Neighborhoods Rehabilitation And Skilled Nursing B

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 296 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 159 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 90.9 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.32 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.23 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.29 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to monitor one resident (Resident #1) at least every two-hours per facility policy and based on resident needs. Staff did not monitor the resident between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 3:10 A.M. Resident #1 was found entrapped in the bedrail, face down in the mattress, unresponsive, and he/she passed away. The facility census was 89.The administrator was notified on [DATE] of Past Non-Compliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on [DATE]. The Administrator immediately terminated Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C, suspended Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) B pending the results of the investigation, conducted an investigation, and in-serviced all staff on rounding on [DATE]. Review of the facility's walking rounds shift report policy, undated, showed staff are directed that rounds will be made during each shift according to resident care needs and individual preferences following nursing standards of practice (typically at least every two hours…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-09-05 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to re-assess bedrail use after a significant change in condition per policy for one resident (Resident #1). Resident #1 was found entrapped in the bedrail, found face down in the mattress and unresponsive, resulting in his/her death. The facility census was 89. The administrator was notified on 09/03/2025 of an Immediate Jeopardy which began on 08/26/2025. The IJ was removed on 09/03/2025, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. 1. Review of the facility's Proper Use of Bed Rails policy, undated, showed staff are to ensure the bed frame, bed rail, and mattress do not leave a gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body, regardless of mattress width, length, or depth. Review showed responsibilities of ongoing monitoring and supervision are specified as follows:-Direct care staff will be responsible for care and treatment in accordance with the plan of care; -A nurse assigned to the resident will complete reassessments in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-31 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for resident (Resident #1) with a signed full code physician order. The facility census is 86. The administrator was notified on [DATE] of past noncompliance Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which occurred on [DATE]. Administration immediately in-serviced nursing staff on CPR, code status, and two-way radio communication policies. The IJ was corrected on [DATE]. Review of the facility's CPR policy, undated and reviewed/revised on [DATE], directed staff to adhere to residents' rights to formulate advance directives. The facility will follow current American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines regarding CPR. If a resident experiences cardiac arrest, facility staff will provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical services, in accordance with the resident's advance directives. Review of the facility's Communication of Code status, undated, directed to follow facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-29 · tag F0627 — isolated
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to provide an appropriate emergency discharge notice to one resident (Resident #1) when staff discharged the resident to the hospital and refused to allow him/her to return to the facility. The facility census was 93.1. Review of the facilities policies did not contain a policy for emergency discharge.2. Review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 5/29/26, showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and staff discharged him/her to the local hospital on 5/20/26.Review of the resident's progress notes, dated 5/20/26 at 11:48 A.M., showed staff documented the resident discharged back to the hospital for uncontrolled pain.Review of the resident's medical records did not contain documentation of an emergency discharge issued to the resident.During an interview on 5/29/26 at 8:47 A.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said the facility was not informed of the full acuity of care and it was felt they could not meet the residents' needs. He/She said it is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to label eye drops and nasal sprays in accordance with professional standards and failed to destroy expired medications for three medication carts and one medication room. The facility census was 88.1. Review of the facility's Medication Storage policy, dated 2025, showed the policy did not contain direction or guidance for labeling or destruction of eye drops or nasal sprays. Review of the facility's Administration of Eye Drops policy, dated 2001, showed the policy directed staff to label new bottles with date opened and follow facility policy or manufacturer's instructions for when to discard and replace the bottle.Review of the facility's Administration of Nasal Spray Administration policy, dated 2025, showed the policy did not contain direction or guidance for labeling or destruction of nasal sprays.2. Observation on 01/20/26 at 9:52 A.M., showed the medication cart on the [NAME] and [NAME] unit contained one opened and undated bottle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff to ensure waste containers in food preparation areas remained covered when not in use. Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility staff failed maintain the internal temperature of hot foods held in the steamtable at a minimum of 140 degrees Fahrenheit (dF) to prevent the growth of food-borne pathogen. Facility staff also failed to ensure staff involved in food preparation and service wore effective hair restraints to prevent physical contamination of food and food contact surfaces. These failures had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 88.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff to ensure waste containers in food preparation areas remained covered when not in use. Facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene as often as necessary using approved techniques to prevent cross-contamination. Facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during wound care for two (Residents #5 and #15) of five residents who had a wound and one (Resident #5) of two residents who had a catheter. The facility staff failed to provide appropriate hand hygiene between glove changes during the provision of care for one (Residents #5) of six residents. The facility staff failed to ensure the two-step purified protein derivative (PPD) (skin test for tuberculosis (TB)) was completed in accordance with their policy and on file for eight employees (Housekeeper J, Certified Medication Technician (CMT) K, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) L, Housekeeper M, Dietary Aide (DA) N, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) O, Social Service Designee (SSD), and the Assistant Business Office Manager (ABOM) out of ten sampled employees. The facility census was 88.1. Review of facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated 2025, showed:-All staff receive training on EBP upon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to obtain written consent from the resident or his/her designee, guardian and conservator, or conservator to manage the personal funds of the resident in the facility resident trust account for four residents (Residents #31, #68, #121 and #122) out of nine sampled residents. Facility staff also failed to maintain a system that assured full, complete, and separate accounting of each resident's personal funds to preclude the commingling of resident funds with facility funds for one resident (Resident #124) out of two sampled residents and ensure timely refunds for five residents (Residents #121, #122, #123, #124, #125) out of six sampled discharged residents. The facility census was 88. 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Personal Fund, revised 01/05/25, showed: -If the resident chooses to deposit personal funds with the facility, upon written authorization of a resident, the facility must act as a fiduciary of the resident's funds and hold, safeguard, manage, and account for the personal funds of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan to included behavioral interventions and activity preferences for three of three sampled residents (Resident #2, #5 and #9) who resided on a secured memory care unit. The facility census was 88. 1. Review of the facility's Dementia Care policy, dated 2025, showed individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care will be utilized, to include meaningful activities aimed at enhancing the resident's well-being. The care plan goals and interventions will be monitored on an ongoing basis for effectiveness and will be reviewed/revised as necessary. Review of the facility's Activity policy, dated 2026, showed it is the policy of the facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Special considerations will be made for developing meaningful activities for residents with dementia.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for three of three sampled residents (Resident #2, #6, and #9) who had falls and failed to update the care plan for one resident (Resident #5) of two sampled residents with pressure ulcers (wound created from pressure). The facility census was 88.Review of the Comprehensive Care Plan policy, dated 2025, showed the comprehensive care plan will include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's needs as identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The objectives will be utilized to monitor the resident's progress. Alternative interventions will be documented, as needed. 1. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change of Status (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/07/25, showed staff assessed the resident as:-Cognitively impaired:-Needed some help with functional cognition;-Had impaired range of motion in one upper and one lower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, facility staff failed to provide services to meet professional standards when staff failed to document and obtain orders for catheter use and indication, catheter size and bulb size for catheters on two of two sampled residents (Resident #8 and #111) and failed to document and obtain orders for dialysis to include days of week, location of clinic, and indication for two of two residents (Resident #2 and #5) who received dialysis. The facility census was 88.1. Review of the facility's Catheter Care policy, undated, showed the policy did not contain direction or guidance for contents of a physician order for catheters. 2. Review of Resident #2's Significant Change of Status (SCS) Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 11/07/25, showed staff assessed the resident as: -Cognitively impaired;-Indwelling catheter;-Diagnosis of Dementia. Review of the residents Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/22/26, showed: -Catheter care every shift,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards of practice when facility staff failed to transcribe physician's orders for one resident (Resident #3) and failed to complete weekly skin assessments for three residents (Resident #2, #3, and #5) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 86. 1. Review of the facilities Physician Orders policy, undated, showed staff are directed as follows:-All physicians orders should be carried out as ordered upon the signed order of a person lawfully authorized to prescribe;-Each order should be noted and processed according to the standards of practice;-The order will be input into the electronic medical record system and then will populate into the proper areas for administration. 2. Review of Resident #3's Significant Chage Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment tool, dated 10/30/25, showed staff assessed the resident with severe cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's care plan, revised 11/03/25,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, facility staff failed to meet professional standards when staff failed to transcribe wound care orders for two resident's (Resident #3 and #4) who had wounds. Facility staff failed to document they provided wound care as ordered for one resident (Resident #4) of one sampled resident. The Facility's censes was 90. 1. Review of the Facility's Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders policy, undated, showed: -Consulting physician/practitioner orders are those orders provided to the facility by a physician/practitioner other than the resident's attending physician/practitioner who is acting on behalf of the attending physician. A consulting physician/practitioner may include, but is not limited to, a resident's: wound clinic physician and Nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, or physician assistant to any of the above physicians; -For consulting physician/practitioner orders received in writing or via fax, the nurse in a timely manner will: document the verification…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$85,090 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $68,105 — penalty dated 2025-09-05
• $16,985 — penalty dated 2025-03-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO