No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Eureka Nursing Center

1020 N School Street, Eureka, KS 67045 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (620) 583-7418 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0610) — most recent Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$23,865 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0610) — most recent Nov 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,865 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-05)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
118 S Wabash St · (620) 374-2650 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1602 N Elm St Ste A · (620) 583-5488 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
324 N Main St · (620) 583-6118 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Eureka City Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
120 E 11th St · (316) 518-0218

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased25.3%17.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.2%1.6%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.9%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.9%6.5%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.6%4.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened26.9%16.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.6%23.2%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%4.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.0%22.6%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.5%18.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.9%1.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.5%22.4%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.361.801.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.542.131.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.1%CMS range 32.2–60.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.8%CMS range 6.5–17.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.2%CMS range 3.2–11.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.321.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.72
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.94
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
50.9%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 47.7 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.94 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.72 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.45 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-15)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-11)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents with five residents sampled and two residents reviewed for abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff identified and responded appropriately to all allegations of abuse, to include resident-to-resident sexual abuse, when independently mobile Resident (R) 2 (who had a history of hypersexual behaviors directed toward staff to include groping, sexual inuendo/comments, and attempting to pull staff into bed with him) grabbed R1's breast on 09/30/24, without her consent. This failure placed R1 in immediate jeopardy due to the lack of facility response and reasonable person concept regarding sexual assault, and the negative impact to R1's psychosocial well-being and feelings regarding her safety. The facility also failed to thoroughly investigate two employee-to-resident abuse allegations which involved R10 when several bruises were documented on 10/03/24 and the facility did not investigate as potential abuse and/or report to the state agency or local police of the multiple bruises of unknown…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-11-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 43 residents with five residents sampled and one resident reviewed for sexual abuse. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff protected residents from sexual abuse, when independently mobile Resident (R) 2 (who had a history of hypersexual behaviors directed toward staff to include groping, sexual inuendo/comments, and attempting to pull staff into bed with him) grabbed R1's breast on 09/30/24, without her consent. This failure placed R1 and other female residents in immediate jeopardy due to the facility did not place interventions to protect R1 and other female residents who resided in the facility, from R2's unwanted sexual abuse/assault. This failure placed the residents at risk for abuse and continued negative impact on their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings Included: - Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), documented R2 had a diagnosis of vascular dementia (a chronic condition that occurs when the brain's blood supply is interrupted, damaging brain tissue and causing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents, with 13 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety for one of the six residents, during transfer of Resident (R) 30. On 04/11/24, staff used the facility shower chair to transport R30 and in doing so the wheel on the chair broke, the resident to fell forward to the floor, and sustained a fractured tibia (one of two long bones in the lower leg). In addition, on 06/04/24 the facility staff did not ensure a safe transfer for R30 into his electric wheelchair (which had exposed metal) while using the mechanical lift, which resulted in a laceration on his anterior (front) lower leg, that required sutures. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)30's medical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food under sanitary conditions, to the residents of the facility appropriately, to prevent the potential for foodborne bacteria. Findings included:- During an initial tour of the resident kitchenette, on 04/13/26 at 08:07 AM, the following areas of concern were noted in the one facility kitchen:1. The bottom shelf of the worktable holding the food processor had a build-up of food debris and dried-on fluids.2. A cart holding clean serving plates contained food debris.3. A stainless steel shelf holding clean serving pots had a build-up of food debris.4. A plastic trash can next to the steam table had dried-on food and fluids on the lid and sides.5. A large, white plastic container used to store thickener had a clear, sticky substance on top.6. Two reach-in freezers in the dry storage room had food debris scattered on the bottom. Review of the Weekly Cleaning schedule revealed the dietary staff was to clean the bottom of prep tables weekly on Mondays. Review of the Weekly Cleaning schedule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to promote dignity for one resident, Resident (R)42, who was using her fingers to get thickened juice out of her cup because staff failed to identify and assist or offer a spoon. Findings included:- On 04/14/26 at 09:20 AM, during a meal observation, R42 sat at a table attempting to drink her thickened juice. She put the glass to her lips and tried to drink it, but it was too thick. After trying to drink it several times without success, R42 dipped her right index finger into the juice to scoop it out to eat it. Dietary Staff CC walked over to her table, turned to the surveyor and said, She likes to make a mess, then proceeded to wipe the table. The surveyor questioned if the resident might do better with a spoon and Dietary Staff CC stated, Ya, I guess I can get her a spoon. Dietary Staff CC provided R42 a spoon, and the resident was able to spoon her thickened juice and eat it.On 04/15/26 at 12:25 PM, Administrative Nurse D stated R42 should have been assisted and given a spoon so she would not have to use her finger.The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide the resident (or their representative) a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) and Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for skilled services when Resident (R) 54's skilled services ended. Findings included:- On 04/14/26 at 09:12 AM, ABN and NOMNC notices were requested for R54, R7, and R19. The facility was unable to provide R54's NOMNC related to the end of the skilled services. R54's start of skilled stay began on 01/04/26 and ended on 02/16/26. On 04/14/26 at 11:55 AM, Administrative Staff A confirmed she had not located the NOMNC for the end or R54's end of skilled services provided by the facility. The facility's undated Advanced Beneficiary Notices policy documented that a NOMNC, Form CMS-10123, shall be issued to the resident/representative when Medicare-covered service(s) are ending, no matter if the resident is leaving the facility or remaining in the facility. This informs the resident on how to request an appeal or expedited determination from their Quality Improvement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for Residents (R)4 and R3, while staff performed cares in their rooms. Findings included:1. R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). R5's re-admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He was dependent on staff for bed mobility. R5's Activity of Daily Living (ADL) Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/28/26, documented the resident required staff assistance for completion of ADLs due to generalized weakness. R5's Care Plan, dated 01/09/26, instructed staff that he required assistance of one to two staff for bed mobility. R5's EMR from 03/16/26 through 04/12/26 under the TASK tab, revealed he was dependent on staff for bed mobility. On 04/13/26 at 12:57 PM, Certified Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 6 and R46 were free from antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality) medication without an appropriate indication of use. Findings Included:- R6's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of insomnia, amnesia (inability to sleep), hostility, anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, chronic kidney disease, chronic anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues) secondary to blood loss, and low back pain. R6's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R6 had intact cognition and no delirium (sudden severe confusion, disorientation, and restlessness), psychosis (any major mental disorder characterized by a gross impairment in reality perception), or behaviors. The MDS documented that R6 received an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and interview, the facility failed to provide a baseline care plan for Resident (R) 49. Findings included:- R49's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of thyrotoxicosis (excessive amount of thyroid hormone in the body), chronic kidney disease, anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), heart failure, and displaced supracondylar fracture with intercondylar extension of the lower end of the right femur (a complex high-energy break of thigh bone just above the knee). The Entry Tracking Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R49 had entered (admitted ) to the facility. R49's MDS, dated [DATE], documented a modification of discharge, return anticipated/end of a Medicare Part A stay. R49's EMR lacked evidence of a baseline care plan. On 04/14/25 at 11:41 AM, upon request for R49's baseline care plan, Administrative Staff A reported the facility lacked a baseline care plan and said she expected the staff to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop an individualized person-centered care plan for Resident 49's stay, which began on 12/17/25 and ended on 01/15/26. Findings included:- R49's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of thyrotoxicosis (excessive amount of thyroid hormone in the body), chronic kidney disease, anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), heart failure, and displaced supracondylar fracture with intercondylar extension of the lower end of the right femur (a complex high-energy break of thigh bone just above the knee). The Minimum Data Set MDS, dated [DATE], documented that R49 had entered (admitted ) to the facility. R49's admission MDS, dated 12/24/25, documented R49 had intact cognition, required partial/moderate assistance with personal hygiene and upper body dressing, substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility and transfers, and was dependent on toileting hygiene, lower body dressing, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate activity of daily living (ADL) cares to Resident (R)5 regarding showering. Findings included:- R5's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (degenerative changes to one or many joints characterized by swelling and pain). R5's re-admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. He was dependent on staff for showering. R5's Activity of Daily Living Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/28/26, documented the resident required staff assistance for completion of ADLs due to generalized weakness. R5's Care Plan, dated 01/09/26, instructed staff he required assistance of two staff for showering. R5's EMR from 03/16/26 through 04/12/26 (27 days) revealed staff showered the resident four times. The EMR lacked any further documentation of showering or rejection of care. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to evaluate the effectiveness of fall interventions for Resident (R)8, who had multiple falls, and revise with person-centered fall interventions to prevent further falls. Findings included:- The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R8 documented diagnoses of dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion), hypertension (high blood pressure), and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin is made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin) type 2 with neuropathy (weakness, numbness, and pain from nerve damage, usually in the hands and feet). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R8 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of four, indicating severely impaired cognition. R8 required substantial staff assistance for toileting, personal hygiene, showers, and lower-body dressing. The MDS further documented R8 required supervision with mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately monitor R35's amlodipine (antihypertensive (high blood pressure medication). The facility failed to ensure R16 was free from unnecessary medication. Findings included:- R16's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented diagnoses of hypertensive (elevated blood pressure) heart disease with heart failure, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), anemia (an inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues), anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty, and irrational fear) disorder, and dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). R16's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented that R16 had moderately impaired cognition and had wandering behavior one to three days of the look-back period. R16 was independent with functional abilities and mobility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least eight continuous hours on 08/21/23, 08/22/23, 08/23/23, 08/30/23, 09/01/23, 09/04/23, 09/06/23, 09/08/23, 09/18/23, 09/20/23, 10/01/23, 10/04/23, 10/28/23, 12/01/23, 12/04/23, 12/13/23, 12/20/23, 12/23/23, 12/24/23, 12/24/23, 12/25/23, 12/26/23, 01/01/24, 01/03/24, 01/06/24, 01/07/24, 01/08/24, 01/10/24 and 01/12/24, a total of 29 days, as required. The facility may permit the DON to serve as a charge nurse only when the facility had an average daily occupancy of 60 or fewer residents. This placed the residents in the facility at risk for unsupervised nursing care and services. Findings included: - Review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) for 04/01/23 through 03/31/24, revealed the facility did not have the required eight consecutive hours of RN coverage, as required, on 08/21/23, 08/22/23, 08/23/23, 08/30/23, 09/01/23, 09/04/23, 09/06/23, 09/08/23, 09/18/23, 09/20/23, 10/01/23, 10/04/23, 10/28/23, 12/01/23,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner to prevent possible food-borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - Observation, on 07/09/24 at 08:55 AM, revealed the following areas of concern in the dry goods pantry: One sealed 10 -pound (lbs.) bag of macaroni that lacked an opened date. Observation, on 07/09/24 at 09:00 AM, revealed half of meat sandwich in a zip lock bag without a date on the bag. A sealed zip locked bag with four, half emptied squeeze bags of icing that measured approximately a half of cup, dated 02/02/24. The icing squeeze containers had no expiration dates noted. Interview, on 07/09/24 at 09:00 AM, with Dietary Staff BB confirmed the areas of concern. Observation, on 07/10/24 at 11:10 AM, revealed an open garbage can that was full with garbage in the kitchen near the food preparation station. Interview, on 07/10/24 at 11:40 AM, with Dietary Staff B confirmed that garbage can should be closed at all times.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-11 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to electronically submit to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) with complete and accurate direct staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS (i.e. Payroll Base Journal (PBJ), related to licensed nursing staffing information, when the facility failed to accurately report 24 hour per day Licensed Nurse coverage on 16 dates between April 1, 2023 and March 31, 2024. Findings included: - Review of the Payroll Base Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report for fiscal year (FY), Quarter 3 2023 (April 1-June 30) revealed a lack of License Nurse (LN) for 24 hours/seven days a week 24 hour/day on the following dates: On 04/01/23, Saturday (SA), On 04/02/23, Sunday (SU), On 04/09/23, SU, On 04/15/23, SA, On 04/16/23, SU, On 04/23/23, SU, On 04/29/23, SA, On 04/30/23, SU On 05/07/23, SU, On 05/13/23, SA, On 05/14/23, SU, On 05/21/23, SU, On 05/27/23, SA, On 05/28/23, SU,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean home-like and sanitary environment for the 11 residents who resided in the special care unit. Additionally, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment for two residents who had cracked fall mats with uncleanable surfaces in their rooms. Findings included: - On 07/11/24 at 01:25 PM, an environmental tour with Maintenance Director U revealed: On the special care unit, an odor of urine existed throughout the special care unit and extended approximately 10-12 feet beyond the locked doors to the main hallway. On 07/11/24 at 01:30 PM, Maintenance Director U reported the odor of urine in and around the special care unit was due to a resident who would urinate in random places and nursing staff have performed multiple interventions to combat the smell of urine. On 05/21/24 at 09:50 AM, Administrative Nurse E revealed multiple interventions had been attempted to mitigate the smell of urine historically back to September of 2022 with varying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R2 had the following diagnoses that included anemia (inadequate number of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to body tissues) and diabetes mellitus (DM-when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made, or the body cannot respond to the insulin). The 12/26/23 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. R2 was independent with eating and wheelchair mobility. R2 required moderate assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), with bed mobility, toileting hygiene, and dressing. R2 was frequently incontinent of bladder. The assessment documented R2 received an anticoagulant medication (a class of medication that prevents or reduces the ability for blood to form clots) and did not receive an antiplatelet medication (a class of medication that prevents or reduces the ability of platelets [a type of blood cell] to stick together). The 12/06/23 Care Area Assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 48 residents, which included 13 residents sampled and reviewed for care plan development. Based on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one resident. Resident (R) 47 comprehensive person-centered care plan was not completed in a timely manner of 21 days from admission, as required. This deficient practice had the potential to lead to uncommunicated needs, which could lead to negative impacts on the resident's physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: - R 47's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents, with 13 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one Resident (R)30's controlled ankle movement (CAM) boot. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)30's medical record revealed diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and difficulty or discomfort in breathing), diabetes (when the body cannot use glucose, not enough insulin made or the body cannot respond to the insulin), polyneuropathy (malfunction of nerves in multiple areas of the body), and right above the knee amputation (surgical removal). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], assessed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated normal cognitive function. The resident had impairment on one side of his lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census of 48 residents, with 13 residents in the sample selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to apply sheepskin padding to Resident (R) 34's arm rests of her wheelchair. This deficient practice had the potential to place R34 at an increased risk for additional skin injuries. Findings included: - The Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented R34 had the following diagnoses that include arthritis (inflammation of a joint characterized by pain, swelling, redness and limitation of movement) and anxiety (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The 08/02/23 Annual MDS documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five, indicating severely impaired cognition. R34 required extensive assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs), with bed mobility, toileting hygiene, and dressing. R34 was frequently incontinent of bladder and had no skin issues. The 08/02/23 Functional ADL Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented R34 required assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 48 residents, with 13 residents in the sample, and one resident reviewed for trauma. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement approaches to care that were both clinically appropriate and person centered for R47, who had a history of personal trauma. Findings included: - R 47's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), anxiety, and dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, indicating moderately impaired cognition. The resident had a total mood severity score of 00, indicating no depression and no behaviors noted. R47 was independent with activities of daily living (ADLs). R47 required supervision with verbal cues when ambulating independently in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    The facility reported a census 48 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment when staff stored an unlined trash can in the soiled utility room of the 400-hall. Findings included: - On 07/11/24 at 01:25 PM, Maintenance Director U identified three soiled utility rooms in the facility during an environmental tour: On the 400-hall, a trash can in the soiled utility room lacked a liner and a lid. On 07/11/24 at 01:30 PM, Maintenance Director U revealed that all trash containers should have liners and lids. The trash and soiled linen containers were to be washed out at the end of every shift. The facility failed to provide a policy related to lids or the covering on trash cans. The facility failed to provide a sanitary environment when staff stored an unlined trash can in the soiled utility room of the 400-hall.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-11-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents with six residents sampled for accidents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to identify risks and implement safety interventions to prevent elopement (when a cognitively imapired resident exits the facility without staff knowledge ro supervision) for Resident (R)12. The facility failed to ensure staff stored bleach wipes in a safe manner. These deficient practices placed R12 at risk for elopement and 10 cognitively impaired, independently mobile residents at risk for chemical exposure and related accidents. Findings included: - R12's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (abnormal emotional state characterized by exaggerated feelings of sadness, worthlessness and emptiness), and schizophrenia (psychotic disorder characterized by gross…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents with one resident sampled for advance directives. Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide the resident or resident's responsible party with a lawfully recognized Out of Hospital Do Not Resuscitate (DNR-an order to withhold resuscitative measures) advance directive form for Resident (R) 13, which placed her at risk for her choice for a DNR not being honored. Findings Included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R13 identified diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and dementia with mood disturbance ((progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion and behaviors including agitation, verbal and physical aggression, wandering and hoarding). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R13 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five which indicated a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for care plan revisions. Based of observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to revise care plan interventions to include Resident (R)1's wheelchair seatbelt and R12's elopement attempt. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for ineffective treatment and safety hazards. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R1's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often before birth), muscle spasms, need for assistance with personal cares, abnormal posture, muscle weakness, and epilepsy (brain disorder characterized by repeated seizures). A review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated 10/18/22 noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition. The MDS indicated that R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents with two reviewed for bowel and bladder management. Based of observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide sanitary Foley catheter care (tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine into a collection bag) for Resident (R)18 and failed to implement an individualized bowel and bladder toileting program for R20. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related urinary tract infections and incontinence. Findings Included: - The Medical Diagnosis section within R18's Electronic Medical Records (EMR) included diagnoses of urinary tract infection (UTI), chronic kidney disease, hemiplegia affecting right dominant side (paralysis of one side of the body), cerebral infarction (sudden death of brain cells due to lack of oxygen caused by impaired blood flow to the brain by blockage or rupture of an artery to the brain ), osteoarthritis of hip (degenerative changes to one or many…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to store oxygen tubing and nasal cannula (device used to deliver supplemental oxygen or increased airflow to a patient or person in need of respiratory help) and nebulizer (device which changes liquid medication into a mist easily inhaled into the lungs) equipment in a sanitary manner for Resident (R) 100. This deficient practice placed R100 at increased risk to develop a respiratory infection. Findings included: - R100's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of acute and chronic respiratory failure (condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide and the lungs are unable to carry the blood to the organs) with hypoxia (inadequate supply of oxygen), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive and irreversible condition characterized by diminished lung capacity and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Five sampled residents were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) identified and reported an inappropriate diagnosis for the antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) for Resident (R) 25 and R13. This failure had to potential of unnecessary antipsychotic medication use and related side effects for R25 and R13. Finding included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R25 identified diagnoses of: dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents which five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed ensure staff monitored physician-ordered parameters for Resident (R) 14's hypertensive medication (class of medication used to treat high blood pressure). This deficient practice had the potential of unnecessary medication administration thus leading to possible harmful side effects. Findings included: - R14's electronic medical record (EMR) from the Diagnoses tab documented diagnoses of dementia with psychotic disturbances (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), major depressive disorder (major mood disorder), hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and anxiety disorder (mental or emotional reaction characterized by apprehension, uncertainty and irrational fear). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility identified a census of 47 residents. The sample included 13 residents. Five sampled residents were reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate diagnosis for an antipsychotic (a class of medications used to treat psychosis and other mental emotional conditions) for Resident (R)25 and R13. This failure had to potential of unnecessary antipsychotic medication use and related side effects for R25,and R13. Finding included: - The electronic medical record (EMR) for R25 identified diagnoses of: dementia without behavioral disturbance (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), and major depressive disorder (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R25 documented she had both short and long-term…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 resident and one kitchen. Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain sanitary dietary standards related to equipment cleaning during food preparation. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk related to food borne illnesses and cross-contamination concerns. Findings Included: - On 11/17/22 at 11:10AM, Dietary Staff CC prepared puree meals for the lunch service. Staff CC followed the dietary menu for making pureed portions of pork, potatoes, and carrots. Dietary Staff CC rinsed the bowl with plain water in between preparing each type of dish. Dietary Staff CC stated the bowl should be properly cleaned/sanitized between food types. On 11/17/22 at 11:30AM an interview with Dietary Staff BB, she stated that dietary staff were expected to complete hand hygiene in between meal services and maintain sanitary food service standards to include keeping the prep stations clean and washing out kitchen items between uses. A review of the facility's Food Safety Requirements revised 10/2022 stated that all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    The facility identified a census of 47 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control standard of practice when staff failed to ensure Resident (R)18's catheter (the insertion of a hollow tube into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection) bag remained off the floor. The facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene (a term used for cleaning your hands by handwashing with soap and water or the use of an alcohol-based hand rub ABHR) while providing catheter care to R18. This placed the resident at risk for increased infection and transmission of communicable disease. Findings included: - On 11/16/22 at 09:55AM R18 rested in his bed. R18's catheter's urine collection bag was on the floor next to his bed with no barrier or dignity bag. R18's urine collection bag was one-third full of dark brown urine. R18's resident representative sat next to his bed and stated that staff usually come in to empty the bag each morning. She stated that she has found to bag on the floor multiple time due to the bags hook…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-15 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to display accurate posted nursing staff hours accessible to residents and visitors. Findings included:- During the survey period of 04/13/26 and 04/14/26, observation revealed the facility did not have posted census and direct care nursing staff hours. On 04/14/26 at 01:47 PM, Administrative Nurse D reported that the nursing hour posting had been posted at the entry of the nursing facility. Administrative Nurse D reported that the administrator had been posting the information, and due to the absence of the administrator, the information had not been posted. Administrative Nurse D stated she had the instructions to provide the information in the usual place upon entry into the facility. The undated facility Nurse Staffing Posting Information policy documented the policy of this facility to make nurse staffing information readily available in a readable format to residents, staff, and visitors at any given time.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,865 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $7,485 — penalty dated 2024-11-05
  • $8,190 — penalty dated 2024-07-11
  • $8,190 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 2 of 53.6-1.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 53.5-1.5 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 53.6-0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 53.0-1.0 vs chain
The other 22 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.6★, per CMS)

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
R H MONTGOMERY PROPERTIES, INCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 06/01/2008
MONTGOMERY, ANNAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2013
MONTGOMERY, RICHARDIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST50%since 01/01/2013
SCHADE, KYLEIndividualCONTRACTED MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 03/01/2021
HATLESTAD, STEVENIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/11/2014
SIGNHATEH, JOLENEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2021
REIKER, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2008
AMERICARE SYSTEMS, INC.OrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 06/01/2008
CROSSON, CLAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/07/2008

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+13.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$270K
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 8%Other / private 27%

This home reported $270K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$213per resident / day
operating cost
$6,469per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$246per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Kansas Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Kansas
$8,669/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,064/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,975/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 175287. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-15, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next