No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ignite Medical Resort Blue Springs

20511 E Trinity Place, Blue Springs, MO 64015 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 90 certified beds · (816) 622-2900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (816) 622-2900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Dec 2022
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
20300 E Valley View Pkwy · (816) 234-3490 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
19321 E US-40 · (816) 795-6034 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
19019 E 48th St
Park
(816) 795-5896 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
20201 NW Valley View Rd · (816) 795-0200

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.6%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight0.0%5.3%5.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.6%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.0%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.3%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.8%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.8%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.8%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%2.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.1%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.6%26.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.5%13.7%12.0%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 547 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.84U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.35hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.30hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 237 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.8%CMS range 61.6–69.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.1%CMS range 9.3–13.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge74.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge53.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge86.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.9–7.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.51
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
55.7%
Total nursing turnover
33.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.555 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.55 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-10-10)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2022-12-13)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment for one sampled resident ( Resident #3) when on 3/8/25 he/she was found on the floor outside of his/her bathroom with his/her bathroom track door. The facility census was 89 residents. 1. Review of Resident #3's admission Record showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Unspecified Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgement, and impulses). -Generalized Muscle Weakness. -Other Abnormalities of Gait and Mobility. -Cognitive Communication Deficit (an impairment in organization/thought organization, sequencing, attention, memory, planning, problem solving, and safety awareness). -Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error did not occur when one sampled resident (Resident #2) received Resident #14's medications instead of his/her own ordered medications out of 14 sampled residents. The facility census was 89 residents. On 4/24/25, the Administrator was notified of the past non-compliance which occurred on 4/16/25. Facility staff were educated on medication administration and the five rights during medication administration. Interventions were put into place to mitigate future occurrences. The deficiency was corrected on 4/17/25. Review of the facility's policy titled Administration of Medications dated October 2024 showed: -A physician or Nurse Practitioner order was required for administration of all medication. -The licensed staff were expected to check the medication administration record prior to administering medication for the right medication, dose, route, resident, and time. -Staff were expected to identify the resident by reading the resident's wristband or checking the picture in the Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain resident rooms 118, 113, 111, 107, 103, 127, 131, 130, 138, 142, 147, 157, 161, 160, 165, 166, 170, 173, and 176 free from cobwebs (a web spun by certain spiders, often found in the corners of disused rooms) and a buildup of dust behind the beds and in the corners next to the cabinets. This practice potentially affected at least 23 residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Room Cleaning process showed: -Section 3: Damp wipe. --Wipe everything you can reach. --Start with the door and work around the room in a circular pattern. --Be sure to include wall spotting, light switches, call buttons, telephones, wall moldings, dispensers, windowsills, furniture and Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC, is a ductless, self-contained air conditioning unit that heats and cools small areas) climate control units. -Section 5: Dust Mop and Sweep Floor; Dust behind all furniture and doors.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate precautions and correct hand hygiene was completed during colostomy (a surgical operation in which a piece of the colon is diverted to an artificial opening in the abdominal wall so as to bypass a damaged part of the colon) care of one sampled resident (Resident #7); failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use personal protective equipment (PPE-protective clothing, helmets, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms in nursing homes) were used when providing care for one sampled resident (Resident #182); and failed to ensure one sampled employee out of 10 sampled employees received tuberculosis (TB - a communicable disease that affects especially the lungs, that is characterized by fever, cough, difficulty in breathing, and abnormal lung tissue and function)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for self-administration of medication at bedside and failed to evaluate and document the ability to self-administer medication for one sampled resident (Resident #49) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Self Administration of Medications and Treatments dated May 2023 showed: -Self-administration of medications and treatments were determined by physician order after determining that the resident was able to self-administer. -Medications and treatments for self-administration were kept in a locked drawer in the resident room. -All medications and treatments that were self-administered were signed out in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) or Treatment Administration Record (TAR). -If determined by a member of the interdisciplinary team, or if the resident requested to self-administer, it would be documented in the chart and the physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, describe and measure wounds weekly for one sampled resident (Resident #69) who had a left knee wound and right hip surgical incision out of 19 sampled residents. The census was 87 residents. Review of the facility's Wound Policy and Procedure dated March 2020 showed: -The facility needed to follow standard of practice for all wounds. -Upon admission, the wound should be assessed. -The wound assessment should include the location, measurement, appearance, drainage, characteristics, and appearance of wound edges. -The staff were to assess the wounds on a weekly basis. 1. Review of Resident #69's Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 9/11/24 showed he/she was admitted for skilled services. Review of the resident's admission nursing evaluation dated 9/11/24 showed: -The resident had a left front knee open area. -There were no measurements or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ordered application of splint devices were utilized to improve or maintain mobility for one sampled resident (Resident #58) with limited mobility out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of a facility policy titled Range of Motion, dated 11/2020, showed: -A resident with limited range of motion would receive services to increase range of motion and/or decrease further range of motion. -Residents of the facility would be provided care and services to prevent formation and progression of contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of tendons and muscles often leading to rigidity and deformities of joints) and deformities. 1. Review of Resident #58's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated comprehensive assessment completed by the facility) dated 8/14/24, showed the resident: -Was severely cognitively impaired. -Did not reject cares in the assessment period. -Was dependent on staff for upper body dressing. -Had upper extremity range of motion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician's order for one sampled resident (Resident #49) to self-perform colostomy (a surgical operation in which a piece of the colon is diverted to an artificial opening in the abdominal wall so as to bypass a damaged part of the colon) care and failed to complete a full evaluation to self-perform the colostomy care out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Self Administration of Medication and Treatments dated May 2023 showed: -Self-Administration of medications and treatments was determined by a physician order after determining that the resident was able to self-administer. -Treatments for self-administration were kept in a locked drawer in the resident's room. -All treatments that were self-administered were signed off in the Treatment Administration Record (TAR). -If it was determined by a member of the interdisciplinary team, or if the resident requested to self-administer, it would be documented in the chart and the physician would be called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for a Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP a form of positive airway pressure ventilation in which a constant level of pressure greater than atmospheric pressure is continuously pumped into the lungs during spontaneous breathing) machine was on their Physician's Order Sheet (POS) and care plan; and failed to ensure respiratory face masks and tubing were kept covered when not in use for two sampled residents (Resident #183 and #280) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 87 residents. Review of the facility policy for Respiratory Supplies revised 5/2023 showed: -There was no policy documentation related to obtaining physician orders for a CPAP machine or storage of CPAP and oxygen supplies. 1. Review of Resident #183's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including sleep apnea (a sleep disorder that causes breathing to repeatedly stop or become shallow during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter (a catheter which is inserted into the bladder in the urethra and remains in place to drain urine) orders were in place including catheter care for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 90 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Foley Catheter (a brand name for one of many brands of urinary catheters) Care dated April 2023 showed: -The purpose of catheter care was to prevent possible urinary tract infections (UTI- an illness in any part of the urinary tract) from bacteria spreading from the perineal area and external catheter into the bladder. -A physician's order for catheterization should include the reason/indications for catheterization, frequency, and type of irrigation if necessary. 1. Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Periprosthetic (a structure in close…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light system was adequately equipped and functioning including that the system was not turned off at the nurse's station only which affected the care of two sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #4) out of six sampled residents. The facility census was 90 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Call Light-Ability to Use dated January 2024 showed: -The call light system was provided as a tool for residents to communicate with staff. -Staff members will acknowledge and respond to the call light by entering the resident's room and determining and assisting with the resident's needs. 1. Review of Resident #1's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Heart Failure. -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure checks through the Employee Disqualification List (EDL - a listing, maintained by the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS), of individuals deemed to have abused or neglected residents, patients, or clients or falsified documentation of services to in-home clients), Criminal Background Checks (CBCs), and/or Federal Indicators (FI) through the Nurse Aide (NA) Registry were completed prior to hire in accordance with State requirements and facility policy to ensure potential employees did not have a history of abuse or neglect or a disqualifying crime against persons for eight out of ten sampled employees. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 89 residents. Record review of the facility's Applicant Reference and Background Checks policy, dated 10/2020 showed all selected applicants must have references checked, licensure and certification verified, and have a background check before an employment offer can be made. 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store food in the refrigerated walk-in unit and to practice sanitary procedures before food preparation tasks. These practices potentially affect an unknown number of residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 89 residents. 1. Observations on 12/8/22 between 5:05 A.M. and 8:20 A.M., in the kitchen, showed: -In the refrigerated, walk-in cooling unit, there was no portable thermometer inside to display the temperature of how cool/warm the unit and the stored foods were being maintained or becoming. -The floors near and behind the convection oven and the deep fryer had visible piles of grease on them. -The stove top burner grates were blackened with cooked on debris attached to them. -On the juice dispensing equipment (gun), its nozzles connected to six different dispensing beverages of orange juice, a lemon beverage, cranberry juice, fruit punch, apple juice and thickened water. These nozzles were sticky with multi-colored debris on the inside and outside of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-13 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the written notice of transfer or discharge was provided to the resident/family and to ensure the notice contained the location of transfer/discharge and the information to appeal the transfer/discharge of the regional Ombudsman (a resident advocate who provides support and assistance with problems and/or complaints regarding the facility) for one sampled resident (Resident #56) out of 18 sampled residents and for one closed record resident (Resident #267) out of three closed record sampled residents. The facility census was 89 residents. A policy was requested and no policy was received related to transfer/discharge notices. 1. Record review of Resident #56's admission Record showed he/she was admitted for Medicare Part A skilled services at the facility. Record review of the resident's Transfer Form dated 9/25/22 showed: -The resident was sent to the hospital. -There was no documentation that showed which hospital the resident was sent to.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 52.7+2.3 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 52.4+1.6 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HAGEMAN INVESTMENTS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 09/01/2020
IGNITE IND LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 09/01/2020
HAGEMAN FAMILY TROrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST30%since 09/01/2020
IGNITE IND JV LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST25%since 09/01/2020
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE IND LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST5%since 09/01/2020
HAGEMAN, SHANEIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF5%since 09/06/2020
GOLD PEARL, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2020
ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/06/2020
ISRAEL INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/06/2020
CARR, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
GOBST, RYANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/06/2020
GRIFFITT, KYLAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/27/2023
HAGEMAN, SANDRAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
HAGEMAN, STEVEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
JABLONSKI, NICOLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
MCFARLANE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
ROGERS, DYLANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
ROSE, MARCIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
THENGIL, MATHEWIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
WHITE, JIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/06/2020
CARR, BARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
FIELDS, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/06/2020
STERN, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 09/06/2020
IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2025
SPARK THERAPY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/02/2025
TADAKAMALLA, SRINATHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/06/2020
BERGER, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/27/2025
ISRAEL, YEHUDISIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/28/2025
LUXE STAFFING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 61 rows in the source record cover these 31 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 31%Medicare 31%Other / private 38%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$454per resident / day
operating cost
$13,802per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$453per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265880. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next