professional standards of practice related to flushing orders and flushing of the catheter, medications administered as ordered, documentation of the insertion and discontinuation of the catheter, assessments of the catheter line with dressing changes and after discontinuing the catheter, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for midline/PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) care. (Residents B, C, and F)Findings include:1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 9/8/25 at 9:56 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, urinary tract infection and bladder cancer. A Care Plan, dated 6/2/25, indicated IV medication was being administered. The interventions included, the dressing for the site was to be changed daily and the observations of the site were to be recorded and the IV line was to be flushed per the Physician's Orders.A Physician's Order, dated 6/2/25, indicated the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician and responsible party that a medication was unavailable for 1 of 9 residents reviewed for physician/responsible party notification. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 5/1/25 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis left ankle/foot and dementia. A Social Service assessment, dated 4/30/25, indicated a severe cognitive impairment A family member was designated as the legal Power of Attorney (POA). A Physician's Order, dated 4/29/25 at 6:00 p.m., indicated IV (intravenous) ampicillin-sulbactam (antibiotic) 3 grams (gm) was to be administered every six hours due to a wound infection. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/2025, indicated the antibiotic had not been available and was not given on 4/30/25 at 12:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. The MAR, dated 5/2025, indicated the antibiotic had not been available and was not given on 5/1/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. Cross reference F755. There was no documentation to indicate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide incontinent care in a timely manner and failed to ensure Resident D was bathed after a large amount of urinary incontinence for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). (Residents D and E) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/29/25 from 9:07 a.m. through 9:32 a.m., Resident D was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. There was a yellow tinged color on the edge of the incontinence pad that was under the resident. LPN 3 and CNA 2 entered the room. CNA 2 indicated she came in to work at 6 a.m. and she had not checked the resident for urinary incontinence since she started work that morning. CNA 2 indicated the gown was wet with urine and there were two incontinence pads under the resident that were saturated with urine. The sheet under the incontinence pads was soaked with urine as well and there was a drying ring of urine on the bottom sheet of the bed. The top sheet and covers were also wet. CNA 2 indicated the gown and incontinence brief were saturated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to care for a midline catheter (inserted into a vein in the upper arm for intravenous [IV] treatments) in accordance with professional standards of practice related to a non-sterile dressing change and a lack of dressing changes to the site, assessments of the site, and flushes of the catheter for 2 random PICC line observations. (Residents D and J) Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/29/25 at 9:46 a.m., Resident D was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. There was a PICC line in the left upper extremity. LPN 3 indicated there was blood on the PICC line dressing and the dressing needed to be changed. A sterile dressing kit was placed on the resident's bed and opened up. LPN 3 applied sterile gloves after using the alcohol based hand rub. She then lifted the resident's left arm up with the sterile gloves on and placed a sterile pad under the arm. She then put a face mask on herself and touched the top of her ears and hair with the sterile gloves. The soiled PICC line dressing was removed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident was provided with an intravenous (IV) antibiotic in a timely manner by the contracted pharmacy, related to the antibiotic not being available to be administered as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic medications. (Resident D) Finding includes: Resident D's record was reviewed on 5/1/25 at 10:00 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, osteomyelitis left ankle/foot and dementia. A Care Plan, dated 4/29/25, indicated an IV antibiotic was ordered by the physician for a wound infection. The goal indicated there would be no complications related to the IV therapy. A Physician's Order, dated 4/29/25 at 6:00 p.m., indicated an IV of ampicillin-sulbactam (antibiotic) 3 grams (gm) was to be administered every six hours due to a wound infection. The Medication Administration Record (MAR), dated 4/2025, indicated the IV antibiotic was given on 4/29/25 at 6:00 p.m., 4/30/25 at 12:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. The MAR indicated the medication had not been available and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0772 — isolatedHave an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received laboratory services as ordered by the physician for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for laboratory services. (Resident B) Finding includes: Resident B's record was reviewed on 4/30/25 at 2:12 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke and dementia. A Wound Physician Progress Note, dated 4/18/25, indicated a Stage IV (full thickness skin loss with extensive destruction) pressure ulcer was present on the coccyx. An order for a pre-albumin and a complete blood count (CBC) was received. The pre-albumin and complete blood count results were not in the medical record and there was no documentation the laboratory testing had been completed. During an interview on 4/30/25 at 4:42 p.m., Wound Nurse 1 indicated the laboratory testing had been ordered and sent to the lab. The pre-albumin and the CBC were not completed by the lab. It was scheduled to be completed on 4/20/25. The lab was notified and they indicated the testing had not been completed and were unable to provide a reason why the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure correct Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used by a staff members (LPN 3, CNA 2, CNA 6, and CNA 7) when providing care to a residents (Residents D and J) who were in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two random observations for infection control. Findings include: 1. During an observation on 4/29/25 from 9:07 a.m. through 9:32 a.m., Resident D was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. There was a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) inserted in the left upper arm and a wound dressing on the right heel. The resident had been incontinent of urine and LPN 3 and CNA 2 had gloves on and were starting to complete incontinence care and were stopped. LPN 3 indicated she was unsure if the resident required EBP and indicated there was no sign on the door that indicated he required EBP and EBP was not needed. LPN 3 then indicated the resident had a wound and EBP would be needed. CNA 2 and LPN 3 then donned a gown and changed gloves and began incontinence care. Resident D's record was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had Physician's Orders for medications and an assessment to self-administer their own medications for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for self-administration of medication. (Resident 40) Finding includes: During a random observation on 1/6/25 at 10:52 a.m., there was a medication tablet in a clear medication cup on Resident 40's bedside table. At the time, Resident 40 indicated the medication was an extra strength Tylenol and the nurse always left her medications at the bedside for her to take before she went to therapy. Resident 40's record was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 3:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and acute respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Care Plan, revised on 1/6/25, indicated the resident had an order for self-administration of all medications and may keep at bedside. An intervention,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were notified in writing related to a transfer to the hospital for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 40) Finding includes: Resident 40's record was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 3:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and acute respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Progress Note, dated 12/21/2024 at 7:39 a.m., indicated the resident was asleep in bed with the head of bed elevated. The resident was observed to have tremors. The resident woke up when stimulated. She was using accessory muscles while breathing, lips slightly blue, and having difficulty breathing while speaking. The resident denied shortness of breath when asked. Oxygen was applied via nasal cannula and she was sent to the hospital for a medical evaluation via 911. The resident left awake, alert and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident and/or their Responsible Party were sent the facility's bed-hold and reserve bed payment policy before and upon transfer to the hospital for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident 40) Finding includes: Resident 40's record was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 3:07 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure, pressure ulcer of the sacral region, and acute respiratory failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/31/24, indicated the resident was cognitively intact for daily decision making. A Progress Note, dated 12/21/2024 at 7:39 a.m., indicated the resident was asleep in bed with the head of bed elevated. The resident was observed to have tremors. The resident woke up when stimulated. She was using accessory muscles while breathing, lips slightly blue, and having difficulty breathing while speaking. The resident denied shortness of breath when asked. Oxygen was applied via nasal cannula and she was sent to the hospital for a medical evaluation via…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received medications as ordered for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dialysis, failed to hold medications outside of ordered parameters for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for discharge, failed to assess and monitor an abdominal hernia, and lack of treatment in place for leg swelling for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for edema and skin conditions. (Residents C, B, and D) Findings include: 1. Resident C's record was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 2:08 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dependence on renal dialysis, unspecified dementia, and gastrostomy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, received renal dialysis and tube feedings. The resident went to renal dialysis on Monday, Wednesday and Friday mornings. The resident went to dialysis on 1/2/25 and 1/3/25 due to the holiday on Wednesday,1/1/25,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an indwelling Foley (urinary) catheter collection bag for a resident with a history of infection was kept off the floor for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 160) Finding includes: On 1/7/25 at 1:40 p.m., Resident 160 was observed sitting in a wheelchair at the nurses' station. The resident was talking on the phone and her catheter collection bag was lying on the floor underneath her wheelchair. On 1/9/24 at 9:16 a.m., Resident 160 was observed sitting in a recliner in her room. The resident's catheter collection bag was touching the floor in front of the recliner. During an interview on 1/19/24 at 9:19 a.m., the A Unit Manager indicated staff should have put the resident's catheter bag into a bath basin so it would not be touching the floor. Record review for Resident 160 was completed on 1/9/24 at 9:36 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, anxiety, cerebral palsy, chronic kidney disease,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely follow up on dietary recommendations for a resident with a feeding tube was completed for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. (Resident 46) Finding includes: Record review for Resident 46 was completed on 1/9/25 at 11:45 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, stroke, hypertension, and intellectual disabilities. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/19/24, indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The resident had a feeding tube. A Care Plan, dated 12/12/24 and revised 1/6/25, indicated the resident had the potential for alteration in nutrition and hydration related to a feeding tube. An intervention included the Registered Dietician was to evaluate and make diet change recommendations when necessary. A Registered Dietician (RD) note, dated 1/7/25 at 3:52 p.m., indicated the resident's weight was slowly increasing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a gastrostomy (surgical insertion of a feeding tube) received the appropriate treatment related to incorrect flow rate for the tube feeding for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for tube feedings. (Resident C) Finding includes: On 1/8/25 at 2:20 p.m., Resident C was observed lying in his bed. His tube feeding was on and flowing at 75 milliliters per hour (ml/hr). On 1/9/25 at 9:18 a.m. and 11:20 a.m., the resident was in bed and his tube feeding was on and flowing at 45 ml/hr. The resident's record was reviewed on 1/7/25 at 2:08 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dependence on renal dialysis, unspecified dementia and gastrostomy. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/2/25, indicated the resident had severe cognitive impairment, received renal dialysis, and tube feedings. A Physician's Order, dated 1/7/25, indicated the resident was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) was maintained related to the dressing not being changed as ordered for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident 116) Finding includes: On 1/6/25 at 1:37 p.m., Resident 116 was observed in his bed. He had a PICC inserted in his right upper arm with a dressing dated 12/23/24. The resident's record was reviewed on 1/6/25 at 3:00 p.m. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to unspecified dementia, asthma, and gout. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/30/24, indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, was dependent on staff for transfers, and did not have IV access. A Physician's Order, dated 12/25/24, indicated to change the PICC dressing every seven days on Saturday. The January 2025 Medication Administration Record indicated the dressing had been changed on 1/4/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control measures were in place and maintained related to improper protective personal equipment (PPE) worn in an isolation room for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident 125) Finding includes: On 1/7/25 at 10:35 a.m., Resident 125 was observed in her room. There were isolation signs on the resident's door that indicated she was on contact and droplet precautions. Another sign indicated the room was a Red Zone, and PPE required to enter was an N95 or approved KN95 respiratory mask, goggles or a faceshield, gown and gloves. There was a PPE bin outside the resident's room. On 1/8/25 at 9:32 a.m., LPN 1 was observed in the resident's room speaking with a family member. The nurse had her personal glasses on and was wearing a surgical mask. She was not wearing an N95 mask, goggles or a faceshield, gown or gloves. LPN 1 exited the room at 9:40 a.m. During an interview at that time, the LPN indicated the resident was on isolation because she was immunocompromised, she was not aware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0573 — isolatedLet each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide residents' medical records to the resident/ Power of Attorney (POA) in a timely manner after a request was made for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for medical record requests. (Residents B, C, and D) Finding includes: 1. Resident B's closed record was reviewed on 12/5/24 at 9:04 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, fractured left femur. Resident B was discharged from the facility on 7/3/24. A Power of Attorney (POA) form and Healthcare Representative (HCR) form, both dated 6/26/18, indicated the resident's husband was appointed POA and HCR. In the absence of the resident's husband, the resident's daughter was the successor. During an interview with resident's POA on 12/5/24 at 9:38 a.m., she indicated the resident's condition had deteriorated and a signed release of information approval had been given to a law firm. The firm had received part of the medical record, though there were several duplicates in the file received and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the Administrator and the Indiana Department of Health (IDOH) immediately or within the 2 hour time period for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse. (Resident E) Finding includes: During an interview on 7/15/24 at 4:35 a.m., LPN 1 indicated a few weeks ago, Resident E had made the allegation the staff were rough with her during care. She was unable to give the names of the staff. LPN 1 immediately reported the allegation to the Director of Nursing (DON) and the DON indicated she would follow up on the allegation. During an interview on 7/15/24, the Administrator indicated he was not notified of the allegation of the staff being rough during care by Resident E. There was no reported incident to the IDOH about the allegation. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 9:45 a.m., the Administrator indicated he had spoken to the DON, who was on vacation, and the DON indicated LPN 1 had reported the allegation to her. The DON had interviewed the resident she had not voiced an allegation about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure standard practice of care was followed during an observation of a gastrostomy (g-tube) (feeding tube) medication administration, related to the placement of the g-tube not being confirmed prior to the administration of the medications, for 1 of 1 resident observed and reviewed for g-tube care. (Resident F) Finding includes: During a medication administration observation on 7/15/24 at 8:28 a.m., LPN 2 entered Resident F's room with 11 medication cups containing one crushed medication in each cup, a glass with apple juice which contained a medication that required apple juice for administration, and 30 ml (milliliters) of a protein supplement. The medications were placed on the over bed table. LPN 2 mixed the medications with 5 mls of water in each cup, flushed the g-tube with 60 ml of water, then administered the protein supplement and the medications separately through the resident's g-tube. LPN 2 did not confirm the placement of the g-tube prior to the administration of the medications. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure there was a sanitary kitchen, related to undated and/ or unlabeled food, a build up on ice in the freezer, and a spilled substance and food on the floors in a refrigerator and dry storage room. This had the potential to affect all 68 residents who received meals prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: On 4/1/24 at 8:45 a.m., during the initial kitchen tour with [NAME] 1, the following was observed: a. In the walk in refrigerator, there were boxes of soda and pies sitting directly on the floor. b. In the walk in refrigerator, there was a package of raw meat, gravy in a plastic container, and mashed potatoes that were unlabeled and undated. c. There was a raw potato and a pink substance spilled on the refrigerator floor. d. In the freezer, there was a heavy build up of ice on the ceiling and on two boxes of food. e. In the dry storage room, there was a large amount of dry oatmeal spilled on the shelves and floor. During an interview with [NAME] 1 at the time of observation, she indicated the items should be labeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary care and treatment related to lack of assessment and treatment order for a skin tear, for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for non-pressure skin conditions. (Resident 31) Finding includes: On 4/1/24 at 2:23 p.m., Resident 31 was observed seated in his room. He had a dressing on his right elbow that was coming loose and was soiled with blood. He indicated he had bumped his elbow that morning and got a skin tear. Resident 31's record was reviewed on 4/2/24 at 9:28 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Diabetes Mellitus and a foot ulcer. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 2/22/24, indicated the resident required extensive staff assistance for transfers and toileting. He was cognitively intact. The record lacked documentation or assessment of the skin tear on his right elbow. The record lacked a Physician's Order for treatment of the skin tear. During an interview on 4/2/24 at 9:35 a.m., LPN 4 indicated she was unaware of what had happened to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a Physician's Order was obtained for a urinary catheter, catheter care was completed, and urinary output was recorded for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for urinary catheters. (Resident 105) Finding includes: On 4/1/24 at 10:44 a.m., Resident 105 was observed in his room with a urinary catheter bag in place. On 4/3/24 at 1:30 p.m., Resident 105 was observed seated in his wheelchair in his room. He had a catheter bag in place. The record for Resident 105 was reviewed on 4/4/24 at 9:51 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, type 2 diabetes mellitus, anemia, and dementia. The resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A Care Plan, dated 3/28/24, indicated the resident had a urinary catheter. The admission Nursing Evaluation, dated 3/28/24, indicated the resident had a 16f (french, catheter size) indwelling catheter. The admission Progress Note from the Nurse Practitioner, dated 3/29/24 6:04 p.m., indicated the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received the correct and necessary respiratory treatment, related to no Physician's Order for oxygen and incorrect oxygen flow rate, for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Residents 258 and 3) Findings include: 1. On 4/1/24 at 11:05 a.m., Resident 258 was observed lying in bed. He had a nasal cannula in place with oxygen flowing at 2.5 liters per minute. Resident 258's record was reviewed on 4/3/24 at 9:05 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, acute kidney failure, Diabetes Mellitus and congestive heart failure. There was no Physician's Order for the oxygen. An admission Nursing Evaluation, dated 3/21/24, indicated the resident's oxygen saturation was 94% on oxygen via nasal cannula. During an interview on 4/3/24 at 2:45 p.m., the Unit Manager indicated there was no Physician's Order for the oxygen. 2. On 4/2/24 at 9:22 a.m., Resident 3 was lying in bed. The resident was wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula with a flow rate at 2.5 liters. On 4/2/24 at 12:52 p.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents who required assistance for activities of daily living (ADL's), received bathing/showers at least twice a week, for 4 of 5 residents who require extensive to dependent assistance for ADL's. (Residents D, E, F, and H) Findings include 1) Resident D's closed record was reviewed on 2/14/24 at 9:06 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and cognitive communication deficit. An Admission/5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/26/24, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, no behaviors, and was dependent on staff for bathing and hygiene. A Care Plan, dated 1/22/24, indicated assistance would be provided for ADL's. The bathing schedule, indicated the resident's bathing was to be completed on Wednesdays and Saturdays on the first shift. The shower forms and tasks area of the record indicated bathing/showers were not completed on January 24, 2024 and February 10, 2024. 2) During an interview on 2/13/24 at 2:26 p.m., Resident E indicated bathing was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's record was complete and accurate, related to documentation of dietary intakes, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for dietary intakes. (Residents D, F, and G) Findings include: 1) Resident D's closed record was reviewed on 2/14/24 at 9:06 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, chronic lymphocytic leukemia and cognitive communication deficit. An Admission/5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 1/26/24, indicated a severely impaired cognitive status, no behaviors, and moderate assistance was required for dietary intake. A Care Plan, dated 1/22/24 and revised on 1/29/24, indicated she was a risk for malnutrition. The interventions included she would be assisted with eating her meals. The food consumption task documentation, dated 1/21/24 through 2/12/24, indicated there were no meal consumption's documented for the following days and meals: 1/21/24 supper 1/22/24 lunch and supper 1/23/24 lunch and supper 1/24/24 lunch and supper 1/25/24 lunch and supper 1/26/24 breakfast, lunch, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2024-07-16 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the posted Nurse Staffing Information included only the staff who were providing direct resident care, related to Nursing Administration hours included on the postings. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility during May, June, and July, 2024. Finding includes: During an observation on 7/15/24 at 4:30 a.m., there were two nurses, one QMA, and three CNAs working the evening/night shift. LPN 1 indicated the staff work 12 hours shifts. During an observation on 7/15/24 at 8 a.m., there were four nurses and six CNAs working the day/evening shift. Nursing schedules and posted nursing hours, dated 5/19/24 through 6/9/24 and 7/1/24 through 7/14/24 were reviewed on 7/16/24 at 12:00 p.m. The scheduled hours for the nurses did not match the posted hours when compared for each day. The nurses' hours were higher on the Nurse Staffing Information than the observations of the nurses in the facility who provided direct resident care. During an interview on 7/16/24 at 1:04 p.m., the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGNITE CROWN POINT JV LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| IGNITE-VILLA IN HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| ANC INDIANA OPCO LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| DRAKE LOUIS ENTERPRISE, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| GOLD PEARL, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| ISRAEL INVESTMENT TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE CROWN POINT LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| CARR, BARRY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| CARR, JARED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| DAVISSON, MARNIE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| FIELDS, TIMOTHY | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| GILLIS, KAREN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| GOBST, RYAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| HARTMAN, DAVID | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| HARTMAN, MARK | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 11/01/2023 |
| JABLONSKI, NICOLE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| MCFARLANE, JOHN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| PETTY, ROBERT | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| RAINEY, SHAWNA | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2024 |
| ROSE, MARC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| THENGIL, MATHEW | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| WHITE, JIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/01/2023 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 11/01/2023 |
| IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| SPARK THERAPY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| STEMER, ALEXANDER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
| BERGER, AVIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/19/2025 |
| ISRAEL, YEHUDIS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/19/2025 |
| LUXE STAFFING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 64 rows in the source record cover these 35 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IN
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Indiana Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155835. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.