Cypress Point-Skilled Nursing By Americare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 184 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 60.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.52 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 83% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 65.6 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to ensure the safety of one resident (Resident #1), when staff assisted the resident to the toilet and did not check on the resident for approximately nine hours. Staff found the resident lying on the bathroom floor on top of his/her wheelchair cushion with his/her hand completely de-gloved (stripped of the skin), an open fractured wrist (bone broken and protruding through the skin), and a laceration to his/her forehead. The facility census was 60. The Administrator was notified on 03/03/25 at 1:55 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 02/21/25. The IJ was removed on 03/03/25 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Record review of the facility policy titled Restorative Sleep Program, dated 09/05/2018, showed: - To ensure adequate procedures have been taken to provide the appropriate opportunities and facilities to rest and sleep according to a resident's individual needs and requirements; - Residents that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 65.Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Storage, dated 2011, showed:- Label all food items held for longer than 24 hours;- The label must include the name of the food and the date by which it should be sold, consumed, or discarded; - Store leftover contents of cans of prepared food in a clean, sanitized container with a proper and secure cover. The new container shall be labeled with the name of the food item and the original expiration date.The facility did not provide a policy addressing the ice machine, kitchen floor cleaning, dented cans, and use of trash cans.1. Observations on 09/15/25 at 9:34 A.M., and 2:20 P.M., 09/16/25 at 2:10 P.M., 09/17/25 at 3:24 P.M., and 09/18/25 at 9:02 A.M., of the ice machine area showed:- Visible water on the floor in front and underneath the ice machine;-…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 65. The facility did not provide a policy for a homelike environment.1. Observations on 09/15/25 at 9:34 A.M., and 2:20 P.M., 09/16/25 at 2:10 P.M., 09/17/25 at 3:24 P.M., and 09/18/25 at 9:02 A.M., of the kitchen's ice machine area showed: - A strip of baseboard trim unattached from the wall on the bottom right side near the ice machine. 2. Observations on 09/15/25 at 3:11 P.M., 09/16/25 at 2:56 P.M., and 09/17/25 at 3:06 P.M., showed:- Visible cobwebs on a sprinkler head located in the TV room near the nurses station;- Several light fixtures with insects, dirt, and debris around the nurses station;- Cobwebs on a light fixture in front of the therapy room near room [ROOM NUMBER];- Two missing light fixture protective covers near the laundry room and room [ROOM NUMBER];- An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic (medication that affect a person's mental state) medication for one resident (Resident #4) and failed to monitor the drug regimen for an unnecessary medication by not ensuring an as needed (PRN) psychotropic (medication that alters the levels of chemicals in the brain that influence mood, behavior, and perception) medication order was limited to 14 days unless a specific duration and clinical rationale was provided for one resident (Resident #8) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 65.Review of the facility's policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, undated, showed:- Psychotropic medications are divided into four broad categories: antipsychotic, antianxiety, antidepressant, and hypnotic medications;- CMS regulations state that each resident's drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs and define what it considered an unnecessary drug: in excessive dose, for excessive duration, without adequate indication, without adequate monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement procedures to ensure medications were accurately reconciled for one resident (Resident #37) of out of 23 sampled residents. The facility also failed to ensure vials of tuberculin (the solution used to administer the test for tuberculosis (TB - an infectious lung disease)) were dated when opened. The facility census was 65. The facility did not provide a policy regarding the narcotic reconciliation.The facility did not provide a policy regarding dating of medications when opened. 1. Review Resident #37's medical record showed:- An admission date of 12/16/24;- An order for lorazepam (an antianxiety medication) 0.5 milliliters (ml) every 8 hours for agitation related to anxiety, dated 04/23/25.Observation on 09/18/25 at 10:14 A.M., of the locked medication refrigerator in the main medication room showed:- One opened 30 ml bottle of lorazepam 2 milligram (mg)/ml for Resident #37 and 16 ml remained. Review of the resident's lorazepam 2 mg/ml Narcotic Reconciliation Log showed:- On-coming and off-going…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when staff accessed and administered medications through a central venous access device (CVAD - a thin, soft, flexible tube that is placed in a vein that leads to the heart) and during personal care for one resident (Resident #33) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 65. Review of the facility's policy, titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions, dated 2024 showed:- An order for EBP will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds (e.g., chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds, and chronic venous stasis ulcers) and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes) even if the resident in not known to be infected or colonized with multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO);- Make gowns and gloves available immediately near or outside of the resident's room;- Personal protective equipment (PPE) for EBP is only necessary when performing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and side rails as a part of a regular maintenance program for three residents (Residents #8, #11, and #28) out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 65.Review of the facility's policy titled, Side Rail Inspection, undated, showed:- Side rails on resident beds must be inspected regularly to ensure safety, proper function, and compliance with regulatory standards. Faulty or unsafe side rails pose a risk of injury, entrapment, or falls and must be addressed immediately;- Routine inspection frequency: Weekly: Visual inspections by nursing staff during bed checks, Monthly: Detailed inspection by maintenance or designate safety personnel, as needed (PRN): After any incident, complaint, or reported issue with a side rail;- Each inspection must include the following checks: side rails are securely attached to the bed frame, latches and locks function properly, no broken, bent, or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and follow an individualized comprehensive care plan with specific interventions for two residents (Resident #12 and #63) out of 17 sampled residents. The facility's census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled, Care Plan Policy, undated, showed: - The purpose of the policy is to set out the values and framework within which the individuals care plan is completed and updated; - Care planning is critical to the quality of service in any care home. It is the means by which the values of the home are translated into specific objectives for each individual who live there; - The care plan should be the means by which the identified needs and wishes of the individual are recorded. It ensures that care is offered consistently by well-informed staff, aware of the individual care needs. 1. Review of Resident 12's medical record showed: - An admission date of 05/21/24; - Diagnoses of occlusion of bilateral carotid arteries (a condition when both carotid arteries become completely blocked,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and document a wound for one resident (Resident #12) out of two sampled residents. The facility's census was 68. Review of the facility policy titled, Skin Assessment, not dated, showed: - A full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission, daily for three days, and as needed by a nurse/certified nurse assistant (CNA) while performing personal care/shower. Any changes in skin assessment will be reported to the charge nurse for further evaluation. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition or after any newly identified pressure injury; - Documentation of skin assessment: include date and time of the assessment, your name, and position title; document observations (e.g. skin conditions, how the resident tolerated the procedure, etc.); document the type of wound; describe the wound (measurements, color, type of tissue in wound bed, drainage, odor, pain); document if the resident refused assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled, Refrigerator/Freezer Temperatures, dated 2011, showed: - In order to ensure all perishable food stuff stays fresh and palatable, temperatures will be recorded on all refrigerators and freezers in use, including unit refrigerators in nourishment rooms; - Dining Services will be responsible for taking temperatures on all kitchen and nourishment room refrigerators and freezers, and recording temperature report logs daily, during each shift. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dishwashing: Machine, dated 2011, showed: - The Dining Services staff shall maintain the operation of the dish machine according to established procedure and manufacturer guidelines posted or contained in this guideline to ensure effective cleaning and sanitizing of all tableware and equipment used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and follow enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for four residents (Residents #12, #13, #35 and #56) out of four sampled residents during care. The facility census was 68. Review of the facility's policy titled, EBP, undated, showed: - An order for enhanced barrier precautions will be obtained for residents with any of the following: wounds (e.g. chronic wounds such as pressure ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, unhealed surgical wounds and chronic venous stasis ulcers) and/or indwelling medical devices (e.g., central lines, urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes) even if the resident is not known to be infected or colonized with multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO); - High-contact resident care activities include: dressing, bathing, transferring, providing hygiene, changing linens, changing briefs or assisting with toileting, device care or use: central lines, urinary catheters, feeding tubes, tracheostomy/ventilator tubes, wound…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$73,743 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $73,743 — penalty dated 2025-03-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO