No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ignite Medical Resort St Marys LLC

111 Mock Avenue, Blue Springs, MO 64014 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 130 certified beds · (816) 220-4200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 220-4200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Oct 2022Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0568)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0568)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 24% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
100 NW Mock Ave · (816) 228-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
600 NE Coronado Dr · (816) 228-2801 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1305 NW State Route 7 · (816) 224-6777 · Call to confirm hours
Park
598 NW Vesper St · (816) 228-0137 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
601 NE Jefferson St · (816) 389-8900

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.4%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight9.9%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.3%2.3%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms38.9%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.1%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication35.0%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.4%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control27.0%17.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.9%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.9%63.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission32.1%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.412.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.852.331.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 271 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
77.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.62U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.22hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 77.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 128 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.5%CMS range 57.7–66.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 7.4–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge77.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge77.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.5%CMS range 7.9–13.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.131.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.48
RN hours/ resident / day
0.71
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.96
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
52.9%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 87.3 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.15 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.48 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.96 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-27)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-10-25)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-08-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of Resident #62's POS dated 11/27/23 showed the following physician's orders: -Skin checks weekly. Every day shift, every Friday. Must open and document skin evaluations for each assessment (including no new areas found). Review of the resident's care plan dated 11/28/23 showed: -The resident was at risk for alteration in skin integrity. -The resident would remain free of new skin impairment through the review date of 8/2/2024. -The resident would receive skin/wound treatments as ordered. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed: -The resident was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. -The resident did not have one or more unhealed pressure ulcer(s) at stage I or higher. -The resident did not have any other ulcers, wounds, or skin problems. Review of the resident's POS dated 6/11/24 showed the following physician's orders: -Wound Care: Right Ankle: Cleanse with normal saline (NS), pat dry, Skin Prep (A topical barrier between skin and adhesives) to the peri wound, apply Silver…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the floor under the deep fat fryer and the six burner stove free from a buildup of food debris; failed to maintain the floor under the shelves in the dry good storage room free from dried food debris; failed to maintain the utensil rack free from dust; failed to maintain the sprinkler heads over the back side of the kitchen free from a dust buildup; failed to maintain the temperature of milk in a serving container the dining room at or close to 41°F (degrees Fahrenheit) and failed to maintain the area around the door of the North entrance to the kitchen free from a buildup of dust. This practice potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84 residents. 1. Observation on 8/19/24 from 9:49 A.M. to 10:13 A.M., during the initial kitchen review showed: -A buildup of food debris under the shelves the dry goods storage room -A buildup of food debris and one whisk under the six-burner stove, the deep fat fryer and the convection oven, and -A buildup of dust on the sprinkler…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain commode risers (assistive devices to improve the accessibility of toilets to older people or those with disabilities. They can aid in transfer from wheelchairs and may help prevent falls) in resident rooms A110, A105, A102, B104, C106, C104, C102, E107, E108, G104, D107 free from areas that were not easily cleanable; failed to maintain the fan in resident rooms B105, free from a buildup of dust; failed to maintain the ceiling vent in in resident room A101; failed to ensure the floor was maintained clean in resident rooms A105 and C109; failed to ensure the countertop in the A Hall shower room was in good repair; failed to ensure the grab bar was firmly attached to the wall in the restroom of B105; and failed to ensure the shower chair in D105 was in good repair. This practice potentially affected at least 30 residents who resided in or used those areas. The facility census was 84 residents. 1. Observation on 8/21/24 with the Environmental Services Director (EVS) Director showed the areas that were not easily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility's physician failed to visit one sampled resident (Resident #8) at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and the facility failed to ensure the physician visited the resident every 60 days for five sampled residents (Resident's #25, #38, #41, #62, and #15) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility Physician's Visits Frequency, Timeliness and Alternates policy and procedure updated 5/2024, showed: -The Physician or Nurse Practitioner must make actual face to face contact with the resident and at the same physical location, not via a telehealth arrangement. -Residents must be seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least once every 60 days thereafter. -Physician visits are considered timely if it occurs no later than 10 days after the date the visit was required. -All required physician visits must be made by the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician responded to the pharmacist's recommendation for Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) for psychotropic (relating to or denoting drugs that affect a person's mental state) medication in a timely manner for two sampled residents (Resident #25 and #62), failed to follow up on a physicians response to the pharmacist's Medication Regimen Review (MRR), failed to follow a physician dose recommendation, and failed to ensure appropriate indication for antipsychotic medication dose increases for one sampled resident (Resident #50) out of 18 residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services policy and procedure updated 5/2024, showed: -Medication Regimen Review-Reviews will be conducted in accordance with all state and federal requirements. Pharmacist medication reviews to the physician and nursing will be completed in a timely manner, but not later than five days from receiving. Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain hot foods on room trays for C and E Hall, at or close to a temperature of 120 °F (degrees Fahrenheit) at the time of service; failed to maintain the temperature of milk in glasses on room trays at or close to a temperature of 41 °F at the time of service; and failed to evaluate the room tray delivery procedure. This practice potentially affected at least 12 residents who resided on those halls who received room trays towards the end of the room tray delivery time for those halls. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the Facility's policy entitled Food Temperatures, the Correct Use of the thermometer, dated 2021, showed: -To ensure food safety, food temperatures are taken and recorded. -Food temperatures are taken and recorded on the temperature monitoring log which indicates the correct temperature for each item. -Hot food holding temperature are taken and recorded for food on the steam tables Cold food temperatures are taken and recorded prior to the cold food leaving the kitchen and again…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the audible portion of the call system was operational at the Nurse's area on C Hall (a unit with residents who had some level of dementia),. This practice affected 14 residents who resided on C Hall. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the description page of the Nurse Call system for the Touchscreen Nurse Console showed: -The Touchscreen Nurse Console is used on the nurse call system as the primary interface among users of the system. -Consoles are typically located in areas where staff congregate and need to communicate with patients, residents and fellow staff members. -The Console displays incoming calls, including calling station, room number, the bed ( A or B), call priority, elapsed time of the call, and other relevant patient information. -The Console has adjustable talk/listen volume settings for each individual patient/staff intercom station. 1. Observation on 8/20/24 at 2:00 PM., showed a call light flashing and alarming on the outside of C Hall but the call light was not audible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the covers of cleanouts (an access point which provides access to the sewer or other plumbing line so that blockages could be removed) in a tight fitting manner so the covers would not be a hazard to facility residents or staff located on C Hall and at the area between D Hall and the Rehabilitation Unit Nurse's station. This practice potentially affected 14 residents on C Hall and 19 residents who resided on D Hall and E Hall who would pass through that area. The facility census was 84 residents. 1. Observation on 8/22/24 at 11:01 A.M., showed the cleanout cover on C Hall moved around when the cover was stepped on and the blue tape which once held it to the floor, was broken. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 11:03 A.M., the Environmental Services (EVS) Director said the cap that the screw of the cover, screws into was broken and that caused the cover to be loose. 2. Observation on 8/26/24 at 9:50 A.M., showed the cleanout cover in the area between D Hall and the Rehabilitation Nurse's station moved when it was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dignity and privacy while completing Activities of Daily Living (ADL-A collective term for all basic skills you need in regular daily life) and performing perineal care (care to the area between the anus and the exterior genitalia) for one sampled resident (Resident #62) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility's Dignity policy and procedure updated in July 2024, showed: -The facility will promote care for residents of the facility in a manner and in an environment that maintains and enhances each resident ' s dignity and respect. -All staff will provide dignity to each resident by maintaining the resident ' s privacy of body. -All staff will refrain from any practice which could be considered demeaning to an elder. 1. Review of Resident #62's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Difficulty in walking. -Muscle weakness. -Need for assistance with personal cares. -Cerebral Infarction (ischemic stroke, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for self administration of medication at bedside and failed to evaluate and document the ability to self-administer medication for two sampled residents (Resident #343 and #345) out 18 sampled residents. Facility's resident census of 84 residents. The facility did not provided a policy for Resident Self-administration of medication at time of exit. 1. Review of Resident #343's admission Face Sheet showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE], had a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a disease process that decreases the ability of the lungs to perform ventilation). Review of the resident's Electronic Medical Record from 8/7/24 to 8/18/24 showed the resident did not have physician order for self administration of medication at bedside and did not have Self Administration of Medication Evaluation completed prior to 8/18/24. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the skin issues that were identified in the initial skin assessment were acted upon timely for one sampled resident (Resident #47); failed to obtain treatment orders timely for one sampled resident (Resident #47); and failed to ensure documentation of the weekly skin assessments were completed for one sampled resident (Resident #47) who was admitted with skin issues and was at risk for developing pressure wounds (areas of damaged skin and tissue caused by sustained pressure that reduces blood flow to vulnerable areas of the body) and failed to complete and document weekly skin assessment orders and failed to follow up on a change in condition in skin for one sampled resident (Resident #62) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility policy titled Skin Integrity, updated 5/2024, showed: -Staff would ensure a resident who entered the facility without a pressure sore/ulcer (injury to skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #74's After Visit Summary (discharge orders) from the resident's hospital stay, dated 7/19/24, showed an instruction to facility staff to attempt a voiding trial to remove the urinary catheter in one week (7/26/24) and, if unsuccessful, consult with a urologist. Review of the resident's Care Plan, dated 7/20/24, showed he/she had a urinary catheter in place. Review of the resident's admission MDS dated [DATE], showed: -Diagnoses of high blood pressure, renal failure (inability of the kidneys to adequately filter blood), benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH, an enlarged prostate). -The resident had an indwelling urinary catheter. -The resident was not evaluated for urinary continence. -The resident was cognitively intact. -The resident required moderate assistance from staff for toileting. An admission progress note, dated 7/22/24, showed Nurse Practitioner (NP) A instructed facility staff to Continue Foley catheter, consider trial for DC. Review of the resident's medical record showed a lack…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen equipment was stored using the proper infection control practices when not in use for one sampled resident (Resident #37) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Handling and Transport dated January 2024 showed oxygen concentrators, cylinders, and equipment would be kept and maintained in such a way as to be compliant with all relevant health and safety guidelines. 1. Review of Resident #37's face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a disease process that decreases the ability of the lungs to perform ventilation). -Unspecified Chronic (persisting for a long time) Bronchitis (inflammation of the lining of bronchial tubes, which carry air to and from the lungs. -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #8) who had a diagnoses of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD- a disorder in which a person has difficulty recovering after experiencing or witnessing a terrifying event) received trauma based interventions or developed a care plan that showed interventions for the staff to provide care to protect the resident and prevent trauma from recurring out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care dated May 2024 showed: -The facility ensured that residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care (a framework for relating to and helping people who have experienced negative consequences after exposure to dangerous experiences) in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounting for each resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause re-traumatization of the resident. -The facility would assist the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services for one sampled resident (Resident #62) who had major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by a feeling of profound and persistent sadness or despair and was frequently accompanied by a loss of interest in things that were once pleasurable) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. A policy was requested related to social services and no policy was received. 1. Review of Resident #62's admission Record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's Care Plan dated of 11/28/23 showed: -The resident had the potential for altercations in psychosocial well-being. -The staff needed to allow the resident time to answer questions, verbalize feelings, perceptions and fears. -Initiate referrals as needed for counseling and psychiatric services as needed. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the physician documented a rationale for why he/she disagreed with the pharmacist's recommendation in a timely manner for two sampled residents (Resident #25 and #62) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services policy and procedure updated 5/2024, showed: -Medication Regimen Review-Reviews will be conducted in accordance with all state and federal requirements. Pharmacist medication reviews to the physician and nursing will be completed in a timely manner, but not later than five days from receiving. -The policy did not address the physician's response to recommendations. 1. Review of Resident #25's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia (a chronic condition that causes a loss of cognitive functioning, such as thinking, remembering, and reasoning, to the point that it interferes with daily life), psychosis (a mental disorder that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the pureed (food that is blended, chopped, mashed, or strained until it becomes a soft and smooth consistency) sausage was made to a consistency without graininess. This practice potentially affected six residents who consume pureed diets. The facility census was 84 residents. 1. Observation on 8/22/24 at 7:50 A.M., during a taste test showed the texture of the pureed sausage, was grainy (having the existence of small particles). Observation on 8/22/24 at 7:51 A.M., showed Dietary [NAME] (DC) A tasted the pureed sausage and he/she noticed the sausage was grainy also. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 7:51 A.M., DC A said the pureed sausage needed to be smoother. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 7:57 A.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said the sausage should have been processed in the food processor a little bit longer to be smoother after tasting it. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 10:11 A.M., DC A said he/she had not tasted the sausage after he/she pureed it earlier that morning and before placing the pureed sausage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow its Visitor's Food Policy, by storing foods in the visitor's food refrigerator which were labeled with names of residents the food was for and the dates the foods were received. This practice potentially affected between 3-5 residents. The facility census was 84 residents. Review of the Resident/Visitor food Policy dated 10/19, showed: -Policy -This facility supports and encourages residents to always maintain autonomy of living. The residents may have personal refrigerators to store food brought to the facility by or for the resident or the resident's family. -The facility requires that all food items be stored in a manner using proper sanitation, temperature, light, moisture ventilation and security. -Food and nutrition items brought to the facility by the residents, family members or other visitors will be evaluated by the nursing staff to ensure the items are appropriately and clearly labeled with the resident's name and the contents of packaging, and the date the item was delivered. -If the item is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-27 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the cover of the outdoor dumpster was in good repair to be close fitting and failed to prevent the accumulation of trash on the ground around the outdoor dumpster. The facility census was 84 residents. 1. Observation on 8/22/24 at 10:29 A.M., showed: -The dumpster lid with a 15 inch (in.) long crack. -A significant amount of debris and trash on the ground behind and at the side of the dumpster's. During an interview on 8/22/24 at 10:34 A.M., the Environmental Services (EVS) Director said: -He/she would have to notify the dumpster company for a new dumpster container. -He/she did not know there was a crack in the lid of the dumpster. -Sometimes when employees place trash in the dumpster. they may miss at times and the trash ended up on the ground around the dumpster.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-25 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident signatures were obtained for goods and services for two sampled residents for funds (Resident #21 and #17); to disperse resident funds to the funeral home upon death for one sampled resident (Resident #268); and to submit resident money back to the State of Missouri timely for one sampled resident for funds (Resident #269). The facility census was 76 residents. A policy was requested and not received from the facility. 1. Record review of Resident #21's Resident Fund Statement dated 4/1/22 through 6/30/22 showed: -On 5/12/22 the resident received a haircut for $10.00. -On 6/24/22 the resident received a haircut for $10.00. Record review of the resident's Withdrawal Receipt dated 5/12/22 showed: -The resident received a haircut for $10.00. -The receipt was signed by the Business Office Manager (BOM) as facility representative payee and not signed by the resident. Record review of the resident's Withdrawal Record dated 6/23/22 showed: -$10.00 was requested to pay the Beauty Shop for the resident's haircut.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-25 · tag F0568 — pattern
