No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Ignite Medical Resort San Antonio, LLC

6035 Eckhert Rd, San Antonio, TX 78229 · For profit - Corporation · 105 certified beds · (210) 642-5300 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (210) 642-5300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 36 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
8554 Huebner Road, Building 1, Ste 103 · (210) 366-4358 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
8602 Huebner Rd · (210) 691-0174 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5500 Babcock Rd · (210) 444-9882 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Babcock Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.0%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine31.0%88.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.8%25.7%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.0%12.3%12.0%typical

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 452 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
71.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.09U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.53hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.48hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 71.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 209 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 41% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.4%CMS range 61.1–70.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.1%CMS range 9.6–14.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge71.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.1%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.7%CMS range 5.1–9.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.31
RN hoursweekends
44.7%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 105 beds and averages 100.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.84 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.25 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-08)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-15)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with state and federal laws, all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 1 treatment carts (TC #1) reviewed for medication storage. The facility failed to ensure the treatment cart in the public area was locked on 3/25/26. This failure could place residents at risk of medication misuse and drug diversion. Findings included: During observation on 3/25/26 at 1:38 pm, TC #1 was observed to be unlocked and unattended on the 100 hall by the state investigator. Further observation revealed the resident room the TC was in front of was closed. Observation revealed wound cleanser, iodine, and wound care supplies in the drawers of TC #1. There were 3 staff in black uniforms assisting residents in the hallway and the TC was not within view of the nurses' station. During an interview on 3/25/26 at 1:40 pm RN A said he had only gone inside the resident's room for 2 minutes. RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #5) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure RN D followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing wound care to Resident # 3 on 3/26/26. The facility failed to ensure RN D followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions when providing wound care to Resident #5 on 3/26/26. The facility failed to ensure RN D followed infection control practices when providing wound care to Resident #3 on 3/26/26. The facility failed to ensure RN D followed infection control practices when providing wound care to Resident #5 on 3/26/26. These failures could affect all residents who require wound care, placing them at risk for infection. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-08 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews for 1 of 1 facility reviewed for competent staffing. The facility failed to complete annual performance reviews for CNAs employed by the facility for 1/1/2025 through 9/1/2025.This failure could lead to incompetent staff and improper care to residents. Findings included: Record review of the facility staff roster provided by the HR Dir on 9/23/2025 reflected 35 CNA staff members. Of the 25 CNAs, 25 were eligible for an annual performance review in that they had been employed by the facility for over one year and had a month of hire occurring from January through September. In an interview with HR Dir. on 9/24/2025 at 8:35 AM, she stated the facility did not have a formal process for annual reviews. She said informal, periodic performance evaluations were completed by the nursing managers and issues were addressed as they occurred. She said the performance evaluations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident environment remained free of accident hazards as is possible for 1 of 1 laundry departments (2 of the 3 dryers) reviewed for fire hazards.The facility failed to clean out the lint from the 2 commercial dryer's interiors for a year.This failure could place residents at risk for a potential fire. The findings included: During an observation on 9/23/2025 at 2:41 PM revealed the facility's laundry department had 2, natural gas fueled, commercial dryers. The mechanical back of the dryers were housed in an enclosed room accessed by a wood frame door. Observation of the room revealed the back of the dryers which included electrical connections, natural gas connections, and electrical motors with pulleys and rubber belts. Further observation revealed the dryers were operating and the flames from the burners used to heat the air could be visualized inside the machines. Further observation revealed a layer of dust / lint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies and skill sets necessary to care for residents' needs for 3 of 3 LVNs (ADON A, LVN F, and LVN G) reviewed for staff competency. The facility failed to ensure ADON A, LVN F, and LVN G were competent and trained to provide care for Resident #108's PleurX [a catheter placed in the chest cavity for long-term drainage]. This failure could lead to improper care and complications of Residents' medical care.Findings included: Record review of Resident #108's face sheet, dated 9/21/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included resistance to vancomycin related antibiotics, malignant pleural effusion [a fluid collection in the space surrounding the lung], and secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung [lung cancer]. Record review of Resident #108's admission MDS, dated [DATE], reflected a BIMS score of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 8 residents (Resident # 87) reviewed for medication errors was free of any significant medication errors. The facility failed to administer the prescribed medication (Potassium & Sodium Phosphates Oral Packet 280-160-250 MG) for low potassium and sodium to Resident #87. