Galena Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

67.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 62 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.42 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 72% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 37.2 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.81 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.05 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 66% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 1 remained free from abuse. On 03/21/26 at around 10:30-11:00 PM Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M identified bruising on R1's right leg and reported it to Licensed Nurse (LN) G. LN G determined the bruising was probably from the wheelchair but did not report the bruises of unknown origin to the administrator. Around 04:20 AM on 03/22/26, CNA M reported to LN G that R1 had vaginal bleeding. LN G instructed the CNA to apply antifungal powder or cream but did not assess the area. The resident remained in her room with her representative, the alleged perpetrator (AP), with the door closed. At 06:00 AM, LN G told LN H and LN I that R1 had some vaginal bleeding. At 08:00 AM, CNA O provided peri care to R1 and identified dried blood on R1's labia and reported to LN I. At 08:30 AM LN I assessed R1 and noted dried blood on the labia and vaginal area, and bruising to the right hip and leg. LN I notified LN H. Around 02:22 PM, LN H and LN I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff identified Resident (R) 1's signs of physical and sexual abuse, and report to the Administrator immediately and the appropriate state entities within the required time. On 03/21/22 at around 10:30-11:00 PM Certified (CNA) M and CNA N identified bruising on R1's right leg and reported it to Licensed Nurse (LN) G. LN G spoke to the resident's representative, the alleged perpetrator (AP), who offered a rationale for the injury which LN G accepted without investigation. Around 04:20 AM on 03/22/26, CNA M reported to LN G that R1 had vaginal bleeding. LN G instructed the CNA to apply topical cream but failed to assess the area. LN G did not document the bruising, the conversation with the AP or the change in condition of R1's vaginal area and failed to report bruising or vaginal bleeding to Administrative Staff A. At 06:00 AM, LN G told LN H and LN I that R1 had some vaginal bleeding and bruising. Neither LN H or LN I identified the injuries…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Actual harm · G2026-03-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to implement protective measures after injuries of unknown origin and signs of potential sexual abuse were identified to prevent further abuse. On 03/21/22 at around 10:30-11:00 PM Certified (CNA) M and CNA N identified significant bruising on R1's right leg and reported it to Licensed Nurse (LN) G. R1 was unable to state how she obtained the injuries. LN G spoke to the resident's representative, the alleged perpetrator (AP), who confirmed he did not know where the bruising came from but offered a rationale for the injury which LN G accepted without further investigation. Staff left R1 in the room with the AP. Around 04:20 AM on 03/22/26, CNA M reported to LN G that R1 had vaginal bleeding. LN G did not assess R1 but instructed the CNA to apply an antifungal to R1's peri area. After the care was completed, staff left R1 alone in the room with the AP, with the door closed. At 06:00 AM, LN G told LN H and LN I that R1 had some vaginal bleeding, but the nurses did not assess the situation at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-24 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the Long-Term Care Ombudsman in writing of Resident (R) 41's discharge to the community. Findings included: -The Entry Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R41's 05/19/2026, Medicare 5-day MDS revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status, (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. It further revealed an anticipated discharge date of three or fewer months. R41's Discharge MDS, dated 05/20/2026, documented the resident discharged to the community on 05/20/2026. A Social Service Progress Note, dated 05/15/2026 at 02:37 PM, revealed Social Service Staff X spoke with the resident regarding a projected discharge date of 05/26/2026. A Social Service Progress Note, dated 05/19/2026 at 2:24 PM, revealed R41 requested to discharge from the facility on 05/20/2026. The note revealed R41's physician wrote the discharge order. A Nursing Progress Note, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to provide appropriate activity of daily living (ADL) cares for three dependent Residents (R ) 3, R24, and R9, who had long, jagged, dirty nails. Findings included:1. R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R3 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She was dependent on staff for personal hygiene. R3's Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 04/16/2026, did not trigger. R3's Modification of the Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented the resident had a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required substantial to maximal staff assistance with personal hygiene. R3's Care Plan, revised 06/23/2026, instructed staff R3 was dependent for personal hygiene cares. R3's EMR under the Task tab, from…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R)3 and R9 remained free from unnecessary medications related to blood pressure medication. Findings included: - R3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR), included the following diagnoses: dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) and hypertension (elevated blood pressure). R3's Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. R3's Care Plan, revised 06/23/2026, instructed staff to obtain blood pressure (BP) readings, as ordered. R3's EMR under the Orders tab included the following physician's orders: Clonidine (a HTN medication), 0.1 milligrams (mg), by mouth, as needed (PRN), every day, for a systolic blood pressure (SBP- the top number of a BP reading), greater than 160, one hour after medications, for a diagnosis of hypertension, ordered 01/14/2026. Obtain BP one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to utilize Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP-infection control interventions designed to reduce transmission of resistant organisms which require targeted gown and glove use during high contact care) when providing direct care for Resident (R) 13 and 7 who had wounds and R1 for catheter care. Findings Included: - On 06/22/2026 at 11:27 AM, R1 rested in bed with the urinary catheter collection bag directly on the floor. The collection bag contained approximately 400 milliliters (mLs) of dark brown, tea colored urine. The door into R1's room had signage that read, This room is under Enhanced Barrier Precautions. The signage educated staff further on what to wear for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when in contact with wounds, urinary catheters, and infections, which included gown and gloves. On 06/22/2026 at 11:30 AM, Certified Medication Aide (CMA) L confirmed the catheter collection bag was directly on the floor and should be positioned off the floor. CMA L revealed the catheter bag would be sanitized after…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents with 15 residents sampled, including 6 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary ADL cares for four sampled resident, Resident (R)16 was not shaven, R6 had dirty clothes, R29 did not get showered, and R17 received no feeding assistance. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk for impaired quality of life, weight loss and poor hygiene. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS) for R16, documented the resident had a diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and chorea (movement disorder). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R16, dated 01/20/25, documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of nine indicating moderate cognitive impairment. He required substantial to maximum assistance for bathing. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 39 residents. The sample included 15 residents with one sampled for dialysis (a procedure where impurities or wastes were removed from the blood). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to address necessary dialysis assessments, care, and services on Resident (R) 143's baseline care plan. This deficient practice had the risk of adverse outcomes and dialysis complications for R143 due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings: - R143's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease (ESRD-a terminal disease of the kidneys) and dependence on dialysis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), was in progress. R143's Baseline Care Plan, dated 04/04/25, was reviewed on 04/14/25 at 03:48 PM. It documented R143 was a full code (desired resuscitative measures) and on skilled services with therapy. R143'sBaseline Care Plan lacked documentation that R143 received dialysis or any direction for dialysis care and services. R143's EMR under the Orders tab lacked evidence of orders related to dialysis…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents, with 15 residents included in the sample. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive care plan for one of the residents sampled, Resident (R)16, to include staff instruction for the use of foot pedals while propelling the resident in his wheelchair. Findings included: - Review of R16's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: chorea (movement disorder) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He had no impairment in functional range of motion (ROM) and was independent with his wheelchair for locomotion. The Functional Ability Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/20/25, documented the resident would not have a further activity of daily living (ADL)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility identified a census of 39 residents, with 15 residents sampled, including two residents reviewed for quality of care. Based on record review, interview, and observation, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 5 had adequate care when the facility did not monitor R5's weights and notify the provider of weight fluctuations as ordered. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for health complications. Findings included: - Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R5 had a pertinent diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF-a condition with low heart output and the body becomes congested with fluid). The 11/03/24 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 13, indicating intact cognition. R5's Care Plan dated 11/06/24, documented that R5 required a daily weight. The plan directed staff to notify heart failure of weight gain of three pounds overnight or five pounds in three days, increased shortness of breath, or increased swelling. R5's EMR from 02/01/25 through 04/14/25, revealed R5 gained weight on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 39 residents with 15 residents sampled including four residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe environment free from accident hazards for Resident (R)16 when staff failed to have foot pedals in place when staff propelled the resident in the chair. This placed R16 at risk for avoidable accidents. Findings included: - Review of R16's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: chorea (movement disorder) and Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He had no impairment in functional range of motion (ROM) and was independent with his wheelchair for locomotion. The Functional Ability Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/20/25, documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 39 residents with 15 sampled. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status by failing to properly follow the plan of care for Resident (R) 17. Also, the facility failed to properly assess nutritional status for R143. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the residents physical well-being and nutritional status. Findings: - R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the following diagnoses: cerebrovascular accident (CVA-stroke- sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), and loss of cognition. The 04/22/24 Annual Minimum Data…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$21,645 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $21,645 — penalty dated 2026-03-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $321K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS