Heritage Health Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 169 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 90 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 53.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.62 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.36 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 53 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 3 remained free from abuse when he had an unwitnessed fall in his room and Licensed Nurse (LN) G instructed R3 to get onto his hands and knees and lift himself off the floor resulting in feelings of anger and embarrassment for R3.Findings included:- R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses of unspecified sequelae of cerebral infarction (lingering, long-term effects or complications following a stroke [ischemic brain damage] when the specific nature of the aftereffects is not detailed), and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).R3's Admit Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. The assessment documented R3 utilized a wheelchair and walker for mobility. He was dependent on staff for toileting, lower body…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 52 residents, with 17 sampled, including three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers/injuries. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide preventive pressure ulcer treatment for two of the three residents reviewed. Resident (R) 109 developed unstageable pressure injuries on her bilateral heels, left lateral foot, and left anterior foot. The deficient practice placed R109 and any other resident with potential skin issues, at risk of further pressure injury development. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)109's Physician Order Sheet, dated 12/06/23, included diagnoses of: fractured (broken bone) left femur (bone in thigh), cervical vertebrae (spinal bones in the neck) fracture, left foot drop (inability or difficulty in moving the ankle and toes upward), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and acute kidney failure (inability of the kidneys to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 53 residents. Based on record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure narcotic reconciliation which included regular narcotic counts of all narcotics, including the narcotics stored as overflow. Findings included:-In a facility reported incident, the facility reported that on 02/13/26 at approximately 02:00 PM, staff reported 12 hydrocodone (a potent semi-synthetic opioid analgesic and antitussive used to treat severe pain) were missing.The facility Facility Narcotic Dispensing Record for R1's hydrocodone medication documented that a count of 30 had been crossed out with a line and a count of 18 had been written in and initialed by two individuals and dated and times 02/12/26 at 11:00 PM. It was documented and initialed an amount given of one with the remaining amount of 17.Licensed Nurse (LN) H's Witness Statement, dated 02/16/26, documented that on 02/12/26 she was asked to pull a hydrocodone from the overflow medication, and she and Certified Medication Aide (CMA) R performed a count of the medication in the bottle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 59 residents, one main kitchen, and two kitchenettes. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the potential for foodborne bacteria. This placed the residents at risk of foodborne illnesses.Findings included:- During an initial tour of the kitchen on 08/04/25 at 11:04 AM, the following areas of concern were noted:The microwave in the dining room was heavily soiled with dried-on food debris on the inside and outside of the microwave oven.The window area used to pass dirty dishes from the dining room to the kitchen had a heavy build-up of dried-on food and liquid on the frame of the window, the cove base underneath the window, and the trash can next to the window had dried-on food substance. The window area used to pass resident plates from the kitchen into the dining room had a heavy build-up of dried-on food and liquid. The stationary can opener had a build-up of a moist food substance on the base of the opener. The preparation table next to the stove, used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-06 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 59 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly by failing to ensure the covers on three of the three dumpsters were kept closed. This deficient practice created a risk of attracting insects and/or rodents.Findings included:- During an initial environmental tour of the kitchen on 08/04/25 at 08:19 AM, observation revealed the lids to three of the three dumpsters outside of the kitchen were left open, with trash on the ground surrounding the dumpsters.On 08/04/25 at 09:15 AM, the lids of the dumpsters remained open.On 08/06/25 at 10:35 AM, Dietary Staff BB stated that staff were to keep the lids of the dumpsters closed at all times.The facility policy for Disposal of Garbage and Refuge undated, included: Dumpsters shall be kept covered when not being loaded. The surrounding areas shall be kept clean so that accumulation of debris and insect/rodent attraction is minimal.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-06 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 59 residents with two medication rooms, three medication carts, and two treatment carts. All five carts have a narcotic box. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately reconcile the medication cart for controlled substances. This placed the residents at risk for misappropriation. Findings include:- On 08/04/25 at 12:30 PM, the cart in the east hallway contained a lock box that contained controlled substances. Review of the controlled substance reconciliation log lacked evidence of a controlled substance reconciliation between two staff on 07/03/25 at 08:00 PM; only the day shift nurse signed off. The log lacked evidence that a reconciliation was completed on 08/04/25 at 06:00 AM shift. There were no signatures present. On 08/04/25 at 12:30 PM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S stated the narcotics should be counted and verified every time the cart changes hands. CMA S said the outgoing nurse, the on-coming nurse, and the CMA all sign for the accuracy of the controlled substances on the cart.On 08/06/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 59 residents, three medication carts, two treatment carts, and two medication rooms. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled, stored, and secured adequately. This placed the affected residents at risk for ineffective medication regimens or diversion.Findings included:- During an observation on [DATE] at 12:30 PM in the east hall, a medication cart was unlocked and unattended. The cart contained various medications, including Talzenna (a cancer medication), Gabapentin (a medication to relieve nerve pain), and narcotics in a lock box. On [DATE] at 01:03 PM, the east treatment cart was observed. The top drawer contained Novolog (a short-acting insulin that lowers the level of glucose in the blood) that was opened on [DATE]. This would have expired on [DATE]. It also contained Tresiba (long-acting insulin) and Lantus (long-acting insulin) that were not dated when they were opened,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, including six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure informed consent including purpose, risks versus benefits, and expected therapeutic benefits for the use of antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality), anxiolytic (medication used to treat symptoms of anxiety) and other psychotropic medications (drugs that affect the brain and nervous system to treat mental illnesses) for Resident (R) 6. This placed the resident at risk for uninformed treatment decisions.Findings included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented the following diagnoses: panic disorder (an anxiety disorder) and depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest).R6's EMR documented the following physician's orders:Duloxetine (an antidepressant medication), 120 milligrams (mg), by mouth, every morning, for a diagnosis of depression, ordered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-06 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, including one resident reviewed for discharge. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Ombudsman (a resident advocate) with a notice of transfer for Resident (R)67 and R69. This placed the residents at risk of impaired residents rights related to discharge. Findings included: -R69's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of seven, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a goal to discharge to the community.The Return to Community Referral Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/22/25, did not trigger.R69's Discharge MDS, dated 06/03/25, documented the resident had a planned discharge to the community.R69's Care Plan for discharge planning instructed staff to identify any resources the resident may need upon dismissal to home.R69's EMR revealed a Progress Note dated,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, including four residents who were reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary ADL care for one sampled resident, Resident (R)8, who did not get showered. This deficient practice placed the affected resident at risk for impaired quality of life and poor hygiene.Findings included:- Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R8's diagnoses included cutaneous abscess of right axilla (cavity containing pus and surrounded by inflamed tissue), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), end stage renal disease (ESRD- the kidneys are no longer able to adequately support the body's needs), periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic right knee joint (a break in the bone surrounding the knee replacement implant), pressure ulcer of sacral region Stage 2…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents, with four residents reviewed for wounds. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary wound care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, including wound assessments at least weekly, including measurements and description, for Resident (R) 58 and R2. This placed R58 and R2 at risk for related complications and delayed healing.Findings included:-R58's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), hypothyroidism (a condition characterized by hyperactivity of the thyroid gland), anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear), pressure ulcer Stage 3 (full-thickness pressure injury extending through the skin into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 59 residents. The sample included 17 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility staff failed to implement sanitary storage of breathing treatment devices for Resident (R) 1, R18, and R3, who received nebulized (a device that changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) breathing treatments. This deficient practice had the potential to spread infections to the residents in the facility.Findings included:- Observed on 08/04/25 at 01:22 PM, R18 was wearing oxygen; the tubing and humidifier bottle were not dated. Her nebulizer equipment and tubing were sitting loosely on a chair, open to the air, and not dated. R18 reported that her nebulizer is left on her chair open to air regularly.Observed on 08/05/25 at 10:33 AM, R18's nebulizer equipment was sitting on her bedside table on paper towels. R18 reported she had her breathing treatment, and the staff had cleaned and set it on the paper towel to dry. The nebulizer tubing was attached to the machine sitting on the floor and chair; none of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$27,860 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $14,015 — penalty dated 2026-03-04
• $13,845 — penalty dated 2023-12-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $504K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS