Moran Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 38 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 20 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 36.2 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.63 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.86 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.446 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.20 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.80 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.99 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 34 residents, with one resident sampled for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free of accident hazards during transportation. On 01/21/25, Transportation Staff E and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D did not ensure R1 was safely secured in the transportation vehicle before operating the vehicle. CNA D, who secured R1 in the transportation vehicle, lacked appropriate training and competency evaluation. Transportation Staff D failed to ensure R1's wheelchair was appropriately secured then operated the vehicle in a manner that caused the CNA to fear for her safety and the safety of the resident, by frequently looking at his phone which caused the vehicle to cross the [NAME] strips (corrugated pavement along the side of the road that causes rumbling and vibration when driven over to alert inattentive drivers of potential danger) on the right and left (center and shoulder) sides of the road multiple times…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents with one kitchen. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide sanitary conditions for food storage to prevent the spread of food borne illness to the residents of the facility. This placed the residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included: - Initial tour of the kitchen on 06/02/35 at 02:51 PM with Dietary Manager BB, revealed the following areas of concern: The stand-up freezer in the kitchen area contained BBQ ribs open to air and undated. There were frozen vegetables in a bag, opened and not dated. The stand-up refrigerator in the kitchen contained salad opened to air and not dated. It also contained cottage cheese, sour cream, and cream opened but not dated. The dry storage area had a freezer with frozen peas that was open to air. The kitchen area had a cutting board with deep grooves and scratches on it. During an interview on 06/02/25 at 03:05 PM, Dietary Manager BB reported she expected all food to be dated and covered. Dietary Manager BB further stated all equipment should have…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents. The sample included 14 residents. Based on interviews, record reviews and observation, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the kitchen was free from insects and/or pests. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for contaminated food, illness and discomfort. Findings included: - During an observation on 06/02/25 at 02:51 PM, there was an abundance of flies throughout the kitchen area. Further observation revealed no methods to prevent or eradicate the insects. During an observation on 06/03/25 at 12:20 PM, observation revealed flies throughout the kitchen and dining room area. During an observation on 06/04/25 at 09:13 AM, the west door that led from outside into the kitchen would not close completely without force. During an observation on 06/04/25 at 09:20 AM, the east dining room door that led directly into the courtyard had a significant gap at the bottom large enough to allow pests and/or rodents to enter the dining room. During an observation on 06/04/25 at 09:25 AM, an outer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents with 14 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignified care for Resident (R)28, when staff failed to cover the resident while receiving care when staff entered and exited his room. This placed the resident at risk for embarrassment and decreased psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - A review of R28's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS noted he required staff assistance with toileting. R28's Urinary Incontinence/Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment dated 04/17/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one sampled for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set assessment for Resident (R) 31 when the resident started dialysis. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for unidentified care needs after a significant change in health status. Findings: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) and dependence on dialysis. R31's 02/21/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R31 was not on dialysis services at that time. R31's 05/09/25 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 13. The MDS noted R31 was on dialysis services at that time. R31's Care Plan, dated 05/09/25, documented R31 had dialysis treatment and instructed staff to coordinate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 36 residents with 14 residents selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set for Resident (R) 2. This placed the resident at risk for unidentified care needs. Findings included: - R2's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD- mental disorder characterized by an acute emotional response to a traumatic event or situation involving severe environmental stress), anxiety (class of medications that calm and relax people), depressive disorder (major mood disorder which causes persistent feelings of sadness), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD- an anxiety disorder characterized by recurrent and persistent thoughts, ideas, and feelings of obsessions severe enough to cause marked distress, consume considerable time, or significantly interfere with the resident's occupational, social, or interpersonal functioning), and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R2's 10/28/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 36 residents with 14 residents sampled including one resident reviewed for positioning. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate wheelchair positioning for Resident (R)23, regarding the positioning of her feet on the foot pedals. This placed the resident at risk for accidents and decreased comfort. Findings included: - Review of R23's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). R23's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS noted R23 was independent with mobility in her wheelchair and had no limitation in range of motion (ROM). The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/01/24,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 36 residents. The sample included 14 residents with one sampled for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood) review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary dialysis assessment, care, and services for Resident (R) 31. This deficient practice had the risk of adverse outcomes and dialysis complications for R31. Findings: - R31's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) and dependence on dialysis. R31's 02/21/25 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS documented R31 was not on dialysis services at that time. R31's 05/09/25 Quarterly MDS documented a BIMS of 13. The MDS noted R31 was on dialysis services at that time. R31's Care Plan, dated 05/09/25, documented R31 had dialysis treatment and instructed staff to coordinate care in collaboration with the dialysis center. The plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly store, prepare and distribute food under sanitary conditions to ensure proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illnesses for the residents of the facility. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 08/30/23 at 01:05 PM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The bottom shelf of the cup rack contained dried food debris. 2. Four plastic pitchers had a brownish stain on the inside. 3. A reach-in refrigerator had an open gallon paper container of potato salad which was undated. 4. The shelf below the microwave had dried food debris. 5. Two reach in freezers had food debris on the bottom shelves. 6. Two coffee pots were heavily stained on the inside glass of the pots with a build-up of dried on coffee on the spout and handle of the pots. 7. A large pork loin was in a dry sink thawing inappropriately. 8. The spice shelf had a layer of dust. 9. The inside of the microwave had multiple areas…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sanitary catheter care for two Residents (R)10 and R87, failed to sanitize a nasal inhaler and utilize proper hand hygiene for this task for R15 and dietary staff failed to don personal protective equipment prior to entry to R30's room who was in isolation due to active COVID infection. Findings included: - Observation, on 09/29/23 at 09:26 AM, revealed Dietary Staff BB entered Resident (R)30's room which required personal protective equipment (PPE) due to the resident's positive COVID-19 status and isolation protocol, without donning (putting on) PPE, as instructed, on the signage near the door to the resident's room. Interview, on 09/29/23 at 09:28 AM, with Dietary Staff BB, revealed she did not know she needed to wear PPE as she delivered breakfast to the resident. Interview on 09/29/23 at 11:20 AM, with Licensed Nurse G, confirmed R 30 was in isolation for COVID and he would expect all staff to don and doff PPE. Interview, on 09/31/21 at 11:40 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-08-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The resident reported a census of 32 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen on 08/30/23 at 01:05 PM, the following area of concern was noted: The floor throughout the kitchen had areas which contained a dried, liquid, sticky substance. The parameter of the floor had a heavy build-up of dirt and grime. On 08/30/23 at 03:18 PM, Administrative Staff A stated it was the expectation the kitchen floor would be kept clean at all times. The facility policy for Sanitation, revised 10/2008, included: The food service area shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner. The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents and staff.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,069 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,069 — penalty dated 2025-03-20

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 10 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $208K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS