Ignite Medical Resort Norman, LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 518 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 215 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.84 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 95% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 38.8 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.34 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.50 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 07/11/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to prevent a significant medication error by administering the wrong dose of morphine (an opioid) to Resident #3.On 07/11/25 at 12:34 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On 07/11/25 at 2:23 p.m., the administrator and the general manager were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided.On 07/14/25 at 2:00 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,IJ removal Plan - Ignite Medical Resort [NAME].Ignite Medical Resort [NAME] is committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of all residents and operates in substantial compliance with Federal and State laws and regulations. This removal plan constitutes Ignite Medical Resort [NAME]'s written credible allegation of compliance for the immediate jeopardy noted. Facility will be in compliance on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-07-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 07/11/25, an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation was determined to exist related to the facility's failure to prevent a significant medication error for Resident #3. On 07/11/25 at 12:34 p.m., the Oklahoma State Department of Health was notified and verified the existence of an IJ situation.On 07/11/25 at 2:23 p.m., the administrator and the general manager were notified of the IJ situation and the IJ template was provided.On 07/14/25 at 2:00 p.m., an acceptable plan of removal was approved by the Oklahoma State Department of Health. The plan of removal, read in part,IJ removal Plan - Ignite Medical Resort [NAME].Ignite Medical Resort [NAME] is committed to ensuring the safety and well-being of all residents and operates in substantial compliance with Federal and State laws and regulations. This removal plan constitutes Ignite Medical Resort [NAME]'s written credible allegation of compliance for the immediate jeopardy noted. It is the facility's policy to ensure that residents are free of any significant…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide pain medication to a resident as ordered for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for medication as ordered. The general manager identified 36 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 07/09/25 at 12:01 p.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 were providing incontinent care on Resident #1. The resident informed CNA #1 and CNA #2 they were in pain. Resident #1 was groaning holding their left hip. On 07/09/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #1 groaned in pain as they were turned to their left side. On 07/9/25 at 12:22 p.m., CNA #2 was observed speaking with CMA #3. A physician's order, dated 04/15/25, showed Tylenol (pain medication) 325 mg give two tablets by mouth every six hours as needed for pain.A Pain Management policy, dated 04/17/25, read in part, The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences.Physician's orders, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dirty linens were handled in a manner to prevent cross contamination during:a. incontinent care for 1 (#1) of 3 sampled residents observed for incontinent care; and b. a hall observation. The general manager identified 36 residents resided in the facility. Findings:On 07/09/25 at 12:01 p.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 was observed to provide incontinent care on Resident #1. Both CNAs had on gloves and provided privacy. On 07/09/25 at 12:05 p.m., Resident #1's brief was observed soiled. CNA #2 wiped the resident's genitalia.On 07/09/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #1 was observed rolled to their left side. CNA #1 removed the resident's soiled pad and placed on the floor next to a white sheet. On 07/09/25 at 12:12 p.m., CNA #1 was observed to wipe the Resident #1's buttocks and anal area. CNA #1 changed their gloves and put a new brief on the resident. On 07/09/25 at 12:14 p.m., CNA #1 and CNA #2 completed incontinent care on Resident #1. They adjusted the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders were followed for tube feeding administration and removal of a Foley catheter for one (#4) of three sampled residents reviewed for physician orders. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: A facility TUBE FEEDING policy, revised 04/2024, read in part, The physician or nurse practitioner should be notified if tube feeding amount not infused as ordered. Res #4 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included rectal cancer. A physician order, dated 11/15/24, documented to provide catheter care every shift and PRN. A physician order, dated 11/17/24, documented to administer Jevity 1.5 Cal at 65 ml/hr via g-tube every shift for feeding. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #4 was moderately cognitively impaired, had an indwelling catheter, and received greater than half of nutritional intake through a feeding tube. An office visit physician note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were showered for one (#3) of three sampled residents reviewed for ADLs. The administrator identified 39 residents resided in the facility. Findings: Res #3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included spinal stenosis, back pain, and dementia. Record review documented Res #3 did not receive a shower from 09/12/24 to 09/17/24. An admission MDS, dated [DATE], documented Res #3 was cognitively intact and required moderate assistance with hygiene/bathing. On 12/02/24 at 11:30 a.m., the DON stated Res #3 was to receive their showers on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. On 12/02/24 at 2:02 p.m., the DON stated they were unable to locate documentation Res #3 received a shower on 09/14/24. On 12/02/24 at 3:07 p.m., the DON stated Res #3 should have received their shower on 09/14/24.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide baths/showers as scheduled for one (#36) of three sampled residents reviewed for activities of daily living. The DON identified 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Bathing policy, dated 05/24, read in part, .All residents are given a bath or shower in accordance with their preferences. If no preferences on a bath is voiced, a bath or shower will be offered twice per week . Res #36 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included chronic kidney disease, pleural effusion, and fluid overload. The resident was discharged [DATE]. A facility shower schedule documented Res #36 was to receive a shower every Tuesday and Friday. An admission assessment, dated 06/14/24, documented Res #36 was cognitively intact and required substantial to maximal assistance with bathing. A Resident Grievance form, dated 07/07/24, documented the resident had requested a shower for days. Res #36's medical record had no documentation the resident received…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prevent an injury to a resident during transfers for one (#29) of two residents sampled for accidents and hazards. The Administrator identified 47 residents resided in the facility. Findings: The facility's Incident and-Accidents policy, dated 11/2018, read in part, If an accident occurs, a full investigation will be initiated, including staff, interviews, equipment, checks, and follow through on policy and procedures. The policy also read, Facility will monitor the effectiveness of the interventions, including adequate supervision consistent with the residents needs, goals, plan of care, and current standards of practice in order to reduce the risk of an accident. The policy also read, The facility shall maintain a file of all written reports of each incident and accident affecting the resident that is not a expected outcome of a residence condition or disease process. Resident #29 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was labeled and dated, per professional standards of care for three (#4,26, and #93) of three resident sampled for respiratory care. The DON identified 5 residents had orders for oxygen therapy. Findings: 1. Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure and systolic heart failure. Resident #4's physician orders, dated 8/04/24, read in part, May administer supplemental Oxygen as needed. On 08/11/24 at 9:05 a.m., Resident #4 was observed wearing oxygen via a nasal cannula. The tubing was attached to an oxygen saturator. There was no date observed on the humidifier or oxygen tubing indicating when the tubing was last changed. On 08/11/24 at 9:06 a.m., CNA #3 was asked what the date was on the oxygen tubing and/or humidifier. They stated there was not a date on the oxygen tubing or humidifier. On 08/11/24 at 9:11 a.m., RN #1 was taken to resident #4's room and asked if the oxygen tubing and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0700 — pattern
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to perform an entrapment risk assessment prior to installing bed or side rails for two (#2 and #86) of two residents and failed to obtain a physician order for the medical rationale and use of bed rails prior to installation for one (#86) of two sample residents reviewed for accident hazards. The DON identified 44 residents whose beds were equipped with a bed rail of any type. Findings: An admission Packet excerpt, undated, read in part, .The grab bars/side rails are/will be implemented for positioning only after a licensed nursing assessment. FULL SIDE RAILS WILL NOT BE UTILIZED. Responsible Party and/or Guest have been advised that bed/side rails may be installed. The risks and alternatives to using bed/side rails, as they apply to Guest's particular condition and circumstances have been clearly explained. A written order from the Guest's attending physician, specifying the medical rational and circumstances for use will be obtained prior to the installation of this medical treatment device. Facility will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were administered according to physician ordered parameters for three (#12, 88, and #89) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The DON identified 47 residents who resided in the facility. Findings: A Pharmacy Services policy, dated 05/24, read in part, .Provide continuity of staff to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions through: following specific monitoring related to medications, when ordered or indicated, including specific item(s) to monitor (e.g., blood pressure, pulse, blood sugar, weight), and parameters for notifying the prescriber . 1. Res #12 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia and hypertension. A physician order, dated 07/22/24, documented amlodipine 10 mg one time a day for hypertension. The order documented to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure less than 110 or a diastolic blood pressure less than 70. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident who received psychotropic medications had an acceptable diagnoses/indication for the use of an antipsychotic medication for three (#12, 88, and #89) of five sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The ADON identified 21 residents who received psychotropic medications. Findings: A Medication Monitoring policy, dated 01/24, read in parts, .Based on a comprehensive assessment of a resident, the facility must ensure residents who have not used psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record .The attending physician in collaboration with the consultant pharmacist must re-evaluate the use of the psychotropic medication and consider whether or not the medication can be reduced or discontinued upon admission or soon after admission . 1. Res #12 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia, anxiety, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,660 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $16,660 — penalty dated 2025-07-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 58 rows in the source record cover these 33 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OK