Quaker Hill Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

64.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 65% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 53 beds and averages 40.2 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.78 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.36 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 47 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility, and to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria in one of one kitchen. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the resident kitchenette, on 12/02/25 at 09:37 AM, the following areas of concern were noted in the facility kitchen:1. The vent on the front of the ice machine had a build-up of dust and debris.2. A cart holding clean, plastic trays for serving residents' food contained food debris.3. Eight plastic containers holding cold cereal had a sticky, dusty substance on the lids.4. Two large, white, rolling plastic containers containing sugar and potatoes had a sticky, dusty substance on the lids.5. Four reach-in freezer doors had dried-on food. The handles of the reach-in freezers had a build-up of food debris and a sticky substance.6. An electric blender base had a thick, dried-on food substance.On 12/03/25 at 08:51 AM, Dietary Staff BB confirmed the above areas of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents with 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to one Resident (R)30, when the resident sat with her bare legs, including her upper thighs, exposed. Findings included:- R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R30's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She had limited range of motion (ROM) on one side of her upper and lower extremities (UE/LE) and was dependent on staff for lower body dressing. The Activity of Daily Living (ADL)/Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/02/25, documented the resident required assistance from staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents; the sample included 12 residents including two residents reviewed for hospitalization. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident (R)15 and R1, and/or their representative, a written notification explaining the purpose of the discharge.Findings included:-R15's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). R15's admission Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident admitted to the facility from a short-term, acute hospital on [DATE]. He had a Brief Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. R15's Discharge MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident discharged from the facility to a short-term, acute hospital on [DATE]. His BIMS was not assessed. R15's EMR lacked documentation of a written notification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R) 1's Care Plan with the interventions to address a diagnosis of cancer or the cancerous lesions.Findings Included:- R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses of lung cancer, respiratory failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing).R1's 10/09/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS recorded R1 had dressing treatments. R1 had a diagnosis of cancer.R1's Care Plan dated 04/23/18 documented R1 was at risk for skin breakdown and documented that the nurse monitored skin daily and completed a monthly skin assessment. R1's Care Plan lacked documentation of cancerous skin lesions or lung cancer.R1's Physician's Orders documented an order to cleanse a wound to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 47 residents; there were 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide oral care for Resident (R)30, who was dependent on staff for oral hygiene.Findings included: - R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain).R30's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She required setup and clean-up assistance with oral hygiene.The Activity of Daily Living (ADL)/Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/02/25, documented the resident required assistance from staff for her ADLs.R30's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented a BIMS score of 14, indicating intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents, with 12 residents sampled, including one resident reviewed for non-pressure skin issues, and one resident reviewed for constipation. Based on record review, interview and observation, the facility failed to monitor skin issues for Resident (R)30 and failed to administer as needed (PRN) medication and assess for constipation for R19.Findings included:- R30's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (CVA - sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain). R30's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. She was dependent on staff assistance with transfers. The Activity of Daily Living (ADL)/Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 10/02/25, documented the resident required assistance from staff for her ADLs. R30's Quarterly MDS,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 47 residents; the sample included 12 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident(R) 4's call light remained in reach to prevent falls for R4. The facility further failed to ensure R45 had wheelchair pedals when staff propelled him in the wheelchair. Findings included:- R4's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (a mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear).R4's 09/23/25 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R4 had no falls in the previous quarter.R4's 09/23/25 Falls Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R4 had a history of falls prior to admission, used medications that may affect his level of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders regarding blood pressure monitoring for Resident (R) 5's blood pressure medication when staff administered the medication despite R5's blood pressure being lower than the ordered parameters. Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of hypertension (HTN-elevated blood pressure).R5's Significant Change Minimal Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She had a diagnosis of HTN.The Psychotropic Medication Use Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 02/23/25, documented the resident took multiple medications.R5's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented she had a BIMS score of 15, indicating intact cognition. She had a diagnosis of HTN.R5's HTN Care Plan, revised 11/07/25, instructed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 47 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to use adequate hand hygiene when caring for residents. Findings included:- Observation on 12/03/2025 at 12:56 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S and Licensed Nurse (LN) G, entered Resident (R) 2's room and donned gloves and gowns. CMA S placed the walker in front of R2 and performed a two-person stand-pivot transfer with the walker. R2 pivoted, sat on the edge of the bed, then laid down on the bed with assistance. LN G grabbed the trash at the top of the trash can and moved the trash to the other side of the bed. LN G did not change gloves after touching the trash can. CMA S removed R2's pants, and LN G obtained a brief and wipes from the bedside stand, wearing the same soiled gloves. CMA S removed her gloves and washed her hands, then CMA S applied clean gloves. Both staff members unattached the brief from their side of R2. LN G obtained wipes and wiped the front of R2's peri area, still wearing the soiled glove, and then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 44 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the resident kitchenette, on 02/12/24 at 01:12 PM, the following areas of concern were noted in the resident refrigerator/freezer: 1. One box of store-bought pizzas that were undated and unlabeled. 2. An opened can of soda, half full, was undated and unlabeled. 3. One resident's half-eaten meal tray which was undated and unlabeled. 4. One bowl of mixed fruit was undated and unlabeled. 5. One bowl of a dessert was undated and unlabeled. 6. The temperature log on the refrigerator was dated December 2023. During an initial tour of the resident kitchenette, on 02/12/24 at 01:12 PM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The inside of the microwave had dried on food substances. 2. The inside of the sink had a build-up of soap scum and dried on food. 3. A coffee maker…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $352K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS