Garden Place Healthcare
193-195 Pleasant Street, Attleboro, MA 02703 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 133 certified beds · (508) 222-4950 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (23% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,372 in federal fines (most recent 2024-11-06)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.5% | 16.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.1% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.8% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.0% | 15.5% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.7% | 3.4% | 3.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 12.3% | 15.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.7% | 19.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.5% | 94.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 28.9% | 21.2% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 21.9% | 21.4% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 48.8% | 77.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.2% | 11.9% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.88 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.66 | 1.50 | 1.80 | typical |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 102 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.4%CMS range 39.6–55.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.7%CMS range 7.6–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.2%CMS range 5.8–13.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.88 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 133 beds and averages 115.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 18 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.63 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-11-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care based on professional standards of practice for one Resident (#212), in a sample of three closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff fully assessed Resident #212 who was on a blood thinner, had expressed pain, and had a bruise to the left hip, resulting in a delay in treatment. The Resident was later identified to have a fracture to the left hip and was subsequently sent to the hospital where he/she received a blood transfusion. The Resident was determined to not be a candidate for surgery and was admitted to a hospice house. Findings include: Resident #212 was admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses of atrial fibrillation (A-fib: irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm which can lead to blood clots in the heart), lower extremity cellulitis (bacterial infection that affects the deeper layers of the skin and surrounding tissue), and dementia. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-08-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development or worsening of a pressure injury for one Resident (#4), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of a pressure wound, assess the Resident's risk and skin per their policy, and implement interventions recommended by the wound physician timely once the area had developed, resulting in a facility acquired unstageable full thickness deep tissue injury (DTI: localized area of persistent non-blanchable discoloration resulting from intense and/or prolonged pressure and shear forces at the bone/muscle) to the left lateral heel of Resident #4 that had worsened within a week of development. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcer/Injury Risk Assessment, dated as revised April 2018, indicated but was not limited to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and individualize a comprehensive care plan for three Residents (#5, #73, #29), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #5, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented related to his/her use of antipsychotic medications;2. For Resident #73, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented related to his/her use of antipsychotic medications; and3. For Resident #29, to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented related to his/her smoking status and preferences. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, comprehensive Person-centered, dated last revised 1/2024, indicated but was not limited to the following: - A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. - The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed for each resident. - The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards for four Residents (#23, #6, #2, #12), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #23, to implement physician's orders for air mattress settings;2. For Resident #6, to transcribe and implement Urology orders (a) for change in Foley catheter size, and (b) for frequency of Foley catheter changes;3. For Resident #2, to obtain a physician's order for treatment to the Resident's right thigh surgical wound; and4. For Resident #12, to follow physician's orders to notify the Resident's cardiologist for systolic blood pressure below 90 mmHg (millimeters of mercury) and/or heart rate below 60 bpm (beats per minute). Findings include:Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#2) who required hemodialysis (a life sustaining treatment that helps the body remove extra fluids and waste products from the blood when the kidneys are not able to), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:a. to ensure nursing staff did not obtain blood pressures from the Resident's arms, where his/her AV fistulas (arteriovenous fistula, where an artery and vein connect directly, allowing blood to flow) used for hemodialysis access were located; andb. to obtain and implement physician's orders for the care and maintenance of the Resident's hemodialysis catheter (a surgically placed catheter connected to a central vein that exits the skin and attaches to the tubing on the dialysis machine) upon his/her return from the hospital; andc. to administer the Resident's phosphorus binder (a medication used to reduce the absorption of dietary phosphate) with meals per the Resident's physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that all drug records were in order and an accurate account of all controlled substances (drugs or chemicals that the government regulates for its manufacture, possession, and use, that are classified into schedules based on their potential for abuse) was maintained for one Resident (#15), from a total sample of 24 residents.Findings include:Resident #15 was admitted to the facility in July 2020 and had diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, low back pain, and anxiety.Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 11/3/25, indicated Resident #15 had severe cognitive impairment as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 and received Hospice services.Review of the medical record indicated Physician's Orders including but not limited to:-Lorazepam concentrate (schedule-IV controlled substance (low potential for abuse and a low risk of dependence) 2 milligrams per milliliter (mg/ML), give 0.5 mg (0.25 mL) sublingually two times a day (11/7/25)-Lorazepam…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents received food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor and appearance as well as being palatable, attractive and at safe, appetizing temperatures for two of two test trays. Findings include:During initial screening on 12/5/25, surveyors obtained the following food concerns on the B-Wing and C-Wing units:- Food is not good and often not palatable to eat.- Food is repetitive and often cold.- The French toast is cold and soggy.- Vegetables are often cold, mushy and overcooked.- Food is cold at all mealtimes.- The temperature of the food is not good.- Toast is always soggy. On 12/9/25 at 11:30 A.M., the surveyor requested a test tray to the C-Wing unit and made the following observations:- At 11:47 A.M., the food truck containing the test tray leaves the kitchen for the C-Wing unit.- At 11:50 A.M., the food truck arrives on the C-Wing unit and staff begin passing trays.- At 11:58 A.M., the last tray is delivered to a resident from the food truck. On 12/9/25 at 12:00 P.M., the surveyor and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to:1. Ensure food items were properly dated and stored in the main kitchen and equipment was maintained in a sanitary manner;2. Ensure the ice machine in the main kitchen was maintained in a clean, sanitary condition; and3. Handle ready-to-eat food (food which does not require cooking or further preparation prior to consumption) utilizing proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another). Findings include:Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following:- 3-301.11 Preventing Contamination from Hands. (A) FOOD EMPLOYEES shall wash their hands as specified under S 2-301.12. (B) Except when washing fruits and vegetables as specified under S3-302.15 or as specified in (D) and (E) of this section,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and document review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and potential transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #2, to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions; and2. For Resident #77, to perform hand hygiene during medication administration.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Guidelines for Nursing Procedures, revised 7/2024, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: -Enhance Barrier Precautions (EBP) are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) -EBP is indicated for nursing home residents with: *Infection or colonization with an MDRO when Contact Precautions don't otherwise apply *Chronic wounds *Indwelling medical devices -PPE: Use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that may provide opportunities for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#8 and #9), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations, were screened for eligibility to receive the recommended influenza and pneumococcal vaccinations, residents/residents' representatives were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccines, and were offered and administered (if applicable) the vaccines in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #8, to ensure influenza and pneumococcal vaccines were administered after the Resident had consented to receive the vaccines; and 2. For Resident #9, to ensure the Resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the Resident's Representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of influenza vaccination and either consented to receive or refused vaccine administration. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Influenza Vaccine, revised 11/2020, indicated, but was not limited to, the following:-All residents who have no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-10 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (#8 and #9), out of a total sample of five residents reviewed for immunizations, were screened for eligibility to receive the recommended COVID-19 vaccination, residents/residents' representatives were educated on the benefits and potential side effects of the vaccine, and were offered and administered (if applicable) the vaccine in a timely manner. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #8, to ensure COVID-19 vaccine was administered after the Resident had consented to receive the vaccine; and 2. For Resident #9, to ensure the Resident's medical record included documentation that indicated the Resident's Representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccination and either consented to receive or refused vaccine administration. Findings include:Findings include:1. Resident #8 was admitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses including heart failure.Review of Resident #8's Immunization Consent indicated that the Resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from accident hazards for Residents on the secure unit ([NAME]) and for two Residents (#105 and #79) in a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. To ensure hazardous items (bleach wipes, razors, medications) were not accessible to cognitively impaired residents on the secure unit; 2. For Resident #105, assessed at a high risk for elopement/wandering, to ensure the Resident was provided the indicated intervention of a wander guard; and 3. For Resident #79, to ensure that alcohol brought in by family was securely stored. Findings include: 1. During the entrance conference on 11/3/24 at 9:15 A.M., the Director of Nurses (DON) said the facility had a secure unit, the [NAME] (Alzheimer's Friendly Unit). On 11/4/24 at 11:11 A.M., the surveyor observed the bathroom/shower room on the unit with an unsecured cabinet with a container of bleach wipes. A child safety lock was observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure food items were properly dated and stored in the main kitchen and kitchenettes; 2. Ensure four of four ice machines were maintained in a clean and sanitary condition; and 3. Ensure one of three unit kitchenettes was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Findings include: Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. 3-501.17 Ready-to-Eat, Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Date Marking. (B) Except as specified in (E) - (G) of this section, refrigerated, READY-TO-EAT TIME/TEMPERATURE CONTROL FOR SAFETY FOOD prepared and PACKAGED by a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a [NAME] Treatment Plan (court approved treatment plan for the administration of antipsychotic medications) was active and current for administration of an antipsychotic medication for one Resident (#66), out of 24 sampled residents. Findings include: Resident #66 was admitted to the facility in [DATE] with diagnoses which included psychosis, major depressive disorder, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated [DATE], indicated Resident #66 had a Guardian and received antipsychotic medications on a routine basis. Review of the medical record indicated Resident #66 was found to be incapable of taking care of him/herself by reason of mental illness and Guardianship was appointed on [DATE] by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Probate and Family Court. Subsequent review of the medical record indicated the court issued an expansion of the Guardianship on [DATE] and authorized administration of antipsychotic medication via a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized, person-centered care plan to meet the physical, psychosocial, and functional needs for one Resident (#33), out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive care plan was developed and implemented to address his/her cancer treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plans, dated as revised January 2024, indicated but was not limited to: -A comprehensive, person-centered care plan will be developed for each resident. The care plan will include objectives that meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed for each resident. -Evaluation of residents is ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the resident and the resident's conditions change. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility in March 2018 with diagnoses which included lung and rectal cancer. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/19/24, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of care were met for two Residents (#33 and #18), of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #33, to ensure his/her Dexamethasone (a corticosteroid to treat/prevent inflammation) orders were accurately transcribed, administered, and documented; and 2. For Resident #18, to administer Propranolol (a medication that affects the heart and circulation and is used to treat conditions such as heart rhythm disorders and other heart or circulatory conditions) in accordance with prescriber orders. Findings include: Review of [NAME], Manual of Nursing Practice 11th edition, dated 2019, indicated the following: -The professional nurse's scope of practice is defined and outlined by the State Board of Nursing that governs practice. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, dated as revised April 11, 2018, indicated: -Nurse's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide pain management interventions for one Resident (#105) with tooth pain, out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #105, the facility failed to provide prescribed, as needed, pain relief for tooth pain. Findings include: Resident #105 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses of toothache and aphthous ulcer (or canker sore- a small shallow ulcer that occurs on the lining of the mouth). Review of the Hospital Discharge Summary indicated Resident #105 had a toothache and aphthous ulcer. The discharge summary indicated the Resident complained of right lower tooth pain, dental caries (cavities) noted and had a aphthous ulcer on the left upper palate. The plan was to continue to monitor, use Tylenol, Lidocaine mouthwash, home benzocaine ointment for pain control and a referral for outpatient dental at discharge. Review of the care plans indicated Resident #105 had dental caries and to refer to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented dialysis care and services consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#412), out of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to assess and monitor the Resident's left Arteriovenous (AV) fistula (a surgically connected artery and vein used for long term dialysis) site. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hemodialysis Access Care, revised November 2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: Care of AVFs (arterio-venous fistula, dialysis access created by surgically connecting an artery and a vein) and AVGs (arterio-venous graft, a synthetic or animal-derived tubing to connect the artery and vein) -Care involves the primary goals of preventing infection and maintaining patency of the catheter (preventing clots). -Do not use the access site arm to take blood samples, administer IV fluids or give injections. -Do not use the access arm to take blood pressure. Check the patency of the site at regular intervals. Palpate the site to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess a history of trauma and failed to assess for triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Resident (#105) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Trauma Informed Care, dated as revised in October 2019, indicated the following: -as part of the comprehensive assessment, identify history of trauma or interpersonal violence when such information is provided to the facility. Identifying past trauma or adverse experiences may involve record review or the use of screening tools. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with diagnoses of dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and poly substance use disorder (PSUD). Review of the Social Service Evaluation, dated 10/19/24, indicated Resident #105 scored 4 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Hospital Discharge Summary indicated Resident #105 had a diagnosis of PTSD. Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon recommendations made by the Consultant Pharmacist during the monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRR) for one Resident (#6), out of a total sample of 24 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to act on the consultant pharmacist's recommendation to consider obtaining a lab to monitor the efficacy of Levothyroxine (a hormone used to treat thyroid disorder). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review, dated August 2020, indicated but was not limited to: -Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber -The prescriber accepts and acts upon recommendations or rejects and provides an explanation for disagreeing Resident #6 was admitted to the facility in August 2022 with diagnoses which included thyroid disorder. Review of Resident #6's medical record indicated he/she was seen by the Consultant Pharmacist in January 2024 and recommendations were made. The surveyor was unable to locate the January 2024 Consultant Pharmacist's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to provide timely dental services for one Resident (#105), of 24 sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #105, the facility failed to initiate a timely dental appointment for tooth pain. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dental Services, dated as revised November 2017, indicated but was not limited to: -Routine and 24-hour emergency dental services are provided to residents through a contract agreement, referral to the resident's personal dentist, referral to a community dentist or referral to other health care organizations that provide dental services. DEFINITIONS for §483.55(b) [F791] Emergency dental services includes services needed to treat an episode of acute pain in teeth, gums, or palate; broken, or otherwise damaged teeth, or any other problem of the oral cavity that required immediate attention by a dentist. Resident #105 was admitted to the facility in October 2024 with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of the Hospital Discharge Summary indicated Resident #105 had a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who developed redness and irritation to his/her facial area after being shaved by a staff member, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical/clinical records, when there was no nursing documentation in the Medical Record related to Resident #1's razor burn to his/her facial area, there was no documentation to support nursing assessed the razor burn to his/her facial area and/or monitored the progress towards healing. Finding Include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised 10/2019, indicated that all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition should be documented in the resident's medical record. The Policy further indicated that the following information is to be documented in the resident medical record: -objective observations; -treatments or services performed; -changes in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff wear beard restraints in the main kitchen, during meal preparation and service; and 2. Ensure adequate sanitation of equipment in the main kitchen, and 2 of 3 nourishment kitchenettes; and 3. Ensure dietary staff wash their hands after touching a body part, before proceeding with food preparation and service; and 4. Ensure ice machines were cleaned and sanitized. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Personal Hygiene for Food Handlers, dated as revised 6/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: POLICY-Individuals that handle food practice good personal hygiene to minimize the risk of contaminating food that can results in foodborne illness. -Facial hair should be neatly trimmed and covered by a mask or beard guard. -Staff should refrain from touching their hair,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-16 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that addressed the full range of care and services, was comprehensive and data-driven, and focused on indicators of outcomes of quality of life, care, and services to residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 4/2018 and last revised 6/2019, indicated but was not limited to: -The purpose of the committee is to review and analyze facility related data and direct appropriate actions for the facility response. -Identify areas of improvement and rank them by factors to determine Performance Improvement Project (PIP). -The Administrator is responsible and accountable for developing, leading, and closely monitoring the QAPI program. -Residents and families have input through resident and family committee and satisfaction surveys. -Concerns are brought…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-08-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespreadSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the Quality Assurance Committee identified quality deficient areas and to develop and implement an appropriate corrective action plan, to ensure satisfactory outcomes. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement a QAPI plan and a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) that focuses on a high risk or problem-prone area identified through data collection and analysis. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI), dated 4/2018 and last revised 6/2019, indicated but was not limited to: -The purpose of the committee is to review and analyze facility related data and direct appropriate actions for the facility response. -Identify areas of improvement and rank them by factors to determine PIP. -Concerns are brought up when a certain department or task is not hitting benchmark, the concern is discussed, and an action plan developed. -A summary of QAPI activities and outcomes will be reviewed and approved by the QAPI committee…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, grievance book review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their grievance policy and ensure that: 1a. For Resident #65, one grievance voiced by the Resident during a Resident Council meeting held on 8/14/23 was addressed and immediate actions taken to resolve the grievance related to an alleged violation involving abuse, was reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) as required, and investigated; and b. a second grievance voiced by the Resident during the Resident Council meeting involving an alleged violation involving abuse was reported to DPH within the required timeframe; 2. three of seven grievances reviewed were resolved within three to five working days of the receipt of the grievance; 3. staff documented and informed the person filing the grievance of the findings and actions taken for four out of seven grievances reviewed within three to five working days; and 4. grievances were documented on the Grievance Tracking Log to be used for tracking and trending per facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to resubmit a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR- screen to determine if a resident had an intellectual or developmental disability and/or serious mental illness (ID/DD/SMI) and needed further evaluation) for one Resident (#11), out of a total sample of 26 residents, who exceeded the approved period for nursing facility level of care by 1566 days. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled admission Criteria, dated 1/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Nursing and medical needs of individuals with mental disorders or intellectual disabilities will be determined by coordination with the PASRR. -Potential residents with mental disorders or intellectual disabilities will only be admitted if the State mental health agency has determined (through the preadmission screening program) that the individual has a physical or mental condition that requires the level of services provided by the facility. Review of the MassHealth Nursing Facility Bulletin 169, titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — patternProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration was maintained with the dialysis center for two Residents (#4 and #76), out of two dialysis Residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care of the Resident with End Stage Renal Disease, dated as revised July 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: the facility will ensure: - the resident receives care and services for the provisions of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice - ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis care and services A. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility in July 2023 with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD). Review of the Dialysis Communication Book and forms in use by the facility for Resident #4 indicated, but was not limited to the following: - 8/8/23: There was no information sent to the dialysis center from the facility, and only return information available from the dialysis center. - 8/10/23:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0700 — patternTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, policy review, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure its staff properly assessed four Residents (#29, #65, #73, and #90), out of a total sample of 26 residents, for the risk of entrapment from bed rails and conducted regular maintenance inspections of the bed rails. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool, dated July 2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Upon admission, residents/patients' beds are assessed to monitor the risk of entrapment Review of the facility's policy titled Proper Use of Side Rails Policy, revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -An assessment will be conducted to identify the reason for using side rails and the risk of entrapment 1. Resident #29 was admitted to the facility in May 2023. On 8/14/23 at 8:45 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #29 in bed. One quarter upper siderail was in the upright position. One half rail was also in the upright position on the opposite side of the bed. On 8/14/23 at 2:40 P.M., the surveyor observed Resident #29 in bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives food prepared by methods that conserve nutritive value, flavor, and appearance, and is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. Findings include: On 8/9/23 between 9:00 A.M. and 11:00 A.M., the survey team identified 13 residents with the following meal concerns: -Food terrible, food in general is an issue. -Cold food, especially if you're served last. -Poor quality of the meats, and bland food. -Sometimes served on Styrofoam plates, then food gets soggy. On 8/10/23 at 11:50 A.M., the surveyor observed the noon meal service in the main kitchen. The surveyor observed that the soup had been pre-poured into insulated bowls, covered with a lid, and stacked on the tray line. The ice cream and specially ordered juices were not held under any refrigeration or on ice during the meal service. At 12:00 P.M., the surveyor requested a house test tray to be sent to the B unit with the following results: The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure standards of practice were implemented to prevent the spread of potential infection on 2 out of 4 resident dining areas. Specifically, Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs), and Nursing Staff failed to assist the residents with hand hygiene prior to meal service. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Meal Service and Dining, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Appropriate hand hygiene is completed before distributing meals. -Nursing assists the resident to prepare themselves for the meal, including assisting with or confirming the residents face and hands are washed. Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Guidelines for all Nursing Procedures, dated 11/2017 last revised 2/2023 indicated but was not limited to the following: -Standard precautions are minimum infection prevention practices and include hand hygiene. -The preferred method of hand hygiene is with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that equipment was in good working order. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure that equipment was in good working order in the nourishment kitchenettes; and 2. Ensure that one Resident (#268), out of a total sample of 26 residents, had a safe, functioning bed. Findings include: 1. The facility failed to maintain essential equipment in all three nourishment kitchenettes, to ensure good working order. a.The ice machines, located in all three nourishment kitchettes, were broken during survey. The ice machine on C unit was observed to have ice in the bottom of the machine and staff were observed using the ice. During an interview on 8/10/23 at 11:15 A.M., the Administrator said the ice machine should not be in use. The Administrator also said they have a contract with a maintenance company, however he was unable to provide the contract to the surveyor. b. The interior of the refrigerator, located on C unit nourishment kitchenette, had water collecting on the glass shelves. c. The base of the bottom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-16 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to conduct inspections of all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails, if any, as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible entrapment in two of four units (A Wing and [NAME]). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Proper Use of Side Rails, revised April 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -When side rail usage is appropriate, the facility will assess the space between the mattress and side rails to reduce the risk for entrapment (the amount of safe space may vary, depending on the type of bed and mattress being used). Review of the bed inspection Logbook Documentation, dated 2021 (paper record) and 2023 (TELS system, a live cloud based electronic building management communication system to schedule and track maintenance services and repairs), failed to indicate evidence that all resident beds, including mattresses, frames, and bedrails, if any, had been assessed for possible…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide dignified dining experiences on 2 out of 4 units. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff delivered meals to all residents seated at the table simultaneously, resulting in residents waiting an extended period of time to receive their meal, while watching their tablemates eat. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Meal Service and Dining, undated, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Staff distribute meals by serving meals to residents at the same table at the same time. On 8/14/23 at 11:54 A.M., the surveyor observed the lunch meal service on Unit C; there were nine residents in the dining room. The surveyor observed the following: -At 11:58 A.M., the first resident at Table #3 was served while two other residents sat idly at the table. -At 12:00 P.M., one resident sitting alone was served at Table #6. -At 12:04 P.M., one resident sitting alone was served at Table #2. -At 12:05 P.M., the second resident at Table #3 was served. This was seven minutes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to notify the attending physician of a consultant's recommendations in a timely manner, for one Resident (#20), from a total sample of 26 residents, resulting in an eight day delay in obtaining a urine for a culture and sensitivity (laboratory tests to check for urinary tract infection and microorganisms). Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in March 2019 with diagnoses that included psychiatric and mood disorders, dementia, and history of urinary tract infections (UTI). Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/25/23, indicated that Resident #20 was usually understood and can usually understand others. The MDS further indicated the Resident had no present signs or symptoms of delirium and required extensive assistance to meet his/her transfers and toileting needs. Review of Resident #20's biannual comprehensive physical exam and review of chronic conditions, dated 3/7/23, indicated to monitor for signs and symptoms of UTI and adjust plan of care as indicated. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 26 residents, for two allegations brought forward during a Resident Council meeting held on 8/14/23. Specifically, the facility failed to: a. Follow their policy for investigating and reporting an alleged violation related to abuse; and b. Follow their policy for reporting an alleged violation related to sexual abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. -The Administrator will inform the resident and his/her representative of the status of the investigation and measures taken to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff reported to the Department of Public Health (DPH) immediately, but no later than two hours, alleged violations of abuse reported during a Resident Council meeting held on 8/14/23, by one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of eight residents in attendance. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations). -An alleged violation of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment will be reported immediately, but not later than two hours if the alleged violation involves abuse or has resulted in serious bodily injury. a. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in December 2022. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/14/23, indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented the facility's abuse policy for one Resident (#65), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to follow their policy for investigating an alleged violation of abuse voiced by the Resident during a Resident Council meeting held on 8/14/23. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse Investigation and Reporting, revised October 2022, indicated but was not limited to the following: -All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be thoroughly investigated by facility management. -The Administrator will inform the resident and his/her representative of the status of the investigation and measures taken to protect the safety and privacy of the resident. Resident #65 was admitted to the facility in December 2022. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/14/23, indicated Resident #65 was cognitively intact as evidenced…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on policy review, record review, and interview, the facility failed to develop and implement the Plan of Care for two Residents (#11 and #90), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement fall prevention interventions for two residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, dated 4/2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Care team shall analyze information obtained to identify any specific accident hazard or risks for individual residents. -Care team shall target interventions to reduce individual risk. -Implementing interventions to reduce risk includes the following: communication, training, ensuring interventions are implemented, and documentation. -Monitoring the effectiveness of intervention includes the following: ensuring the interventions are implemented correctly and consistently, evaluate, modify if needed and re-evaluate. Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for one Resident (#38), in a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff observed the consumption of administered medication prior to leaving the room. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Safety and Supervision of Residents, revised April 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. -In addition to general evaluation of decision-making capacity, the staff and practitioner will perform a more specific skill assessment, including (but not limited to) the resident's ability to read and understand medication labels; comprehension of the purpose and proper dosage and administration time for his or her medications; ability to remove medications from a container and to ingest and swallow the medication; and ability to recognize…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility policies and manufacturer's instructions, the facility failed to label medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, and the expiration date when applicable. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff labeled medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, for 2 of 3 medication carts observed; and 2. Ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals under proper temperature controls in 2 of 3 medication carts observed. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy as written by the contracted pharmaceutical provider titled Storage of Medications, with a revision date of August 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: - Medication and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. - Medications requiring refrigeration are kept in a refrigerator at temperatures between 36 degrees Fahrenheit and 46 degrees Fahrenheit with a thermometer to allow temperature monitoring.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain laboratory services timely, resulting in a 15-day delay in treatment for one Resident (#20), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician of a recommendation to obtain a urine culture and sensitivity (lab testing for urinary tract infection and effective antibiotic) for eight days and failed to collect the urine timely once an order was obtained, resulting in a total delay of 15 days. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in March 2019 with diagnoses that included psychiatric and mood disorders, dementia, and history of urinary tract infections (UTI). Review of the behavioral health Nurse Practitioner's Progress Note, dated 7/31/23, indicated the Resident had a reoccurrence of behavioral symptoms that included weepiness, self talk, sleep disturbance, and speaking in his/her native language, that had previously resolved several weeks ago. The Nurse Practitioner made the recommendation to collect a urine for urinalysis (UA) and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-16 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective policy which addressed the reheating of residents' food brought in from home in accordance with professional standards to ensure food safety. Specifically, the facility failed to provide a thermometer or device (T-stick) and adequate reheating instructions to reheat residents' food brought in from home to an internal temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) to prevent potential foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Microwave Ovens and Safety Guidelines, lasted revised 11/2017, indicated but was not limited to the following: General instructions for heating food: -use a clean and sanitized thermometer or T-stick to ensure food has reached a safe, internal cooking temperature of 165 degrees. During the observation of the three nourishment kitchens on A unit, B unit, and C unit, on 8/10/23 11:15 A.M., the surveyor observed the following: Unit A and C had posted reheating instructions, however B unit did not. All three units did not have T-sticks or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,372 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,372 — penalty dated 2024-11-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE — 14 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 1.7 | +0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 2.2 | +0.8 vs chain |
The other 13 homes this chain runs (chain average 1.7★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| DELL'ANNO, DAMIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| STEPHAN, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 09/01/2017 |
| NEXT STEP HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/04/2025 |
| LOEW, MATTHEW | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2017 |
| MAGANGA, ANDRICK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/03/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $684K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225267. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.