Ignite Medical Resort Round Rock, LLC
16219 Ranch Road 620 North, Austin, TX 78717 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 70 certified beds · (512) 520-1834 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $63,733 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-16)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (61%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 54.0% | 88.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.2% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 328 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 82.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.6%CMS range 57.7–68.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 9.2–14.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 82.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 79.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 64.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.8% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.2%CMS range 5.8–11.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.02 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 57.6 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.05 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.77 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-11-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to consult with the resident's physician when there was a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial status (that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life-threatening conditions or clinical complications) for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights. 1. The facility failed to notify the MD or NP when Resident #1, who has a diagnosis of stage 5 kidney failure, complained of not being able to urinate. 2. The facility failed to notify the MD or NP when Resident #1, with a BIMS score of 15, began exhibiting erratic behaviors, changes in mental status, confusion, and agitation. 3. The facility failed to notify the MD, NP, or abuse coordinator when Resident #1 presented with bruises on her abdomen, back, legs, arms, and forehead . The failures resulted in an identification of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 11/13/24 at 2:49 PM. While the IJ was removed on 11/14/24 at 7:19 PM, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial wellbeing for 1 (Resident #1) of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility failed to assess the resident or notify the provider when Resident #1, who has a diagnosis of stage 5 kidney failure, complained of not being able to urinate. 2. The facility failed to assess Resident #1, notify the provider or the abuse coordinator when Resident #1, who was taking blood thinners and had a BIMS score of 15, presented with bruises all over her body, and began throwing herself on the floor, hitting herself on the head, yelling, and exhibiting erratic behaviors . 3. The facility failed to follow the care plan and notify the MD of changes in mental status, confusion, and agitation. 4. The facility failed to assist Resident #1 to transfer to the hospital on [DATE], before she called 911 and waited 27 minutes on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to inform the resident's Physician or Nurse Practitioner when there was a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's scheduled medications were acquired and administered. Resident #1 was not given ceftriaxone (antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) for a total of 4 times within the dates of 07/09/2024 to 07/11/2024, staff did follow up with the pharmacy for the antibiotics, staff did not communicate with the NP of the lack of antibiotics and missed medications, and staff did not communicate the missed doses to the administration. This failure resulted in the Resident #1's being sent to the hospital to have consistent antibiotic treatment, and to treat Bacteremia (bacteria in the blood stream) and ventriculitis (inflammation of the ventricles in the brain). An IJ was identified on 07/18/2024. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including accurate acquiring, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's scheduled medications were acquired and administered. Resident #1 was not given ceftriaxone (antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) for a total of 4 times within the dates of 07/09/2024 to 07/11/2024, staff did follow up with the pharmacy for the antibiotics, staff did not communicate with the NP of the lack of antibiotics and missed medications, and staff did not communicate the missed doses to the administration. This failure resulted in the Resident #1's being sent to the hospital to have consistent antibiotic treatment, and to treat Bacteremia (bacteria in the blood stream) and ventriculitis (inflammation of the ventricles in the brain). An IJ was identified on 07/18/2024. The IJ Template was provided to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free of any significant medication errors for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's scheduled medications were acquired and administered. Resident #1 was not given ceftriaxone (antibiotic used to treat bacterial infections) for a total of 4 times within the dates of 07/09/2024 to 07/11/2024, staff did follow up with the pharmacy for the antibiotics, staff did not communicate with the NP of the lack of antibiotics and missed medications, and staff did not communicate the missed doses to the administration. This failure resulted in the Resident #1's being sent to the hospital to have consistent antibiotic treatment, and to treat Bacteremia (bacteria in the blood stream) and ventriculitis (inflammation of the ventricles in the brain). An IJ was identified on 07/18/2024. The IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 06:35 p.m. While the IJ was removed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-09-24 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections to the extent possible for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for foley catheter care. The facility failed to monitor/document Resident #1's (who has a history of urine retention) urine output for three days (09/11/24 - 09/13/24). On 09/14/24 an I/O catheter removed 700 CCs of urine and he was sent out to the hospital the following day due to swelling to his groin, the foley not draining, and his urine being cloudy with clots of pus. This failure could place residents at risk of UTIs, urine retention, bladder rupture, or hospitalization. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including urinary tract infection, severe sepsis (a serious condition in which the body responds improperly to an infection),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-28 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #3) reviewed for medication errors. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff administered Resident #3's medication at the scheduled time. These failures could place all 3 residents at risk of their medications not being administered according to Physician's orders, getting their medications late, or not receiving the intended therapeutic benefits of their medications.Findings included: Record review of Resident #3's order summary report indicated Resident #3 had an order for Carbidopa-Levodopa Oral Tablet Disintegrating 25-100 MG. Give 1.5 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for Parkinson's. Please give at scheduled time. Notify provider if unable to give at scheduled time with start date 01/06/2026. Record review of Resident #3's Medication Administration Record, dated 01/01/2026-01/31/2026, indicated the following scheduled time for administration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-28 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident has the right to secure and confidential personal and clinical records for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) on Kindle Unit of the facility reviewed for Privacy and Confidentiality. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's clinical records were protected from being viewed by unauthorized persons when the CNA left Resident #2's personal information visible on the computer's screen at unattended charting station on Kindle Unit. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's clinical records were protected from being viewed by unauthorized persons when the RN left Resident #1's personal information visible on the computer's screen on unattended NC on Kindle Unit. This failure could result in residents' personal information being exposed to unauthorized individuals. The findings included: Observation on 1/28/2026 at 9:09 a.m. revealed that the computer screen on the CNA's charting station on Kindle Unit…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident or family group with private space for 1 of 1 resident council meetings reviewed for resident rightsThe facility failed to provide a private space for residents to meet during resident council meetings, exposing residents to loss of privacy.This failure could affect place residents by placing them at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. the Findings included:Record review of previous Resident Council Meetings Minutes, dated 10/23/2025,11/20/2025, 11/23/2025 revealed that Resident council meetings were regularly held in the facilities dining room.During an interview on 01/13/2026 at 10:00 AM revealed AD F had been trained in Resident Rights and in Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation. AD F stated, Per the State of Texas Constitution, residents will not be denied their rights and residents should be able to make choices. AD F stated the topics previously addressed in past resident council meetings included: Protecting and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 5 of 8 residents (Resident #31, Resident #57, Resident #76, Resident #93, and Resident #94) reviewed for quality of life.1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #57, Resident #76, Resident #93, and Resident #94 received regular showers.2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #31, and Resident #94 were offered to have their facial hair removed.These failures placed residents at risk of having poor hygiene.Findings included:1. A record review of Resident #31's face sheet dated 1/14/2026 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (end-stage heart disease), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heartbeat), chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, need for assistance with personal care, hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen and food sanitation.1. The facility failed to ensure the [NAME] used proper hand sanitation while preparing pureed foods. 2. The facility failed to ensure the DA D used proper hand sanitation prior to distributing food to residents' rooms. These failures could place residents, who receive food from the kitchen, at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness.Findings Included:An observation and interview on 01/13/2026 at 11:25 a.m., revealed the [NAME] cleaned and disinfected the robot coup blender after finishing a puree of Tamale pie. The [NAME] failed to wash her hands before putting clean gloves on. [NAME] completed a puree of refried beans, removed her gloves, and cleaned and sanitized the robot coup. [NAME] did not wash her hands between cleaning of robot coup and puree of rice. The [NAME] put gloves on and pureed rice and no handwashing after rice was pureed and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for reviewed for infection control.DA D did not sanitize his hands between each resident when passing meal trays for lunch. This failure could place the residents at risk of transmission of disease and infection.Findings included:Observation on 01/13/2026 at 12:50 PM of staff passing lunch trays to the resident rooms on the 100 Hall revealed DA D did not hand hygiene when leaving Resident #59's room. He took a tray from the cart to Resident #26's room, and no hand hygiene was conducted. DA D then returned to the cart and took a tray to Resident #38's room, and no hand hygiene was conducted. He returned to the cart and took a tray to Resident 67's room, and no hand hygiene was conducted. An interview on 01/13/2026 at 1:14 PM with DA D, who stated he had been trained to clean his hands…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide housekeeping and maintenance services necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable interior for 2 of 15 residents (Resident #22 and Resident #71) reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22 and Resident #71's rooms were clean.This deficient practice could place residents at risk of feelings dissatisfaction.The findings were:Record review of Resident #22's face sheet, dated 01/14/2026, revealed an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #22 had diagnoses which included embolism and thrombosis (blood clots in blood vessels), atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), dementia (memory, thinking, difficulty), need for assistance with personal care, muscle weakness, history of falls and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of Resident #22's MDS assessment, dated 01/05/2026, revealed Resident #22 had a BIMS score of 13 which indicated intact cognitive responses. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs are stored properly and only authorized persons have access for 1 of 2 medication carts (TC #1) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure TC #1 was locked, medications secured, and not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications, decreased effectiveness of medication, or missing medications.Findings included:An initial walkthrough observation of the facility on 01/13/2026 at 09:01 a.m., revealed TC#1 was unlocked and unattended outside of a resident's room. A nurse was inside a resident's room with her back turned away from the treatment cart. The resident's door was cracked open about two inches. Residents were walking by the unlocked treatment cart. TC #1 contained residents prescribed creams. On top of the treatment cart was a bottle of wound cleaner solution and two packages of black foam wound dressings. One foam dressing was opened. LVN C came out of the room, introduced herself,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff through a communication system that relays the call directly to a staff member or a centralized staff work area from toilet facilities for 1 of 1 resident rooms. (Resident #10's room [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for call lights.The facility failed to ensure emergency call lights in Resident #10's room's bathroom were operable.This failure could place residents at risk of injury, pain, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Record review of Resident #10's face sheet dated 10/05/25 indicated Resident #10 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included low back pain, pain in the right leg, and age-related osteoporosis (bone disease that occurs because of the aging process). Record review of Resident #10's annual MDS assessment has not been completed yet. Resident #10 required total assistance with toileting, personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assured the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for one of four residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received her Furosemide (given to help treat fluid retention) on 04/06/25 at 7:00 AM and 04/11/24 at 5:00 pm, Spironolactone (used to treat high blood pressure) on 04/06/25 at 7:00 AM and 05/11/25 at 5:00 PM, alprazolam (used to treat anxiety disorders) on 04/11/25 at 5:00 PM and 04/12/25 at 5:00 PM, Metronidazole (used to treat infections) on 04/11/25 at 5:00 PM, and Midodrine HCl (used to treat low blood pressure) on 04/11/25, 04/14/25, 04/19/25 and 04/20/25 at 5:00 PM. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medications and supplements, which could result in worsening or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from physical abuse for one (Resident #1) of seven residents reviewed for abuse in that: CNA B forced Resident #1 to have his vitals taken after he refused and used force to push Resident #1 on his back on 01/27/2025. Noncompliance existed from 01/27/2025 to 01/28/2025, but the facility corrected the noncompliance through re-training and assessment of staff, reviews of clinical information, and the immediate suspension of CNA B. Therefore, the findings are of past noncompliance. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of fear, physical injury and psychosocial harm. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis of pressure ulcer of sacral region (above tailbone), paraplegia (a condition that causes paralysis or loss of mobility in both legs), muscle weakness, and chronic pain (syndrome a condition characterized by persistent pain that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice to promote wound healing and to prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for pressure injuries. The facility failed to: 1.) Ensure Resident #1 had wound care treatments until four days after being admitted . She missed seven wound care treatments in December 2024 and January 2025. 2.) Ensure Residents #2 and #3 had orders for the monitoring of their wound vacs (a negative pressure wound therapy) every shift. This failure could place residents at risk of improper wound management, the development of new pressure injuries, deterioration in existing pressure injuries, infection, and pain. Findings included: 1.) Review of Resident #1's undated face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including type II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services, based on the comprehensive assessment and consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent development of pressure injuries for 4 (Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) of 4 residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. The facility did not prevent the development of one facility acquired Stage II pressure injury for Resident #3. 2. The facility failed to complete weekly skin assessments according to their policy for Residents # 1, 2, 3, and 4. These failures could place residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers or wounds. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's face sheet dated 11/12/2024 reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses included muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, other abnormalities of gait and mobility. It reflected Resident # 3 was discharged from the facility on 11/06/2024. Review of Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 2 (Resident #1 and Resident #2) of 6 residents who were reviewed for administration. 1. The facility failed to accurately document the administration of Resident #1's anticoagulant medication from 10/28/24 through 11/05/24. 2. The facility failed to transcribe a wound care order 10/30/24 for Resident #2. These failures could place residents at risk of lack of desired effect of medications and treatments, and lack of wound healing. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #1's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE], Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Section I (Active Diagnoses) reflected diagnoses included left hemiplegia following cerebral infarct, chronic kidney disease, muscle weakness, seizures, anxiety, and abnormalities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for infection prevention and control. The facility failed to place Resident #2 on Enhanced Barrier Precautions when admitted on [DATE] with a surgical wound. The facility failed to ensure they made PPE available near or outside resident's rooms who were on EBP. These failures could place residents at risk for infections. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment, dated 10/28/24, reflected Section A (Identification Information) reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Section I (Active Diagnoses) reflected her diagnoses included a hip fracture, pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic device, unspecified fall, and hypertension. Section C…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food service safety. 1. The facility failed to properly seal, label, and date foods stored in the kitchen's freezer, refrigerator , activity room snack bar, and walk-in cooler. 2. The facility failed to clean and sanitize the kitchen's only industrial can opener. 3. The HC failed to wear effective hair restraint while preparing food. This failure could have placed residents at risk of ingesting food borne pathogens, ingesting adulterated foods, and becoming ill. Findings Included: Record review and observation on 10/14/2024 at 9:05 AM of the facility's only kitchen revealed a sign on the small refrigerator/freezer (side by side) door, which reflected the correct way to fill out a food label. The sign indicated:1. Fill in the item name; 2. Current date/ Prep date: 3. Use by date was 6 days after prep date; 4. Your initials. Observations in the small freezer revealed an opened, yet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — patternProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment and care plan and preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, both facility-sponsored group and individual activities and independent activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 3 of 7 Residents (Resident #32, Resident #152, and Resident #154) reviewed for facility activities. 1. The facility failed to post the activity schedule in a prominent location, visible to residents and responsible parties. 2. The facility failed to hold activities that were on the activity schedule. 3. The facility failed to complete Resident #152's Activity Assessment. 4. The facility failed to perform Resident #154's Activity Assessment within the facility's required completion period. 5. The facility failed to provide Resident #32, Resident #152, and Resident #154 a monthly activity…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 7 Residents (Resident #33) reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to provide grooming services, in the form of nail care, for Resident #33. This failure could have placed residents at risk of scratches, infections, or lowered self-esteem. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #33's AR, dated 10/14/2024, reflected an [AGE] year-old woman, who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She was diagnosed with Dementia (which was a disease that affected memory, thought, and interfered with daily life), Acquired Absence of Left Finger (left index), the Need for Assistance with Personal care, and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2 (which was a condition of the body that disrupted how the body used sugar for fuel). Record review of Resident #33's admission MDS assessment, dated 10/8/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #37 and Resident #42) reviewed for accidents and supervision. The facility failed to ensure Resident #37, and Resident #42 were provided safety when facility staff were directing the residents to going outside to smoke in the roadway without supervision. Findings Included: Record review of Resident #37's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/04/24. Resident #37 had diagnoses which included fall subsequent encounter, generalized muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Resident #37's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS Score of 12, and moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #37 used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS did not have that the resident was a smoker. Record review of Resident #37's Care Plan dated 09/04/24 revealed Resident #37 was at risk for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-16 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to establish policies regarding smoking for 2 of 2 (Resident #37 and Resident #42) residents reviewed for smoking. 1. The facility failed to enforce the no smoking policy for Resident #37 and #42. 2. The facility failed to ensure that the residents did not have their cigarettes and lighters in their rooms. This failure could place all residents at risk of injury, burns, and unsafe environment. Findings included: Record review of Resident #37's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old male with an admission date of 09/04/24. Resident #37 had diagnoses which included fall subsequent encounter, generalized muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #37's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected he had a BIMS Score of 12, and moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #37 used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS did not have that the resident was a smoker. Record review of Resident #37's Care Plan dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medical records were accurately documented for three (Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4) of six residents reviewed for accurate medical records. The facility failed to document nursing notes in Residents #2's, #3's, and #4's EMRs when they were discharged from the facility. This deficient practice could result in errors in care and treatment. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's undated face sheet reflected an [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 09/13/24 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive , type II diabetes, urinary tract infection, hypertension (high blood pressure), and a history of falling. Review of Resident #2's discharge MDS assessment, dated 09/13/24, reflected a BIMS of 12, indicating a moderate cognitive impairment. Section Q (Participation in Assessment and Goal Setting) reflected he was in active discharge planning already occurring for him to return to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection and prevention control program that included, at a minimum, a system for preventing and controlling infections for 1 of 3 residents (Residents #1) reviewed for infection control, as indicated by: CNA A and LVN B failed to wash hands and change dirty gloves while handling clean items while providing pericare to Resident #1. This failure could place the residents at risk of transmission of diseases and infection. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 07/27/24 reflected, Resident #1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was a [AGE] year-old male diagnosed with Fracture of first, second, third, fourth and fifth lumbar vertebra ( the bone in the lower spine) , Fracture of other parts of pelvis, Multiple fractures of ribs, Alcoholic cirrhosis of liver( a type of late stage liver disease due to excessive alcohol consumption), Hypertension, Muscle weakness, Difficulty in walking and Need for assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-03 · tag F0660 — patternPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that focused on the resident's discharge goals, the preparation of residents to be active partners and effectively transition them to post-discharge care, and the reduction of factors leading to preventable readmissions for 6 of 6 residents (Residents #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6). The facility failed to fully involve residents and/or their responsible parties in the discharge planning process prior to their discharge. This failure placed residents at risk of anxiety, disenfranchisement, and rehospitalization. Findings included: Review of the undated face sheet for Resident #1 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of peritonitis (inflammation of peritoneum, the membrane that lines the inner abdominal wall and encloses organs within the abdomen) and discharged on 10/03/23. Review of the Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment for Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen. The facility failed to ensure frozen food items were sealed and dated in the freezer in 2 of 2 freezers. The facility failed to ensure refrigerated food items were dated when opened or prepared in 2 of 2 refrigerators. The facility failed to ensure vegetables were disposed when expired in 1 of 2 refrigerators. The facility failed to ensure grilling equipment in the kitchen was clean and free of food debris. The facility failed to ensure pureed meals when prepared were free of risk of contamination. These failures could place resident who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings were: Observations on 08/22/2023 at 10:26 a.m. during the initial tour of the kitchen the standing refrigerator revealed peach cobbler in souffle cups on a tray in the fridge with no dates on the tray or the saran wrap covering the cups. The standing freezer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0941 — patternDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide effective communications mandatory training for 10 of 12 employees (DON, ADON, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure DON, ADON, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N completed effective communication training. This failure could place residents at risk of miscommunication and social isolation due to lack of staff training. The findings were: 1. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the DON was hired on 12/09/2019. Record review of the DON's training history revealed the DON had not completed effective communication training in the last year. 2. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the ADON was hired on 07/19/2022. Record review of the ADON's training history revealed the ADON had not completed effective communication training in the last year. 3. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the CNA F was hired on 11/01/2021. Record review of CNA F's training history revealed CNA F had not completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0942 — patternEnsure that staff members are educated on resident rights and facility responsibilities to properly care for its residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required education on the rights of the resident and the responsibilities of a facility to properly care for its resident for 10 of 12 employees (DON, ADON, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure DON, ADON, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N completed resident rights training within the previous year. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of being uninformed due to lack of staff training. The findings were: 1. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the DON was hired on 12/09/2019. Record review of the DON's training history revealed the DON had not completed resident rights training in the last year. 2. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the ADON was hired on 07/19/2022. Record review of the ADON's training history revealed the ADON had not completed resident rights training in the last year. 3. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the CNA F was hired on 11/01/2021.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0944 — patternConduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) training that outlines and informs staff of the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program for 10 of 12 employees (Cook D, CNA E, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure [NAME] D, CNA E, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N completed QAPI training within the last year. These failures could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: 1. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the [NAME] D was hired on 08/16/2022. Record review of [NAME] D's training history revealed [NAME] D had not completed QAPI training in the last year. 2. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed CNA E was hired on 06/16/2022. Record review of CNA E's training history revealed CNA E had not completed QAPI training in the last year. 3. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the CNA F was hired on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0946 — patternProvide training in compliance and ethics.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required compliance and ethics training for 12 of 12 employees (DON, ADON, [NAME] D, CNA E, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure DON, ADON, [NAME] D, CNA E, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N completed compliance or ethics within the previous year. This failure could affect residents and place them at risk of poor care or victimization due to lack of staff training. Findings included: 1. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the DON was hired on 12/09/2019. Record review of the DON's training history revealed the DON had not completed compliance or ethics training in the last year. 2. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the ADON was hired on 07/19/2022. Record review of the ADON's training history revealed the ADON had not completed compliance or ethics training in the last year. 3. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the [NAME] D was hired on 08/16/2022. Record review of [NAME] D's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-25 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide mandatory effective behavioral health training for 10 of 12 employees (DON, ADON, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N) reviewed for training, in that: The facility failed to ensure DON, ADON, CNA F, CMA G, RN I, RN J, LVN K, LVN L, PT M, OT N completed behavioral health training within the previous year. This failure could place residents at risk of not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being due to lack of staff training. The findings were: 1. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the DON was hired on 12/09/2019. Record review of the DON's training history revealed the DON had not completed behavioral health training in the last year. 2. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the ADON was hired on 07/19/2022. Record review of the ADON's training history revealed the ADON had not completed behavioral health training in the last year. 3. Record review of Staff Roster, undated, revealed the CNA F was hired on 11/01/2021.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who needed respiratory care were provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 residents (Residents #117) reviewed for respiratory care, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #117's humidifier for her oxygen was dated. This deficient practice could place residents who received oxygen therapy at risk for incorrect oxygen support being delivered and an increase in respiratory complications. The findings were: Record review of Resident #117's face sheet, dated 08/25/2023, revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute respiratory failure, asthma, depression, and acute kidney failure. Record review of Resident #117's admission MDS assessment, dated 08/19/2023, revealed the resident had a BIMS score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of Resident #117's physicians orders, dated 08/25/2023, revealed an order entered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2023-08-25 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data on a daily basis at the beginning of each shift for 1 of 4 days (8/22/23), reviewed for daily staff posting. The facility failed to post the required daily staff posting on 8/22/23. This failure could result in residents and visitors being unaware of daily staffing levels. The findings were: In an observation on 8/22/23 at 10:10 a.m., the daily staff posting was in a hard clear plastic stand up display on the counter at the entrance of the facility next to the visitor sign in. The daily staff posting was dated 8/21/23. In an interview on 8/22/23 at 10:10 a.m., staff C stated one of the facility nurses was responsible for posting the daily staffing information and she was unaware it had not been completed today. In an interview on 8/25/23 at 3:00 p.m., the DON stated she or her assistant were responsible for posting the daily staffing and it was usually done after the morning meeting and surveyors arrived before it had been completed. The DON further stated the harm from not posting the daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$63,733 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $18,295 — penalty dated 2024-10-16
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-09-24
- $37,420 — penalty dated 2024-07-19
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-20 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.4 | -1.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 1.9 | +1.1 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGNITE ROUND ROCK JV LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| IGNITE-VILLA HOLDCO LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| GOLD PEARL, LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| ISRAEL INVESTMENT TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE ROUND ROCK LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TR | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| CARR, JARED | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2025 |
| GILLIS, KAREN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| GOBST, RYAN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 04/01/2022 |
| JABLONSKI, NICOLE | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| MCFARLANE, JOHN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| ROSE, MARC | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| SHEARER, RACHEL | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| THENGIL, MATHEW | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| WHITE, JIM | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| BERGER, MENACHEM | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 04/01/2022 |
| CARR, BARRY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| FIELDS, TIMOTHY | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| ISRAEL, BENJAMIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 04/01/2022 |
| STERN, TODD | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | since 04/01/2022 |
| IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| SPARK THERAPY LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2022 |
| GAGE, LEAH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/09/2024 |
| RATHI, ANIL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2025 |
| BERGER, AVIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
| ISRAEL, YEHUDIS | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 54 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Texas Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676440. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.