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes, increased adverse side effects, and a decline in health. The findings included: Record review of admission face sheet, dated 9/22/2025, revealed Resident # 87 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Type two diabetes (condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel), and Anxiety Disorder (excessive fear of or apprehension about real or perceived threats, leading to altered behavior) and Hypertension (is a chronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 5 residents (Residents #52, #53, #87, #108, and #121) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure enhanced-barrier precautions were initiated for Residents #52, #53, #87, and #121.The facility failed to ensure contact isolation precautions were initiated for Resident #108 when she admitted to the facility on antibiotic therapy for blood culture results positive for VRE (a contagious bacterial infection that is resistant to multiple antibiotics). These failures could lead to the spread of infection and illness. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #52's face sheet dated 9/22/2025 reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included encounter for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure at the time each resident is admitted , the facility must have physician orders for the resident's immediate care for 2 of 2 residents (Residents #108 and #148) reviewed for new admissions.The facility failed to ensure Resident #108 had an order in place to drain the PleurX device [a catheter inserted into the chest cavity for long-term drainage of fluid accumulation] after readmission on [DATE]. The facility admitted Resident #148 with the need for a thoracolumbar spine orthosis (TSLO) back brace and did not support the Resident with a physician's order for the TSLO brace.These failures could lead to residents not receiving necessary care. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #108's face sheet, dated 9/21/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included resistance to vancomycin related antibiotics, malignant pleural effusion [a fluid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implemented a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the residents that met professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan was not developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and did not include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident including for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #148) [TT1] reviewed for a baseline care plan. Resident #148 was admitted on [DATE] at 5:00 PM with the need for a thoracolumbar spine orthosis (TSLO) back brace, the TSLO brace was not addressed in the baseline care plan. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving care and services. The findings included: A record review of Resident #148's admission record dated 9/24/2025 revealed an admission date of 9/18/2025 with diagnoses which included fracture of T11-T12 vertebra without healing (the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #87) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #87 received routine bathing assistance after admitting to the facility in September 2025. These failures could lead to skin breakdown, infection, or psychosocial harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #87's face sheet, dated 9/22/2025, reflected an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the circulatory system and dependence on renal dialysis [a procedure that filters the blood due to kidney disease]. Record review of Resident #87's MDs assessments revealed no submissions of a BIMS score assessment as of 9/21/2025. Record review of Resident #87's care plan report, printed 9/22/2025,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 26 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure for a resident who enters the facility with an indwelling catheter or subsequently receives one had a clinical condition that demonstrates catheterization is necessary for 1 of 3 residents (Resident # 50) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheterization necessity, in that: Resident #50 did not have a physician's order for an indwelling catheter. This deficient practice could affect residents in the facility who have an indwelling or external catheter and place them at risk for infection and improper care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #50 face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that included: Urinary retention (refers to the inability to empty the bladder),Congestive heart failure (a condition where the heart muscle is weakened or stiffened), and Hypertension (is a condition where the force of blood against the artery walls is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who needs respiratory care is provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #108) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #108's long-term indwelling chest catheter, known by the brand name PleurX, was drained per physician order and by competent staff. These failures could result in infection and/or complications to a resident's respiratory or cardiovascular systems. Findings included: Record review of Resident #108's face sheet, dated 9/21/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Relevant diagnoses included resistance to vancomycin related antibiotics, malignant pleural effusion [a fluid collection in the space surrounding the lung], and secondary malignant neoplasm of unspecified lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%, for 25 medication administration opportunities with 2 errors resulting in a 8% medication error rate, for 2 of 8 residents (Resident #25 and Resident #126) reviewed for medication administration. 1. LVN K administered to Resident #126 his prescribed insulin aspart after breakfast contrary to the physician's orders. 2. ADON LVN A attempted to administer Resident #25 his prescribed insulin aspart after breakfast contrary to the physician's orders. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic effects of their medications. The findings included: 1 A record review of Resident #126's admission record dated 9/24/2025 revealed an admission date of 9/15/2025 with diagnoses which included type II diabetes with hyperglycemia (a disease where excess sugar accumulates in the bloodstream and could contribute to infections) and infection of right knee prosthetic (artificial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permitted only authorized personnel to have access, for 1 of 6 medication carts (200-hall medication cart), reviewed for security. LVN G left the 200-hall west medication cart unattended and unlocked. This failure could place residents at risk for having their medications accessible to unauthorized people. The findings included: During an observation and interview on 9/23/2025 at 10:43 AM revealed the 200-hall west medication cart parked in the 200-hall west hallway unlocked and unattended. Further review revealed staff and residents ambulated nearby in the hallway. During an interview on 9/23/2025 at 10:45 AM ADON J stated the cart was assigned to LVN G. ADON J stated the expectation was for the medication carts to be locked when not attended. During an interview on 9/23/2025 at 10:49 AM LVN G stated he was in a resident's room assessing their blood sugar. LVN G stated he could not see his medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-19 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain all mechanical, electrical, and patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 2 of 2 elevators reviewed for essential equipment. The facility failed to ensure elevators #1 and #2 were functioning properly. This failure could place residents at risk of not having functional and safe mode of travel from floor to floor. The findings included: Record review of Elevator #1's Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation revealed last known annual inspection was 7/24/2024 and the hydraulic elevator passed inspection. Record review of Elevator #2's Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation revealed last known annual inspection was 7/24/2024 and the hydraulic elevator passed inspection. Record review of elevator service calls documented [elevator repair company portal] from 5/21/2024 to 5/15/2025 revealed a total of 25 service calls of which 4 were related service calls: -5/15/2025 3:54 pm (after surveyor intervention) elevator 1, Jumping very hard 1 of 2 with resolution documented as checked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biological's were stored properly in the cart for 1 (100 hallway med aide cart) of 2 medication carts reviewed, in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #5's Lyrica (pregabalin), a DEA controlled substance, was stored appropriately in a double locked container. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving prescribed medications as ordered and drug diversions. The findings included: During an observation of LVN B's medication cart for the 100 hallway on 5/15/2025 at 5:00 p.m., revealed one white capsule marked Z 14 and identified as Lyrica, a schedule V (5) controlled substance, was found in an unmarked medication cup that had been removed from the locked controlled substance box of the medication cart and left in the upper right drawer of the medication cart which did not have a separate locked compartment for controlled substances. During an interview on 5/15/2025 at 5:00 p.m., CNA B stated the white capsule marked Z 14 was a capsule of Lyrica meant for Resident #5.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain medical records that were complete and accurately documented in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A documented Resident #1's medication at the correct time the medication was administered. This failure placed resident at risk for delayed or inaccurate medication administration which could result in decline in health and well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/15/2025 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing (fracture to left leg bone with surgical repair), benign neoplasm of cerebral meninges (non-cancerous tumor of the lining of the brain and spinal cord) and generalized muscle weakness. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to protect the confidentiality of personal and medical records for 14 (Resident #2, Resident #3, Resident #4, Resident #5, Resident #6, Resident #7, Resident #8, Resident #9, Resident #10, Resident #11, Resident #12, Resident #13, Resident #14, Resident #15) of 14 residents and involving one (LPN A) of six staff observed for confidentiality of records. The facility failed to ensure LPN A would not leave a Vital Signs Flow Sheet Report on a 200-East Hall medication cart exposing 200-East Hall residents' personal information. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk for loss of privacy and dignity. The findings included: During an observation on 200-East Hall on 03/13/2025 at 09:18 a.m., revealed an unattended and visible Vital Signs Floor Sheet Report, dated 03/13/2025 for shift 6A-6P (06:00 a.m. to 06:00 p.m.). The staff identified on the document was LPN A, CNA B for 06:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., and CNA C for 12:00 p.m.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of care within 48 hours of a resident's admission for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of four residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that addressed the services that were being provided for Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3. This failure could place newly admitted residents at risk for not receiving the care, services, and continuity of care to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 03/13/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 03/10/2025 to an acute care hospital. Record review of Resident #1's Medical Diagnosis EMR tab, undated and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments for three (Cart 200-East Hall, Cart 200-West Hall, and Cart 300-West Hall) of six reviewed for drug storage. The facility failed to ensure medication carts, 200-East Hall and 200-West Hall on the second floor and 300-West Hall on the third floor were secured when unattended on 03/12/2025. This failure could place residents at risk of having access to unauthorized medications and/or lead to possible harm, drug overdose, or drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation and interview on 03/12/2025 at 03:07 p.m., a medication cart on 200-West Hall was observed to be unlocked and unattended. Facility staff and residents were not observed around the unlocked medication cart. At 03:08 p.m., RN G was observed coming out of a resident room. RN G confirmed the medication cart was his and that the cart was unlocked. He stated he had just gone to quickly administer a Tylenol to one of his residents. He stated the medication drawers that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for physician orders for treatments. The facility failed to follow physician orders and obtain Resident #2's weight during night shift every Tuesday per physician order schedule. This failure could affect residents currently residing in the facility resulting in not receiving needed care to maintain optimum health and placing them at risk for injury and/or deterioration in their condition. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 03/13/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #2's Medical Diagnosis EMR tab, undated and accessed on 03/13/2025, reflected Resident #2 had diagnoses which included encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the digestive system, pneumonia (a lung…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure ulcers from developing for one (Resident #2) of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. In three observations over three days, the facility failed to follow physician orders and apply Prevelon boots (cushioned boots, also known as heel protectors, designed to lift the heel off the bed and help prevent heel pressure injures and provide pressure relief) as ordered for Resident #2. This failure could affect residents currently residing in the facility resulting in not receiving needed care to maintain optimum health and placing them at risk for injury and/or deterioration in their condition. The findings included: Record review of Resident #2's admission Record, dated 03/13/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old male. He was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for the kitchen. The facility failed to ensure osmolite (a tube feeding formula) was disposed of after its best-by date. The facility failed to ensure staffs facial hair was covered by a hair restraint. The facility failed to ensure trays, insulated plate lids, and insulated plate bases were air dried prior to stacking them with water droplets resulting in being wiped dry with a hand towel during meal prep. The facility failed to ensure dietary staff used proper hand hygiene during meal preparation. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation on 08/12/2024 at 3:20 PM, revealed 4 8 fl. oz. closeable cartons of Osmolite with a best-by date on the top of the carton of 1FEB2024 in the 3rd floor nutrition fridge. Interview on 8/12/2024 at 5:00 PM, the DON stated that there should be no Osmolite in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to deliver the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychological well-being for 3 of 30 Residents (Resident # 201, Resident # 67, and Resident # 203 who were reviewed for call light response in that: The facility failed to deliver timely call light response for Resident #201, Resident # 67, and Resident # 203. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive care at the facility and could result in missed or inadequate care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #201's face sheet dated 8/15/24 revealed Resident # 201 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of fusion of spine (a surgical procedure to correct problems with the spine, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the body has trouble controlling blood sugar), and adult T-cell lymphoma (a cancer of the immune system). Record review of Resident # 201's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement baseline care plans that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care within 48 hours of admission for 8 of 25 residents (Residents #77, #99, #100, #102, #106, #149, #150, and #199) that were reviewed for baseline care plans in that: The facility failed to complete (Residents #77, #99, #100, #102, #106, #149, #150, and #199) baseline care plans within 48 hours. This deficient practice could affect residents who receive care at the facility and could result in missed or inadequate care. The findings were: Record review of Resident #77's face sheet, dated 08/15/2024, revealed Resident #77 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included: acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, COVID19, pneumonia due to SARS-associated coronavirus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, unspecified, acute bronchitis, pulmonary hypertension, unspecified, hypothyroidism, unspecified,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infection for 2 of 11 residents (Residents #89 and #204) reviewed for infection control and for residents who eat in their rooms in halls, in that: 1. RN-E did not sanitize glucometer in between uses with Residents #204 and #89, or after leaving Resident's #89 room, who was on droplet precautions. 2. RN-E failed to wash or sanitize his hands between glove changes before administering medications to Resident #204 and Resident #89. RN-E failed to wash or sanitize his hands when entering or exiting Resident #89's room, who was on droplet precautions. 3. Server B during meal pass did not sanitize hands between trays when entering and exiting resident rooms. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for infection due to improper care practices. The findings include: 1. Record review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to be adequately equipped to allow residents to call for staff assistance through a communication system which relays the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area from each resident's bedside and toilet and bathing facilities, for 1 of 30 residents (Resident #79) reviewed for call light accessibility and functionality, in that: On 07/09/2024 at 01:00 PM Resident #79 utilized his call light which did not illuminate the nurse call light directly outside of and above of his room door. This failure could place residents at risk for harm by not receiving care and attention when their nurse call light system malfunctions and or is out of reach. The findings included: A record review of Resident #79's admission record dated 08/15/2024 revealed an admission date of 7/15/24 with diagnoses which included acute kidney failure (the kidney was not functioning correctly), type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition in which the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assist the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing ,and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for 1 of 3 residents(Resident #1) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to acquire and administer Resident #1's scheduled dose of Dexamethasone (a corticosteroid that prevents the release of substances in the body that cause inflammation.) on 7/7/2024 and 7/8/2024. This failure could place residents at risk for pain and poor quality of life. The findings were: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 7/17/2024 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an admission date of 6/27/2024 and diagnoses which included neoplasm of cerebral meninges, ( A meningioma is a tumor that grows from the membranes that surround the brain and spinal cord, called the meninges. A meningioma is not a brain tumor, but it may press on the nearby brain, nerves and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 4 of 4 residents (Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4) reviewed for quality of care in that: The facility failed to ensure Residents #1, #2, #3 and #4 received their scheduled wound care as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for worsening skin conditions and infections. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's admission Record, dated 1/19/24, revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the following diagnoses: Acute embolism (blockage in a blood vessel caused by a piece of material) and thrombosis (blood clot in an artery/vein) of right femoral vein, Type 2 Diabetes (chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar) , Hyperlipidemia (high levels of fat in the blood), Hypertension (high blood pressure), Peripheral Vascular Disease (circulatory…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments in 2 of 9 medication carts (third floor treatment cart and medication cart) reviewed for medication storage, in that: The facility failed to ensure the third-floor treatment cart and medication cart were locked when left unattended in the hallway. This deficient practice could place residents at risk of medication misuse or drug diversion. Findings included: During an observation on 1/19/24 at 11:30 a.m., the treatment cart on the third floor was unlocked and unattended. The treatment cart contained prescription and over the counter medications related to skin and wound care, and suture removal kits. There were visitors and non-nursing staff walking up and down the hallway and there were no nurses at the nurses' station or in the hallways. The treatment cart was again observed unlocked on 1/20/24 at 5:21 pm. The CNO was notified by the surveyor. During observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care, for 2 of 8 Residents (Residents #236 and #238) reviewed for base line care plans, in that: 1. The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan to support Resident #236's needs for hypotension, low blood pressure, with prescribed medications meant to raise blood pressure, oxygen use, prescribed opioid use for pain, and support interventions for a fractured hip. 2. The facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan to support Resident #238's needs for communication in Arabic. These failures could place residents at risk of not having their needs identified within the required timeframe, to provide person centered care. The findings included: 1. A record review of Resident #236's admission record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate below 5%. The facility error rate was 10.7% based on 3 errors out of 28 opportunities for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #256 and #257) reviewed for medication administration: 1. LVN M administered a late medication for Resident #256. The medication was scheduled for 07:30 AM administration, the medication was administered at 08:44 AM. 2. MA N administered late medications for Resident #257. The medications were scheduled for administration any time between 07:00 AM and 10:00 AM. The medications were administered at 11:54 AM. These deficient practices could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications and possible adverse reactions. The findings included: 1. Resident #256 A record review of Resident #256's admission record, dated 07/12/2023, revealed an admission date of 06/28/2023 with diagnoses which included diabetes mellitus type II [a deadly disease where the body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors, for 2 of 5 residents (Resident #236 and Resident #256) reviewed for medication administration, in that: 1. MA N administered midodrine (a drug prescribed to raise blood pressure) while Resident #236 was experiencing high blood pressure. 2. LVN M administered Resident #256's insulin late. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving therapeutic effects of their medications to include a diminished health status. The findings included: 1. Resident #236 A record review of Resident #236's admission record, dated 07/11/2023, revealed an admission date of 07/04/2023, with diagnoses which included hypotension [low blood pressure]. A record review of Resident #236's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #236 was an [AGE] year-old female admitted from the hospital and assessed with a BIMS of 15 out of 15 score indicating no mental cognition impairment. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview and record review revealed the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchens in that: The DM used a white towel from the sanitizer bucket under the holding food cart as a sanitizer thermometer testing in between food items. This failure could place residents at risk of cross contamination and food borne illness. The Findings were: Observation on 7/13/2023 at 4:08 PM in kitchen for food temperature, testing with the DM, he used a white towel from a small red bucket. This was labeled sanitizer bucket and was under the holding food cart, to wipe the food thermometer in between food items. Interview on 7/13/2023 at 4:09 PM the DM stated he always had used a towel from the sanitizer bucket to take the food temperature of food items. Interview on 7/13/23 at 4:10 PM [NAME] O stated he had just put a new bucket that was sanitizer and had not used, before the DM used it to take food item temperatures. [NAME] O stated he had not used the sanitizer towel for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls for 1 of 8 Residents (Resident #47) reviewed for storage of medications. Resident #47's triamcinolone cream [a cream used to treat the itching, redness, dryness, crusting, scaling, inflammation, and discomfort of various skin conditions], was stored in his room at his bedside. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for harm due to improper storage. The findings are: A record review of Resident #47's admission record, dated 07/13/2023, revealed an admission date of 06/28/2023, with diagnoses which included a rash. A record review of Resident #47's admission MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #47 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted from the hospital. A record review of Resident #47's physician's orders dated 07/10/2023 revealed Resident #47 was prescribed triamcinolone cream 0.1% topical apply to bilateral lower extremities topically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-13 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provide the therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician for 1 of 8 residents (#71) reviewed in that: Resident # 71 did not receive his sugar free health shake lunch meal as ordered by physician. This failure could affect residents with diet needs and could result in a decrease in calories and potential weight loss. The Findings were: Record review of Resident #71's admission Record dated 7/13/2023 revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with acute kidney failure, diabetes II and chronic kidney disease Record review of Resident #71's consolidated physician orders for July 2023 documented House Shake-Sugar Free three times a day with meals. Record review of Resident #71's admission MDS dated [DATE] revealed Section C: Cognitive Patterns BIMS score was 11/15 (moderately impaired). Record review of Resident #71's Care plan dated 6/13/2023 revealed Resident #71 for diet, controlled carbohydrate, regular texture,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to IGNITE MEDICAL RESORTS — 22 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.4+0.6 vs chain
The other 21 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.7★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
IGNITE SAN ANTONIO JV, LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
IGNITE-VILLA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
BERGER FAM TR UA 06252014OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
BLUE PEARL FINANCIAL LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
GOLD PEARL, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
IGNITE POST ACUTE SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
ISRAEL FAMILY INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
ISRAEL INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
PRESTIGE WORLDWIDE SAN ANTONIO, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
STERN FAMILY INVESTMENT TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
CARR, JAREDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
GILLIS, KARENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
GOBST, RYANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2022
JABLONSKI, NICOLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
MCFARLANE, JOHNIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
ROSE, MARCIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
SHEARER, RACHELIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
THENGIL, MATHEWIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
THEUS, MICHELLEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2023
WHITE, JIMIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
BERGER, MENACHEMIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/01/2022
CARR, BARRYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
FIELDS, TIMOTHYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
ISRAEL, BENJAMINIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/01/2022
STERN, TODDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 04/01/2022
IGNITE TEAM PARTNERS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
SPARK THERAPY LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2022
MUSHTAQ, UZAIRIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
BERGER, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
ISRAEL, YEHUDISIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$3.4M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 27%Other / private 73%

This home reported $3.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$496per resident / day
operating cost
$15,064per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$526per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in TX

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Texas Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Texas
$5,627/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,666/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676447. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next