Montgomery Place Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 39.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.58 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.04 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.25 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0801 — pattern
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to employ a full-time Certified Dietary Manager for 38 residents who reside in the facility and received their meals from the kitchen. This placed the residents at risk of not receiving adequate nutrition. Findings included: - On 02/04/25 at 08:18 AM, observation revealed the kitchen staff finishing the morning meal and preparing the midday meal. Dietary Staff BB stated she was the dietary manager. Dietary Staff BB reported she was presently enrolled in a Certified Dietary Manager course but had not completed the course. The facility's undated Dietary Services policy states the facility will employ a qualified dietitian or other qualified nutritional professional on a full-time or consultant basis. A qualified dietitian or nutritionist who has completed at least 900 hours of supervised dietetics accredited by an appropriate national accreditation organization recognized for this purpose. The facility failed to employ a full-time…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to prepare and store food in a sanitary manner for 38 residents who received their meals from the kitchen. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings included: - On 02/04/25 at 08:18 AM, during the initial tour of the kitchen, the double-door stainless steel refrigerator had sliced ham stored on a middle shelf with directly above gallons of milk and a large bowl of yellow pudding and unpasteurized eggs also stored on the middle shelf. The fluorescent plastic light cover above the food prep area was cracked through. The white window air conditioner above the small white freezer had a gray/blackish lint-type material on the air outlet levers. Directly in front of the window air conditioner, seated on the small white freezer was a fan that had grey/brown lint type of material on the front guard in which the airflow direction at a food prep area. On 02/05/25 at 01:51 PM, Dietary Staff BB verified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for dementia care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to revise one resident, Resident (R) 35's plan of care with individualized person-centered interventions for dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion). The facility further failed to monitor and document R35's behaviors as directed in his plan of care. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life due to uncommunicated care needs. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R35 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R35 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), dementia, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with two reviewed for dementia care. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory and confusion) treatment plan that utilized non-pharmacological approaches to care for one resident, Resident (R) 35. This placed the resident at risk for abuse and decreased quality of life. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R35 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R35 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), dementia, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling other fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the Consultant Pharmacist (CP) failed to identify and report out-of-parameter blood pressures for one resident, Resident (R) 35. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and medication related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) R35 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling other fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R35 had intact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents, the sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to hold blood pressure medications per the physician ordered parameters for one resident, Resident (R) 35. This placed the resident at risk for physical decline and other related complications. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) R35 had diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (rapid, irregular heartbeat), Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest), and Parkinson's disease (a slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremors, rolling other fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity, and weakness). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R35 had intact cognition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility had a census of 38 residents. The sample included 12 residents, with five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure an appropriate indication, or a documented physician rationale which included the unsuccessful attempts for non-pharmacological symptom management and risk versus benefit for the continued use for Resident (R) 35's antipsychotic (a class of medication used to treat major mental conditions that cause a break from reality). This placed R35 at risk for unintended side effects relate to psychotropic (alters mood or thought) drug medication. Findings included: - The Electronic Medical Record (EMR) documented R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R35 had diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), dementia (a progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), depression (a mood disorder that causes a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 28 residents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, and serve food under sanitary conditions to prevent the spread of food borne illnesses to the residents of the facility. Findings included: - An environmental tour of the kitchen, on 03/06/23 at 08:13 AM, noted the following items/areas of concern: 1. Dietary staff CC and DD were preparing and serving breakfast without hairnets on. 2. A resident refrigerator, located inside the kitchen, had a container of potato salad, a container of cole slaw, three containers of cottage cheese and a plate containing a resident's meal, all covered but were unlabeled and lacked a date. 3. A sink in the kitchen held a tub with four bags of ham, which were being defrosted in hot water, and with hot water running over the frozen meat. 4. Dietary staff CC was cooking and serving over medium eggs with eggs which were not pasteurized (a process of partial sterilization). On 03/06/23 at 08:13 AM, Dietary staff CC stated she did not have access to pasteurized eggs, so she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 28 with 14 selected for review. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections for two sampled residents including; Resident (R)21's urinary catheter (insertion of a catheter into the bladder to drain the urine into a collection bag) with failure to keep the collection device off of the floor, to decrease the risk of developing a urinary tract infection; and R3 with the failure to ensure staff were managing a nebulizer medication delivery kit in a sanitary manner to decrease the risk of developing a respiratory infection. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R21 included a diagnosis of neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R21 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of two, indicating severe cognitive impairment, required extensive assistance of two staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-03-08 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
  Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 28 residents with 14 selected for review including two residents reviewed for use of side rails, Resident (R)10 and R4. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform routine inspections of the bed rails to ensure they met safety standards and were not a risk for resident entrapment. The facility reported 17 residents had a rail or other assistive device on the bed. Findings included: - The Medical Diagnosis tab for R10 included diagnoses of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscular weakness of one half of the body), Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness), convulsions (involuntary series of contractions of a group of muscles), cerebral palsy (progressive disorder of movement, muscle tone or posture caused by injury or abnormal development in the immature brain, most often…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 79% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $306K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS