No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ignite Medical Resort Overland Park LLC

11901 Rosewood Street, Overland Park, KS 66209 · Non profit - Corporation · 102 certified beds · (913) 345-1745 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (913) 345-1745 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations$6,942 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $6,942 in federal fines (most recent 2024-07-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4800 W 135th St Ste 190 · (913) 428-8000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5001 W 135th St · (913) 851-9903 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
6261 WEST 135TH STREET
Park
12601 Nall Ave · (913) 339-6700 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.4%17.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.9%4.9%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.9%2.9%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms25.1%6.5%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.0%4.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.2%16.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.7%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.5%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.9%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control16.7%22.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.3%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine41.5%73.8%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.6%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.251.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.922.131.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 27 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

49.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.38U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 78 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF49.2%CMS range 35.8–66.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.3%CMS range 7.0–15.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.4–11.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.50
RN hours/ resident / day
1.29
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.87
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.52
RN hoursweekends
53.5%
Total nursing turnover
70.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 98% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.87 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-17)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 93 residents. The sample included five residents reviewed for abuse. Based on record review, interviews, and observations, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from avoidable accidents for Resident (R) 72 when staff failed to apply wheelchair pedals to her chair when propelled by staff and failed to use the required amount of staff assistance for transfers to ensure safety. Subsequently, R72 sustained a comminuted (a type of broken bone that is broken in at least two places and are usually caused by severe trauma) distal (away from the farthest point of origin or attachment) left femur (the thigh bone) fracture. This also placed R72 at risk for increased pain and impaired well-being. Findings included: - R72's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab, recorded diagnoses of need for continuous supervision, aphasia (condition with disordered or absent language function) following cerebral infarction (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 86 residents. The sample included one resident reviewed for accidents. Based on record review, interview, and observations, the facility failed to provide adequate assistance during transfer to prevent injury from avoidable accidents for Resident (R)1, who required assistance of one staff member with the use of a gait belt (belt used to help transfer or stabilize during activity) during transfers. As a result, R1 sustained a medial (towards the middle) and lateral (pertaining to the side, away from the middle) tibial (bone of the lower leg) plateau (an elevated and usually flat area) fracture as well as an associated fibular (one of the two bones of the lower leg) fracture and increased pain. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab, recorded diagnoses of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain), morbid obesity, pain in left hip, and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-17 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 110 residents. The sample included 20 residents with three residents reviewed for notification of roommate/room changes. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice, including the reason for the change, to Resident (R) 1 and/or his representative before R1 received a roommate, R2. Findings included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of generalized muscle weakness and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) with other behavioral disturbances. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 01/09/26, documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/13/26, documented R1 was highly active in his ADLs and preferred to do what he could for himself. R1's Care Plan, dated 08/18/25, documented R1 had a behavior problem and directed staff to administer medications as ordered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-29 · tag F0559 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 98 residents which included ten residents reviewed for transfers to another room in the facility for the convenience of staff. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to inform Residents (R) 1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, and R9 in writing of the impending room change in order to create a hall to group skilled residents. This placed the residents at risk for impaired resident rights and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R9's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) recorded a Family Communication Note dated 07/23/24 at 11:10 AM that documented R9 (Brief Interview for Mental Status [BIMS] score of 15 which indicated intact cognition), discussed moving rooms on 07/33/24. R9 was agreeable to a new room. On 08/01/24 at 12:30 PM R9's Notification of Room Change located under the Evaluations tab documented the reason for the room change was a transfer from post-acute to long-term care. Administrative Staff C spoke with R9 and R9's family member on 07/22/24 regarding the move. R3's EMR recorded a Family…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 98 residents. The sample included three residents reviewed for weight loss. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to monitor the effectiveness of weight loss interventions after a significant weight loss for Resident (R)1. This deficient practice placed R1 at risk for further loss and malnutrition. Findings included: - R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), under the Diagnosis tab documented diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, difficulty in walking, dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), paralysis (the loss of muscle function, sensation, or both) of vocal cords and larynx, and iron deficiency. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. R1 required setup or clean-up assistance with meals but was independent with eating. R1 weighed 173 pounds upon admission. The Five day Scheduled MDS dated 07/26/24 documented a BIMS score of 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four residents sampled for reasonable accommodations of resident needs and preferences. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)11, R43, and R80 had call lights to call for assistance. The facility further failed to provide footrests for R72's wheelchair. This deficient practice left these residents at risk for impaired care due to unmet care needs. Findings included: - On 07/15/24 at 09:33 AM, R80's call light lay in the middle of her bed. R80 sat in her recliner and the call light was out of her reach. On 07/15/24 at 09:45 AM R43's call light was wrapped around her bed rail, R43 was in her Broda chair (specialized wheelchair with the ability to tilt and recline). R43's call light was out of her reach. On 07/16/24 at 12:09 PM, R11's call light was wrapped around his bed rail. R11 was in his wheelchair eating lunch. R11's call light was out of his reach. On 07/15/24 at 11:48 AM R72 was pushed to the dining room without foot pedals, R72…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - R44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of cerebral infarction (stroke - the sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R44 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented R44 was dependent on staff assistance for positioning. The Quarterly MDS dated 06/05/24 documented R44 had severely impaired cognition. The MDS documented that R44 was dependent on staff assistance for positioning. R44's Pressure Ulcer Care Area Assessment (CAA) dated 01/09/24 documented she required repositioning. R44's Care Plan dated 12/13/23 documented that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with eight medication carts, four treatment carts, and three medication rooms. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to properly store medications in seven of the eight medication carts and four of the four treatment carts. This placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes or ineffective medication regimens. Findings included: - On 07/15/24 at 07:12 AM the medication cart on C-hall was unlocked and unattended in the hallway. The medication cart contained plastic cups in the top drawer with unlabeled pills in the cups. On 07/15/24 at 07:16 AM the medication cart on B-hall was unlocked and unattended in the hallway. On 07/15/24 at 07:20 AM the treatment carts on F-hallway and G-hall were unlocked and unattended in the hallway. On 07/15/24 at 07:20 AM the medication cart on G-Hall was unlocked and unattended in the hallway. On 07/15/24 at 07:21 AM the treatment cart on E hall was unlocked and unattended in the hallway. On 07/15/24 at 07:22 AM the mediation cart on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents and 13 residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact care). Based on record review, observations, and interviews, the facility failed to follow sanitary infection control standards related to the handling of soiled laundry, storage of oxygen tubing while not in use, and hand hygiene during catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) care. The facility further failed to follow EBP. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk for infectious diseases. Included Findings: - On 07/15/ 24 at 07:40 AM Resident (R) 51 had a portable oxygen tank with a nasal cannula (a hollow tube used to deliver supplemental oxygen) that was not in use near the entrance of her room. The nasal cannula hung over the portable oxygen tank, there was not a sanitary container for storage of the cannula. On 07/15/24 at 09:07 AM R33's nasal cannula was wrapped around the arm of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one reviewed for self-administration of medications. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)53 was safe to self-administer her medications. This deficient practice placed R53 at risk for unidentified medication complications and administration errors. Findings Included: -The Medical Diagnosis section within R53's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of multiple sclerosis (MS- progressive disease of the nerve fibers of the brain and spinal cord), paraplegia (paralysis characterized by motor or sensory loss in the lower limbs and trunk), and obstructive uropathy (structural blockage within the urinary tract blocking urine flow). R53's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/07/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, transfers, bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents with 18 residents included in the sample. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to issue Center for Medicare/Medicaid Services (CMS) Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage Form 10123 (NOMNC- the form used to notify Medicare A participants of their rights to appeal and the last covered date of participants of potential financial liability when a Medicare Part A episode ends) with the required information for Resident (R)139. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased autonomy and impaired decision-making. Findings included: - A review of R139's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented that the Medicare Part A episode began on 04/10/24 and ended on 04/27/24. R139 did not remain in the facility for custodial care. R139's clinical record lacked evidence of a NOMNC issued for this Medicare Part A episode. On 07/16/24 at 11:40 AM AM Administrative Staff A stated the facility was unable to find the NOMNC issued to R139. The facility did not provide a policy for beneficiary notification. The facility failed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four residents sampled for transfer and discharge. Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer as soon as practicable to Resident (R) 13 and R56 or their representative for their facility-initiated transfers. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between the facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunities for healthcare service for R13 and R56. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/28/23 documented a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with four residents sampled for transfer and discharge. Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice with the required information to Resident (R) 13 and R56 and/or to their family representative when transferred to the hospital. This deficient practice placed R13 and R56 at risk for impaired ability to return to the facility or his same room. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R13 documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 07/28/23 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide assistance for Resident (R)10 and R11 during mealtimes to promote and maintain their highest practicable abilities. This deficient practice placed both residents at risk for impaired nutrition and a decline in their ADLs. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R10's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), left-sided hemiparesis (weakness and paralysis on one side of the body), and insomnia (difficulty sleeping). R10's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 06/05/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight indicating moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with three residents reviewed for treatment/services to prevent/heal pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pressure-reducing measures were placed on Resident (R) 11 and R80's bilateral lower extremities to prevent pressure ulcers. This placed R11 and R80 at increased risk for pressure ulcer development. Findings Included: -R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) with cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure, obesity, and lymphedema…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for catheters (a flexible tube inserted through a narrow opening into a body cavity, particularly the bladder, for removing fluid) and urinary tract infection (UTI-an infection in any part of the urinary system). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment for Resident (R) 11 with an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) when the facility failed to prevent the drainage bag tubing from resting on the floor and failed to practice good hand hygiene during catheter care. These deficient practices placed R11 at risk for catheter-related complications. Findings included: - R11's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body) with cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, and confusion) care services. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)73 with dementia-related care and practices during her mealtimes. This deficient practice placed the R73 at risk for impaired quality of life. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R73's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), osteoporosis (abnormal loss of bone density and deterioration of bone tissue with an increased fracture risk), hypertension (high blood pressure), and dementia. R73's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) completed 05/08/24 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated she was dependent on staff assistance for toileting, bathing, transfers, bed mobility, dressing, and personal hygiene. The MDS indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The facility identified one resident positive for Clostridium difficile (C-diff- contagious bacteria characterized by foul smelling frequent bowel movements). Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to follow transmission-based precautions related to isolation practices for Resident (R)60 (mildly cognitively impaired resident) and failed to perform adequate infection control practices including hand hygiene practices during wound care for R4. The deficient practice placed both residents at risk for the spread of infectious diseases and delayed healing. Findings Included: - A review of the facility's Infection Control Log revealed one resident on isolation precautions for March 2023; R60 for C-Diff. A review of R60's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was placed isolation precautions related to C-diff and started Vancomycin (strong medication used to treat resistant bacterial infections) for ten days. R60's isolation was continued on 03/17/22 due to ongoing loose stool and positive test…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for self-administration of medications. Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure safe and appropriate self-administration of medication for Resident (R) 47. This placed the resident at risk for unnecessary medication side effects and self-administration errors. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time to time). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for notification of changes. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to notify Resident (R)30 and/or his family/durable power of attorney (DPOA- legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to) of a significant change in skin condition when R30 developed a pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) during his stay at an acute hospital which was identified when R30 readmitted to the facility. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of miscommunication between facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunity for healthcare service. Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD - abnormal condition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for abuse and mistreatment. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to identify an allegation of abuse, and report to the State Agency, when Resident (R) 40 told the Hospice nurse he received rough treatment from staff, and the Hospice nurse then informed the facility Director of Nursing (DON). This placed the resident at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse and /or neglect. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R40's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of pulmonary fibrosis (scarring of the lungs), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with one resident reviewed for abuse and neglect. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of staff to resident abuse when Resident (R)40 reported rough treatment from direct care staff. This placed R40 at risk for ongoing and/or unidentified abuse and mistreatment. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R40's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of pulmonary fibrosis (scarring of the lungs), type two diabetes mellitus (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and major depressive disorder (major mood disorder). A review of R40's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/19/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90. The sample included 18 residents. Two sampled residents were reviewed for hospitalization. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer with the required information to Resident (R)30 and R4 and/or to their family/durable power of attorney (DPOA- legal document that named a person to make healthcare decisions when the resident was no longer able to) in a practicable amount of time. This deficient practice had the risk of miscommunication between facility and resident/family and possible missed opportunity for healthcare service for R30 and R4. Findings included: - The electronic medical record for R30 documented diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (PVD - abnormal condition affecting the blood vessels), hypertension (HTN-an elevated blood pressure), and heart failure (a chronic, progressive condition in which the heart muscle is unable to pump enough blood to meet the body's needs for blood). The Annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) cares. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing was provided for two residents who required assistance from staff to complete the care. This deficient practice placed Resident (R) 47 and R60 at risk for impaired psychosocial wellbeing, potential skin breakdown and/or skin complications from not maintaining good personal hygiene and bathing practices. Findings included: - R47's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear), and mood disorder (category of mental health problems, feelings of sadness, helplessness, guilt, wanting to die were more intense and persistent than what may normally be felt from time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide bowel monitoring as ordered by a physician for Resident (R) 6 who received opioid (medications used to treat pain). This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for constipation (difficulty passing stools) and physical complications. Findings included: - R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of chronic pain syndrome and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion) with mood disturbance. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. R6 required extensive assistance with two staff for bed mobility and dressing; total dependence with two staff for transfers and toileting; and supervision with setup help for eating. R6 was always incontinent (lack of voluntary control over…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, because of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented infection control practices during wound care for Resident (R) 4 who received antibiotics to treat a wound infection. This deficient practice placed R4 at risk of delayed healing, ongoing infection, and worsening of her wound. Findings included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R4 documented diagnoses of osteomyelitis (local or generalized infection of the bone and bone marrow) of vertebra (bone of the spinal column) and sacral (large triangular bone between the two hip bones), pressure ulcer, hypertension (HTN- an elevated blood pressure), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive and irreversible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure foot pedals were used for Resident (R) 67 and R11, when staff pushed residents in their wheelchairs. This deficient practice placed these residents at risk of avoidable accidents. Findings included: - On 3/16/23 at 12: 00 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) O pushed R67 in a wheelchair with no foot pedals into the dining room. R67's feet slid along the floor. R67 stomped her feet onto the floor while staff propelled her forward and attempted to stop her wheelchair in the middle of the dining room. On 03/16/23 at 12:05 PM CNA N pushed R11 in a wheelchair with no foot pedals into the dining room as R11's feet slid along on the floor. On 03/20/23 at 01:59 PM Licensed Nurse (LN) G stated all residents who were in a wheelchair and pushed by staff should have foot pedals on their wheelchair to prevent a fall or injuries that could occur if they flipped out of their wheelchairs. LN G stated all the residents had foot pedals for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported a lack of an appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis [any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing] and other mental emotional conditions) medication usage. The facility failed to ensure the CP identified and reported the lack of laboratory monitoring for R6 who was on Depakote (medication used to treat seizures) for two years, antihypertensive (medications used to treat high blood pressure) medication given outside parameters for R6, a lack of dosing instructions for Voltaren (topical pain reliever medication) gel for R6, and a lack of a 14-day stop date for a PRN (as needed) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-20 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide bowel monitoring for Resident (R) 47, who received opioid (medication used to relieve pain) medications; failed to ensure antihypertensive (medications used to treat high blood pressure) medications were not given outside of parameters for R6; failed to provide laboratory monitoring for R6 who received Depakote (medication used to treat seizures) for two years, and failed to ensure Voltaren (topical pain reliever medication) gel had dosing instructions for R6. This deficient practice had the risk for unnecessary medication use and unwarranted physical complications for the affected residents. Findings included: - R47's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 90 residents. The sample included 18 residents with five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)47 and R65 had an appropriate diagnosis for antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat psychosis [any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality testing] and other mental emotional conditions) medication use and failed to ensure an as needed (PRN) antianxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people with excessive anxiety, nervousness, or tension) medication had a 14-day stop date for R6 and R142. This deficient practice had the risk for unnecessary medication use and physical complications for the affected residents. Findings included: - R47's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), anxiety (mental or emotional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility's Consultant Pharmacist failed to identify blood sugar levels for Resident (R) 60 out of physician ordered parameters, monitor blood pressures and pulses for R73, and monitor bowel movements for R21, R87, R73, and R90. Findings included: - R60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact) and no behaviors. The MDS documented R60 transferred and walked without staff assistance, and received insulin injections seven days a week. The Diabetic Care Plan, dated 06/29/21, directed staff to check R60's blood sugars as ordered by the physician, monitor