Pleasant Valley Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 35.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.38 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.92 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to prepare and serve food to the residents, under sanitary conditions, to prevent the potential for food borne bacteria. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchenette area between the dining room and kitchen on 01/29/25 at 10:47 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The pop machine had standing liquid in the spill tray. 2. A trash can was over-flowing with trash and had dried-on liquid and food debris on the top and sides of the trash can. 3. The bags of syrup for the pop machine were kept in a cabinet underneath the pop machine. The bags had spilled syrup which had dried on several areas of the shelfs on which they rested. 4. The cabinet and drawer doors had multiple areas of dried-on food and fluids. During an initial tour of the dining room on 01/29/25 at 10:47 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The inside of microwave had a heavy build-up of dried on food on the top and all sides of the microwave oven. 2. The juice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  The resident reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for all residents and staff. Findings included: - During the initial tour of the kitchen areas on 01/29/25 at 10:27 AM, the following area of concern was noted: The floor throughout the kitchen had a heavy build-up of a blackish substance at the end of all table legs and legs of the kitchen equipment. The floor in the kitchenette area had a dried-on red liquid. The floor of the dry storage room had a sticky substance throughout. On 01/30/25 at 01:30 PM, Administrative Staff A stated it was the expectation for the floors to be kept mopped and cleaned at least daily. The facility policy for Dietary Cleaning Procedures, undated, included: The dietary staff will keep the kitchen floor clean and free of debris. The facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for all residents and staff.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-04 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents. Based on observation, interviewed and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program to ensure the facility remained free of pests, specifically cockroaches, and affected all residents in the facility. Findings included: - During an initial tour of the kitchenette area between the dining room and kitchen on 01/29/25 at 10:47 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The pop machine had standing liquid in the spill tray. 2. A trash can was over-flowing with trash and had dried-on liquid and food debris on the top and sides of the trash can. 3. The bags of syrup for the pop machine were kept in a cabinet underneath the pop machine. The bags had spilled syrup which had dried on several areas of the shelfs on which they rested. 4. The cabinet and drawer doors had multiple areas of dried-on food and fluids. During an initial tour of the kitchen on 01/29/25 at 10:47 AM, the following areas of concern were noted: 1. The two-door reach-in refrigerator had dried-on food on the front of the doors, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  The facility reported a census of 40 residents Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to the failure of staff to sanitize the glucometer between use and the failure to perform proper hand hygiene. This deficient practice had the potential to spread possible infections to the residents in the facility. Findings included: - During an observation on 01/30/25 at 10:30 AM Certified Medication Aide (CMA) S gathered supplies to complete a glucose check. CMA S went to the therapy room to find R1 and completed a glucose check. CMA S then removed her gloves without preforming hand hygiene, she opened a door and walked to the nurses' station and threw away her gloves and retrieved other gloves, without performing hand hygiene. CMA S also did not sanitize the glucometer (instrument used to calculate blood glucose). CMA S walked through another hallway to R37's room, knocked on the door, performed hand hygiene, applied gloves, and checked R37's blood sugar. She removed her gloves and walked to the nurses'…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents with 12 residents sampled, including three residents reviewed for dignity. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to show respect and dignity to one Resident (R)13, regarding staff dressing her in tops which were to large for her and hung on her, exposing her bare skin. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)13's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of dementia (progressive mental disorder characterized by failing memory, confusion). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required substantial/maximal staff assistance with upper body dressing. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 07/21/24, did not trigger. The Quarterly MDS, dated 10/18/24, documented the resident had a BIMS score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents with 12 residents sampled, including 2 residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R)8, regarding staff not dressing the resident in clean clothing and R 13, regarding not assisting the resident at meal times, as care planned. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)8's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interviewf or Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required substantial/maximal staff assistance for dressing her upper portion. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment, (CAA), dated 01/20/25, did not trigger. The Quarterly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 40 residents with 12 residents selected for review, including three residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safely transfer Resident (R)8. Findings included: - Review of Resident (R)8's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four, indicating severe cognitive impairment. She had functional limitation in range of motion (ROM) on both sides of her lower extremity and required substantial to maximal staff assistance for chair-to-bed-to-chair transfers. The Functional Abilities Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/20/25, did not trigger. The Quarterly MDS, dated 10/23/24, documented the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 14 selected for review. The sample included four residents for skin conditions. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)4, one of the four sampled residents, received wound treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, with the failure to report a skin tear timely to the nurse for adequate treatment, for the nurse to timely assess the wound/skin tear, and failure to implement immediate intervention implementation to prevent further skin tears for this dependent resident with a history of skin tears. Findings included: - Review of the resident (R)4's, Physician Orders, dated 01/15/23, revealed diagnoses which included, displaced intertrochanteric fracture of right femur (leg bone broken at joint), Alzheimer's Disease (progressive mental deterioration characterized by confusion and memory failure), Parkinson's Disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 14 residents sampled, including six residents reviewed for accidents. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide safe transfers for Resident (R)10, one of the six sampled residents. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/23/23, documented Resident (R)10 had a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (slowly progressive neurologic disorder characterized by resting tremor, rolling of the fingers, masklike faces, shuffling gait, muscle rigidity and weakness). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of ten, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for transfers and had limited range of motion (ROM) in her upper and lower extremities. The Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Functional/Rehabilitation Potential Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/30/23, documented the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-02-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility reported a census of 38 residents with 14 residents sampled, including five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (R)10 was kept free from unnecessary medications regarding the failure to administer as needed (PRN) bowel medication for constipation. Findings included: - The Physician Order Sheet (POS), dated 01/23/23, documented Resident (R)10 had a diagnosis of constipation (difficulty passing stool). The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, indicating moderately impaired cognition. She required extensive assistance of two staff for toileting and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The Urinary Incontinence and Indwelling Catheter Care Area Assessment (CAA), dated 01/30/23, documented the resident was dependent on staff for toileting needs. The quarterly MDS, dated 10/21/22, documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AMERICARE SENIOR LIVING — 23 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $233K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in KS