Ignite Medical Resort Kansas City, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 444 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 71.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 159 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.82 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 85.7 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-01-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect Resident#1's right to be free from abuse when he/she was hit in the face by another resident (Resident #2). Resident #1 sustained a laceration to the lower lip. Facility census was 79. On 1/9/25, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which began on 1/1/2025. Upon discovery, the facility administration immediately conducted an investigation and corrective actions were implemented. The noncompliance was corrected on 1/2/2025. Review of the facility's Abuse Policy, dated November 2018, showed: -Abuse is defined as an infliction of physical, sexual, or emotional injury or harm, including financial exploitation by any person, firm, or corporation; -This facility prohibits abuse, neglect, or mistreatment of residents. The facility will educate all employees upon hire and at least annually on the Abuse Policy and all components. The facility Administrator will be designated as the facility's Abuse Coordinator and is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment of two sampled residents remained free of accident hazards when the facility failed to ensure oxygen stored in Resident #131's room was stored in accordance with NFPA 99, 1999 Edition, when one type E oxygen cylinder was stored unsecured on the floor in the resident's room and when the resident's room contained more than one emergency use type E oxygen cylinder, and when the facility failed to provide a safe gait belt transfer for Resident #12 when CNA B failed to securely place the gait belt around the resident's waist and also when CMT A grabbed Resident #12 under the arm during a transfer. This affected two of 18 sampled residents (Resident #131 and Resident #12. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's Oxygen Storage policy dated May 2024, showed:-Fasten cylinders securely in an upright position. Review of NFPA 99, 1999 edition 8-3.1.11 Storage Requirements showed:8-3.1.11.2 Storage for nonflammable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's who were incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections when the facility failed to ensure staff properly clean catheter tubing for Resident #142 and when facility staff failed to wear Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy where staff wear a gown and gloves when providing direct care to residents with indwelling medical devices) for two Resident's #142 and #4. This affected two of 18 sampled resident's. The facility census was 86.Review of the facilities Catheter Care policy, dated January 2026, showed:- The purpose of catheter care is to prevent possible urinary tract infections from bacteria from spreading from the perineal area and external catheter into the bladder;- Begin cleaning starting at the ureteral meatus wiping away from the body;- The policy did not address using a single cleansing wipe more than once to clean the catheter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was in good repair and maintained the kitchen in a clean and sanitary manner when cooking and food prep areas where dirty with dust and food debris, and when repairs in the kitchen had not been completed. This had the potential to affect all residents who received a meal from the kitchen. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy on cleaning and repairs in the kitchen. Observation of the kitchen on 02/08/26 at 09:12 A.M. showed:-The grill with a thick layer of encrusted grease and food debris;-The shelf above the stove with a thick layer of grease and food debris;-The ceiling in the dish room with a round brown stain the size of a basketball with pieces of ceiling tile hanging down.Observation of the kitchen on 02/11/26 at 10:42 A.M. showed:-The grill with a thick layer of encrusted grease and food debris;-The shelf above the stove with thick layer of grease and food debris;-The ceiling in the dish room with a round brown stain the size of a basketball with pieces of ceiling tile…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections when the facility failed to ensure staff wore enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, an infection control strategy where staff wear a gown and gloves when providing direct care to residents with wounds or indwelling medical devices) for Resident #142, and Resident #4 and failed to ensure dirty gloves were changed before providing catheter care for resident #142. Facility staff failed to provide a barrier between a resident's wound and the floor when performing a dressing change for resident #16. This affected three of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 86. Review of the facilities Infection Control Policy dated May 2024, showed: - Perform hand hygiene when moving from contaminated body sites to clean body sites during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat Resident #131 with dignity and respect when staff failed to assist the resident with trimming facial hair. This affected one of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 86. Review of the facilities Resident Rights policy, dated May 2023, showed: - Resident's had rights to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication; - The facility must protect and promote the rights of the resident's; - The facility must treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality. Review of the facility's Bathing policy dated April 2023, showed:-All residents are given a bath or shower in accordance with their preferences;-If no preference is voiced a bath or shower will be offered twice a week. Review of Resident #131's admission MDS a dated 10/20/25 showed:-No cognitive impairment;-Substantial assistance with showers and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #143 received insulin as with meals ordered when staff served the resident the noon meal tray at 12:05P.M. and administered insulin at 12:37 P.M. This affected on of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's Administration of Medication Policy dated 04/2023, showed:-Staff to read each order entirely;-Read label of medication three times;-If there is a discrepancy between Medication Administration Record (MAR) and label, check orders before administering medications;-Follow instructions written on label.Review of the facility's Pharmacy Services Policy dated 05/2024, showed:-Staff to follow specific monitoring related to medications, such as blood sugar;-Staff to follow specific timing and parameters of medications (e.g. before or after meals)Review of the facility's Insulin Administration Procedure Policy dated 05/2023, showed:-Insulin is only given with a practitioner order;-Objective is to safely and accurately inject insulin.Review of resident #143's POS dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living (AQDLs) received the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene when staff used a soiled incontinence wipe to perform per-care and did not fully clean the peri-area, which affected one of the 18 sampled residents, (Resident #12). The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy for Perineal Care, reviewed 5/23 showed:- Perineal care is done daily and as needed for all residents requiring assistance and/or those residents with a Foley catheter (sterile tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine).Wash perineal area with peri wash and water using a washcloth. If appropriate, rinse with warm water. For males, retract foreskin if present, wash, dry and replace foreskin. When complete, remove gloves and cleanse hands. 1. Review of Resident #12's care plan dated 12/21/25, showed: - The resident had bowel incontinence. Check resident every two hours and assist with toileting as needed. Provide peri care after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff prepared foods in a form designed to meet the needs of individual residents when they did not ensure the puree (a texture-modified diet in which all foods have a soft, pudding-like consistency) food had a smooth and appropriate consistency. This affected one resident identified by the facility as having an order for a pureed diet (Resident #115). The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide the requested policy on pureed diets.1. Review of Resident #115's Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 02/6/26 showed:-Moderate cognitive impairment;-Supervision with eating;-Mechanically altered diet;-Diagnoses included diabetes, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing, causing pain or choking) and asthma. Review of the resident's care plan dated 2/9/26 showed:-Moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living;-The resident is on a pureed diet related to dysphagia.Review of the resident's Dietitian Evaluation dated 11/08/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-02 · tag F0624 — pattern
  Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer to Event ID 1YDJ12 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and orderly discharge from the facility for five (5) out of the six (6) sampled residents (Resident #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5) when five (5) residents were discharged without proper orders, medications, home health services, dialysis services, and/or follow up appointments. The facility census was ninety 90. Review of the facility's policy for discharge to home, revised 04/2023, showed: - (3.) Social services will meet with the resident and/or family to set up outside services and equipment. - (4.) A discharge form is completed by all involved members of the IDT (interdisciplinary team) that explain the resident care needs at home. - (6.) Teaching will be done with the resident/family on any dressings or special tasks. - (8.) If necessary, therapy will provide any necessary instructions. - (9.) On the day of discharge, the nurse will review the discharge form as well as the medications with the family.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-10-03 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ a qualified director of food and nutrition services. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 87 of 87 residents who received meals prepared in the facility's only kitchen. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the Dietary Manager's (DM) job description, titled Executive Chef, dated 01/08/23, revealed, . Must have Food Service Sanitation certification . Review of the DM's employee file revealed an original date of hire was September 2018. No training course document was included in the file. Review of the Dietary Schedule for 09/29/24 through 10/05/24 revealed the DM was listed as Manager. During an interview on 09/30/24 at 9:35 AM, the DM was asked how long she had worked as the dietary manager and if she was a certified dietary manager (CDM) or had other qualifying credentials as a dietary manager. The DM stated she had been employed at the facility for five years as a cook but had only been the dietary manager for nine months. The DM confirmed she did not have two or more years of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$6,368 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $6,368 — penalty dated 2025-01-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 64 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO