Ignite Medical Resort El Paso, LLC
3421 Joe Battle Boulevard, El Paso, TX 79936 · For profit - Corporation · 60 certified beds · (915) 599-5500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $67,425 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-13)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.0% | 3.0% | 5.4% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.2% | 0.8% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.4% | 18.0% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 21.0% | 3.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 32.7% | 13.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 26.2% | 9.6% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 50.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.9% | 25.7% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 10.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 103 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 56 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.74 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.3%CMS range 49.2–70.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.5%CMS range 9.1–18.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 57.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 62.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 46.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 27.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 86.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.1%CMS range 5.5–15.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.93 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 51.4 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.45 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.40 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2026-03-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician was immediately notified of a need to alter treatment (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #2) of 9 residents reviewed for physician notifications. -The facility failed to notify the physician when Resident #2 experienced elevated blood glucose levels exceeding 400 mg/dL from 02/26/2026 through 03/02/2026. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 03/12/2026. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at the scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for minimum harm, due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems.This failure could have resulted in a decline in health and placing the resident at risk of adverse outcomes like sepsis, DKA, or death.Findings…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provided needed care and services that are centered in accordance with residents preferences, goals for care and professional standards of practice that meet each residents physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #2) of 10 residents. The facility failed to assess Resident #2 prior to admission and failed to identify and implement physician orders related to antibiotic therapy and blood glucose management for readings outside established parameters which resulted in hospitalization with diagnoses of DKA and sepsis. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 03/12/2026. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at the scope of isolation with the potential for more than minimal harm , due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could have resulted in serious deterioration of the residents health, including infection…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2026-03-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are free of any significant mediation errors for 1 (Resident #2) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration errors.The facility failed to assess Resident #2 prior to admission and failed to identify and implement physician orders related to antibiotic therapy and blood glucose management for readings outside established parameters. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was identified on 03/12/2026. While the IJ was removed on 03/13/2026, the facility remained out of compliance at the scope of isolation with the potential for more than minimal harm , due to the facility's need to evaluate the effectiveness of their corrective systems. This failure could have resulted in serious deterioration of the residents health, including infection progression, unstable blood glucose levels, and life-threatening complications. Findings included:Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 03/11/2026, revealed an [AGE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving injuries of unknown source are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency and adult protective services where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for 1of 8 resident (Resident #9) reviewed for Injury of unknown origin. The facility failed to ensure Resident #9 injury of unknown origin was reported to the state agency. This failure could have resulted in protection of residents from further potential harm. In an interview on 03/10/2026 at 02:20 pm the ADON stated that while conducting rounds, Resident #9 was found in bed in an abnormal position, with the head positioned opposite the foot of the bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 of 7 residents (Resident #10 and Resident #11) reviewed for infection control.The facility failed to ensure RN M performed hand hygiene and/or used PPE while conducting a blood glucose check.The facility failed to ensure LVN R properly discarded of used lancet after use. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. Findings included: In an Observation on 03/08/2026 at 11:36am revealed LVN R prepared to perform a blood glucose check before lunch for Resident #11. LVN R prepared all his materials for the blood glucose test and entered the resident's room, performed the blood glucose test and read the numbers to the resident. LVN R exited the room and walked to his med cart. He then inputted Observation of the resident's blood glucose level revealed a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the residents had the right to a dignified existence for 2 (Resident #2 & Resident #3) of 3 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure the urinary collection bags for Resident #2 and Resident #3's catheters were covered with a privacy bag. This failure could place residents at risk for a loss of dignity, decreased self-worth and decreased self-esteem.Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 12/15/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia (high amount of glucose in blood), Hypermagnesemia (too much magnesium), and Acute kidney failure (kidneys stop working). Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 09, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #2 had no impairment to one side of upper extremity, and no impairment to both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Resident #1) of 2 reviewed for medication administration in that: The facility failed to ensure that Resident #1 was provided with wound care treatment according to physician's routine, PRN, and STAT orders, due to the order being placed incorrectly in the MAR. This failure could place residents at risk of a decline in health due to incorrect medication administration and inaccurate orders.Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 12/15/2025, revealed admission on [DATE] to the facility. Record review of Resident #1 's H&P dated 11/09/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with pulmonary embolism (a blood clot blocking the flow to the lungs), rheumatoid arthritis (arthritis in the joints), chronic congestive heart failure/cardiomyopathy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure the urinary catheter bag for Resident #2 was anchored and secured to prevent infection. This failure could place residents at risk of infection due to improper care practices. Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 12/15/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with hyperglycemia (high amount of glucose in blood), Hypermagnesemia (too much magnesium), and Acute kidney failure (kidneys stop working). Record review of Resident #2's MDS dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of 09, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #2 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespreadMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to have an adequately equipped system that allowed residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system for 2 of 2 call light systems viewed for resident call system. The facility failed to ensure that residents call lights for 3 of 3 Resident Halls were functioning properly. This failure put residents at risk of not being able to call for assistance when needed. Findings included: During an observation 12/01/25 at 12:53 PM in Hall 200 revealed, two residents had turned on the Nurse Call Lights. It was observed that the corridor lights for Nurse Call were on, room [ROOM NUMBER] and 209, and were not ringing in the residents' rooms or at the nurse's station. There were no staff sitting at the nurse's station. During an observation 12/01/25 at 1:33 PM revealed, the resident in room [ROOM NUMBER] had turned on his Nurse Call Light. It was observed that the corridor light for Nurse Call in room [ROOM NUMBER] was on and was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility had sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by the resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population in accordance with the facility assessment including other personnel, including but not limited to nurse aides for 5 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4 and Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for sufficient staff. The facility failed to have sufficient staff, which resulted in missed showers, delayed response to call lights, and delayed incontinent care for dependent residents. This failure could place residents at risk of decreased physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: During an observation on 12/01/25 at 12:51 PM, it revealed the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 5 (Resident #1, #2, #,3, #4, and #5) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. 1. The facility failed to administer Dapagliflozin Propanediol, Levothyroxine, Acetylcysteine Solution, Eliquis, Memantine HCI, to Resident #1 according to physician's orders. 2. The facility failed to administer Farxiga and Folic Acid, to Resident #2 according to physician's orders. 3. The facility failed to administer Pravastatin Sodium, Alendronate Sodium, Sodium Chloride, Linagliptin, and Calcium 600 + D to Resident #3 according to physician's orders. 4. The facility failed to administer Levothyroxine, Rifaximin, Symbicort Inhalation Aerosol to Resident #4 according to physician's orders. 5. The facility failed to immediately consult with and/or Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish procedures for storing and disposing of drugs and biological in accordance with federal, state, and local laws. -The facility failed to ensure medication deliveries were not left unattended at the nurse's station. -The facility failed to ensure licensed staff did not leave medications unattended at the nurse's station This failure could place residents living at the facility at risk of drug diversion. The findings included:During an observation on 12/03/25 at 9:00 AM, revealed a cardboard box was on top of the nurse's station countertop labeled El Paso with a label on one side that documented Dressing Change Kits. During an observation, interview and record review on 12/03/25 at 9:50 AM revealed, LVN I, was sitting at the nurse's station taking medication blister packets out of the cardboard box that was labeled El Paso, that was on the nurse's station countertop unattended earlier that morning. He said the pharmacy ships medications in cardboard boxes from out of town and the boxes should be received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were accurately documented for 1 (Resident #22) of 8 residents reviewed for medical records. -The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented in the Nurse's Notes on 11/18/25 when she notified the physician of resident family's non-compliance of NPO status. -The facility failed to ensure that licensed staff promptly wrote physician's telephone orders and entered new orders in the medication administration record. This failure could place residents at risk of residents records not reflecting accurate and complete information. Findings include:Closes Record Review of the admission Record dated 12/01/25 for Resident #1 revealed, admission date 11/10/25. discharge date [DATE] to Acute Care Hospital.Review of the Hospital Physician Progress Note for Resident #1 dated 11/09/25 revealed, [AGE] year-old male with a history of esophageal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 27 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet a resident medical and nursing needs to be furnished to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two residents (Residents #1, and #2) of 4 residents reviewed for care plans.The facility failed to have a comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident # 1 and #2 to address resident's wound vac.These failures could affect residents and put them at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings included: Resident #1Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 10/27/2025 revealed a [AGE] year old male with an admission date of 09/22/25.Review of Resident #1's history and physical dated 09/23/2025 revealed resident had a left 5th toe amputation and the presence of a wound vac to distal lower leg.Review of Resident #1 's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received food that is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 1 of 1 meal (7/30/25) tested for nutritive value, flavor, and appearance:The facility failed on 7/30/25 to serve and address the residents concerns regarding their meals not being at a safe and palatable temperature for residents who were served their meals in their rooms.The facility failed on 7/30/25 to serve a sample food tray for the surveyors at a safe and palatable temperature. The facility failed on 7/30/25 to serve meals at a safe temperature. This failure could affect the residents who ate food from the facility's kitchen by placing them at risk of poor food intake and/or dissatisfaction due to not providing appetizing temperature meals. The findings included:Record review of the facility's lunch menu for Wednesday July 30th, 2025, consisted of Beef Pepper Steak, Garlic Mashed Potatoes and Buttered Carrots. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed in that:The facility's kitchen staff failed to thaw food properly.This failure could place residents who eat foods prepared in the kitchen at risk of cross contamination and food-borne illnesses.The findings include: In an observation on 7/29/25 at 8:13 AM in the kitchen, two packs of beef, approximately four pounds each, were thawing inside a large and clear plastic container. The container was observed next to the kitchen sink. Meat juice was visible outside of the bags containing the meat and a pool of juices was forming inside the container. In an observation on 7/29/25 at 8:25 AM in the kitchen, the same receptacle containing the meat had been moved to a different sink and was completely submerged in water below the faucet and the water was left running. In an interview on 7/31/25 at 9:53 AM with the Executive Chef, he stated that the procedure for thawing meat was to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 1 of 14 Residents (Resident #62) reviewed for accommodation of needs.The facility failed to ensure Resident #62's call light was in reach.This failure could affect the residents' dependent on staff for transferring in and out of their bed and/or wheelchair by causing feelings of isolation, frustration, hunger, and a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Record review of Resident #62's face sheet dated 07/30/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission date of 12/18/24 and a re-admission date of 07/25/25. Record review of Resident #62's history and physical dated 07/27/25 revealed medical history of: Senile Degeneration of brain (decline of cognitive function impacting memory and reasoning), Anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment was as free from accident hazards as possible for 2 of 18 residents (Resident #2 and Resident # 49) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to properly dispose of shaving razors in a sharps container in Residents #2 and 49's shared room. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of harm or injury and contribute to avoidable accidents. The findings included: Resident #2 Record review of Resident #2's face sheet dated 07/31/2025 revealed a [AGE] year-old male that was initially admitted to facility on 10/12/2022 and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #2's history and physical dated 01/17/2025 revealed, Resident #2 was diagnosed with dementia (decline in mental ability). Record review of Resident 2's MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 09 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #2's care plan reviewed on 04/24/25 revealed the Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for infection control. (Residents #62)CNA A failed to perform hand hygiene after disposing of dirty briefs and before putting on new clean briefs for Resident #62.These failures could place the residents who required incontinent care at risk for cross contamination and infection.Findings include:Record review of Resident #62's face sheet dated 07/30/25 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with initial admission date 12/18/24 and re-admission date 07/25/25. Record review of Resident #62's history and physical dated 07/27/25 revealed medical history of: Senile Degeneration of brain (decline of cognitive function impacting memory and reasoning), Anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for professional standards for food service safety. -Access to trash can next to handwashing sink was not hands free as the lid of the trash can was damaged. -The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's only walk-in refrigerator were sealed and labeled appropriately. -The facility failed to ensure food items in the facility's only walk-in freezer were dated and stored appropriately. -The dishwashing and sanitization machine was dirty with dried caked on substance on top of the machine and streaking down the front of the machine. -The kitchen ice machine was dirty with dried caked on substance around the ice dispenser door. -Multiple vents observed with dust and debris over cooking prep areas. -Wall and ceiling observed with dried yellow splatter in a kitchen prep area. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, and food contamination.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #1) of 4 residents whose records were reviewed for accuracy and completeness. -The facility failed to document Resident #1's fall incident per policy in an incident report. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for improper care due to incomplete or inaccurate records. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record dated 03/25/2025, revealed an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1's diagnoses included lack of coordination, weakness, and falls. Record review of Resident #1's MDS assessment dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #1's Progress Notes dated 02/27/2025 at 3:28 p.m., reads in part notify MD and NP, patient found sitting on the floor by the toilet. Patient assessed and no injuries…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 5 (Resident #3) r esidents reviewed for infection control in that: The facility failed to dispose of Resident #3's dirty brief and wipes smeared with feces that were left on the room floor wrapped in a linen. This failure could place residents at risk for cross contamination resulting in acquired infection. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3 's face sheet dated 07/19/24 reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. Record review of Resident #3's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected her cognitive was severely impaired. During an interview on 07/12/24 at 4:09 pm, Resident #3's family member was at bedside and denied any concerns with care provided.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to conduct assessments that accurately reflected the resident's status for 4 of 12 residents (Residents #10, #15, #28, and #237) reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure Resident #10's admission MDS Assessment accurately reflected her diagnosis of anxiety. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #15's admission MDS Assessment accurately reflected his skin status or diagnosis of anxiety/use of anti anxiety medication. The facility failed to ensure Resident #28's Medicare 5 Day MDS Assessment accurately reflected his diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus. The facility failed to ensure Resident #237's admission MDS Assessment accurately reflected his diagnosis of chronic pain. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving the proper care required to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being. The findings included: Resident #10 Review of Resident #10's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #15 Care Planning Copied from another care area: [NAME], [NAME] (26221) 06/04/24 02:23 PM No communicateion w VA as res believes documented Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive, person centered care plan for each resident that included measurable objectives and time frames to meet, attain, and/or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well being for 3 of 6 residents (Residents #10, #15, and #28) reviewed for care plans. Resident #10 did not have a care plan to address her antipsychotic use. Resident #15 did not have a care plan to address CAA areas of vision, psychosocial status, urinary status, skin status, active diagnosis, or anti anxiety use. Resident #28 did not have a care plan to address his diabetic status or insulin use. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving individualized care and services to meet their needs. The findings included the following: Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents who have not used psychotropic drugs [NAME] not given these drugs unless the medication [NAME] necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record for 3 (Residents #10, #21, and #137) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications., The facility failed to ensure Resident #10 had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of Seroquel (an antipsychotic used to treat schizophrenia and bipolar disorder). The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 was not given risperidone (an antipsychotic) without a diagnosis. The facility failed to ensure that Resident #137 did not receive an antipsychotic (Seroquel/Quetiapine Fumarate) that was not necessary to treat Dementia. These failures put residents at increased risk for adverse consequences such as impairment or decline in an individual's mental or physical condition or functional or psychosocial status from receiving unnecessary antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 3 of 4 medication carts reviewed for medication storage and security. Medication Carts 100, 200, and 300 were left in the hallway unlocked and unattended. These failures could place clients at risk for drug diversion or accidental ingestion. Findings included: Observation on 06/04/24 at 08:57 AM revealed the hall 100 medication cart was unlocked and unattended in front of a resident's room. Staff moved it to in front of the nurse's station facing outward still unlocked and unattended, facing outward (anyone passing by have access to the drawers), and walked away from it. At 9:02 a.m. staff returned to the cart, set up medication and then left, again leaving the cart unlocked and unattended. The staff continued to leave the cart unlocked and unattended until surveyor left at 9:11 a.m. Observation on 06/04/24 at 08:38 AM LVN C walked away from the 300 Hall Medication Cart leaving it unlocked, unattended, and facing outward. At 8:42 AM the Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. The facility failed to ensure stored foods were properly stored, labeled, and dated. This failure could place residents who received prepared meals from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness and cross-contamination. The findings included: Observation on 6/4/24 at 8:45 AM of the walk-in refrigerator revealed a large plastic tub on the bottom rack of shelving that contained a large, torn open, plastic bag of raw, pre-cut white meat. The bag containing the meat had no label or date. The plastic tub had approximately 0.5 inch of bloody liquid collected in the bottom where it had leaked out of the open bag of meat (no spillage was noted outside of the tub). Observation on 6/4/24 at 8:50 AM of the walk-in freezer revealed one 5-pound bag of frozen, sliced, yellow-colored vegetables with no label and no date. In an interview on 6/5/24 at 12:20 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 4 (Resident #137, #8, #15, #87 ) of 6 reviewed for incontinent care and 3 of 4 residents reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure that CNA D performed proper hand hygiene and glove changes while providing incontinence care to Resident #137. The facility failed to ensure residents were identified for enhanced barrier control for Residents #8, #15, #87. This failure could place residents at risk for the spread of infection. Findings included: Incontinent Care Review of Resident #137's face sheet dated 06/06/24, revealed a 69- year- old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Pulmonary embolism and diabetes mellitus. Review of Resident #137's admission MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-06 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received parenteral fluids administered consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #237) reviewed for peripheral intravenous care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #237's midline dressing was changed after becoming soiled on 6/2/24. This failure could place residents at risk of developing an infection. The findings included: Review of Resident #237's admission Record, dated 6/5/24, revealed he was a [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident #237's admission MDS Assessment, dated 5/23/24, revealed a BIMS score of 15 (indicating he was cognitively intact) with no signs or symptoms of delirium. He had diagnoses of multi drug resistant organism and septicemia. He received insulin, antibiotic, diuretic, and opioid medications. He received IV medications and had IV access. Review of Resident #237's Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-06 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents, for 1 of 3 (Resident # 136) residents reviewed for laboratory orders. The facility failed to follow physician orders on 05/29/24 that required obtaining a lab and provide needed treatment for Resident #136. This failure could place residents at risk for untreated medical issues and diminished quality of care. Findings included: Record review of Resident # 136's face sheet dated 06/06/2024 reflected a [AGE] year old female admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses of acute embolism (blocked artery), thrombosis (blood clot), difficulty in walking, and weakness. Record review of Resident #136's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #136 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Resident #137 did not have any behavioral or mood issues. She was continent of bowel and bladder. Resident #137 ambulated by self and required limited assistance with most…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 (Resident #3) of 6 residents reviewed for repositioning. The facility failed to ensure Resident #3 was repositioned every 2 hours. This failure could affect others by placing them at risk of potential medical complications related to changes in condition. Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 09/13/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of failure to thrive (general state of decline in elderly patient) and muscle weakness. Record review of Resident #3's MDS quarterly assessment dated [DATE] revealed she could not complete BIMS interview, she was severely cognitive impaired. Required extensive assistance with 2-person physical assistance for bed mobility and was at risk for pressure ulcer/injury risk with no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY FACILITY Medication Administration 04/11/23 04:28 PM Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 resident (Residents #247) of 3 reviewed for medication administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN D administered Resident # 247 medications according to the physician ' s order. This deficient practice could place residents with g-tubes at risk of not receiving their medication in accordance with the physician ' s order. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #247 face sheet dated 4/14/2023 Resident #247 was a 70 yr. old female admitted on [DATE]. Record Review of Resident #247 ' s History and Physical dated 03/16/23 revealed a diagnosis of Alzheimer ' s dementia, cva (stroke), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Record Review of MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY FACILITY Kitchen 04/11/23 08:02 AM Culinary Director [NAME] - in refrigerator open bag with three hotdog buns with no label. unlabeled open container of chocolate syrup with Exp date of 11/04/2022. Risk - don't know when opened so don't know how long it will be good. Possible a threat to the safety of the product for residents to consume. Residents could have stomach issues, diaharrea. 04/11/23 11:10 AM CD [NAME] and cook [NAME] - issues with gloving in process of doing Puree - Puree OK but issues with infection control - uses same gloves to wash blender parts and then in preparation of pureed vegetables without glove change or hand washing. Wash water seen dripping from inside right hand glove onto surface of blender while in the process of blending the vegetables. When asked about gloving she states without prompt that she should have changed gloves and washed hands , re-gloved after washing the blender parts. That there is a risk of contamination of the food due to the failure, that resident could get sick. -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #23 Advance Directives [DATE] 10:44 AM [DATE] 02:37 PM on [DATE] - DNR order on Facility Record - No document in Documents file. Review of hard chart reveals no DNR document and front page states Full Code. [DATE] 03:03 PM interview and record review with RN Licely [NAME] - reviews [NAME] electronic chart for code status and states he is a DNR. Reviews hard chart and states that there is a sticker that says full code. Reviews resident chart and states she is unable to find a copy of the TX OOH DNR. Reviews residetn IDt admission Evaluataion with Baseline Care plan and states that it indicates no Advance Directives - . Says that this puts residetn at risk of delayed response to emergency sitatuaion. States she is not able to find the completed DNR form in the residetn's chrat. [DATE] 09:47 AM [NAME], LBSW - Resident - admissions asks if ADs are in place - Family will provide information regarding status all ADs including DNR. Full code is default - and some ay not have documents in place. DNR if wanted -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #96 Unnecessary Meds, Psychotropic Meds, and Med Regimen Review 04/12/23 11:16 AM Resident is in the Initial Pool. According to RR the resident takes an Antianxiety. Buspiron 10 mg TID According to RR the resident takes an Anticoagulant. - Lovenoz 30 MG Q AM According to RR the resident takes an Insulin. - she is not taking insulin - Actos 15 MG - for blood sugar but not insulin. According to RR the resident takes an Opioid. - Tramaol 50 MG Q 6 hrs PRN - Has not requested this According to RR the resident takes an Antidepressant. - Lexapro 20 MG Q day. Anticoagulant is on the MDS but not on either care plan baseline or comprehensive care plan. 04/14/23 11:17 AM DON - anticoagulans shouldb on base [NAME] care plan - If resident is h ere long enough woul be o n comprehansive. Staff standrd woul dlook for brusiing bleeding stool collor, Wouild be lok infor this because thins the bllo - increased tenedency to bleeding. Nursing practice is to monitor - it does not matter if it is ion the care plan or not.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to change midline dressing in accordance with physician orders and the comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident #39) of 16 residents reviewed for quality of care The facility failed to change Resident #39 Midline dressing according to physician ' s orders. These deficient practices could have placed residents at risk for cross-contamination resulting in acquiring infections. Findings included: Record Review of Resident #39 ' s face sheet dated 04/14/23 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 03/24/23. Record Review of Resident #39 ' s History and Physical dated 03/14/23 revealed a diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint infection, left shoulder and MRSA (Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus). Record Review of MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #39 had a BIMS score of 15 indicating he was cognitively intact. In section I of the MDS assessment Resident #39 revealed active diagnosis of infection due to unspecified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 (Resident #8, Resident #5, and Resident #96) of 5 residents observed for oxygen management. 1. The Facility failed to change oxygen tubing for Resident # 8 according to physician's orders. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 5's oxygen sign was posted on entrance door to resident's room. 3. The facility failed to store Resident #96 ' s respiratory treatment mask with a protective cover. These failures could place residents on oxygen therapy at risk of receiving incorrect or inadequate oxygen support, decline in health, and expose them to oxygen hazards. Findings included: Resident #8 Record review of the facility's Hospital Transfer/Discharge Report Sheet for Resident #8 revealed admission to nursing facility on 01/04/2023. Record review of History and Physical dated 01/06/2023 for Resident #8…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-04-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY FACILITY Infection Control [DATE] 04:08 PM Resident [NAME] - 310 - [NAME] - worked for the state 1991 - worked as a case worker eligibility - Has been does not know. - Fell and has been here because of fractured tibia - Feels very lucid today - usually feels confused and asks that I call husband - they treat her very good. Bath room looks fine. Infection control concern the treatment mask is not bagged. [DATE] 09:04 AM Licely [NAME], RN - states that treatment mask should be in bag because of infection control concerns. Resident might breath in things that get in mask like germs. on her hospital paper work said Buspirone 2 5 MG pills - TID for anxiety. Mitirats a pin 7.5 MG at HS depression. escitaopran - 20 MG q day - Depression. admit date [DATE] [DATE] 11:15 AM DON - between treatments masks whold be stored in bags - for infecgtion prevention - risk to resident of infection. FACILITY Infection Control [DATE] 11:35 AM resident done with quarantine on [DATE] wound care cart observation red bag not being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-04-14 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared in a form designed to meet the individual needs for 1 (Resident # 246) of 2 residents reviewed for dietary services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #246's lunch meal was a thin liquid consistency diet as ordered by the physician. This failure could place residents at risk of choking and aspiration by not serving the prescribed liquid consistency. Findings included: Record review of facility Transfer/Discharge Report Sheet for Resident #246 revealed admission to facility on 09/27/22 and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #246 History and Physical dated 03/31/2023 revealed an [AGE] year-old male with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination). Record review of the baseline care plan dated 04/06/2023 for Resident #246 revealed dietary/nutritional status as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-12-04 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse staffing data was posted daily and readily accessible to residents and visitors, for 1 of 1 nursing unit reviewed for nurse staffing information. The facility failed to post and maintain the required nursing staffing information since 11/20/25. These failures could place residents, their families, and facility visitors at risk of not having access to information regarding facility regarding staffing schedule and facility census. Findings included: During an observation and record review on 12/01/25 at 12:55 PM revealed, the daily staffing sheet posting information, posted by the main entrance to the facility, was dated 11/20/25. During an interview and record review on 12/01/25 at 4:46 PM with RN D Assistant Chief Nursing Officer revealed, the previous Chief Nurse Officer's last day of work was on 11/20/25 and she posted the nurse staff data daily. She said she had requested access to the electronic PPD reports to complete the nurse staff data daily and as of today she had not been granted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$67,425 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $67,425 — penalty dated 2026-03-13
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.7 | -1.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGNITE MEDICAL RESORT EL PASO, LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| AB INVESTMENT TRUST U/A/D 1/3/23 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/16/2025 |
| IGNITE EL PASO JV, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/16/2025 |
| PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE EL PASO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 01/16/2025 |
| IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| FIELDS, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| GOLD PEARL, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| IGNITE EL PASO PROPERTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| IGNITE-VILLA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| ISRAEL INVESTMENT TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/16/2025 |
| CARR, BARRY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| FLORES, CLAUDIA | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2025 |
| PANNEERSELVAM, EZHIL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 27 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676428. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.