No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ignite Medical Resort Okc, LLC

6312 North Portland, Oklahoma City, OK 73112 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (405) 946-6932 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (405) 946-6932 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (60%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 17% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Pharmacy
ASP Cares0.4 mi
3405 Northwest Expy · (405) 607-3995 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3501 NW Expressway · (405) 946-6342 · Call to confirm hours
Park
6600 N Independence Ave · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
MLC Youth0.2 mi
3600 Northwest Expy · (405) 501-1706

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.8%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine74.6%74.1%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%27.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.3%16.6%12.0%worse

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 687 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
80.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.97U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.52hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.36hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 80.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 315 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.97 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.2%CMS range 61.5–68.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.4%CMS range 10.4–14.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge80.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge72.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified79.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.5%CMS range 6.4–11.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.231.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
1.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.22
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.43
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.65
RN hoursweekends
60.2%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 72.7 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.43 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.57 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment for 1 (#16) of 5 sampled resident rooms reviewed for cleanliness.The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings: On 09/09/25 at 9:50 a.m., Resident #16's floor of their room was observed to have a substance throughout the room. The substance was clear to white in appearance and there were footprints in the substance in several different places. There were small pieces of paper and white tape scattered on the floor. There were two large pieces of black cardboard on the floor by Resident #16's bed. On 09/09/25 at 10:59 a.m., Resident #16's floor was observed to still have the sticky substance, pieces of paper, tape, and black cardboard on the floor of their room. On 09/10/25 at 5:22 p.m., Resident #16's floor was observed to still have the sticky substance, pieces of paper, tape, and black cardboard on the floor of their room. An undated policy Room Cleaning for Residents, read in part, The resident's room daily cleaning steps daily cleaning steps and recommended…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a baseline care plan was developed within 48 hours of admission for 1 (#62) of 18 sampled residents were reviewed for baseline care plans.The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:Resident #62's Care Plan Report, dated 08/28/25, showed Resident #62 admitted on [DATE].Review of the electronic health record did not show a baseline care plan had been completed for Resident #62.A Care Plan policy, revised 04/2025, read in part, A baseline care plan is developed for each resident upon admission, but no later than 48 hours of admission to the facility. The care plan includes minimum health care information necessarily to properly care for the resident.On 09/10/25 at 3:03 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated the facility had 48 hours to complete a baseline care plan. They stated it was to be completed by the admitting nurse. The MDS coordinator stated the baseline care plan had been started but not completed within the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was completed for 1 (#62) of 18 sampled residents reviewed for care plans.The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:Resident #62's Care Plan Report, dated 08/28/25, showed Resident #62 admitted on [DATE].Review of the electronic health record showed 1 activity entry in the care plan; no other entries had been documented.A Care Plan policy, revised 04/2025, read in part, The comprehensive care plan is developed within 7 days of CAA completion . The care plans are developed by the members of the interdisciplinary team based on their assessments and interaction with the resident and/or resident's significant others.On 09/10/25 at 3:04 p.m., the MDS coordinator stated the comprehensive care plan had not been completed by all departments and should have been completed on 09/03/25.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and intervene for no bowel elimination from 09/02/25 to 09/07/25 for 1 (#48) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for bowel elimination.The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 09/10/25 at 1:20 p.m., Resident #48 was lying in bed watching television. The resident was clean and without foul odor. The resident was pleasant and denied pain or discomfort at the time. A private sitter was in the room at the time of the observation.A facility policy titled Bowel Monitoring, revised/reviewed 07/2025, read in part, Licensed nursing staff will complete a review daily to ensure there are no abdominal abnormalities present. Abnormal findings may include but aren't limited to:.Infrequent bowel patterns and/or consistency of stool.An undated face sheet showed the Resident #48 had disease of spinal cord, quadriplegia C5-C7 incomplete, cognitive communication deficit, and need for assistance with personal care.A care plan, dated 08/16/25, did not show a care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident with limited mobility was provided with the appropriate padding for a cervical collar for 1 (#48) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for the use of a cervical collar. The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 09/10/25 at 1:20 p.m., Resident #48 was lying in bed watching television. The resident was wearing a Miami J cervical collar. On 09/11/25 at 8:57 a.m., Resident #48 was sitting in their wheelchair eating breakfast with assistance from the private sitter. The resident's cervical collar was lying on the bed and the padding was soiled. An undated face sheet showed Resident #48 had diagnoses which included disease of the spinal cord, quadriplegia C5- C7 incomplete, and falls. The care plan, dated 08/16/25, showed Resident #48 had an ADL self-care performance deficit and limitations in physical mobility. A physician order, dated 08/25/25, showed Resident #48 was to always wear the Miami J cervical collar except during meals and showers until follow up in six…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as usual body weight for 1 (#48) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for weight loss. The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 09/11/25 at 8:57 a.m., Resident #48 was sitting in their wheelchair eating breakfast. The resident was assisted with the meal by the private sitter. An undated face sheet showed Resident #48 had diagnoses which included quadriplegia, muscle weakness, the need for assistance with personal care, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and a body mass index (BMI) 19.9 or less. A care plan, dated 08/16/25, showed Resident #48 had the potential for alterations in nutrition and hydration. Interventions were to evaluate any weight changes and follow facility protocol for weight change. A physician order, dated 08/22/25, showed Resident #48 was to receive a regular diet and Ensure one can with meals for a supplement. A physician order, dated 08/22/25, showed Resident #48 was to be offered assist with every…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physicians' orders for 2 (#2 and #69) of 4 sampled residents reviewed or medication administration.The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:A Medication Orders policy, dated 01/2023, read in part, If medication is ordered but not available, check to see if it was misplaced and then call the pharmacy to obtain the medication. 1. Resident #32's Order Summary Report, dated 09/2025, showed they had diagnoses which included atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft without angina pectoris, major depressive disorder, and overactive bladder. Resident #32's Order Summary Report, dated 09/2025, showed clopidogrel bisulfate (antiplatelet) 75 mg, lamotrigine (anti-epileptic) 25 mg, oxybutynin (anticholinergic/antimuscarinic) 15 mg. On 09/11/25 a number 9 (other/see nurses note) was documented on the MAR on the following medications:a. clopidogrel bisulfate 75 mgb. lamotrigine 25 mgc. oxybutynin 15 mg2. Resident #69's Order Summary Report,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene was performed during medication administration observation for 4 (#32, 53, 69, and #69) of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration.The MDS coordinator identified 72 residents resided in the facility.Findings:On 09/11/25 at 8:32 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident #81's medications without proper hand hygiene performed. CMA #1 was not observed to wash their hands before, during, and throughout the medication administration process.On 09/11/25 at 8:40 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident #53's medications without proper hand hygiene, CMA #1 was not observed to wash their hands before, during, and throughout the medication administration process.On 09/11/25 at 9:25 a.m., CMA #1 was observed to prepare and administer Resident #32's medications without proper hand hygiene, CMA #1 was not observed to wash their hands before, during, and throughout the medication administration process.On 09/11/25 at 9:40 a.m., CMA #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure: a. medication allergy adherence; b. a medication was accurately transcribed; and c. medications were administered as ordered for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication administration. The director of MDS identified 69 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Administration of Medication policy, dated 04/2024, read in part, All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to and help in overcome [sic] illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included polyosteoarthritis, essential hypertension, and venous insufficiency. Resident #2's admission record showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had allergies which included acetaminophen. A physician order, dated 01/04/25, showed Tylenol/acetaminophen (a pain reliever and fever reducer) eight hour oral tablet 650 mg, give one tablet every six hours as needed for pain not to exceed 3000 mg in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide bathing for 1 (#3) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for bathing. The director of MDS identified 69 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A BATHING policy, revised 04/2023, read in part, All residents are given a bath or shower in accordance with preferences. If no preference on a bath is voiced, a bath or shower will be offered twice per week. Resident #3 was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 01/27/25. Resident #3 had diagnoses which included need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. Resident #3's admission resident assessment, dated 01/02/25, showed the resident required substantial to maximum assistance with bathing. A shower schedule showed Resident #3's weekly shower schedule was Tuesday and Friday. There was no documentation Resident #3 received a bath on 12/27/24, 12/31/24, and 01/07/25 during their admission stay at the facility. On 03/13/25 at 3:19 p.m., certified nurse aide #1 stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-13 · tag F0772 — isolated
    Have an agreement with an approved laboratory to obtain services, if on-site laboratory services aren't provided.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician ordered labs were obtained for 1 (#2) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for assess monitor and intervene. The director of MDS identified 69 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility lab policy, dated 05/2024, read in part, A physician or nurse practitioner order is necessary for any lab specimen collection .Label container with pertinent information .place specimen in designated area .Document in the nursing notes that a specimen was collected and a description of the specimen. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included diverticulitis of the intestine. A physician order, dated 01/04/25, read in part, STOOL SAMPLE NEEDED (CDIFF?) [clotridoides difficile colitis] LEAVE ORDER UNTIL COLLECTED. ONCE COLLECTED CALL LAB TO PICK UP .PRINT ORDER OUT AND PUT IN PURPLE BOOK. A physician progress note, dated 01/06/25, showed Resident #2 had experienced diarrhea since before Thanksgiving. The note showed stool studies collected 01/05/25 and the results were pending. The note was signed by physician #1. There…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to appropriately develop and/or implement comprehensive care plans for two (#2 and #3) of three sampled residents identified as exit seeking or confused. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Elopement Policy, dated November 2018, documented residents identified as having wandering or exit seeking behavior will be assessed and appropriate interventions will be included in the plan of care at the time of identification of the wandering or exit seeking behavior. 1. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included nontraumatic intracerbral hemorrhage and hemiplegia. An initial physician history and physical visit for Resident #2, dated 11/20/24, read in part, confused and confabulating [memory loss that effects their higher reasoning] during visit. Nursing reported patient is exit seeking but is easily redirected. The care plan did not indicate the resident was an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to adequately supervise and prevent a resident from eloping for one (#2) of three sampled residents identified as exit seeking or confused. The administrator identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Elopement Policy, dated November 2018, documented residents identified as having wandering or exit seeking behavior will be assessed and appropriate interventions will be included in the plan of care at the time of identification of the wandering or exit seeking behavior. It documented all exit doors were alarmed with audible alerts. Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses which included nontraumatic intracerbral hemorrhage and hemiplegia. An initial physician history and physical visit for Resident #2, dated 11/20/24, read in part, confused and confabulating [memory loss that effects their higher reasoning] during visit. Nursing reported patient is exit seeking but is easily redirected. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was securely locked according to company policy and procedure. The administrator identified 69 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Administrations of Medications policy, dated 04/2023, read in part, Never leave the medication cart open or unattended. On 11/26/24 at 4:03 p.m., medication cart #1 on hall 400 was found unsecured and unattended. On 11/26/24 at 4:04 p.m., LPN #1 reported the medication cart was supposed to be locked. On 11/26/24 at 4:05 p.m., CMA #1 reported the medication cart was to be locked. On 11/27/24 at 11:25 a.m., the DON reported according to company policy and procedure, medication carts were to be locked.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication error did not occur for one (#2) of three sampled residents whose medication regime was reviewed. The assistant general manager identified 74 residents resided in the facility. Findings: An Administration of Medications policy, dated 05/2024, read in part, GENERAL All medications are administered safely and appropriately to aid residents to and help in overcome illness, relieve and prevent symptoms and help in diagnosis. The policy also read, A physician or nurse practitioner order is required for administration of all medications. The policy also read, Check medication administration record prior to administering medication for the right medication, dose, route, patient and time. Read each order entirely. Remove medication from drawer and read label three times; when removing from drawer, before pouring and after pouring .Identify resident by reading wrist band or checking the picture in the MAR. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included acute kidney failure, seizure, sepsis, and acute cystitis. An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications administered to residents were necessary to treat a specific diagnosis for two (#24 and #158) of five residents who were reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 74 residents resided at the facility. Findings: 1. Resident #24 admitted with diagnoses which include dementia and anxiety. A Physician's Order, dated 02/27/24, to administer trazodone (an antidepressant medication) 150 mg, 0.5 tablet by mouth at bedtime for depression. A Physician's Order, dated 02/28/24, to administer citalopram hydrobromide (an antidepressant medication) 40 mg 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for depression. The February and March medication administration records for Resident #24 documented both antidepressants were administered as ordered except when the resident was outside of the facility due to hospitalization. The care plan, dated 02/27/24, documented a focus for an antipsychotic, and antianxiety medication, an antidepressant, an anticoagulant, a diuretic, and an opioid medication. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to properly sanitize reusable equipment between residents for two (#4 and #6) of three residents observed during the collection of vital signs. The Resident Census and Conditions of Residents report, dated 08/30/23, documented 66 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Infection Control Policy, revised May 2023, read in part, .disinfection of resident care equipment including equipment shared among residents will be cleaned prior to and after each use including but not limited to: Vital sign devices .portable thermometers, vital sign machines .blood pressure monitoring equipment . On 08/31/23 at 8:12 a.m., CMA #3 was observed while taking Resident #7's temperature, pulse, and blood pressure. Once completed, CMA #3 returned the vital sign devices to the basket on the vital sign cart and exited Resident #7's room. CMA #3 did not sanitize the vital sign devices before moving to the room of Resident #4 and taking their temperature, pulse, and blood pressure. Once completed, CMA #3 returned the vital sign devices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
IGNITE OKLAHOMA JV, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
GOLD PEARL, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/03/2022
IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE OKLAHOMA, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
CARR, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CASTILLO-SIMON, REVELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2023
GOBST, RYANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 03/01/2020
JABLONSKI, NICOLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
MCFARLANE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
ROLF, CHELSEYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
ROSE, MARCIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2020
SHEARER, RACHELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
SKELTON, MEAGHANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
THENGIL, MATHEWIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
WHITE, JIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/01/2020
CARR, BARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
FIELDS, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 03/01/2020
STERN, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2020
IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
SPARK THERAPY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2020
HENRY, WHITNEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2024
JOHN, TENEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
BERGER, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
ISRAEL, YEHUDISIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/14/2025
LUXE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2021
SABRA HEALTH CARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 56 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense17% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 68%Other / private 32%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$592per resident / day
operating cost
$17,999per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$590per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Oklahoma Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Oklahoma
$7,026/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,756/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,150/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 375412. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next