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility to ensure resident trust funds were held in the resident trust fund account and/or failed to prevent commingling of resident money in the facility operating account for seven sampled residents (Resident #269, #267, #271, #272, #273, #274, #275) who were sampled for funds. The facility census was 76 residents. A policy was requested but not received from the facility. 1. Record review of Resident #269's financial information showed: -Personal Funds Account Balance Report (a report sent to the State of Missouri to show the amount of personal funds the resident had at time of death) showed the resident passed away on 9/4/21. The form was not submitted to the State of Missouri until 4/18/22. -The resident had $3789.77 which had been held in the facility operating account and not in the resident's trust fund account. Record review of the facility's Aging Report dated 10/21/22 showed: -The facility operating account including the last 12 months of transactions. -Resident #267 discharged on 1/2/21 and had a credit of $426.47 in the private…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-10-25 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to check results of the Employee Disqualification List (EDL) as part of the employees' complete background check for two sampled newly hired employees (Employee A and Employee F) and to check their current employees against each quarterly EDL update to assure no employees were added to the EDL since their initial or previous EDL check. The facility had 151 employees. The facility census was 76 residents. Record review of the facility's Applicant Reference and Background Checks and Licensure and Certification Verification policy, undated, showed: -All selected applicants must have references checked, licensure and/or certification verified and have background check screenings before an employment offer can be made. -A conditional offer of employment will be made to an applicant pending a complete background check. -If any questionable information is returned the offer will not be confirmed. Record review of State Statute 192.2495.3 (2) showed: -Prior to allowing any person who has been hired as a full-time, part-time or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for enteral feeding (also known as tube feeding, is a way of delivering nutrition directly to your stomach or small intestine) for one sampled resident (Resident #56) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 76 residents. Record review of the facility's Tube Feeding policy dated 11/19 showed: -Continuous tube feeding are based on a 22-hour consumption period or other time frame based on individual resident needs per Registered Dietician (RD) assessment and to be delivered over a 24 hour period. -There are no set hours for the tube feeding to be off. -An order was required by the physician or nurse practitioner for the type of formula and the rate. 1. Record review of Resident #56's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility with an initial admission date of 9/17/15, and with a readmission on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: -Dysphagia (impairment in the production of speech…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from unnecessary anti-anxiety Pro Re Nata (PRN-as needed) medications (medications which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience) were limited to 14 days for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility census was 76 residents. Record review of the facility's Psychotropic Medications (medications which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience) policy dated 12/2019 showed: -The resident's need for the medication needed to be monitored as well as when the resident had received the optimal benefits from the medication and when the medication can be lowered or discontinued. -The physician must certify the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition or behavior. 1. Record review of Resident #2's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the lid of the dumpsters were closed for three days during the survey. The facility census was 76 residents. 1. Observations on 10/18/22, 10/19/22 and 10/21/22, at 8:15 A.M., 7:22 A.M. and 5:03 A.M. respectfully, showed: -The facility had two large trash containers/dumpers with two top lids attached on each dumpster. -The two trash dumpsters were enclosed by a fenced area with its sides measuring approximately eight feet tall with a large gate enclosing the dumpsters. -On 10/18/22, two lids on one of the containers were open lids. -On 10/19/22, one lid was open on each of the dumpsters. -On 10/21/22, one lid was open on one of the containers. During an interview on 10/21/22 at 7:06 A.M., the Dietary Manager said each person that uses the dumpster is responsible for closing the lids after they discard trash.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-25 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure a call light system or alternate system to contact staff for assistance was consistently accessible within the resident's reach for one resident (Resident #46) who was dependent on staff for several Activities of Daily Living (ADL - dressing, grooming, bathing, eating, and toileting) while he/she was in his/her room. The facility census was 76 residents. Record review of the facility's ADL policy, dated 11/2020 showed the facility will provide all residents with care, treatment and services according to the resident's individualized care plan. 1. Record review of Resident #46's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: -Parkinson's disease (a chronic nervous disease characterized by a fine slowly spreading tremor, muscle weakness, muscle stiffness, lack of coordination and a peculiar gait). -History of transient ischemic attack (TIA - temporary interference with blood supply to the brain). -Atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean environment when they did not keep resident bathrooms and the handrail on locked unit in clean condition. Lights on the locked unit were missing covers. The facility also failed provide a laundry service that was homelike. The facility census was 75. 1. Review of the facility's housekeeping checklist included: - Resident rooms to be completed daily; - The checklist included various rooms and the stairway on the locked unit but did not specify handrails in the hallway. Review of an undated work order which specified how to submit maintenance requests. Review of Resident Council Meeting Notes for November 2019 showed: - Residents indicated their rooms need thoroughly cleaned. Observations on 1/7/20 beginning at 10:51 A.M., showed the following bathroom floors contained dirt, dust, and debris: - Rooms #A106, #B108, and #B109. Observation on 1/9/20 at 5:22 P.M., showed the following in locked unit: - The hand rails on both sides of the hall, all the way down the hall were sticky to the touch; -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-14 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided a written notice of transfer or discharge to residents and their responsible person, including the reason for the transfer, in writing and in a language they understood. This effected three out of 19 sampled residents (Residents #4, #184 and #195). The facility census was 75. Review of the facility's policy for transfers or discharges, dated 11/20/19, showed: - When a resident is scheduled for transfer or discharge, the business office will notify nursing services of the transfer or discharge so that appropriate procedures can be implemented. - Nursing services is responsible for obtaining orders for discharge or transfer, as well as the recommended discharge services and equipment and providing the resident or representative with required documents (i.e., discharge summary and plan.) - The business office is responsible for informing the resident, or his/her representative of the facility's readmission appeal rights, bed-hold…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure three of 19 sampled residents (Resident #30, #49 and #52) dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) received complete perineal care. The facility census was 75. 1. Review of the facility's procedure for Peri Care, dated December 2019, showed: - Wash the perineal area wiping front to back; - Separate the perineal fold and wash downward, front to back; - Continue to wash the perineum moving from inside outward to and including the thighs; - Do not reuse same disposable wipe to clean the inner perineal fold; - Wipe the rectal area thoroughly. 2. Review of Resident #30's care plan, start date 1/25/17, showed: - Resident will have daily care needs met; - Resident is dependent on staff for toilet use; - Resident requires frequent checks related to the resident's inability to recognize his/her own care needs. Review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control protocols to prevent the spread of infection related to hand hygiene during resident care when staff did not create a clean field during medication administration and when staff emptied a urinary catheter (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) drainage bag. This affected three out of 19 sampled residents (Residents #65, #194 and #195) and one additionally sampled resident (Resident #27). The facility census was 75. 1. Review of the facility's policy related to catheter care, dated December 2019, showed: - The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. - Maintain clean technique when handling or manipulating the catheter, tubing, or drainage bag. - Empty the drainage bag regularly using a separate, clean collection container for each resident and prevent contact of the drainage spigot with the nonsterile container. - The policy did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect during meal times when they did not assist one of 19 sampled residents (Resident #54) who had difficulty getting food to his/her mouth. The facility censes was 75. Review of the facility's policy for Quality of Care - Dignity, dated December 2019, showed: - Each resident shall be cared for in a manner that promotes and enhances quality of life, dignity, respect and individuality; - Treated with dignity means the resident will be assisted in maintaining and enhancing his or her self-esteem and self-worth. Review of the facility's policy for Assistance with Meals, dated November 2019, showed: - It is the facility's policy that residents shall receive assistance with meals in a manner that meets the individual needs of each resident. 1. Review of Resident #54's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/28/19, showed: - Impaired decision making ability; - Independent with eating; - Diagnoses of dementia and Parkinson's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-14 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to distribute interest to each resident evenly with an account in the Resident Trust Fund (RTF). This effected one sampled resident (Resident #66). The facility was holding funds for 17 residents at the time of the survey. The facility census was 75. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Trust Fund, dated April, 2018, showed the following: - Resident funds must be paid in an interest bearing account that is separate from the community's operating accounts. - Interest earned on the funds shall be credited to trust fund participant accounts on at least a quarterly basis. 1. Review of Resident #66's RTF account showed the following: - The beginning balance on 1/1/19 was $0.00; - The resident deposited $60.00 in his/her account on 5/13/19 making the balance $60.00; - The resident's balance was $60.00 in June with no deposits or withdraws, he/she did not have any interest added to his/her account; - The resident received $0.01 in interest for July, making his/her balance $60.01; - The resident received $0.01 in interest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure they provided care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to follow manufacturers' guidelines when administering medicated eye drops and nasal spray. Staff failed to follow physician orders for a wound treatment. This affected two of 19 sampled residents (Resident #65 and #27). The facility census was 75. 1. Review of the manufacturer's guideline for Flonase (used to treat seasonal allergies) showed the patient should: - Shake the medication well; - Gently blow nose before administration; - Occlude the opposite nare while administering medication. Review of Resident #65's current physician's order sheet (POS), dated January 2020, showed: - The physician ordered Flonase 50 mcg/actuation nasal spray (used to treat allergies). One spray in each nare every day; - Cleanse right inner foot wound with wound cleanser, pat dry. Skin prep peri (around outer edges of the wound bed) wound. Apply maxsorb (alginate, material used to absorb wound drainage) and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-01-14 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and closed record review, the facility failed to ensure staff completed a comprehensive discharge summary for two of 19 sampled residents (Resident #32 and #84) to include appropriate information about the residents' diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, a post-discharge plan of care to assist the resident to adjust to his/her new living environment when applicable. The facility census was 75. Review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, dated November, 2019, included the following: - Residents will be prepared in advance for discharge; - When a resident is scheduled for transfer or discharge, the business office will notify nursing services of the transfer or discharge so that appropriate procedures can be implemented; - A post-discharge plan is developed for each resident prior to his or her transfer or discharge. This plan will be reviewed with the resident, and/or his or her family, at least 24 hours before the resident's discharge or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to date oxygen tubing and maintain oxygen concentrator filters clean and free of dust. This affected three of 19 sampled residents (Resident #75, #80, and #134). The facility census was 75. Review of the facility policy titled Respirator Care- Prevention of Infection, dated November 2018, showed the purpose of this policy is to guide prevention of infection associated with respiratory therapy tasks and equipment, including ventilators, among residents and associates. It listed the Infection Prevention Related to Oxygen Administration as: - Change the oxygen cannula and tubing every seven days, or per state regulations (whichever is more strict) or as needed; - Wash filters from oxygen concentrators every seven days with soap and water. Rinse and squeeze dry. 1. Review of Resident #134's Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff showed: - 12/13/19: Entry tracking record that showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
IGNITE ST MARYS JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 11/01/2020
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE ST MARYS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 11/01/2020
GOLD PEARL, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2020
ISRAEL INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
CARR, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
EDDLEMAN, MINDYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
GILLIS, KARENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
GOBST, RYANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 11/01/2020
JABLONSKI, NICOLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
MCFARLANE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
ROGERS, DYLANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2024
THENGIL, MATHEWIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
WHITE, JIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014Organization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2020
CARR, BARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
FIELDS, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2020
STERN, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/01/2020
IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2025
SPARK THERAPY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2025
ROSE, MARCIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
SUDHOLT, WILLIAMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
BERGER, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
ISRAEL, YEHUDISIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
IGNITE MISSOURI PROPERTY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
IGNITE-VILLA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
LUXE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2020
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE MISSOURI PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021
STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TROrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 59 rows in the source record cover these 33 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.9M
Related-party expense24% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 40%Medicare 12%Other / private 48%

This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 24% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$288per resident / day
operating cost
$8,748per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$319per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265759. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next