for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (more than normal amount of sugar in the blood), and notify the physician of abnormal blood sugars and changes in condition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor blood sugars for Resident (R) 60, bowel movements for R21, R73, R87, and R90, and blood pressures and pulses for R73. Findings included: - R73's Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 06/28/21, documented diagnoses of congestive heart failure (a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid) and cardiomyopathy (heart disease). R73's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], recorded the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. The resident required extensive assistance of one staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) except eating, which she was independent. The MDS recorded the resident received antipsychotic (class of medications used to treat any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-08-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents. Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to identify and remove expired medications in one of three medication rooms. Finding included: - On 07/27/21 at 08:40 AM, observation during initial tour of the facility revealed the B Hall medication room contained one bottle of Calcium 600 milligrams (mg) 150 tablets with an expiration date of 06/2021 and two bottles of Children Ibuprofen Oral Suspension 120 milliliters (ml) with expiration date of 05/2021. On 07/27/21 at 08:41 AM, Administrative Nurse E verified the Calcium tablets expired 06/2021 and Children's Ibuprofen expired 05/2021. Administrative Nurse E removed and disposed the items and stated expired medications should not be left in the medication room for use. The facility's Labeling of Medication Containers policy, dated August 2021 documented medications maintained in the community shall be properly labeled in accordance with state and federal regulations. Expired medications to be destroyed per protocol for medication destruction,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-08-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to notify the physician of elevated blood sugar levels outside the physician ordered parameters for one of five sampled residents, Resident (R) 60. Findings included: - R60's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 (cognitively intact) and no behaviors. The MDS documented R60 transferred and walked without staff assistance, and received insulin injections seven days a week. The Diabetic Care Plan, dated 06/29/21, directed staff to check R60's blood sugars as ordered by the physician, monitor for signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia (more than normal amount of sugar in the blood), and notify the physician of abnormal blood sugars and changes in condition. The Physician's Order, dated 02/28/21, directed staff to check R60's blood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-08-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 96 residents. The sample included 20 residents, with six reviewed for pressure ulcers (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction). Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to consistently complete wound treatment as ordered for three of six sampled residents, Resident (R) 62, R90, and R64. Findings included: - R62's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented the resident required extensive staff assistance with bed mobility, transfers, locomotion on and off the unit, limited staff assistance with personal hygiene, and supervision with eating. The MDS documented the resident had one unhealed Stage I (intact skin with nonblanchable redness of a localized area, usually over a bony prominence) pressure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-07-17 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 83 residents. The facility identified one main kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen's walk-in refrigerator and freezer unit was in safe operating condition. Findings included: - Upon inspection of the main kitchen during the initial tour on [DATE] at 07:19 AM observation revealed a blanket and towels on the floor at the base of the walk-in refrigerator and freezer unit. Water was leaking from the unit onto the floor with a stream of water flowing to a drain on the floor. When the door to the walk-in freezer compartment was opened, the light in the unit did not work. A review of the facility's Work Orders Summary report from [DATE] to the present noted that a work order had been turned in on [DATE] by the kitchen for excessive water coming from the walk-in. On [DATE] another work order was submitted to look at the walk-in again due to it leaking water again. On [DATE] a work order was submitted for a leak on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$6,942 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $6,942 — penalty dated 2024-07-17
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-12-12 for 27 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.4-0.4 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GOLD PEARL, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 08/01/2024
IGNITE OVERLAND PARK JV LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
IGNITE-VILLA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ISRAEL INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE OVERLAND PARK LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
CARR, BARRYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2024
CARR, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
CHUKU, BRANDYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
GILLIS, KARENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
JABLONSKI, NICOLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
MCFARLANE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ROGERS, DYLANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ROSE, MARCIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
THENGIL, MATHEWIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
WHITE, JIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2024
FIELDS, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2024
STERN, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 08/01/2024
IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/07/2025
MIDDLEMAS, MELISSAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 59 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$11.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense9% of expenses

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$414per resident / day
operating cost
$12,571per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$314per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175183. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next